[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Nicotine and Fish

Genocide Summer Camp, And Other Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix

This Can Create Endless Green Energy WITHOUT Electricity

Geoengineering: Who’s Behind It and How We Stop It

Pam Bondi Ordered Prosecution of Dr. Kirk Moore After Refusing to Dismiss Case

California woman bombarded with Amazon packages for over a year

CVS ordered to pay $949 MILLION in Medicaid fraud case.

Starmer has signed up to the UNs agreement to raise taxes in the UK

Magic mushrooms may hold the secret to longevity: Psilocybin extends lifespan by 57% in groundbreaking study

Cops favorite AI tool automatically deletes evidence of when AI was used

Leftist Anti ICE Extremist OPENS FIRE On Cops, $50,000 REWARD For Shooter

With great power comes no accountability.

Auto loan debt hits $1.63T. 20% of buyers now pay $1,000+ monthly. Texas delinquency hits 7.92%.

Quotable Quotes from the Chosenites

Tokara Islands NOW crashing into the Ocean ! Mysterious Swarm continues with OVER 1700 Quakes !

Why Austria Is Suddenly Declaring War on Immigration

Rep. Greene Wants To Remove $500 Million in Military Aid for Nuclear-Armed Israel From NDAA

Netanyahu Lays Groundwork for Additional Strikes on Iran: 'We Didn't Deal With The Enriched Uranium'

Sweden Cracks Down On OnlyFans - Will U.S. Follow Suit?

Joe Rogan CALLS OUT Israel's Media CONTROL

Communist Billionaire Accused Of Funding Anti-ICE Riots Mysteriously Vanishes

6 Factors That Describe China's Current State

Trump Thteatens to Bomb Moscow and Beijing

Little Bitty

Vertiv Drops After Amazon Unveils In-House Liquid Cooling System, Marking Pivot To Liquid

17 Out-Of-Place Artifacts That Suggest High-Tech Civilizations Existed Thousands (Or Millions) Of Years Ago

Hamas Still Killing IDF Soldiers After 642 Days

Copper underpins every part of the economy. If you want to destroy the U.S. economy this is how you would do it.

Egyptian Pres. Gamal Abdel Nassers Chilling Decades-Old Prediction About Israel-Palstine Conflict.

Debt jumps $366B in one day.


Miscellaneous
See other Miscellaneous Articles

Title: Palin says questioning Obama’s birth certificate legit
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://rawstory.com/2009/12/palin-questioning-obama/
Published: Dec 5, 2009
Author: Raw Story
Post Date: 2009-12-05 14:21:59 by wudidiz
Keywords: None
Views: 2906
Comments: 183

Palin says questioning Obama’s birth certificate legit

By Raw Story
Friday, December 4th, 2009 -- 8:32 am

Update at bottom: Palin backtracks -- partly -- in Facebook posting

In a radio appearance Thursday, former Alaska governor and GOP vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin said questions about President Obama's birth certificate -- a spurious attempt to argue that he's not a US citizen and thus ineligible for President -- are fair game for debate.

Transcript and video follows.

HUMPHRIES: Sarah Palin here on the Rusty Humphries Show. One of the questions Jason asks is would you make the birth certificate an issue if you ran?

PALIN: I think the public rightly is still making it an issue. I don’t have a problem with that. I don’t know if I would have to bother to make it an issue because I think there are enough members of the electorate that still want answers.

HUMPHRIES: Do you think it’s a fair question to be looking at?

PALIN: I think it’s a fair question just like I think past associations and past voting records. All of that is fair game. You know, I’ve got to tell you too, I think our campaign, the McCain-Palin campaign didn’t do a good enough job in that area. We didn’t call out Obama and some of his associates on their records and what their beliefs were, and perhaps what their future plans were, and I don’t think that was fair to voters to not have done our job as candidates and a campaign to bring to light a lot of things that now we’re seeing manifest in the administration.

HUMPHRIES: I mean, truly if your past is fair game and your kids are fair game, certainly Obama’s past should be. I mean, we want to treat men and women equally, right?

PALIN: Hey, you know, that’s a great point. And that weird conspiracy theory freaky thing that people talk about that Trig isn’t my real son, and a lot of people that went "Well, you need to produce his birth certificate, you need to prove that he’s your kid," which we have done, but yeah, so maybe we can reverse that, and use the same [inaudible] thinking on the other one.

UPDATE

Following her radio interview comments about Obama's birth certificate, Sarah Palin backtracked -- partly -- in a posting to her Facebook page late Wednesday night.

"At no point ... have I asked the president to produce his birth certificate or suggested that he was not born in the United States," Palin wrote in a posting she titled "Stupid conspiracies."

The full statement reads:

Voters have every right to ask candidates for information if they so choose. I’ve pointed out that it was seemingly fair game during the 2008 election for many on the left to badger my doctor and lawyer for proof that Trig is in fact my child. Conspiracy-minded reporters and voters had a right to ask... which they have repeatedly. But at no point – not during the campaign, and not during recent interviews – have I asked the president to produce his birth certificate or suggested that he was not born in the United States.

(1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 80.

#20. To: wudidiz (#0)

I think our campaign, the McCain-Palin campaign didn’t do a good enough job in that area. We didn’t call out Obama and some of his associates on their records and what their beliefs were, and perhaps what their future plans were, and I don’t think that was fair to voters to not have done our job as candidates and a campaign to bring to light a lot of things that now we’re seeing manifest in the administration.

The whole political establishment was ballless in 2008.

Obama lied throughout the campaign - and no one laid a glove on him but Palin.

I see no one other then Palin, who will tackle the Jewish machine that put Obama in office.

Go Sarah!

your_neighbor  posted on  2009-12-05   18:45:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: your_neighbor (#20)

I see no one other then Palin, who will tackle the Jewish machine that put Obama in office.

They own her too.

wudidiz  posted on  2009-12-05   19:25:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: wudidiz (#22)

I see no one other then Palin, who will tackle the Jewish machine that put Obama in office.

They own her too.

Then why is she attacking thier boy?

your_neighbor  posted on  2009-12-05   20:45:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: your_neighbor (#29)

Then why is she attacking thier boy?

All part of the charade, I guess.

wudidiz  posted on  2009-12-05   20:54:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: wudidiz (#31)

Then why is she attacking thier boy?

All part of the charade, I guess.

So is it good that she is attacking Obama - or bad??

It does seem to matter.

your_neighbor  posted on  2009-12-05   21:10:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: your_neighbor (#33)

It does seem to matter.

To who? It's a diversion that gets her base giddy. It's a diversion that gets her opposition frothing at the mouth. It's a dog and pony show. It's not as if this issue will go anywhere....lol. And it's not as if there isn't a mountain of salient issues Saint Sarah could address, although without the same giddy and frothy responses from the overly emotional true believers.

abraxas  posted on  2009-12-05   21:51:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: abraxas (#39)

It does seem to matter.

To who? It's a diversion that gets her base giddy.

Hmm?

What about her ‘Boycott Copenhagen’ because of ‘Climategate’ remarks?

What about her “death panel” remarks?

Do these matter to more then her base?

Were they not of value?

your_neighbor  posted on  2009-12-05   22:14:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: your_neighbor (#42) (Edited)

What about her ‘Boycott Copenhagen’ because of ‘Climategate’ remarks?

What about her “death panel” remarks?

Do these matter to more then her base?

Were they not of value?

All of these statements matter to the same two camps: her true believing base and her frothing at the mouth opposition. Were these statement of value to those outside the true believer camps? I don't think so.

Do you really think it mattered an iota to your average independent or libertarian?

The way Palin makes her statements is taken directly from Edward Bernays' playbook. He was the father of public relations (coined the term because people felt a negative connotation for propaganda) He new that you sold issues and people and anything under the sun, not with logic but with emotion.

Every statement Saint Sarah makes must contain loaded words. She can't open her mouth without them. IMO, you are making the mistake of allowing an emotional response to what she says without consideration of the content or intent. But, that's how she gets so much media attention, that's how she gets the base giddy, that's how she gets her opposition frothing--it's really quite a PR circus if you step back and evaluate what people say about her and what Saint Sarah says to attain the desired response.

abraxas  posted on  2009-12-05   22:27:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: abraxas (#43)

The way Palin makes her statements is taken directly from Edward Bernays' playbook. He was the father of public relations (coined the term because people felt a negative connotation for propaganda) He new that you sold issues and people and anything under the sun, not with logic but with emotion.

So Palin is guilty of throwing red meat to the lions – oh NO not that!

The problem for her opponents is that what she throws sticks to the ribs!

There is truth to what she says – the other side is lying when it says there will be no death panels – when they say climate change is going to raise the sea levels ten feet – when they say Obama is a legitimate middle of the road American.

Some of all of this is sticking to America’s ribs.

NO one else is saying these things with the same effect --- Thank you Sarah!

your_neighbor  posted on  2009-12-05   23:54:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: your_neighbor (#67) (Edited)

There is truth to what she says – the other side is lying when it says there will be no death panels – when they say climate change is going to raise the sea levels ten feet – when they say Obama is a legitimate middle of the road American.

Your statements just show how out of touch you people are.

There is going to be change. The earth will change, along with the people inhabiting it. There will be more changes that are going to become more radical and more accelerated as time goes on.

The people who most resist change, who think that someone like Mommy Palin will protect them from needing to adapt, are going to get swept away by it.

AGAviator  posted on  2009-12-06   0:06:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#70. To: AGAviator (#68)

The people who most resist change, who think that someone like Mommy Palin will protect them from needing to adapt, are going to get swept away by it.

You are talking about the Jewish - right!

your_neighbor  posted on  2009-12-06   0:12:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: your_neighbor (#70) (Edited)

Now that you mention it, there is quite a lot of resistance to doing things differently surrounding that enclave and the people who support it.

But I find it quite telling that the best the conservatives can do for leadership in these tumultuous times is a superficial, 40ish female who bounced around between 5 different colleges in 6 years when she was younger.

AGAviator  posted on  2009-12-06   0:21:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: AGAviator (#71) (Edited)

But I find it quite telling that the best the conservatives can do for leadership in these tumultuous times is a superficial, 40ish female who bounced around between 5 different colleges in 6 years when she was younger.

I like it that Sarah has little in common with a bunch of pseudo-intellectual North East trash.

You want to see people who knuckle under to the Jewish gutter -- then look at the North East!

Harvard is the center of the Jewish sewer.

your_neighbor  posted on  2009-12-06   0:52:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#77. To: your_neighbor (#74)

Notice the complete omission of substance regarding her position, a mantra is repeated over and over with no logic or reasoning or insight....and this stance is as firm today as it was when she was campaiging with McCain.

abraxas  posted on  2009-12-06   1:12:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#80. To: abraxas (#77)

Notice the complete omission of substance regarding her position, a mantra is repeated over and over with no logic or reasoning or insight....and this stance is as firm today as it was when she was campaiging with McCain.

"Substance" on Israel, give us a break - who dares to speak substance on Israel - speaking substance on Israel means you must fall on your political sword. Sarah is not that dumb (along with 100% of the world's Western politicians).

your_neighbor  posted on  2009-12-06   1:36:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 80.

#85. To: your_neighbor (#80) (Edited)

"Substance" on Israel, give us a break - who dares to speak substance on Israel - speaking substance on Israel means you must fall on your political sword. Sarah is not that dumb (along with 100% of the world's Western politicians).

Bovine Excrement!!

This nation is so conditioned to the two party fraud they refuse to listen to a candidate who actually speaks with any substance on the topic.

Notice how Nader is being asked to not run? Notice how he actually speaks to the issue with knowledge, intellect and logic? Nader wasn't my choice, but he sure as hell offered substance on this issue. Blows your 100% all to pieces.

Sarah Palin simly has no substance to offer. If she refuses to speak with any substance on an issue simply to save herself from falling on a political sword, then she sure as hell isn't the image that she is selling to the plain folks, is she?

I'm not a Nader supporter, but I admire his conviction and willingness to state the truth rather than save his political image like Sarah Palin does.

This is a sad commentary, you are so conditioned to politicians saving face and keeping up with perception management that you no longer expect any truth or substance out of them. No wonder this nation is in the sorry state of corruption and ignorance that it is in today.

abraxas  posted on  2009-12-06 01:46:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 80.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]