[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

How Anish heat a barn

This is an Easy Case SCOTUS Takes On The UN and Mexico's Gun Control Alliance!

Would China Ever Invade Russia? Examining a Possible Scenario

Why Putin Can NEVER Use a Nuclear Weapon

Logical Consequence of Freedom4um point of view

Tucker Carlson: This current White House is being run by Satan, not human beings

U.S. Submarines Are Getting a Nuclear Cruise Missile Strike Capability: Destroyers Likely to Follow

Anti-Gun Cat Lady ATTACKS Congress Over Mexico & The UN!

Trump's new border czar will prioritize finding 300,000 missing migrant children who could be trafficking victims

Morgan Stanley: "If Musk Is Successful In Streamlining Government, It Would Broaden Earnings Growth And Stock Performance"

Bombshell Fauci Documentary Nails The Whole COVID Charade

TRUTH About John McCain's Service - Forgotten History

Bombshell Fauci Documentary Nails The Whole COVID Charade

Joe Rogan expressed deep concern that Joe Biden and Ukrainian President Zelensky will start World War III

Fury in Memphis after attempted murder suspect who ambushed FedEx employee walks free without bail

Tehran preparing for attack against Israel: Ayatollah Khamenei's aide

Huge shortage plagues Israeli army as losses mount in Lebanon, Gaza

Researchers Find Unknown Chemical In Drinking Water Posing "Potential Human Health Concern"

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

The Problem of the Bitcoin Billionaires

Biden: “We’re leaving America in a better place today than when we came into office four years ago … "

Candace Owens: Gaetz out, Bondi in. There's more to this than you think.

OMG!!! Could Jill Biden Be Any MORE Embarrassing??? - Anyone NOTICE This???

Sudden death COVID vaccine paper published, then censored, by The Lancet now republished with peer review

Russian children returned from Syria

Donald Trump Indirectly Exposes the Jewish Neocons Behind Joe Biden's Nuclear War

Key European NATO Bases in Reach of Russia's Oreshnik Hypersonic Missile

Supervolcano Alert in Europe: Phlegraean Fields Activity Sparks Scientists Attention (Mass Starvation)

France reacted to the words of a US senator on sanctions against allies

Trump nominates former Soros executive for Treasury chief


Activism
See other Activism Articles

Title: Direct Democracy — Why the American People must disband Congress
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.infowars.com/direct-demo ... -people-must-disband-congress/
Published: Nov 9, 2009
Author: Mike Adams
Post Date: 2009-11-09 18:09:22 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 2100
Comments: 29

Given that the massive health care reform bill just passed by the House was one of the largest pieces of legislation in U.S. history, you might wonder why you didn’t get to vote on it. When it comes to federal legislation, your vote doesn’t count in America, didn’t you know? You are dictated to by a small band of the political elite who may or may not represent your interests (or even the interests of your fellow citizens).

Those people are called members of Congress. And as you’ll read here, they are essentially obsolete. Society no longer has any need for them. Here’s why…

Why Congress was created

Consider why the U.S. Congress was created in the first place: Back in the 1700s, there was no internet. There weren’t even telephones. Heck, this was pre-telegraph! Long-distance communication was simply impossible, so the people had a very practical need to send a representative to Washington to represent their wishes on the legislative front.

And so the idea of the U.S. Congress was born. Senators and Congresspeople would be representatives of the People from their home states and districts, and they would vote according to the wishes, desires and best interests of the people back home. They would essentially be proxy voters. Sounds good in theory, right?

Fast forward 230 years or so…

Now, instant communication is available to almost everyone. A new law being proposed in Washington could be instantly read — and voted on — by the People all across America. The internet has made the whole purpose behind the U.S. Congress obsolete… irrelevant. Why do Americans need someone else to represent them when we can all just read and vote on the bills ourselves? In an age of instant communications, Congress is no longer needed.

But of course, the current members of Congress would heartily disagree with that assessment. If there’s one rule about power, it’s that those in power always seek more power. And because only members of Congress can vote federal laws into existence — not the actual citizens of the country — they hold a tremendous amount of concentrated power… and they’re not about to let it go.

Corporations love the current system, too, because they can simply bypass the People and lobby Congress to pass the laws that favor their own interests. This is how the U.S. Congress has become a legislative auction house where new laws are passed to appease whoever raises more money for reelection campaigns. Meanwhile, the People have been abandoned in this equation, and the interests of the People that were supposed to be “represented” in Washington have been long forgotten.

Did you realize that 237 members of Congress are millionaires? (http://www.politico.com/news/storie…) And seven of them have a net worth greater than $100 million. When lawmakers are rolling in that kind of cash, how can they possibly represent the interests of the People, of which 99% earn far less?

Further demonstrating detachment from the people they claim to represent, one new Congressman — just sworn in yesterday — managed to break four campaign promises in his first hour of office (http://www.gouverneurtimes.com/inde…).

It’s time for Direct Democracy

In a Direct Democracy, the People directly participate in the debate and passage of new laws. All laws are publicly published for debate and discussion — unlike the current situation where 1,000-page laws like the Patriot Act or the new health care reform bill are covertly written, then often deposited in the federal register just minutes before a scheduled vote.

Today, we have a system of “ambush lawmaking” going on in Congress where even the members of Congress voting on the laws have little time to read the bills (much less understand them). In a Direct Democracy, however, all proposed laws are posted publicly so that the People can read them, debate them and vote on them.

After all, if the whole point of the U.S. Congress was to represent the votes of the People, in an age where people can now vote directly thanks to internet technology, shouldn’t the U.S. Congress step aside and just let the People vote for themseles?

How to disband Congress and give power back to the People

Disbanding the U.S. Congress would, of course, require a Constitutional amendment. That is extremely unlikely to happen, given that such an amendment requires an approval of the majority of U.S. states (and existing members of Congress happen to be quite influential in their home states). So to disband Congress, you’d have to convince hundreds of power-hungry people to vote themselves out of power. The odds against that happening are astronomical.

The other option is to just wait for the current U.S. system to collapse, and then replace it with a form of Direct Democracy that makes more sense. This is the more likely scenario, and it may be closer than you think: The financial blowout of America is well under way, and it’s only a matter of time before unbridled debt spending leads to runaway inflation and the disastrous demise of the dollar. The passage of the $1 trillion health care bill, in fact, will accelerate America towards financial collapse.

Within a few short years, there may be an opportunity to “reboot America” and create a smarter society to replace the corrupt, outmoded system of government that’s failing the American people right now. I support the idea of a Direct Democracy that eliminates the entire U.S. Congress. Of course, there would need to be some sort of process for deciding which proposed laws get put on the public website for discussion and voting, but even that process can be crowdsourced to some degree.

It’s time to decentralize power in Washington and distribute it back to the People. In one sense, it’s the most politically progressive idea yet proposed, but at the same time, it’s also about preserving personal freedom, liberty and responsibility. So it appeals both to progressives and conservatives (Libertarians, too).

The point is, it’s time to give back to the American people the power they once granted to their representatives out of practical necessity. Besides, the People can do a far better job debating and voting on proposed laws than the U.S. Congress ever did. Many of the comments I’ve read about the health care bill on discussions boards are far more intelligent than the debate that took place in the House. The People deserve the right to directly vote on laws that deeply impact their lives and finances.

After all, if the United States is supposed to be a government of the People, by the People and for the People, then why not let the laws be directly voted on by the People?

We the People don’t need Senators and Congresspeople to make our decisions for us. What we need is the freedom to vote for ourselves. If we continue to allow Congress to make our decisions for us, they will drive America into the dirt, leaving us all penniless, diseased and neck-deep in debt. (Actually, we’re sort of there already…)

Congress promises freedom but delivers financial slavery. It promises to take care of us but then it sells us out to the corporations. Congress puts the corporations first and the people last, and it’s time to advance to a better form of Democracy where individual participation in our democratic lawmaking process is the norm.

Now, I know what the main critics of this idea will say: “The People aren’t qualified to vote on legislation!” It’s a fair question. But I answer, “Are the members of Congress any better qualified?” I’m willing to bet that not 1 out of 5 members of Congress can even cite the Bill of Rights ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United…). They are nutritionally illiterate. They almost universally have little or no knowledge of the banking system or how the Federal Reserve really works. How are they any more qualified to vote on health care than you or I?

Truth is, they aren’t. The hard-working, tax-paying people of the United States of America could do a much better job voting on legislative bills than members of Congress.

Congress has become a big part of what’s wrong with America today. Disbanding Congress and invoking a Direct Democracy might be the only remaining way to save America from destruction at the hands of greedy corporations, powerful lobbyists and contemptible Congresspeople.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 10.

#5. To: christine (#0)

The other option is to just wait for the current U.S. system to collapse, and then replace it with a form of Direct Democracy that makes more sense.

Not no, but HELL NO!

Democracy is nothing more than the tyranny of the ill informed majority over the informed minority.

The Founding Fathers looked at "democracy" and discarded it out of hand as it is a system which is inherently unstable and does not protect the RIGHTS of the minority.

Governance under "democracy" is nothing more, or less, than rule by herd mentality.

No democracy in history as lasted more than a few generations because it degenerates into chaos and injustice visited upon those in the minority.

A Republic with a stout and soundly written enforceable Constitution is the best which we have yet envisioned. That our current Republic falls short is not that the Republican form is unworkable but that our Constitution lacks an open enforcement mechanism to restrain the Congress.

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-11-09   23:46:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Original_Intent, Christine, SonofLiberty, Jethro Tull, HOUNDDAWG, TwentyTwelve, X-15, James Deffenbach, gengis gandhi, IndieTX, Horse, noone222, randge, scrapper2, Rotara, RickyJ (#5) (Edited)

A Republic with a stout and soundly written enforceable Constitution is the best which we have yet envisioned. That our current Republic falls short is not that the Republican form is unworkable but that our Constitution lacks an open enforcement mechanism to restrain the Congress.

Quite correct.

However, there is good seed idea here of an update to the PROCESS of running the Republic: faster feedback, including quick recall of non-responsive representatives!

Building on an idea proposed by the great Buckminster Fuller, phone voting on referendums, and leveraging the technology available to enable instant voting via anonymous secure Internet connection, my idea goes like this:

[This proposal assumes that we have broken the Oligarchy of corporate/government collusion, have sound money, removed all Bill of Rights protection from non-living corporations and the media-Matrix is broken, paid lobbyists are outlawed, the House representation is re-apportioned to mirror the population, as the Constitution stipulated but which has not been done for many years, based on the original purpose of the census, so that we can conduct this experiment in a free market of ideas.

In other words, this is a clean sheet proposal, assuming that we have passed through the fire and are rebuilding, building upon the good foundation we were given 200 years ago and modernizing the process to handle the dynamic needs of vibrant growing future civilization.

We start by repealing the vast majority of legislation enacted in the 20th century and institute the mandate to periodically renew ALL legislation, else it expires, dies and lives no more! Only legislative law that is really functional and important will live on, because it requires regular re- certification to persist.

By the way, another major rule change that informs this feedback process: only ONE legislative focus per bill. NO MORE shotgun bills that muddy the will of the people and enable deal-making and BAD LAW. One clearly stated law ber bill, PERIOD!]

Keep (return to) paper trail elections, where you have to get off your duff to elect your representative.

That representative's new role is: present information to the populace for weekly (monthly/yearly) referendums.

No direct voting, no unmitigated mob rule because the actual votes on legislation are still cast by those elected representatives.

The new breed of politician must a be an educator, an explicator who still votes his conscience, but with one important difference:

If our representative votes against the will of his constituents on a particular bill, as expressed in the weekly referendums, more than X number of times, he is impeached with mininal formality, to be succeeded by the person who received the next highest number of paper votes in the election.

To the objection that people don't care to be informed and vote electonically in the referendums (one on EVERY piece of legislation to be voted upon), I say that once people can see that their vote in the referendum DIRECTLY impacts their representative's vote OR ELSE, watching C-SPAN will be more engaging and educational than watching "So you think you can dance?"!

Another side effect: if ain't broke, don't fix it!

LESS legislation!

LESS legislation!

LESS legislation!

LESS legislation!

LESS legislation1

More fine tuning of those legislative laws that persist. (see above)

So, the skills of the representatives will shift from lying in service of oligarchic masters to presenting the best case for their vote, to explaining the issues, bringing light upon the big picture and citing principles from the Constitution and common law in order to hold back the spikes of popular mob will.

Instead of the skillset of high-school debating, which most existing politicians even lack these days, and rabble rousing in the caustic TV talking pundit style, the true leaders, those who can explain in a balanced, even- handed, inclusive manner, the merits of the proposed legislation will continue to be re-elected.

Leaders who know how to appeal to peole's higher natures, not pander to their fears and base instincts, would rise to serve, because their motivation is not to lie to the public while serving the oligarchy, but to explicate and educate, to set an example of reasoning and knowledge.

The limits to any move by the masses to vote themselves handouts is the Constitution and good sense, presented without filtering through the oligarchically controlled media-Matrix.

PLUS the fact that when the economic powerhouse of free enterprise is again allowed to function unfettered, within a clear structure of minimal law, once again merit and the feedback of intelligent choices can make the way to individual prosperity clear to all.

Small, minimal government that MUST respond to the will of the people, WITHIN the bounds of the COnstitution and Bill of Rights, fine tuned by direct public participation and its consequent education.

This is just a sketch of course.

We have the damping of the popular sentiment by the structure of a Republic of Constitutional law, made as agile as a Ferrari by adding in weekly (or monthly) direct public participation through referendum.

When we can see that we DO have an effect, then we participate.

In addition to the air time that the elected representatives get, to present the merits/demerits of particular legislation, there will be air time, internet bandwidth for the people to stand up in cyperspace, on offical channels, such as a C-CPAN utube-like web site, to provide direct insight and reasoning from the wise and courageous among us.

The elected representatives will have to compete fairly in the marketplace of ideas because a SonOfLiberty or an Original_Intent's utube presentation could MAKE MINCE MEAT out of poor arguments and sway the referendum numbers away from their proposed vote.

Remember, the representatives are still free to and obligated to vote on the bills, BUT, if they vote against their constituents three times (or whatever), they are subject to IMMEDIATE recall.

To stay and play, they must do their best to raise consciousness among their constituents, in order that the public referendum stay aligned with their vote, which will presumably be in the service of the greater good since the bribe incentive will have been removed.

There must be some damping mechanism, some due process for recall of an out of sync representative (by which I include both House and Senate) but the feedback loop is there, providing incentive to tell the truth better, not to lie better.

The foundation of this proposal (or outline of one) is a view of human nature that has almost been outlawed in the pursuit of a pussified population:

Individual sovereignty, self-determination, individual responsibility, cooperating under minimal interference within a system of laws that everyone can understand.

That on a free level playing field, people acting in their own self-interests, enlightened by the instant feedback of global communications, will co-create a world where all can share in the creation and enjoyment of wealth.

Where none of that wealth is extorted by special interests, used to suppress invention and innovation and turned against the general populace in the form of institutionalized highway robbery and indentured servitude.

This is the dream of freedom and the true sustainable wealth it can create as soon as it is allowed to breathe freely.

This is one of the dreams that will displace our collective nightmare, within this lifetime, when we awaken.

HighLairEon  posted on  2009-11-10   15:19:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: HighLairEon, Rotara (#7)

[This proposal assumes that we have broken the Oligarchy of corporate/government collusion, have sound money, removed all Bill of Rights protection from non-living corporations and the media-Matrix is broken, paid lobbyists are outlawed, the House representation is re-apportioned to mirror the population, as the Constitution stipulated but which has not been done for many years, based on the original purpose of the census, so that we can conduct this experiment in a free market of ideas.

Step Zero is to defang the Oligarchy. No other plan can proceed without that step first having been accomplished.

Given my preference for simplicity, complete accountability, and transparency the main changes I would propose are few but sweeping:

1. The establishment of a co-equal fourth branch of government whose sole function is to oversee the operation of the other 3 and to ensure that their actions are in compliance with the written Constitution. It would have as part of its authority the ability to nullify any law passed which does not comply with the written constitution. Any bill passed may be referred for review by any Congressmember or Registered Voter. The Bill would then have to receive review before being enacted into law. Such review would be based solely upon its compliance with the written constitution.

2. Provision for direct citizen challenges of the Constitutionality of a Bill or Executive Action, which if sustained are fully and completely legally enforceable and that such enforcement is required.

3. The requirement for complete transparency in all elections and that the only legal form of Ballot is a hand marked paper ballot which is then hand counted under the eyes of an independent observer to verify the legitimacy of the count. Counting to be done at the level of the precinct and the talliers and observers are to be selected randomly from among the residents of the that precinct.

4. No candidate for office may accept campaign donations from any source whatsoever outside of the district for which the election is held. No campaign for or against a referendum in any form may accept donations from any source whatsoever outside of the district in which the referendum is being voted on.

5. Any Congressperson convicted of any act of corruption shall be forbidden for life from running for or serving in any elected position of public trust. This is in addition to any other legal penalties which may apply. Any Congressman knowingly proposing a law or bill in violation of the written Constitution shall be removed from office and forbade again running for or serving in any elected position in any level of government State, Local, and Federal, and any pension accrued from service in the Congress shall be forfeit. The President of the United States knowingly signing a law which contravenes the written Constitution shall upon validated challenge by any citizen or Congress member be automatically referred for Impeachment and upon conviction in the Senate shall be forever forbade serving in any elective office at any level of government for life. Any Pension accrued while serving in the office shall be forfeit.

6. No direct tax may in any form be levied by the Federal Government upon the individual citizens. Any additional levies for emergency funds must be enacted by the several States. Congress may, in time of national emergency when enacted into law by three fourths of both the House and Senate compel the States to comply with the levy which shall be apportioned by State population. The means of raising the levied funds would be determined by the Several States. The traditional means of indirect taxation would remain as written in the original Constitution.

7. Only individual corporeal citizens have the rights of citizens. No Corporation shall be granted any aspect thereof. The officers of a Corporation, just as the officers of a ship, are personally liable for the actions of a Corporation. Individuals employed by a corporation are personally liable for any personal infraction of the law.

8. The legal principle of "Stare Decisis" shall not apply in any case involving a challenge to the Constitutionality of any bill or act. The sole and only arbiter is reference to the written constitution. The use of "Stare Decisis" to resolve constitutional issues is expressly forbidden as it enters in elements which are not in the written constitution.

9. The Executive is expressly forbidden from issuing "Executive Orders" affecting the citizens of the United States. Executive Orders are limited in authority only to agencies and individuals serving in the Executive Branch of government. No executive order may be used at any time as grounds for depriving any citizen of life, liberty, or property. Only those laws duly enacted by Congress and signed into law by the President may be used as legal basis for depriving any citizen of life, liberty, or property.

I would suggest a few other things such as clarifying the "Commerce Clause" through which great mischief has been justified to specifically its original intent which was to prevent trade wars between the States. As well adding additional fangs to the right to keep and bear arms specifying that there should be no doubt that it guarantees the individual the right to keep and bear arms.

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-11-11   0:17:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 10.

#12. To: Original_Intent (#10)

Excellent post! Your ideas are to the point and very well thought out, in contrast to mine.

If my spontaneous brainstorming in public did nothing more than provide a stimulus to bring forth your brilliant response, it was worth being misunderstood.

Thanks for the reply.

HighLairEon  posted on  2009-11-11 11:36:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 10.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]