See other Science/Tech Articles
Title: Internet geeks here! Who can determine how many web spiders/crawlers are on 4um??
Source:
none
URL Source: http://none
Published: Nov 20, 2009
Author: X-15
Post Date: 2009-11-20 03:04:08 by X-15
Keywords: None
Views: 2789
Comments: 170
"Web spiders/crawlers: programs that search websites looking for specific words or patterns to compile into a database." A popular gun website I visit had 20 running, if 4um has less then I assume it has a lower profile in the eyes of FedGov.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-82) not displayed.
.
.
.
#83. To: TooConservative (#80)
You manage to be both needy and bitter, all in less than a paragraph. Nice work. What's this business about 'truthers'? I guess you're not a 'truther', is that right? So what are you, a liar? You seem to have a real big problem when it comes to answering simple questions. That's what happens when stupid people complicate their simple minds with such things as education and knowledge isn't it? Go ahead, prove me right again, asshole.
ROFLMAO. Keep laughin' asshole.
Speaking from personal experience? And why the cheap shot against those who know the official 9/11 legend is bullshit?
And why the cheap shot against those who know the official 9/11 legend is bullshit? Good luck getting a straight answer out of the piece of work calling itself TooConservative.
He (or she) appears to be ignoring me for some reason or another...
Maybe waiting to come up with a sarcastic, shnotty, stupid answer? Maybe to tell you how preposterous and paranoid you are?
Either of you ever going to make a meaningful informed post on the topic? However fulfilling you find making silly ad hominems on me to be, you may recall this thread is about web spiders, how to detect them, what they are, how they operate, etc.? Other than wudi's delusional notions about various liberty____.___ domain names, do you guys have anything to actually contribute to the topic?
Perhaps you missed this question. Do you have an answer? "And why the cheap shot against those who know the official 9/11 legend is bullshit?" I have no issues with your comments concerning web spiders, however, you decided to divert from that topic, so I'm just asking why, and what do you have to say about it.
Because I saw wudi making enemies for the RP movement on other sites because he had to carry the Truther banner and try to associate RP with it, despite the fact that RP himself only favored fuller investigations of 9/11, not any kind of endorsement of MIHOP or LIHOP Trutherism. BTW, I do not intend to take this thread on an excursion into Trutherism. I am quite familiar with how bitter the adherents are for those who do not find the cut-and-paste Alex Jones articles quite so compelling. I mention it only because wudi got chased off a couple of conservative forums with Truth threads.
You just don't know when to admit you're wrong do you? Got a link for that?
BTW, I do not intend to take this thread on an excursion into Trutherism. I am quite familiar with how bitter the adherents are for those who do not find the cut-and-paste Alex Jones articles quite so compelling. I mention it only because wudi got chased off a couple of conservative forums with Truth threads. So you decided you'd jump on the bandwagon and be my enemy? How did I 'make enemies for the RP movement'? What are these 'other sites' of which you speak? lol How was I associating RP with the 'Truther banner'? What are these 'couple of conservative forums with Truth threads'? Don't worry now, I don't expect someone as unreasonable and dishonest as yourself to answer any or all of these direct questions.
Like I would care quite so much about who boots you off a forum. But since you asked so nicely, I spent ten seconds looking at LP, just one site, for your posts. I found this LP thread. That was only one week ago, and here you are at 4um, trying to pretend that no one has ever banned you. Banning offense. You must be doing that to 1. force me to ban you 2 stir up a fight because of it ---------------- You called someone a pedophile. THAT isn't even a debatable ban. It's instant and without recourse. Have a nice life...someplace else. Trying to be a little disingenuous for an audience, wudi? I notice that somehow this thread has also become all about you. What a surprise. But, no, you aren't "needy", not at all.
Like I say, you're just one of those educated, knowledgeable people that's actually quite stupid.
Yet you already have confided in Stone .....one of the bigger flakes in the universe or haven't you visited his website lately?. There are plenty of discrepancies about 911 that should be discussed especially WTC7, Ron Paul isn't running anymore and I doubt Wudidiz had one iota of influence on him losing when he had enemies such as OReilly, Beck and the GOP establishment to isolate and diss him, and deny him media coverage. Really.... one little poster on a website had such an influence? You are usually better than that.
Okay, that's really impressive. Now answer the direct questions I gave you or stop posting to me. Just answer one at at time. C'mon, you can do it. Oh, you're gonna have fun here.
I notice you refuse to respond to my posted proof that you are lying deliberately about getting kicked off a forum. And in the last week too.
ROTFLOL!!!!! Wudoofus, the pansy-ass, canuckistani displaying his abject stupidity once again! I'm not happy until you're not happy!
Shut up, yukon.
I notice you refuse to respond to my posted proof that you are lying deliberately about getting kicked off a forum. And in the last week too. Show me where I lied about getting kicked off of a forum. C'mon, you can do it. Cuz you're smart, remember?
I haven't "confided" in Stone, nor did I flag him here to this thread (but I will flag him now). AFAIK, I have never visited his site since I didn't know (or care) that he had a site or want to visit it. I vaguely recall a few threads where I was in agreement with him (maybe antiwar stuff) but more often disagree with him on a broader range of topics. On many forums, the Truthers who tried to hijack the RP campaign tried to use RP as their Truther "champion", much as they later used the foolish Charley Sheen to make that stupid commercial to Zero. Sheen wasn't the only one either. It was a burned-bridge strategy. Posters like that made it virtually impossible to advocate steadily from Ron Paul. We still get smeared on RP threads on various forums simply because of this. Even on the main RP forums, the Truthers were always trying to stage a takeover. It was similar to how various elements tried to take over JBS surreptiously back in the Sixties and Seventies. In the end, JBS was so tarred by this repeated subterfuge that they still cannot be an effective organization to this day. Parasites who try to take over organizations to use them for their own purposes generally disgust me. I am fairly consistent with this, for instance, rejecting the complete takeover of the GOP by the neocons.
Dishonest people aren't capable of recognizing the truth or discerning fact from fiction. Their constitution won't allow it.
So to try and cover up your bullshit and divert from the questions you're being asked, you're attempting to blame me for Ron Paul not becoming the President? I suppose it's my fault for 9/11 now, too. How clever you are.
I'm counting 1 spider/crawler.
Trying to micromanage voter's other interests and issues is futile. Anyway most of that consisted of excuses and smokescreens that the MSM and others used and they will find other smears and create other spot fires when those go away or are proven false. Keeping their opponents disunited and busy putting out fires is their motto. It's better to just ignore them and keep persevering.
My comment was not an opportunity for you to engage in some free-association exercise. Try reading it again. Maybe you just don't read adequately or lack the capability of reading more than a few sentences at once. That has become quite common with the products of the public skrools over the last few decades, those whose educations were the most neglected are the most "needy" people on the web.
Yeah. It's because of posters like me that you get smeared on various forums for advocating Ron Paul. There, now you have someone to blame.
You haven't answered any of my questions. You're a liar. Simple as that. I've just exposed you as one and you don't even realize it. I read adequately enough and for your information, I read one sentence at a time. That's how I keep up. Go ahead, try it. Now go back, read the questions I asked you and answer them. One at a time. Or stfu.
I'm still waiting for you to make your first on-topic post on this thread (that wasn't just some nonsense of the supposedly sinister libertypost.net or your confusion about liberty-post.net as opposed to libertypost.net). You've now managed to make more than half this thread all about little wudidiz. That's pretty much your intent on any thread where anyone disagrees with you, whether you're aware of it or not. And of course, someone else is always to blame for it, aren't they?
At least you finally admit the truth.
Hi Yuki!
LOL Amen!
"The only thing better than a Federal Reserve audit would be a Federal Reserve autopsy."
You've now managed to make more than half this thread all about little wudidiz. That's pretty much your intent on any thread where anyone disagrees with you, whether you're aware of it or not. And of course, someone else is always to blame for it, aren't they? You're to blame for what you've posted here, not me. Like I say, answer my questions or stop posting to me. Lying asshole.
At least you finally admit the truth. No, stupid. I was being sarcastic. I always tell the truth. You lie.
I think you two scared Yukon off... ;-)
There must not be much other entertainment in your neck of the woods, if you over react like that. Too bad. But stay there.... the jails around here are full.
I answered all your on-topic posts, incoherent and uninformed as they were. I answered at some length and in detail. But your rudeness is all the thanks I need.
It all makes sense now......I always thought Goldi-Lox was a tad bit postal. : )
Since you bring up a thread from LP where apparently wud had gotten fed up with ButtSniffer over there and responded to him harshly, getting himself banned, do you support ByteShredder's constant barrage of ugly personal attacks against anyone who doesn't toe the Goldi-Lox/Israeli/NWO line?
As far as the Ron Paul movement, Goldi snuffed that out on her website prior to the first primary. She started banning anyone who posted anything positive about him, and allowed people such as 50yardline (or whatever his handle was at the time) to post idiotic threads such as what RP had for lunch, or outright negative threads about him accusing him of being anti-semetic, associated with white supremists, you name it, he posted it. So I really find it hard to believe you have a problem with wudidiz, where I've never seen you say boo to the idiot who WAS spamming LP with anti RP propaganda, and given free reign to do so.
Yukon is very afraid of me. The man has no balls.
"The only thing better than a Federal Reserve audit would be a Federal Reserve autopsy."
But your rudeness is all the thanks I need. Listen asshole, if you're going to accuse me of something, be prepared to back it up. If not, shut up and stop posting to me.
Comments (124 - 170) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestWhat are you? A liar?
"The trouble with people is not that they don't know but that they know so much that ain't so." ~ Josh Billings
#84. To: TooConservative (#81)
LOL.
"The trouble with people is not that they don't know but that they know so much that ain't so." ~ Josh Billings
#85. To: TooConservative (#71)
Kind of like a crack baby that screams for attention and then screams when anyone so much as looks them in the eye.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#86. To: FormerLurker (#85)
Speaking from personal experience?
"The trouble with people is not that they don't know but that they know so much that ain't so." ~ Josh Billings
#87. To: wudidiz, TooConservative (#86)
Good luck getting a straight answer out of the piece of work calling itself TooConservative.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#88. To: FormerLurker (#87)
(Edited)
"The trouble with people is not that they don't know but that they know so much that ain't so." ~ Josh Billings
#89. To: wudidiz, FormerLurker (#88)
#90. To: TooConservative (#89)
do you guys have anything to actually contribute to the topic?
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#91. To: FormerLurker (#90)
#92. To: TooConservative, FormerLurker (#89)
delusional notions
"The trouble with people is not that they don't know but that they know so much that ain't so." ~ Josh Billings
#93. To: TooConservative (#91)
Because I saw wudi making enemies for the RP movement on other sites because he had to carry the Truther banner and try to associate RP with it, despite the fact that RP himself only favored fuller investigations of 9/11, not any kind of endorsement of MIHOP or LIHOP Trutherism.
"The trouble with people is not that they don't know but that they know so much that ain't so." ~ Josh Billings
#94. To: wudidiz, FormerLurker (#92)
Got a link for that?
783. To: wudidiz (#678)
#95. To: TooConservative (#94)
"The trouble with people is not that they don't know but that they know so much that ain't so." ~ Josh Billings
#96. To: TooConservative, wudidiz, Former Lurker (#91)
(Edited)
BTW, I do not intend to take this thread on an excursion into Trutherism. I am quite familiar with how bitter the adherents are for those who do not find the cut-and-paste Alex Jones articles quite so compelling. I mention it only because wudi got chased off a couple of conservative forums with Truth threads
#97. To: TooConservative (#94)
Trying to be a little disingenuous for an audience....
"The trouble with people is not that they don't know but that they know so much that ain't so." ~ Josh Billings
#98. To: wudidiz (#95)
Like I say, you're just one of those educated, knowledgeable people that's actually quite stupid.
#99. To: TooConservative, wudidiz (#94)
(Edited)
twoofer
#100. To: yukon (#99)
"The trouble with people is not that they don't know but that they know so much that ain't so." ~ Josh Billings
#101. To: TooConservative (#98)
Like I say, you're just one of those educated, knowledgeable people that's actually quite stupid.
"The trouble with people is not that they don't know but that they know so much that ain't so." ~ Josh Billings
#102. To: mininggold, A K A Stone (#96)
Yet you already have confided in Stone .....one of the bigger flakes in the universe or haven't you visited his website lately?.
...and I doubt Wudidiz had one iota of influence on him losing when he had enemies such as OReilly, Beck and the GOP establishment to isolate and diss him, and deny him media coverage. Really.... one little poster on a website had such an influence? You are usually better than that.
#103. To: All (#101)
"The trouble with people is not that they don't know but that they know so much that ain't so." ~ Josh Billings
#104. To: TooConservative, mininggold (#102)
"The trouble with people is not that they don't know but that they know so much that ain't so." ~ Josh Billings
#105. To: All (#104)
Internet geeks here! Who can determine how many web spiders/crawlers are on 4um??
"The trouble with people is not that they don't know but that they know so much that ain't so." ~ Josh Billings
#106. To: TooConservative (#102)
It was a burned-bridge strategy. Posters like that made it virtually impossible to advocate steadily from Ron Paul. We still get smeared on RP threads on various forums simply because of this.
#107. To: wudidiz (#104)
So to try and cover up your bullshit and divert from the questions you're being asked, you're attempting to blame me for Ron Paul not becoming the President?
#108. To: mininggold, TooConservative (#106)
We still get smeared on RP threads on various forums simply because of this.
"The trouble with people is not that they don't know but that they know so much that ain't so." ~ Josh Billings
#109. To: TooConservative (#107)
Maybe you just don't read adequately or lack the capability of reading more than a few sentences at once. That has become quite common with the products of the public skrools over the last few decades, those whose educations were the most neglected are the most "needy" people on the web.
"The trouble with people is not that they don't know but that they know so much that ain't so." ~ Josh Billings
#110. To: wudidiz (#109)
#111. To: wudidiz (#108)
Yeah. It's because of posters like me that you get smeared on various forums for advocating Ron Paul.
#112. To: yukon (#99)
#113. To: wudidiz (#100)
Shut up, yukon.
#114. To: TooConservative (#110)
I'm still waiting for you to make your first on-topic post on this thread (that wasn't just some nonsense of the supposedly sinister libertypost.net or your confusion about liberty-post.net as opposed to libertypost.net).
"The trouble with people is not that they don't know but that they know so much that ain't so." ~ Josh Billings
#115. To: TooConservative (#111)
Yeah. It's because of posters like me that you get smeared on various forums for advocating Ron Paul.
"The trouble with people is not that they don't know but that they know so much that ain't so." ~ Josh Billings
#116. To: farmfriend, wudidiz (#113)
#117. To: yukon (#99)
ROTFLOL!!!!! Wudoofus, the pansy-ass, canuckistani displaying his abject stupidity once again!
#118. To: wudidiz (#114)
Like I say, answer my questions or stop posting to me.
#119. To: TooConservative (#79)
USPS owns libertypost.us and libertypost.com. I can't figure out why but I assume it is historical.
#120. To: TooConservative, wudidiz (#94)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#121. To: TooConservative, wudidiz (#91)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#122. To: mel_living, wudidiz (#116)
I think you two scared Yukon off... ;-)
#123. To: TooConservative (#118)
I answered all your on-topic posts, incoherent and uninformed as they were. I answered at some length and in detail.
"The trouble with people is not that they don't know but that they know so much that ain't so." ~ Josh Billings
.
.
.