[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Veteran CIA officer who drugged and sexually assaulted dozens of women gets 30 years in prison

Poll: How Will Diddy [and Trump's latest wannabe assassin] Get Suicided in Jail?

After Overwhelming Pro-Trump Polling, Teamsters Will Not Endorse Any Candidate For First Time Since 1996

The US is averaging one assassination attempt per month. How did we get here?

LARGE ISRAELI MILITARY CONVOYS ARE MOVING TOWARDS THE LEBANESE BORDER

Americans are depleting capital faster than producing, negative net savings since early 2023.

CBS Correspondent Baffles Cohosts When Nevada Trip Nets One Kamala Supporter Per Stop

FBI Puts Up Billboards in Haitian Creole Encouraging People to Report 'Hate Crimes' in Springfield

WEF Is Planning THIS!! Summer Davos 2024 & What It Means For You!

The U.S. government is running a $2 trillion deficit, while gold prices rise, signaling a potential fiscal disaster ahead.

Meet The Hate-Crime Commissar Of New Normal Berlin

Billionaire stock market visionary reveals SHOCK financial move he'll make, if Harris wins the election

Ukraine Loses Over 14,200 Soldiers During Operation in Kursk Area -MOD

Israel blocks over 80 percent of food aid from entering Gaza

CNN Fact Checks Kamala Harris Campaign, 8 Repeated Examples of Deception

Trans-Identifying 19-Year-Old Arrested After Expressing Desire To Shoot Up Elementary School

John Deere SCREWED Farmers, Now They're Paying The Price!

Top Oncologist Raises Alarm: Every New Cancer Patient Is Under 45

Hint: This Election is About the Cats and Dogs! (VIDEO)

Italian Socialite Slams Car on Alleged Moroccan Handbag Thief and Kills Him

Not Just 'Russia, Russia, Russia': Hillary Demands Criminal Charges For Americans "Engaged" In "Propaganda"

Popular Female Comedian Wrongfully Banned By Leftist Moles Still Inside X Appeals To Elon Musk

"This is Hezbollah's 9/11 and it's DEVASTATING"

Nassim Taleb: People Aren't Seeing The Real De-Dollarization

"Operation Beef Bandit": Four Thieves Caught In Multi-Million Dollar Chain Of Food Heists Spanning 3 Years

Cash Jordan: Destroy a Park For Immigrant Housing

FBI whistleblower WARNS about agent investigating 2nd Trump assassination attempt

Arrogance not frustration is fueling political violence

Hillary to Maddow: We Need Criminal Penalties For Misinformation

The liberal outlet ‘The Hill’ is pushing a new NAACP poll focused on black voters and Kamala Harris


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: 9/11: PENTAGON AIRCRAFT HIJACK IMPOSSIBLE (FLIGHT DECK DOOR CLOSED FOR ENTIRE FLIGHT)
Source: pilotsfor911truth.org
URL Source: http://pilotsfor911truth.org/american_77_hijack_impossible.html
Published: Nov 27, 2009
Author: unk
Post Date: 2009-11-27 21:43:30 by rack42
Keywords: 911, pentagon, flight 77
Views: 1723
Comments: 118

(PilotsFor911Truth.org) - Newly decoded data provided by an independent researcher and computer programmer from Australia exposes alarming evidence that the reported hijacking aboard American Airlines Flight 77 was impossible to have existed. A data parameter labeled "FLT DECK DOOR", cross checks with previously decoded data obtained by Pilots For 9/11 Truth from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) through the Freedom Of Information Act.

On the morning of September 11, 2001, American Airlines Flight 77 departed Dulles International Airport bound for Los Angeles at 8:20 am Eastern Time. According to reports and data, a hijacking took place between 08:50:54 and 08:54:11[1] in which the hijackers allegedly crashed the aircraft into the Pentagon at 09:37:45. Reported by CNN, according to Ted Olson, wife Barbara Olson had called him from the reported flight stating, "...all passengers and flight personnel, including the pilots, were herded to the back of the plane by armed hijackers..."[2]. However, according to Flight Data provided by the NTSB, the Flight Deck Door was never opened in flight. How were the hijackers able to gain access to the cockpit, remove the pilots, and navigate the aircraft to the Pentagon if the Flight Deck Door remained closed?[3]

Founded in August 2006, Pilots For 9/11 Truth is a growing organization of aviation professionals from around the globe. The organization has analyzed Data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) for the Pentagon Attack, the events in Shanksville, PA and the World Trade Center attack. The data does not support the government story. The NTSB/FBI refuse to comment. Pilots For 9/11 Truth do not offer theory or point blame at this point in time. However, there is a growing mountain of conflicting information and data in which government agencies and officials along with Mainstream Media refuse to acknowledge. Pilots For 9/11 Truth Core member list continues to grow.

== [3] Right click and save target as here to download csv file with "FLT DECK DOOR" parameter.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 54.

#1. To: rack42 (#0)

Newly decoded data provided by an independent researcher and computer programmer from Australia exposes

No need to read further.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-11-27   21:56:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Cynicom (#1) (Edited)

No need to read further.

So, how should I interpret that statement? And why don't you say what you mean?

[edit] And why not make plain what you mean.

rack42  posted on  2009-11-27   22:52:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: rack42 (#2)

So, how should I interpret that statement?

"Newly decoded data provided by an independent researcher and computer programmer from Australia exposes alarming evidence "

Opening statement is self explanatory.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-11-27   22:55:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Cynicom, rack42 (#3)

"Newly decoded data provided by an independent researcher and computer programmer from Australia exposes alarming evidence "

Let me see if I get the reasoning right.

That the data was read and decoded by an independent researcher makes it unworthy of notice"

No one not in the government, or under a government contract, is a credible researcher - particularly independent researchers?

Therefore there is no possibility that the data could be correct?

Makes sense to me. The source of the data does not agree with my prejudices so throw it out without any further examination or cross checking.

After all we all know that 911 was perpetrated my "19ARABSWHOHATEUSCUZWE'REFREE" directed by a madman with his magic cell phone hidden in a secret cave in Tora Bora. You know - the super sophisticated one that was in the Snoozeweak piece on Osama Ben Forgotten's high tech Deathstar Fortress.

Can we say conclusion without examination?

Sure we can.

Wasn't that easy?

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-11-28   12:21:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: Original_Intent (#38)

Wasn't that easy?

OI...

The most egregious attempt to confuse an already confused affair was the eye witness accounts of the aircraft going into the Pentagon.

The government took statements and testimony from 52 people at the scene that saw an aircraft. Twelve of whom identified it as an American airlines plane. They were people unknown to each other and many from foreign countries. Yet toms have been written about an aircraft NOT hitting the Pentagon.

One has to strain mightily to envision getting all of them to lie, all to be there at a precise moment that no one knew. Such as that detracts from all efforts to name the people at the top.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-11-28   16:35:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: Cynicom, christine, TwentyTwelve, Wudidiz, CadetD, Jethro Tull, IndieTX, bluegrass, HOUNDDAWG, Kamala, farmfriend, all (#52) (Edited)

Wasn't that easy?

OI...

The most egregious attempt to confuse an already confused affair was the eye witness accounts of the aircraft going into the Pentagon.

The government took statements and testimony from 52 people at the scene that saw an aircraft. Twelve of whom identified it as an American airlines plane. They were people unknown to each other and many from foreign countries. Yet toms have been written about an aircraft NOT hitting the Pentagon.

One has to strain mightily to envision getting all of them to lie, all to be there at a precise moment that no one knew. Such as that detracts from all efforts to name the people at the top.

So, one piece of planted disinformation overrules every other piece of information contradicting the Official Fairy Tale®? Without getting off into specific anomalies on the Pentagram strike I will say I do believe something struck the Pentagram. Now whether the airliner or whether the airliner was used as an optical diversion is open as there are too many valid scientific/engineering based arguments - notably that an airliner of that size and wing type would have been unstable at the reported speed and altitude; so unstable that, even assuming it was the airliner, the plane was NOT piloted by a flight school wash-out. Between the lift, and the wingtip vortices formed at that altitude it would have required a Master Pilot to hit THAT target with THAT aircraft. However, the available data is not enough to resolve the question, and the FBI insured that it would not be by collecting every videotape in the area that could have filmed the approach and strike (32 of them) the afternoon of 911. NONE of which have released or returned to their rightful owners 8 years after the event.

My mind is boggled at the reasoning involved, and I don't mean to be insulting, but I simply find it absurd that you would dismiss every other piece of data contrary to the Official Conspiracy Theory©® because of one piece of planted disinformation.

There is little I can say in the face of that because it logically amounts to: My mind is made up now don't confuse me with the facts.

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-11-28   17:08:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 54.

#59. To: Original_Intent (#54)

My mind is boggled at the reasoning involved, and I don't mean to be insulting, but I simply find it absurd that you would dismiss every other piece of data contrary to the Official Conspiracy Theory©® because of one piece of planted disinformation.

Going over 9/11, and all of the years, and all of the hundreds of credible doubts espoused by honest people, not ONE fact has been retracted, not one statement by the witnesses has changed.

Not one iota. True or false the government account still stands. I would love to see them eat crow over just one small part of 9/11, but so far that is not happened. Many well intentioned good people have tried.

I am not an expert in anything, being such, I try to take a look at the overall picture and do not involve myself with technical items that are beyond my pay grade.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-11-28 17:43:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 54.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]