Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Neocon Nuttery
See other Neocon Nuttery Articles

Title: Ranking Republican Rep. Ros-Lehtinen on Time to Take Action on Iran
Source: Heritage.org
URL Source: [None]
Published: Nov 3, 2009
Author: Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla)
Post Date: 2009-11-03 12:25:24 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 217
Comments: 7

For too long, the Iranian regime has played hide and seek with the U.S. and other countries regarding its nuclear weapons program. Last week, the House took a critical step to end this deadly game.

Just days before the 30th anniversary of the Iranian hostage crisis, the House Committee on Foreign Affairs took up the Iran Refined Petroleum Sanctions Act. This bipartisan legislation, which Rep. Howard Berman, the Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, and I introduced, and which enjoys the support of well over 300 co-sponsors, targets one of Iran’s major weaknesses, namely its need to import gasoline and other refined petroleum products. By placing financial sanctions on U.S. and foreign companies providing Iran with this crucial resource, Iran’s already weak economy would be crippled.

We must take tough measures such as this because it is now clear that the diplomatic route alone will not work. The revelation that Tehran has been building a second secret uranium enrichment plant is proof that the policy of “accommodation and concessions” pursued by the Bush Administration in its second term and augmented by the policy of “direct engagement with the Iranian regime” followed by the Obama Administration has failed.

Years of proposed negotiations and repeated offers of cooperation have done nothing to slow Iran’s march toward a nuclear weapon. The clerical regime’s acceptance of repeated pleas by the U.S. and our European allies to participate in discussions on improving relations has been coupled with expressions of contempt, the first being its statement that the nuclear issue is off the table, the other the recent launch of advanced missiles capable of striking U.S. forces and our allies, Israel foremost among them.

Endless efforts to persuade our allies and other countries to take measures to pressure Iran have produced next to nothing in terms of effective sanctions. Those adopted by the United Nations Security Council were gutted by Russia and China to little more than slaps on the wrist. Far from alarming Tehran, these baby steps have convinced the regime that it is free to proceed without fear of punishment.

This situation is unlikely to change. Russia and China will continue to serve as Iran’s protectors and veto any harsh measures. And our allies in Europe and elsewhere are unlikely to strengthen sanctions sufficiently to inflict real pain on Tehran.

That is why the U.S. must be prepared to act alone, if necessary, and bring every weapon in its arsenal to bear. The Iran Refined Petroleum Sanctions Act is one such tool. But, while imposing these sanctions would be a major step forward, it is not a magic bullet and must be coupled with actions on all fronts.

Some would be virtually effortless. At a minimum, the U.S. should specifically reject Iran’s claim to an inalienable right to produce nuclear fuel and instead openly state that we will not allow the regime to use this claim as cover for a nuclear weapons program.

Although we must do all that we can to persuade our allies to act with us, we can no longer allow them to restrain us. Given the urgency of stopping this rapidly growing threat to our security and that of the world, the U.S. must make clear that we will reassess our relations with other countries around the world, including our allies, depending on their actions to help us.

The stakes go well beyond Iran. Every regime dreaming of nuclear weapons is watching the West’s huffing and puffing and learning that defiance is likely to be rewarded by bribes and pleas, a path already blazed by North Korea. We cannot allow another demonstration of our weakness to embolden our enemies to ever-greater threats.

Chamberlain’s plea to talk over problems with Hitler in order to satisfy his “reasonable” demands brought not peace but catastrophe.

We must put away the begging bowl and pick up the stick. For only when we have convinced Iran that we are prepared to act will there be a chance of preventing this nightmare from becoming a reality.

U.S. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla), is the Ranking Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: BS, all (#0)

Since when can a Rep. from a minority party influence foreign policy?

Have you Kenyan fellators no shame?

www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1027578.html

Obama threatens dire consequences if Iran doesn't change its ways

By Haaretz Service and News Agencies

Tags: Israel News, Barack Obama

U.S. Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama told an audience at the second U.S. presidential debate on Tuesday that he would deliver a tough and direct message to Iran that if they did not change their behavior there would be dire consequences.

Obama's opponent, Republican John McCain, reiterated that he would never allow a second Holocaust to take place, referring to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's threats to "wipe Israel off the map." The Republican candidate also repeated his criticism of Obama's willingness to hold direct negotiations with the Islamic republic, without preconditions.

The debate, which was town-hall style, included questions from an audience of 80 selected voters, identified as undecided. The candidates were also asked questions sent via the Internet, and selected by moderator Tom Brokaw, during the 90 minute debate held at Belmont University in Nashville Tennessee. Advertisement

Retired U.S. Navy officer and audience member, Terry Shirey, addressed both candidates saying, "I know both of you have expressed support for Israel. If despite your best diplomatic efforts, Iran attacks Israel, would you be willing to commit U.S. troops to support Israel or wait for approval from the United Nations Security Council?"

Both McCain and Obama said they would come to Israel's aid against an attack from Iran during the debate, with McCain saying he would not wait for UN approval to intervene militarily, and Obama saying that the U.S. cannot take the military option off the table or allow the Islamic Republic to acquire a nuclear weapon.

After repeatedly thanking Shirey for his service, McCain was first to respond saying "we obviously would not wait for the United Nations Security Council. I think the realities are that both Russia and China would probably pose significant obstacles."

McCain also said he believed the U.S. needed to join with their allies in a "league of democracies" to stop Iranian behavior, hopefully causing them to abandon their quest for nuclear weapons.

"At the end of the day, my friend," McCain told the Shirey, "I have to tell you again, and you know what it's like to serve, and you know what it's like to sacrifice, but we can never allow a second Holocaust to take place."

Obama thanked Shirey for his service, too and said that the U.S. could not allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon for it would be a "game-changer" in the Middle East.

Calling Israel the U.S.'s strongest ally in the region and one of their strongest allies in the world, Obama said nuclear weapons in the hand of the Iranians would create the possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists.

McCain and Obama also clashed on the Iraq war, but shied away from the rancor and character attacks of the days leading up to the face-off.

Neither candidate offered new proposals on the war, which McCain supports and Obama has opposed from its inception. Likewise they did not put forward new proposals to shore up America's crumbling financial system, a significant drag on the four-term Arizona senator's candidacy given his membership in the incumbent party of deeply unpopular President George W. Bush.

McCain said Obama would bring U.S. troops home from Iraq in defeat. Obama said the war was draining the U.S. Treasure of $10 billion a month, money that was needed to put a floor under the country's failing financial system.

McCain said America's troubled economy would require the government to scale back benefits now enjoyed by older Americans, and both men agreed that U.S. government entitlement programs - social security retirement payments and medical insurance for the elderly - had to be reformed.

McCain did, however, quip at one point that trying to pin down Obama's tax plan was like trying to nail Jell-O (gelatin) to the wall.

Obama shot back, "Sen. McCain, I think the Straight-talk Express lost a wheel on that one," referring the name McCain has applied to his campaign bus and jet.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-11-03   12:46:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Jethro Tull (#1)

feeling nostalgic ?

"Bomb, bomb, bomb...bomb-bomb-Iran...bomb, bomb, bomb...bomb-bomb-Iran...Bomb Iraaaaaaaaaaaan..." LOL


"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams

Rotara  posted on  2009-11-03   12:47:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Jethro Tull (#1)

McCain did, however, quip at one point that trying to pin down Obama's tax plan was like trying to nail Jell-O (gelatin) to the wall.

Obama shot back, "Sen. McCain, I think the Straight-talk Express lost a wheel on that one," referring the name McCain has applied to his campaign bus and jet.

They do make a cute set of puppets tho...


"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams

Rotara  posted on  2009-11-03   12:48:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Rotara (#3)

I had a dream that those two, and Lindesy Graham, went on a private, one way fishing trip. BS was tied up by the feet in an attempt to attract shark.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-11-03   12:54:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Jethro Tull (#4)

That would make a great REALITYTEEBEESHOW...


"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams

Rotara  posted on  2009-11-03   13:04:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Jethro Tull (#1)

"At the end of the day, my friend," McCain told the Shirey, "I have to tell you again, and you know what it's like to serve, and you know what it's like to sacrifice, but we can never allow a second Holocaust to take place."

Say what? How come McCain and his political weasel compadres are allowing the Holocaust of Palestinians to take place?

scrapper2  posted on  2009-11-03   13:31:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: scrapper2 (#6)

How come McCain and his political weasel compadres are allowing the Holocaust of Palestinians to take place?

As you told someone last week?, read some of Mearsheimer and Walt for the answer.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-11-03   13:41:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest