See other Dead Constitution Articles
Title: Cartoon Exposes “Hate Crimes” Law Insanity
Source:
David Duke
URL Source: http://www.davidduke.com
Published: Dec 3, 2009
Author: David Duke
Post Date: 2009-12-03 15:06:55 by Prefrontal Vortex
Keywords: None
Views: 103
Comments: 5
A Mallard Fillmore cartoon has caused political controversy among the politically correct, so much so that one of the cartoons’ syndicated publications, Newsday, issued an apology. After all, a large newspaper in America has an obligation to censor anything that challenges the orthodoxies of our times. We can’t have anything in our papers that make us think! To quote Newsday: The cartoon simply makes the point that the idea of classifying crimes as “hate crimes” is ridiculous, for indeed, aren’t all violent crimes, “hate crimes?” Isn’t most murder or assault motivated by “hate.” In the cartoon, the prehistoric victim of the appetite of a Tyrannosaurus Rex feels relief because he will be eaten not because he is certain breed of dinosaur. Of course, a “crime is a crime is a crime” and when one makes certain kinds of thoughts more punishable for the same crime, such laws lead to the Orwellian concept of “thought crimes” and a slippery slope that leads to suppression of our most basic rights. In a way, the words of Newsday show exactly where the concept of “hate crimes” leads, even to a suppressing a cartoon that simply offers a differing opinion. — David Duke
Cartoon Exposes “Hate Crimes” Law Insanity
Newsday issued a statement saying, “we expect the cartoons we publish, many of which are nationally syndicated, to amuse, stir and entertain, but never to offend. Hate crime is a serious issue. This nationally syndicated cartoon should never have run and we have expressed our concern to the syndicator.”
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#0)
I like it. : )
Yeah, David Duke sure is an authority to rely on for hate crimes.
What "hate crime" did David Duke ever commit??
_________________________________________________________________________ You have a point. Probably most black-on-white assaults or murders aren't hate crimes. They're just "chimping out". Just as platonic love is less common among blacks, so is hate, as white men understand the term. I do disagree with that part his piece above. But it's good enough otherwise that I wasn't going to quibble.
If a nation expects to be diverse and free, it expects what never was and never will be.
That means that in the middle of the night when your door is bashed in,you wake from your sleep,dont go for your weapon,Hell you might offend someone or someone could claim even though in self defense you killed the intruder NOT to defend yourself but because you hated intruders.
#2. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#0)
#3. To: Quatermass (#2)
(Edited)
"This man is Jesus,” shouted one man, spilling his Guinness as Barack Obama began his inaugural address. “When will he come to Kenya to save us?”
-Schweizerische Schuetzenzeitung (Swiss Shooting Federation) April, 1941
#4. To: Quatermass (#2)
#5. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#4)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest