Title: CIA Torture Jet crashed with 4 Tons of COCAINE Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Dec 11, 2007 Author:danostamper714 Post Date:2009-12-06 19:48:23 by Itistoolate Keywords:None Views:175 Comments:3
A Gulfstream II jet that crash landed in Mexico's Yucatan Peninsula in late September bearing a load of nearly four tons of cocaine. This particular Gulfstream II (tail number N987SA), was used between 2003 and 2005 by the CIA for at least three trips between the U.S. east coast and Guantanamo Bay home to the infamous "terrorist" prison camp according to a number of press reports.
I found this at: http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/12/15/cia-torture-jet-wrecks-with-4-tons-of- cocaine/
Here are the problems Dvorak Uncensored has with this Daily Kos post. First of all where exactly are the tail numbers? There is not one picture that shows them. And with a messy crash like this why wasnt coke splattered all over the place. All the bags remain intact it seems. Thats weird. And do we see even one bag cut open? Why not? There is something extremely fishy about this story. Finally with such an experienced pilot how did he run low on fuel? How does that happen to a seasoned CIA pro? And, of course, why hasnt the major media done anything at all with the story? As for the supposedly disappearing coke how about this for an idea. Since the useful load capacity of a G-5 is 6500 pounds (3.25 tons) people are trying to match the story to the reality of the plane. Oh wait this was a Gulfstream II!! That has a maximum payload of 5456 pounds or 2.725 tons. Watch how the number goes down further!
Let us get this straight. We're going to pass a health care plan written by a committee whose head says he doesn't understand it, passed by a Congress that hasn't read it but exempts themselves from it, signed by a president that also hasn't read it and who smokes, with funding administered by a treasury chief who didn't pay his taxes, overseen by a surgeon general who is obese, and financed by a country that's nearly broke. What could possibly go wrong?