[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Massive Property Tax Fraud Exposed - $5.1 Trillion Bond Scam Will Crash System

Israel Sold American Weapons to Azerbaijan to Kill Armenian Christians

Daily MEMES YouTube Hates | YouTube is Fighting ME all the Way | Making ME Remove Memes | Part 188

New fear unlocked while stuck in highway traffic - Indian truck driver on his phone smashes into

RFK Jr. says the largest tech companies will permit Americans to access their personal health data

I just researched this, and it’s true—MUST SEE!!

Savage invader is disturbed that English people exist in an area he thought had been conquered

Jackson Hole's Parting Advice: Accept Even More Migrants To Offset Demographic Collapse, Or Else

Ecuador Angered! China-built Massive Dam is Tofu-Dreg, Ecuador Demands $400 Million Compensation

UK economy on brink of collapse (Needs IMF Bailout)

How Red Light Unlocks Your Body’s Hidden Fat-Burning Switch

The Mar-a-Lago Accord Confirmed: Miran Brings Trump's Reset To The Fed ($8,000 Gold)

This taboo sex act could save your relationship, expert insists: ‘Catalyst for conversations’

LA Police Bust Burglary Crew Suspected In 92 Residential Heists

Top 10 Jobs AI is Going to Wipe Out

It’s REALLY Happening! The Australian Continent Is Drifting Towards Asia

Broken Germany Discovers BRUTAL Reality

Nuclear War, Trump's New $500 dollar note: Armstrong says gold is going much higher

Scientists unlock 30-year mystery: Rare micronutrient holds key to brain health and cancer defense

City of Fort Wayne proposing changes to food, alcohol requirements for Riverfront Liquor Licenses

Cash Jordan: Migrant MOB BLOCKS Whitehouse… Demands ‘11 Million Illegals’ Stay

Not much going on that I can find today

In Britain, they are secretly preparing for mass deaths

These Are The Best And Worst Countries For Work (US Last Place)-Life Balance

These Are The World's Most Powerful Cars

Doctor: Trump has 6 to 8 Months TO LIVE?!

Whatever Happened to Robert E. Lee's 7 Children

Is the Wailing Wall Actually a Roman Fort?

Israelis Persecute Americans

Israelis SHOCKED The World Hates Them


Resistance
See other Resistance Articles

Title: URGENT Save on-line cigarettes, Call your Senator Now
Source: CD2U
URL Source: http://www.cd2u.org/email.html
Published: Nov 4, 2009
Author: CD2U
Post Date: 2009-11-04 12:17:04 by palo verde
Keywords: None
Views: 1052
Comments: 120

By making all cigarettes nonmailable, the Senate is ensuring you will no longer be able to purchase these products by mail-order, telephone order, or over the Internet because the United States Postal Service, along with UPS, Fed-Ex and all other carriers, will be prohibited by law from delivering your orders to you.

*** URGENT - PLEASE CALL BEFORE THURSDAY ***

*** The US Senate committee will be voting this week ***

Your Senators will be voting shortly to make ALL TOBACCO PRODUCTS NON-MAILABLE!!!

WE NEED YOUR HELP TO TELL YOUR SENATORS NOT TO PASS THIS BILL !!!

(This has ALREADY BEEN PASSED in the House of Representatives !!!)

Please contact BOTH your Senators by phone, email, or regular mail.
(We have provided all of their contact information below.)

(You do NOT have to identify yourself as a smoker.)

HOW TO CONTACT YOUR SENATORS:

TELEPHONE: You can directly dial your Senators office using the number shown for them below, or you can dial 1-800-828-0498 (this is a toll-free number) to be connected with a Capitol Switchboard Operator. Simply ask the Operator to connect you with your Senators Office.

Time is crucial at this point, so a phone call is by far the best choice for contacting your Senators.

EMAIL: Simply go to each of your two Senators websites shown above and find the Senators contact form. Fill in the required information, type your message and click the "Send" button.

REGULAR MAIL: Send a letter to your Senator at their LOCAL offices nearest you. You can find the addresses for local offices on the Senators' websites or by looking in your telephone book's government section. It is important that you send your letter to your Senators' local office since mail often takes months to reach a Senator's Washington, DC office due to increased security at the Capitol.

EVERY TELEPHONE CALL, EMAIL AND LETTER MAKES A DIFFERENCE.

YOUR SENATORS NEED TO HEAR FROM YOU ON THIS IMPORTANT ISSUE!

THE SITUATION: Right now there is legislation pending in the United States Senate - the Prevent All Cigarette Trafficking Act of 2009 ("PACT Act") (S.1147) which contains, among other bad ideas, a provision to make ALL cigarettes and smokeless tobacco products nonmailable. This legislation has already been passed by the House of Representatives and is currently in a Senate Committee that could send it to the Senate floor at any time for a vote!

WHAT THIS MEANS TO YOU: By making all cigarettes and smokeless tobacco products nonmailable, the Senate is ensuring you will no longer be able to purchase these products by mail-order, telephone order, or over the Internet because the United States Postal Service, along with UPS, Fed-Ex and all other carriers, will be prohibited by law from delivering your orders to you. Taking away your options means forcing you back to buying over-priced tobacco products from your local retailer once again.

WHY WE NEED YOUR HELP: Native American cigarette and tobacco sellers are committed to doing everything we can to stop the PACT Act, but we need your help. Your Senators work for you and as their constituents, it is your voice and your vote that counts!

WHAT YOU CAN DO: Contact your Senators and tell them not to pass the PACT Act. Your Senators should be protecting your interests, but it is up to you to let them know what you think about the PACT Act. There are three easy ways to contact your Senators - by telephone, email, or regular mail - all of which are explained below. Every state has two Senators - please remember to contact BOTH Senators for your state. At this point time is crucial, so a phone call is by far the best means to use.

YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO EXPRESS YOUR OPINION: As an American Citizen, it is your right to let your Senators know how you feel about any action Congress takes. You elected your Senators to represent you and they can only do this if you tell them what you want. When you contact your Senator you do not need to identify yourself as a smoker or as someone who purchases cigarettes and/or smokeless tobacco products by mail-order, telephone-order, and/or the Internet. You only need to identify yourself as a resident of the state they represent.

SOME CONCERNS ABOUT THE PACT ACT TO DISCUSS WITH YOUR SENATORS:

THE POSTAL SERVICE: The price of stamps is being raised practically every year. The PACT Act will take an entire class of legal, non-hazardous goods and make them nonmailable. What this means is a huge loss of business (potentially hundreds of millions of dollars) for the Postal Service. Will they continue to raise the price of stamps and other mail services to compensate for their lost income? The United States Postal Service is already suffering a fiscal crisis due to the downturn in the economy. If the PACT Act is passed and millions of dollars of revenue are taken away, there could be serious consequences for consumers, including reducing the number of delivery days from 6 per week down to 5 or perhaps only 4 days per week.

COST: When the PACT Act of 2003 (S.1177) passed the Senate, the Congressional Budget Office prepared a Cost Estimate for the Bill. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that the PACT Act of 2003 would cost about $140 MILLION over the 2004-2008 period to enforce. $140 Million over four years - and that estimate is already six years old. How much will the PACT Act of 2009 cost to enforce? Isn't there a better way to spend our tax dollars?

IMPORTANT THINGS TO REMEMBER WHEN COMMUNICATING WITH YOUR SENATORS:

1. Tell your Senators that you are one of their constituents and provide an address so they know where in the state you are from. Since anyone can contact a Senator, it is important that you let your Senators know that you live and vote in their home state. Because the Senators receive so much mail, mail from their constituents always takes priority.

2. Make it clear to your Senators that you DO NOT want them to pass the PACT Act of 2009 (S.1147). Let your Senators know that if they don't support you - you won't support them.

3. This bill presents undue hardship to many smokers who are older, and shut-in with limited mobility. It is unfair to prevent them from ordering tobacco products through home delivery.

4. This bill represents discriminatory pricing as the majority of smokers are lower-income, many on a fixed income. It is discriminatory to force them to pay higher prices.

5. This bill represents discriminatory taxation as smokers were forced to pay an additional increase of more than $7 a carton in new federal taxes earlier this year.

6. This bill represents unlawful double-taxation as Internet and mail-order retailers are already collecting and paying federal and state excise taxes in the state where the tobacco is purchased.

7. This bill represents discriminatory restriction of trade towards smokers as all other lawful products can be purchased through the mail-order and through the Internet. Let your Senators know that if they don't support you - you won't support them.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-55) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#56. To: scrapper2 (#53)

Particular brand name clothing and shoes I can only buy at stand up stores. That's an inconvenience but certainly not an assault on my liberty.

That is by your choice.

You CAN purchase other makes if you choose to.

You are not required by any law or edict to purchase "designer" brands or merchandise. Personally I REFUSE to buy logo'ed merchandise I find it pretentious and tacky. If some manufacturer wants me to wear their advertising they can pay me to do so and I am not so insecure that I have to wear a logo to show "I'm in". I purchase those items of clothing which I like (generally classic styles like the Merino Wool Shawl Collar Cardigan Sweater I'm currently wearing - purchased online at a HUGE discount).

"An education isn't how much you have committed to memory, or even how much you know. It's being able to differentiate between what you know and what you don't. ~ Anatole France

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-11-05   12:29:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: scrapper2 (#53)

but to get in fluff about smokers now having to pay sales tax on their in store cigarette purchases, is to miss the elephant in the room which you and previous generations have acquiesed to accepting as a "right" of government to generate income to waste.

I disagree.

First they come for the smokers, you do nothing because you don't smoke.

Next they come for the drinkers, you do nothing because you don't drink.

Next they come for the free thinkings...................

Next they come for the gun owners................

You, I think, miss the elephant in the room in that if you allow the freedoms of one group to go under assualt and do nothing, then the assault (the elephant) will continue until it does impact you personally. That's my "fluff" on this issue and this is a legitimate fluff.

I'm surprised at your willingness to have the goobermint single out one group and one product for unequal access and consumer freedom. Tell me, where does this slippery slope end for you?

I disagree with the entire premise of sin tax and always have. Of course, this crap legislation sails through because so many people say, "well, I don't smoke so who cares if this group pays more." If people stood on principle, rather than personal choices, then they would not have let this elephant get out of hand to the extent that it has. I don't see how allowing more and more and more infringment reduces this income to waste problem, in fact, it exacerbates the problem.

abraxas  posted on  2009-11-05   12:31:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: Hayek Fan (#54)

Most Americans don't care about that which doesn't affect them. Hence the Patriot Act, Military Commissions Act, and thousands of other laws and regulations passed by the government

The Patriot Act and Military Commissions Act were grave assaults on liberty and freedom that all of us here recognized as such. But this matter is from my view a matter of inconvenience and saving sales tax $. In no way does this matter compare to the Patriot Act or Military Commissions Act. Now if you said that gubment arbitrarily imposing sales tax on consumer items to generate income was an assault on on our liberty, I'd be with you but you are not saying that. In fact, you and others here as per generations before you have accepted sales taxes as gubment's right to generate income [to waste on useless programs]. To be selective in your outrage re: sales taxes doesn't fly with me. You fret about the small cut, but you have accepted the big gouge.

scrapper2  posted on  2009-11-05   12:31:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: SonOfLiberty (#52)

I wish I could remember the name of that jackass woman running around country by country organizing anti-smoking pushes and ultimately legislation. I think I heard that she is from Australia. From what I've read, she's behind every single push in the West thus far, from the EU to Australia to New Zealand to the U.S. to Canada.

Gosh, what's her name? She would be a good place to start I think.

Where I would go would be to "follow the money". Who is funding her "crusade"? My guess would be that like "CHAD" (an advocacy front group for the so-called learning disabled) which promotes the use of drugs like Ritalin and Adderol whose financial support comes from Big Pharma. No doubt in my mind that someone with a different agenda is funding this woman - likely through conduits and cut-outs to make it harder to trace.

"An education isn't how much you have committed to memory, or even how much you know. It's being able to differentiate between what you know and what you don't. ~ Anatole France

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-11-05   12:36:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: SonOfLiberty, RickyJ (#24)

I can't recall a time when a smoker cost me money involuntarily. Not one time.

Your health insurance premiums are higher due to smokers.

belmontconservative  posted on  2009-11-05   12:37:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: Original_Intent (#59)

Right, what I mean is that by knowing her name you'd have a clear starting point to begin looking behind the scenes. I'll see if I can locate her name.

MapQuest really needs to start their directions on #5. Pretty sure I know how to get out of my neighborhood.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-11-05   12:38:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: belmontconservative (#60)

I can't recall a time when a smoker cost me money involuntarily. Not one time. Your health insurance premiums are higher due to smokers.

So your claim is that I have insurance involuntarily? It's a legal mandate that I own insurance at this date? Show me the law.

MapQuest really needs to start their directions on #5. Pretty sure I know how to get out of my neighborhood.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-11-05   12:39:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: scrapper2 (#48)

This is all about $ - the gubment wants to make more because it doesn't want to reduce expenses.

Read this part of your post again. Then tell me this isn't a problem in itself.

"What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that its people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms....The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson

phantom patriot  posted on  2009-11-05   12:43:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: abraxas (#31)

Yes, he did die of lung cancer. However, we would not had such good times had he not smoked or loved to shoot black powder. He liked kids to be useful and you had to enjoy the activities he picked to have any fun. I don't feel that I contributed to his death, but rather to his life. He would found some other grandkid to make the smokes if I opted out.

You would have had a longer time together had he not smoked. Maybe you would have had good times had he not smoked such as taking hikes, etc.

belmontconservative  posted on  2009-11-05   12:43:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: abraxas (#57)

I'm surprised at your willingness to have the goobermint single out one group and one product for unequal access and consumer freedom. Tell me, where does this slippery slope end for you?

There is no slippery slope for me - perhaps for you - you allow yourself to slide until a small bump causes aggravation. I resent the whole idea of sales taxes being arbitrarily imposed by government on all of us. I resent the whole idea of income taxes being collected by government, period, and particularly so when they are "graduated" and continually increasing. But you seem to resent gubment taxes only when a small sub-category catches your interest to trumpet about.

I'm tired of debating this miniscule issue with you. Call Congress. Better still march on Congress so smokers can buy cigarettes online without sales tax. Go for it!

But I fear you are focusing on the ant while the tiger is about to devour you - in case you have forgotten, a grandiose assault on our liberty and freedom will be voted on by Congress on Saturday.

scrapper2  posted on  2009-11-05   12:45:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: Hayek Fan (#54)

Most Americans don't care about that which doesn't affect them. Hence the Patriot Act, Military Commissions Act, and thousands of other laws and regulations passed by the government. However, while one little cut on your finger may not kill you, thousands of little cuts all over your body will. That's exactly where we are at today. The government is cutting our bodies in as many different places as they can and we are being bled dry. Is it the most important thing going on in the country? No. But that doesn't mean it should be ignored either.

Very good articulation! Step by step. Inch by inch.

"What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that its people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms....The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson

phantom patriot  posted on  2009-11-05   12:48:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: phantom patriot (#63)

Read this part of your post again. Then tell me this isn't a problem in itself.

List for me all the dates of protest events you attended, the letters you wrote to Congress, your continued battle over the years against gubment's arbitrary power to impose sales taxes on all consumer items. Thank you.

scrapper2  posted on  2009-11-05   12:50:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: SonOfLiberty (#62)

I you are under a group health insurnace plan you pay the same rate as the smokers. Just curious,do you have health insurance?

belmontconservative  posted on  2009-11-05   12:50:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: scrapper2 (#26)

Smokers are not having cigarettes removed from the market place, correct? So they still have freedom and liberty to buy cigarettes.

Incorrect.

Smokers will be forced to pay the price their State demands, a bad precedent. What will be next?

So they still have freedom and liberty to buy cigarettes.

Only if you call being financially raped by liberal legislators "freedom"

Ted Kennedy Is Now Eligible To Vote In Chicago.

Flintlock  posted on  2009-11-05   12:51:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#70. To: belmontconservative (#68)

I you are under a group health insurnace plan you pay the same rate as the smokers. Just curious,do you have health insurance?

You didn't answer my question. Please answer my question.

Where is it mandated that I'm forced to have health insurance, or am forced to participate in one health insurance program over another by law?

Show me the law. Then we can talk about being forced to pay anything. Anything else is sloppy language and sophistry.

Thanks.

MapQuest really needs to start their directions on #5. Pretty sure I know how to get out of my neighborhood.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-11-05   12:53:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: Original_Intent (#59)

which promotes the use of drugs like Ritalin

Years ago they put my son on that crap. He looked like a zombie. I took him off because then I still could. I don't about now.

"What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that its people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms....The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson

phantom patriot  posted on  2009-11-05   12:53:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: SonOfLiberty (#24)

I can't recall a time when a smoker cost me money involuntarily. Not one time.

Read up on the hospitality industry. Hotels are savings vast amounts of money by going to non smoking rooms-less burns on the furnituire, carpet, less cleaning cost etc. Smokers cost you money indirectly whether you want to admit to it or not.

belmontconservative  posted on  2009-11-05   12:54:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#73. To: belmontconservative (#64)

taking hikes

Something you should have done from this Forum long ago

PS A song just for you :)

Ted Kennedy Is Now Eligible To Vote In Chicago.

Flintlock  posted on  2009-11-05   12:55:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: belmontconservative, abraxas, SonOfLiberty, Lod, scrapper2, RickyJ, palo verde, farmfriend, all (#60) (Edited)

I can't recall a time when a smoker cost me money involuntarily. Not one time.

Your health insurance premiums are higher due to smokers.

Not true.

It is only true in the limited sense that most group policies do not differentiate between members of the group but that the premiums are based upon actuarial tables relevant for the entire group.

The same argument could be made that:

Diabetics push your premiums up.

Drinkers push your premiums up.

People who have poor dental habits push your premiums up.

Government mandates push your premiums up (the biggest culprit).

The requirement to use expensive products from Big Pharma push your premiums up.

Legal requirements which require the use of an MD rather than a Nurse Practioner or Naturopath push your premiums up.

People who eat junk food or otherwise unhealthy "meat and potatoes" diets push your premiums up.

People who are overweight push your premiums up.

Give me a break and get real. Take the time to actually look at the available information before embarrassing yourself.

Premiums are based on ACTUARIAL TABLES FOR THE ENTIRE GROUP in Group Policies.

The hazards and risks of tobacco use have been exaggerated, hyped, and over sold. "The dose makes the poison." There is also a difference between a "two pack-a-day" smoker and someone like myself who smokes less than one pack per day.

You are like someone else on this thread regurgitating authoritative sounding propaganda which turns to mush when given more than a cursory analysis.

If you insist on robotically repeating "everybody knows" misinformation then stand by to stand by because I have studied the issue and the science and I will not let regurgitated planted information go unchallenged.

"An education isn't how much you have committed to memory, or even how much you know. It's being able to differentiate between what you know and what you don't. ~ Anatole France

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-11-05   12:56:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: belmontconservative (#72)

Read up on the hospitality industry. Hotels are savings vast amounts of money by going to non smoking rooms-less burns on the furnituire, carpet, less cleaning cost etc. Smokers cost you money indirectly whether you want to admit to it or not.

Show me where I'm forced to stay at a Hotel (or Motel) by law. Also, please answer my first questions to you.

You don't seem to understand the term "involuntary". I recommend you to www.dictionary.com.

MapQuest really needs to start their directions on #5. Pretty sure I know how to get out of my neighborhood.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-11-05   12:56:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#76. To: Original_Intent (#74)

And, the biggest cost of all on health care/insurance, people who live very long lives. They just suck the industry dry.

It's fun to throw the argument back at'em from time to time ain't it? :)

MapQuest really needs to start their directions on #5. Pretty sure I know how to get out of my neighborhood.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-11-05   12:57:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#77. To: SonOfLiberty (#70)

You didn't answer my question. Please answer my question.

Where is it mandated that I'm forced to have health insurance, or am forced to participate in one health insurance program over another by law?

Nope, not a law to have health insurnace. But I pointed out that if you are on a groups health insurnace plan you are paying for the smokers on th eplan via higher premiums.

Sounds like you have no health insurancee. If you have a $500k claim are you ready to pay for it or are your going to walk away and have the hospital write it off as a loss...and then charge me higher rates?

belmontconservative  posted on  2009-11-05   12:58:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#78. To: SonOfLiberty (#75)

Show me where I'm forced to stay at a Hotel (or Motel) by law.

You have never stayed in a hotel or motel???

belmontconservative  posted on  2009-11-05   12:59:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#79. To: scrapper2 (#67)

List for me all the dates of protest events you attended, the letters you wrote to Congress, your continued battle over the years against gubment's arbitrary power to impose sales taxes on all consumer items. Thank you.

What does that have to do with my post?

"What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that its people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms....The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson

phantom patriot  posted on  2009-11-05   13:00:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#80. To: belmontconservative (#77)

Nope, not a law to have health insurnace.

Then my statement stands, and my point is validated.

It's been a fun discussion. Thanks for participation.

MapQuest really needs to start their directions on #5. Pretty sure I know how to get out of my neighborhood.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-11-05   13:00:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#81. To: phantom patriot (#71)

which promotes the use of drugs like Ritalin

Years ago they put my son on that crap. He looked like a zombie. I took him off because then I still could. I don't about now.

Your experience parallels that of many others I have heard and read.

According to Dr. Fred Baughman the only significant difference between Ritalin and Methamphetamine is that Ritalin produces big profits for Big Pharma.

"An education isn't how much you have committed to memory, or even how much you know. It's being able to differentiate between what you know and what you don't. ~ Anatole France

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-11-05   13:02:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#82. To: belmontconservative (#78) (Edited)

You have never stayed in a hotel or motel???

Show me where I'm forced to do so by law.

This answer should end up the same as the one regarding insurance.

Ergo, I'm not "forced" to pay any costs, I choose where my money goes and am quite capable of choosing not to participate where I feel the burden is too great.

Seems a much better solution, to me, than getting on the government bandwagon.

Seriously this was the easiest thread debate I've ever been in. Thanks for being a part of it. :)

MapQuest really needs to start their directions on #5. Pretty sure I know how to get out of my neighborhood.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-11-05   13:02:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#83. To: Original_Intent (#74)

Excellent points!

"What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that its people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms....The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson

phantom patriot  posted on  2009-11-05   13:07:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#84. To: Original_Intent (#81)

According to Dr. Fred Baughman the only significant difference between Ritalin and Methamphetamine is that Ritalin produces big profits for Big Pharma.

I did not know this. But his behavior while taking it did match the crash at the end.

"What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that its people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms....The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson

phantom patriot  posted on  2009-11-05   13:10:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#85. To: belmontconservative, SonOfLiberty, all (#77)

You didn't answer my question. Please answer my question.

Where is it mandated that I'm forced to have health insurance, or am forced to participate in one health insurance program over another by law?

Nope, not a law to have health insurnace. But I pointed out that if you are on a groups health insurnace plan you are paying for the smokers on th eplan via higher premiums.

Sounds like you have no health insurancee. If you have a $500k claim are you ready to pay for it or are your going to walk away and have the hospital write it off as a loss...and then charge me higher rates?

And as I pointed out smoking is not the only risk factor which increases premiums for a GROUP.

Do you advocate executing diabetics or depriving them of their liberty because it increases YOUR premiums?

Have you ever advocated special punishment for people whom you perceive as overweight because they increase YOUR insurance premiums?

People who eat an unhealthy diet regardless of weight?

Have you ever taken action to look for a policy which which is lower for non-smokers?

If you wish to live in a slave state may I commend China or North Korea for your list of hospitable societies?

Your argument is a Strawman based upon your personal prejudices and accumulated misinformation.

"An education isn't how much you have committed to memory, or even how much you know. It's being able to differentiate between what you know and what you don't. ~ Anatole France

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-11-05   13:12:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#86. To: phantom patriot (#79)

What does that have to do with my post?

That you are protesting this one single issue of arbitrary gov't powers under the guise of it being an attack on all our liberty [ one cut, one step] whereas it's really a personal self-serving matter that you want rectified - I'm guessing you or a loved one smoke? - because you have not previously protested the idea of gubment empowering themselves to impose and increase sales taxes on consumer goods willy nilly at their pleasure.

scrapper2  posted on  2009-11-05   13:13:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: scrapper2 (#65)

I resent the whole idea of sales taxes being arbitrarily imposed by government on all of us. I resent the whole idea of income taxes being collected by government, period, and particularly so when they are "graduated" and continually increasing. But you seem to resent gubment taxes only when a small sub-category catches your interest to trumpet about.

I resent all of these........even when the small sub catagory is feeling the brunt of it. You seem to feel that the small sub catagory is okie dokie, as long as you aren't a participant.

For most of my life, I've lived where NO sales tax is pushed on the people. When I began working more I shifted from no sales tax to no state income tax to pay. I've battled every tax increase, even after I became a parent and the kiddies need school. I adamently opposed no smoking mandates in bars and restaurants because an OWNER should determine this NOT the goobermint or nanny staters. Of course all the non smokers said "goodie!! Mandate them!! It's for the greater good." The stupid issued passed because of this notion that it only impacts some people in some ways and we need to think of the greater good. Rubish!!

This isn't a miniscule issue because it is a foot in the door to more and more and more and more nanny state. IMHO, apathy over assaults on small sub catagories has led to the larger laviathon goobermint and taxed to death situation we all face now.

abraxas  posted on  2009-11-05   13:14:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#88. To: phantom patriot (#84)

According to Dr. Fred Baughman the only significant difference between Ritalin and Methamphetamine is that Ritalin produces big profits for Big Pharma.

I did not know this. But his behavior while taking it did match the crash at the end.

While they have a chemically different formula they affect the same receptor cells in the brain and thus produce virtually identical affects.

Dr. Baughman has a website located at: ADD and ADHD Fraud. Find out the truth about ADD and ADHD ...

Also of interest a father's account at: Death from Ritalin the Truth Behind ADHD.

"An education isn't how much you have committed to memory, or even how much you know. It's being able to differentiate between what you know and what you don't. ~ Anatole France

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-11-05   13:20:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#89. To: Original_Intent (#74)

A. Not true.

It is only true in the limited sense that most group policies do not differentiate between members of the group but that the premiums are based upon actuarial tables relevant for the entire group.

The same argument could be made that:

Diabetics push your premiums up.

Drinkers push your premiums up.

B.Premiums are based on ACTUARIAL TABLES FOR THE ENTIRE GROUP in Group Policies

C.Government mandates push your premiums up (the biggest culprit).

A. Premium rates for groups are based upon the health medical forms submitted before the group is approved. There is a question on every application that ask if you smoke or not. Insurnace companies rate the group higher based upon people who mark the questions yes. Smoking (like diabetes due to obesity and higher rates) leads to high blood pressure, cancers, various breathing conditions etc.

Renewal rates are primarily based upon the claims of the group from the prior year. So yes, smoking leads to higher rates for the group as a whole when there are smokers that also have HBP, etc.

B. Insurnace companies have a base rate but primarily base their HEALTH INSURANCE rates on the medical quest. submitted. 2 identical companies with the same age/demographics can have widly different premiums due to the health of the group. I just submitted a group with a dependent child with downs syndrome and 2 other serious conditions. The family rate was $1800 per month with the baby and $1100 per month without the baby being covered.

C. Gov't mandates are not the biggest culprit for the high rates. Not even in the top 5 reasons. Gov mandates only affect a few parts of health insurnace policies-mainly some mental health issues, preventive care dealing with physicals, mammograms etc. oh and let's not forget the insurance companies are now required to pay for a least a 48 hour stay after childbirth..something all the hospitals and doc's were for as it was proven most issues are gping to happen with a baby in the first 24 hours of the birth.

belmontconservative  posted on  2009-11-05   13:21:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#90. To: abraxas, scrapper2, all (#87)

It's for the greater good." The stupid issued passed because of this notion that it only impacts some people in some ways and we need to think of the greater good. Rubish!!

"From each according to his ability to each according to his needs." ~ Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels - "The Communist Manifesto"

"An education isn't how much you have committed to memory, or even how much you know. It's being able to differentiate between what you know and what you don't. ~ Anatole France

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-11-05   13:23:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#91. To: SonOfLiberty (#82)

You have never stayed in a hotel or motel??? Show me where I'm forced to do so by law.

You never did answer my question(s). Have you ever stayed in a motel or hotel? If you did you involuntarily paid a higher room rate due to smokers in the room.

If you are on a group health insurnace plan your employer and possibly you (if your employer makes you pay a portion of the premium)are paying a higher rate due to smokers. If the answer is yes you are involuntaily paying higher rates due to smokers.

belmontconservative  posted on  2009-11-05   13:28:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#92. To: belmontconservative (#91)

You never did answer my question(s). Have you ever stayed in a motel or hotel? If you did you involuntarily paid a higher room rate due to smokers in the room.

Bzzt, wrong. If I stayed in a hotel, I voluntarily agreed that the price was acceptable to me. If I found the price burdensome or unfair, I would find another hotel, or sleep in my car as a last resort. Nobody made me do anything involuntarily.

Sorry dude, you're looking for victimhood where none exists.

MapQuest really needs to start their directions on #5. Pretty sure I know how to get out of my neighborhood.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-11-05   13:30:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#93. To: Original_Intent (#85)

And as I pointed out smoking is not the only risk factor which increases premiums for a GROUP.

Your health insurance premiums are higher due to smokers.

OI: Not true.

You have contradicted yourself.

belmontconservative  posted on  2009-11-05   13:32:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#94. To: abraxas (#87)

I resent all of these........even when the small sub catagory is feeling the brunt of it. You seem to feel that the small sub catagory is okie dokie, as long as you aren't a participant.

Are you kidding me? Don't you understand? I am a part of it and so are you and we've been a part of it for a long time. I resent it every time I pay sales tax because it further enables a Marxist gov't in Sacramento to fatten bureaucracy and dream up bigger and more wasteful social/welfare/educational programs. I resent it every time when I buy alcoholic beverages, knowing that fat lazy gubment douchebags are benefiting. You are talking about this online cigarette thingie like it is a turning point issue, a line in the sand, that is going to lead to more gubment interference, regulation, and control of consumer goods. Hello. Where have you been hiding? "It" has already happened and "it" happened many years ago and "it" affected all consumers not just smokers who now can't buy cigarettes online. Good grief. See things in proper perspective, why don't you.

scrapper2  posted on  2009-11-05   13:33:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#95. To: SonOfLiberty (#92)

Bzzt, wrong. If I stayed in a hotel, I voluntarily agreed that the price was acceptable to me. If I found the price burdensome or unfair, I would find another hotel, or sleep in my car as a last resort. Nobody made me do anything involuntarily.

You are twisting the argument.

belmontconservative  posted on  2009-11-05   13:35:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#96. To: belmontconservative, SonOfLiberty, all (#89)

A. Not true.

It is only true in the limited sense that most group policies do not differentiate between members of the group but that the premiums are based upon actuarial tables relevant for the entire group.

The same argument could be made that:

Diabetics push your premiums up.

Drinkers push your premiums up.

B.Premiums are based on ACTUARIAL TABLES FOR THE ENTIRE GROUP in Group Policies

C.Government mandates push your premiums up (the biggest culprit).

A. Premium rates for groups are based upon the health medical forms submitted before the group is approved. There is a question on every application that ask if you smoke or not. Insurnace companies rate the group higher based upon people who mark the questions yes. Smoking (like diabetes due to obesity and higher rates) leads to high blood pressure, cancers, various breathing conditions etc.

Renewal rates are primarily based upon the claims of the group from the prior year. So yes, smoking leads to higher rates for the group as a whole when there are smokers that also have HBP, etc.

B. Insurnace companies have a base rate but primarily base their HEALTH INSURANCE rates on the medical quest. submitted. 2 identical companies with the same age/demographics can have widly different premiums due to the health of the group. I just submitted a group with a dependent child with downs syndrome and 2 other serious conditions. The family rate was $1800 per month with the baby and $1100 per month without the baby being covered.

C. Gov't mandates are not the biggest culprit for the high rates. Not even in the top 5 reasons. Gov mandates only affect a few parts of health insurnace policies-mainly some mental health issues, preventive care dealing with physicals, mammograms etc. oh and let's not forget the insurance companies are now required to pay for a least a 48 hour stay after childbirth..something all the hospitals and doc's were for as it was proven most issues are gping to happen with a baby in the first 24 hours of the birth.

Again you resort to a Strawman Argument.

Yes different groups receive different rates. However, you avoided the primary point that it is based on Actuarial Tables relevant to the entire group.

Neither did you acknowledge the fact of choice.

Instead you avoid the larger issue by committing the "fallacy of division" and asserting that what is true for one is true for all when that is demonstrably false.

Certainly there are factors which affect the group rate and as you proved by your example smoking is neither the only nor the largest.

So, you would surrender your liberty and that of your fellows for a few shekels.

Well done.

Logically your argument is no different than "I think is a great idea" BUT "NIMBY".

As well while denying it you acknowledge the affect of mandates on costs. Logically known as a "non sequitur" (Latin for "does not follow").

Many of the special coverages and requirements in group policies are there because of government mandates.

Even the tax preference for employer provided health insurance is a preference established in law. Up until a few years ago self insurers received no tax break while the corporate break was 100%. It is better now - the self employed get to deduct 60%. So, do not try to make the false argument that government mandates have no impact. It is not true and if you are as knowlegable as you claim you should already know it is not true.

There are a myriad of other factors established by government as well - not the least of which is the monopoly, granted in law, to the AMA, and its approved practicioners and which excludes Naturopaths etc., from having the same rights and priveleges as the legally preferred class.

"An education isn't how much you have committed to memory, or even how much you know. It's being able to differentiate between what you know and what you don't. ~ Anatole France

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-11-05   13:38:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (97 - 120) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]