[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Trump Lawyer WARNS Letitia James, Vows RETRIBUTION After Trump Win: 'We'll Put Your Fat A** In JAIL'

Tucker Carlson:11/7/2024 "now that Trump is president, i can tell you everything"

Fear-Stricken Pharma Big-Wigs Convene Emergency Teleconference to Thwart RFK Jr.

Judge strikes down Joe Biden administration program aimed at easing citizenship pathway for some undocumented immigrants

CNN faces another defamation lawsuit after appeals court sides with Project Veritas

These Hollywood Celebrities Swore They'd Leave America If Trump Won All Talk, No Walk

Blaze News original: Border Patrol whistleblower's career on the line after spotlighting trafficking horrors

Dems open can of worms by asking about millions of 2020 Biden voters who somehow disappeared in 2024

Deadline: US says Israel failing in aid efforts. What happens now?

Kash Patel, Rumored Pick for CIA Chief, Announces Massive Declassification Will Occur

Hezbollah unveils ‘Fateh 110’ ballistic missile in targeting Israeli sites

Pentagon running low on air-defense missiles as Israel, Ukraine gobble up remaining supplies

An Open Letter To Elon Musk

Is this why Trump was allowed to win?

This Is The Median Home Price In Each US State

Alex Soros Shocked That the Incumbent Political Order Is Being Crushed Around The Globe

Beverly Hills Lawyer Disbarred Two Years After Admitting He Paid a Ringer to Take the Bar

Lumumba: 'I am not guilty, and so I will not proceed as a guilty man.'

Lauren Boebert Wins House Election After Switching to More Conservative Colorado District

AIPAC Boasts of Influence Over Congress, Ousting 'Eleven Anti-Israel Candidates'

Police Searching for 40 Escaped Monkeys After Mass Breakout from South Carolina Research Facility

"You Don't Deserve Any Respect!": Steve Bannon Goes Scorched Earth On Democrats On Election Night Livestream

Putin's ready to talk now that the mentally ill homosexuals have been brushed aside

Trump, the Economy & World War III: Col. Douglas Macgregor

Ex-Top Official Catherine Austin Fitts: Inside Trump’s Victory, RFK Jr., and the Deep State

10 Big Losers That Weren't On The Ballot

Elon’s first day working for the Federal Government

Senior Harris Advisor Deletes X Account As "Massive Scandal" Brews Over $20 Million In Campaign Debt

Biden addresses the nation after Trump's election victory

Top Foods & Lifestyle Habits To Make New Mitochondria For Longevity | Dr. William L


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: 9/11: PENTAGON AIRCRAFT HIJACK IMPOSSIBLE (FLIGHT DECK DOOR CLOSED FOR ENTIRE FLIGHT)
Source: pilotsfor911truth.org
URL Source: http://pilotsfor911truth.org/american_77_hijack_impossible.html
Published: Nov 27, 2009
Author: unk
Post Date: 2009-11-27 21:43:30 by rack42
Keywords: 911, pentagon, flight 77
Views: 1984
Comments: 118

(PilotsFor911Truth.org) - Newly decoded data provided by an independent researcher and computer programmer from Australia exposes alarming evidence that the reported hijacking aboard American Airlines Flight 77 was impossible to have existed. A data parameter labeled "FLT DECK DOOR", cross checks with previously decoded data obtained by Pilots For 9/11 Truth from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) through the Freedom Of Information Act.

On the morning of September 11, 2001, American Airlines Flight 77 departed Dulles International Airport bound for Los Angeles at 8:20 am Eastern Time. According to reports and data, a hijacking took place between 08:50:54 and 08:54:11[1] in which the hijackers allegedly crashed the aircraft into the Pentagon at 09:37:45. Reported by CNN, according to Ted Olson, wife Barbara Olson had called him from the reported flight stating, "...all passengers and flight personnel, including the pilots, were herded to the back of the plane by armed hijackers..."[2]. However, according to Flight Data provided by the NTSB, the Flight Deck Door was never opened in flight. How were the hijackers able to gain access to the cockpit, remove the pilots, and navigate the aircraft to the Pentagon if the Flight Deck Door remained closed?[3]

Founded in August 2006, Pilots For 9/11 Truth is a growing organization of aviation professionals from around the globe. The organization has analyzed Data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) for the Pentagon Attack, the events in Shanksville, PA and the World Trade Center attack. The data does not support the government story. The NTSB/FBI refuse to comment. Pilots For 9/11 Truth do not offer theory or point blame at this point in time. However, there is a growing mountain of conflicting information and data in which government agencies and officials along with Mainstream Media refuse to acknowledge. Pilots For 9/11 Truth Core member list continues to grow.

== [3] Right click and save target as here to download csv file with "FLT DECK DOOR" parameter.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 53.

#1. To: rack42 (#0)

Newly decoded data provided by an independent researcher and computer programmer from Australia exposes

No need to read further.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-11-27   21:56:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Cynicom (#1) (Edited)

No need to read further.

So, how should I interpret that statement? And why don't you say what you mean?

[edit] And why not make plain what you mean.

rack42  posted on  2009-11-27   22:52:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: rack42 (#2)

So, how should I interpret that statement?

"Newly decoded data provided by an independent researcher and computer programmer from Australia exposes alarming evidence "

Opening statement is self explanatory.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-11-27   22:55:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Cynicom, rack42 (#3)

"Newly decoded data provided by an independent researcher and computer programmer from Australia exposes alarming evidence "

Let me see if I get the reasoning right.

That the data was read and decoded by an independent researcher makes it unworthy of notice"

No one not in the government, or under a government contract, is a credible researcher - particularly independent researchers?

Therefore there is no possibility that the data could be correct?

Makes sense to me. The source of the data does not agree with my prejudices so throw it out without any further examination or cross checking.

After all we all know that 911 was perpetrated my "19ARABSWHOHATEUSCUZWE'REFREE" directed by a madman with his magic cell phone hidden in a secret cave in Tora Bora. You know - the super sophisticated one that was in the Snoozeweak piece on Osama Ben Forgotten's high tech Deathstar Fortress.

Can we say conclusion without examination?

Sure we can.

Wasn't that easy?

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-11-28   12:21:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: Original_Intent (#38)

Wasn't that easy?

OI...

The most egregious attempt to confuse an already confused affair was the eye witness accounts of the aircraft going into the Pentagon.

The government took statements and testimony from 52 people at the scene that saw an aircraft. Twelve of whom identified it as an American airlines plane. They were people unknown to each other and many from foreign countries. Yet toms have been written about an aircraft NOT hitting the Pentagon.

One has to strain mightily to envision getting all of them to lie, all to be there at a precise moment that no one knew. Such as that detracts from all efforts to name the people at the top.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-11-28   16:35:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: Cynicom (#52)

12 out of 52 ain't bad. That's almost 24 percent.

Others saw aircraft from other airlines. Still others saw different kinds of aircraft.

Got no idea what flew into the Pentagon. Kinda makes me wonder though.

randge  posted on  2009-11-28   17:03:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 53.

#55. To: randge (#53)

At the scene of an accident, cops have to be careful of whom they accept as a "witness".

Six people witness the accident, they give at least three scenarios that do not match.

Criminal justice often teaches by example, someone bursts into the classroom, screams something, smacks the professor and takes off.

The students are then asked to write down everything they saw and heard. Four or five will get it basically the same, with the others in variation. Then they are asked to fill out a questionnaire concerning the intrusion. Some of the questions are loaded, inferring something that was not there.

Question...What was approximate age of the woman holding the door open for the perp to what color hair did the perp have. (bald headed)

After the fact and insertion of unseen information, their answers are all over the board.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-11-28 17:17:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 53.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]