[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Trump Lawyer WARNS Letitia James, Vows RETRIBUTION After Trump Win: 'We'll Put Your Fat A** In JAIL' Tucker Carlson:11/7/2024 "now that Trump is president, i can tell you everything" Fear-Stricken Pharma Big-Wigs Convene Emergency Teleconference to Thwart RFK Jr. Judge strikes down Joe Biden administration program aimed at easing citizenship pathway for some undocumented immigrants CNN faces another defamation lawsuit after appeals court sides with Project Veritas These Hollywood Celebrities Swore They'd Leave America If Trump Won All Talk, No Walk Blaze News original: Border Patrol whistleblower's career on the line after spotlighting trafficking horrors Dems open can of worms by asking about millions of 2020 Biden voters who somehow disappeared in 2024 Deadline: US says Israel failing in aid efforts. What happens now? Kash Patel, Rumored Pick for CIA Chief, Announces Massive Declassification Will Occur Hezbollah unveils ‘Fateh 110’ ballistic missile in targeting Israeli sites Pentagon running low on air-defense missiles as Israel, Ukraine gobble up remaining supplies An Open Letter To Elon Musk Is this why Trump was allowed to win? This Is The Median Home Price In Each US State Alex Soros Shocked That the Incumbent Political Order Is Being Crushed Around The Globe Beverly Hills Lawyer Disbarred Two Years After Admitting He Paid a Ringer to Take the Bar Lumumba: 'I am not guilty, and so I will not proceed as a guilty man.' Lauren Boebert Wins House Election After Switching to More Conservative Colorado District AIPAC Boasts of Influence Over Congress, Ousting 'Eleven Anti-Israel Candidates' Police Searching for 40 Escaped Monkeys After Mass Breakout from South Carolina Research Facility "You Don't Deserve Any Respect!": Steve Bannon Goes Scorched Earth On Democrats On Election Night Livestream Putin's ready to talk now that the mentally ill homosexuals have been brushed aside Trump, the Economy & World War III: Col. Douglas Macgregor Ex-Top Official Catherine Austin Fitts: Inside Trump’s Victory, RFK Jr., and the Deep State 10 Big Losers That Weren't On The Ballot Elon’s first day working for the Federal Government Senior Harris Advisor Deletes X Account As "Massive Scandal" Brews Over $20 Million In Campaign Debt Biden addresses the nation after Trump's election victory Top Foods & Lifestyle Habits To Make New Mitochondria For Longevity | Dr. William L

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: 9/11: PENTAGON AIRCRAFT HIJACK IMPOSSIBLE (FLIGHT DECK DOOR CLOSED FOR ENTIRE FLIGHT)
Source: pilotsfor911truth.org
URL Source: http://pilotsfor911truth.org/american_77_hijack_impossible.html
Published: Nov 27, 2009
Author: unk
Post Date: 2009-11-27 21:43:30 by rack42
Keywords: 911, pentagon, flight 77
Views: 1953
Comments: 118

(PilotsFor911Truth.org) - Newly decoded data provided by an independent researcher and computer programmer from Australia exposes alarming evidence that the reported hijacking aboard American Airlines Flight 77 was impossible to have existed. A data parameter labeled "FLT DECK DOOR", cross checks with previously decoded data obtained by Pilots For 9/11 Truth from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) through the Freedom Of Information Act.

On the morning of September 11, 2001, American Airlines Flight 77 departed Dulles International Airport bound for Los Angeles at 8:20 am Eastern Time. According to reports and data, a hijacking took place between 08:50:54 and 08:54:11[1] in which the hijackers allegedly crashed the aircraft into the Pentagon at 09:37:45. Reported by CNN, according to Ted Olson, wife Barbara Olson had called him from the reported flight stating, "...all passengers and flight personnel, including the pilots, were herded to the back of the plane by armed hijackers..."[2]. However, according to Flight Data provided by the NTSB, the Flight Deck Door was never opened in flight. How were the hijackers able to gain access to the cockpit, remove the pilots, and navigate the aircraft to the Pentagon if the Flight Deck Door remained closed?[3]

Founded in August 2006, Pilots For 9/11 Truth is a growing organization of aviation professionals from around the globe. The organization has analyzed Data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) for the Pentagon Attack, the events in Shanksville, PA and the World Trade Center attack. The data does not support the government story. The NTSB/FBI refuse to comment. Pilots For 9/11 Truth do not offer theory or point blame at this point in time. However, there is a growing mountain of conflicting information and data in which government agencies and officials along with Mainstream Media refuse to acknowledge. Pilots For 9/11 Truth Core member list continues to grow.

== [3] Right click and save target as here to download csv file with "FLT DECK DOOR" parameter.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 59.

#1. To: rack42 (#0)

Newly decoded data provided by an independent researcher and computer programmer from Australia exposes

No need to read further.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-11-27   21:56:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

No need to read further.

So, how should I interpret that statement? And why don't you say what you mean?

[edit] And why not make plain what you mean.

rack42  posted on  2009-11-27   22:52:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

So, how should I interpret that statement?

"Newly decoded data provided by an independent researcher and computer programmer from Australia exposes alarming evidence "

Opening statement is self explanatory.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-11-27   22:55:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

"Newly decoded data provided by an independent researcher and computer programmer from Australia exposes alarming evidence "

Let me see if I get the reasoning right.

That the data was read and decoded by an independent researcher makes it unworthy of notice"

No one not in the government, or under a government contract, is a credible researcher - particularly independent researchers?

Therefore there is no possibility that the data could be correct?

Makes sense to me. The source of the data does not agree with my prejudices so throw it out without any further examination or cross checking.

After all we all know that 911 was perpetrated my "19ARABSWHOHATEUSCUZWE'REFREE" directed by a madman with his magic cell phone hidden in a secret cave in Tora Bora. You know - the super sophisticated one that was in the Snoozeweak piece on Osama Ben Forgotten's high tech Deathstar Fortress.

Can we say conclusion without examination?

Sure we can.

Wasn't that easy?

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-11-28   12:21:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Wasn't that easy?

OI...

The most egregious attempt to confuse an already confused affair was the eye witness accounts of the aircraft going into the Pentagon.

The government took statements and testimony from 52 people at the scene that saw an aircraft. Twelve of whom identified it as an American airlines plane. They were people unknown to each other and many from foreign countries. Yet toms have been written about an aircraft NOT hitting the Pentagon.

One has to strain mightily to envision getting all of them to lie, all to be there at a precise moment that no one knew. Such as that detracts from all efforts to name the people at the top.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-11-28   16:35:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Wasn't that easy?

OI...

The most egregious attempt to confuse an already confused affair was the eye witness accounts of the aircraft going into the Pentagon.

The government took statements and testimony from 52 people at the scene that saw an aircraft. Twelve of whom identified it as an American airlines plane. They were people unknown to each other and many from foreign countries. Yet toms have been written about an aircraft NOT hitting the Pentagon.

One has to strain mightily to envision getting all of them to lie, all to be there at a precise moment that no one knew. Such as that detracts from all efforts to name the people at the top.

So, one piece of planted disinformation overrules every other piece of information contradicting the Official Fairy Tale®? Without getting off into specific anomalies on the Pentagram strike I will say I do believe something struck the Pentagram. Now whether the airliner or whether the airliner was used as an optical diversion is open as there are too many valid scientific/engineering based arguments - notably that an airliner of that size and wing type would have been unstable at the reported speed and altitude; so unstable that, even assuming it was the airliner, the plane was NOT piloted by a flight school wash-out. Between the lift, and the wingtip vortices formed at that altitude it would have required a Master Pilot to hit THAT target with THAT aircraft. However, the available data is not enough to resolve the question, and the FBI insured that it would not be by collecting every videotape in the area that could have filmed the approach and strike (32 of them) the afternoon of 911. NONE of which have released or returned to their rightful owners 8 years after the event.

My mind is boggled at the reasoning involved, and I don't mean to be insulting, but I simply find it absurd that you would dismiss every other piece of data contrary to the Official Conspiracy Theory©® because of one piece of planted disinformation.

There is little I can say in the face of that because it logically amounts to: My mind is made up now don't confuse me with the facts.

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-11-28   17:08:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

My mind is boggled at the reasoning involved, and I don't mean to be insulting, but I simply find it absurd that you would dismiss every other piece of data contrary to the Official Conspiracy Theory©® because of one piece of planted disinformation.

Going over 9/11, and all of the years, and all of the hundreds of credible doubts espoused by honest people, not ONE fact has been retracted, not one statement by the witnesses has changed.

Not one iota. True or false the government account still stands. I would love to see them eat crow over just one small part of 9/11, but so far that is not happened. Many well intentioned good people have tried.

I am not an expert in anything, being such, I try to take a look at the overall picture and do not involve myself with technical items that are beyond my pay grade.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-11-28   17:43:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#62. To: Cynicom (#59)

Not one iota. True or false the government account still stands.

Not true. No theory is valid unless it accounts for ALL of the data.

Conversely if it does not account for all the data then it is not valid.

There are literally hundreds of outpoints many of which are not in dispute, but merely ignored and avoided. There are in fact so many outpoints and flat contradictions that as much as I have read on the subject it is difficult to remember the details of each and every one - and I have a very good memory.

1. No proven mechanism has ever been given in the Official Conspiracy theory to account for the collapse of WTC 7. The last was so risible that it was laughed at 'round the world. Everywhere except in the controlled Amurkin' Media.

2. No mechanism has ever been proposed, in the Official Conspiracy Theory®, to account for the recovery of molten metal as much as 8 weeks after the collapse of the towers.

3. No credible explanation has ever been given, in the Official Conspiracy Theory®, to account for the stand down of the most sophisticated air defense system on the planet i.e., NORAD. No one in the Military Chain of Command has ever been charged, prosecuted, or in any way condemned or reprimanded for this failure.

The lame excuse was given that they had turned off the transponders (which known incompetent pilots would first have to find and know how to shut them down) but that would not take them off Radar. It would merely eliminate the transmission of their identification. I've operated Radar, am a trained electronics technician, and I can tell you with absolutely certainty that, that explanation is complete and utter bullshit.

4. All pilots are taught a 4 digit emergency hijack code. It takes about 3 seconds to send it. Not one of the 4 aircraft transmitted that code.

5. Multiple Cell Phone Calls were alleged to have been made by low wattage cell phones, through signal attenauting skin of the aircraft, at ten thousand feet, doing 500 miles per hour. The technology to do that was not available at that time. The story has since morphed to "they used the plane's phone" to cover up that impossibility.

6. None of the hijackers was a qualified pilot. In fact they were known incompetents one of which was denied rental of a single engine Cessna because the guy checking him out did not trust his ability to competently handle the plane.

7. How did the FBI know where every video camera that could photograph the approach of the Pentagon Plane? How did they know it quickly enough to have confiscated all 32 tapes by late afternoon on the day of 911?

8. Several of the hijackers were trained at U.S. Military bases. ???

I could go on, but there seems no point. You have a conclusion which no amount of fact will sway.

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-11-28 20:06:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]