[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

‘Knucklehead’: Tim Walz returns to Minnesota ‘defeated'

Study Confirms the Awesome Destructive Power of Sugar in Utero Originally published via Armageddon Prose:

Ukraine mobilizing mentally challenged and deaf people lawmaker

COL. Douglas Macgregor : Trump and Netanyahu At Crossroads

.': Parisians Revolt Against Israeli Minister's Visit As Riots Grip Amsterdam

US Confirms Israel Will Face No Consequences for Not Improving Aid Situation in Gaza

Judge rules AstraZeneca, other COVID jab makers NOT immune from injury claims for breach of contract

Israel knew October 7th was going to happen

One of the World’s Richest Men is Moving to America After Trump’s Landslide Victory

Taiwan has a better voting system than America

Donald Trump on Tuesday nominated veteran, author, and Fox News host Pete Hegseth as the Secretary of Defense

"Warrior For Truth & Honesty" - Trump Names John Ratcliffe As CIA Director

"The Manhattan Project" Of Our Time: Musk And Vivek Ramaswamy To Head Department Of Government Efficiency (DOGE)

Trump, Rogan and French Fries at MsDonalds

President Trump wants a 10% cap on all credit card interest rates

Senator Ted Cruz STUNS the Entire Congress With This POWERFUL Speech (On the Border)

Kash Patel, Trump’s top choice for CIA Director, wants to immediately release classified

The £4 supplement that could slash blood pressure - reducing stroke, dementia and heart attack risk

RFK Jr. to be involved in oversight of health and agriculture departments under second Trump admin

​​​​​​​"Keep Grinding": Elon Musk's America PAC Will Continue Anti-Soros Push Ahead Of Special Elections & Midterms

Johnny B Goode

Russian Hypersonic Advances Remain Beyond Western Reach

US Preps for War vs China, Dusts-Off Deserted WWII Air Bases

Spain on high alert as deadly storms loom: new flood risks in Barcelona, Majorca, Ibiza.

U.S. Publication Foreign Policy Says NATO Knows Ukraine Is Losing The War

Red Lobster and TGI Fridays are closing. Heres whats moving in

The United Nations is again warning of imminent famine in northern Gaza.

Israeli Drone Attack Targets Aid Distribution Center in Syria

Trump's new Cabinet picks, a Homan tribute, and Lizzo's giant toddler hand [Livestream in progress]

Russia and Iran Officially Link Their National Banking Systems


ObamaNation
See other ObamaNation Articles

Title: Who'll stop the snow?
Source: townhall.com
URL Source: http://townhall.com/columnists/Paul ... 2009/12/20/wholl_stop_the_snow
Published: Dec 20, 2009
Author: Paul Jacob
Post Date: 2009-12-20 08:42:26 by Eric Stratton
Keywords: None
Views: 563
Comments: 55

Who'll stop the snow?
Paul Jacob
Sunday, December 20, 2009

People express this simple fact with markedly different emphasis and emotion. With joy, my 10-year old screeches it at the top of her lungs. My wife mutters it as if an invading army had just crossed the Potomac — perhaps from Copenhagen, where they had huddled to “do something” about the climate.

This current burst of precipitation is no light dusting: We’ve received more than a foot of snow, and it’s still coming down, the air full of the swirling white stuff.

I like snow. It excites me — in some part because I’m slow to appreciate new realities. I react just as I did in school (more than three decades ago): That is, a miracle has occurred, preventing the cruel teacher, world, you-name-it, from controlling my life as previously planned.

But I’m not a schoolboy anymore. Snow or no snow, I have a column due Saturday evening, and so I must write. Yet, how can anyone sit still in their basement to write when snow pours out of the sky above?

The fond memories of sledding with my daughters over the years, and making snowmen, cross my mind. I don’t even object to shoveling. It’s hard work, but it is also good exercise, leaving one with a firm sense of satisfaction, provided one avoids keeling over from a heart attack.

Minutes ago I could have been found shoveling the driveway and the walk, and cleaning off the cars. The snow was coming down faster than I could shovel it out of the way, so I gave up.

I guess “I can’t get me no satisfaction,” at least not until the snow lets up. But there is some serenity: I can easily accept that Mother Nature is more powerful than I am. (It’s an ancient wisdom: Do not fret about what you have no control over.) And there is nothing anyone can do about it — not President Obama, the federal Congress, the Supreme Court or the United Nations.

For someone who perhaps works too much and plays too little, snow — especially a blizzard — reminds me that sometimes life tosses out curve balls, and that, when that happens, you have to go with the pitch. Hoping for a fastball right down the middle — or protesting the pitch — won’t stop it from breaking across the plate for a strike.

Or help you hit it.

So it is with snow. The flakes are like little whispers that “we’re not in control,” which is scary. But the message is reassuring, too, in signaling that the blowhards on television aren’t in control, either.

It’s often said that timing is everything. I note this East Coast snow storm coincides with the end of the U.N. Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen.

In Copenhagen, the governments of 193 nations met to dicker over how to control the planet’s weather. On the last day of the event, President Barack Obama proclaimed a “meaningful and unprecedented breakthrough” as the United States, China, Brazil, India and South Africa agreed to a deal whereby developed countries will list voluntary emissions targets and wealthier countries pledged monetary aid to assist poorer countries in dealing with global warming.

The Boston Globe reported that the accord was “not legally binding” and “falls short of even the most timid expectations of what would come out of the much-anticipated talks.” Obama himself admitted that this agreement “will not be sufficient” to micromanage the global thermostat or avoid the most serious effects of climate change.

The Obama-negotiated deal attempts to limit global warming through the end of the 21st century to no more than 2 degrees Celsius over pre-industrial times, while some climate scientists now predict the rise will be 3 to 7 degrees.

Will it work? Can governments around the world concentrate enough knowledge and direct enough sheer force — and, with it, muster up enough compliance — to manage the climate?

Folks in Washington and Copenhagen say “Yes.” Folks shoveling the snow on my block think Mother Nature is not so easily legislated.

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 33.

#4. To: Eric Stratton (#0)

Global Warming is a fact. Get over your idealistic and defensive posture.

buckeroo  posted on  2009-12-20   15:19:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: buckeroo (#4)

Global Warming is a fact.

Yeah, yeah. Now why not yammer about how "the science is settled" like Al Gore? Even in the face of the fraud that has been perpetrated with the missing, deleted emails and how it has been shown that they had to "fudge the facts" to make their "science" fit their theory?

James Deffenbach  posted on  2009-12-20   15:46:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: James Deffenbach (#5)

Al Gore and all the politicians claiming fame don't influence my opinions; I regard these monsters as the scum of the Earth. But, it is inarguable that the Earth's average temperature is rising. With rising temperatures we are going to experience incredible changes in our own individual lifestyles. When government attempts methods of regulation of any issue, we are doomed.

buckeroo  posted on  2009-12-20   15:53:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: buckeroo (#6)

But, it is inarguable that the Earth's average temperature is rising.

Please elaborate on how it is inarguable that the earth's temperature is rising. Follow by explaining what the source of the warming is, then explain the Medieval Warm Period, where there wasn't a diesel engine to be found.

Your appeal to authority is unconvincing.

echo5sierra  posted on  2009-12-20   17:42:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: echo5sierra (#7)

Your appeal to authority is unconvincing.

ROTFL.

buckeroo  posted on  2009-12-20   23:32:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: buckeroo, echo5sierra, all (#12)

Where is the evidence?

He is right. An appeal to authority in a scientific argument is never valid.

The data, measurements, and observations are at the heart of matters.

No data = no valid argument.

We know now that the data coming out of the CRU was cooked and cherry picked to fit the hypothesis not the hypothesis formulated to fit the data. Glowbull Warming is a scam which is being pushed to enrich, and increase the power of, the usual suspects.

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-12-20   23:44:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Original_Intent (#13)

Get out of your Lazy-Boy chair, OI. I want no such thing as government intervention of and/or about global warming phenomena much-less anything else. HELL, the rat bastards in Congress can't even decide how much they want to pay themselves while stripping every man, woman and child of their own dignity.

Global Warming is a fact. And no legislative effort can stop the phenomena. Perhaps when the human population stops climbing geometrically, we can see some positive changes.

buckeroo  posted on  2009-12-20   23:52:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: buckeroo (#14)

Asserting that something is a "fact" does not make it "a fact". Only evidence, cold hard data can do that. The evidence for Glowbull warming is the null set. The climate readings for the last ten years when you do not use the cooked data of CRU show averages within the norm. The "scientists" who have been heralding Glowbull Warming are now shown to be liars, cheats, and frauds. The Glowbull Warming hypothesis is NOT supported by the data.

I'm not trying to play "me right" "you wrong". I go where the data takes me not what I am told to believe.

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-12-21   0:05:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Original_Intent (#15)

Do you think that I dismiss "facts" as the common layman? The phenomena is not a political issue based upon some Washington DC politician's opinion or even their electorate's opinions.

The world is dying: even the resources that once shaped America's incredible rise upon the world's political landscape are diminishing.

buckeroo  posted on  2009-12-21   0:13:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: buckeroo (#16)

The world is dying: even the resources that once shaped America's incredible rise upon the world's political landscape are diminishing.

You are still making unproven assertions. You haven't explained the facts/proof behind your assertion that the earth is warming. Now I will assume you are referring to oil with this sentence above concerning the world's diminishing resources.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/09/090910084259.htm

http://www.enviroliteracy.org/article.php/1130.html

Please read these articles and consider the alternative: oil and hydrocarbons are abiotic. We know, for example, that Neptune, Jupiter and Saturn are gas giants, filled with hydrocarbons such as methane. Where did the methane and other hydrocarbons come from?

echo5sierra  posted on  2009-12-21   0:37:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: echo5sierra (#17)

As long as the world's population continues to expand (it is over 6.5Bn right now) the world's natural resources shall decline.

What is so hard to believe is that there are folks on these chit-chat boards that believe there is an infinite amount of resources. Where do these silly ideas come from?

buckeroo  posted on  2009-12-21   0:48:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: buckeroo (#19)

What is so hard to believe is that there are folks on these chit-chat boards that believe there is an infinite amount of resources. Where do these silly ideas come from?

Why are they silly? It is rather arrogant of you to denounce out of hand the abiotic theory. Did you read either of the articles or consider the Jovian dilemma? As far as we know, there are no dinosaurs or biomass on Jupiter, so where did the hydrocarbons come from?

As far as the world's population increasing, 7 billion people could easily fit in the state of Texas with plenty of room for each person. The overpopulation myth is just that.

The chart you posted, where does the data that populates the chart come from? If it comes from HadCrut or NASA it is tainted and can not be relied upon, and I doubt anyone on this forum will lend it any credence whatsoever.

echo5sierra  posted on  2009-12-21   0:58:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: echo5sierra (#22)

As far as the world's population increasing, 7 billion people could easily fit in the state of Texas with plenty of room for each person. The overpopulation myth is just that.

I have heard this silly and preposterous argument way too often to even consider it plausible. Are you aware of what happens to individual rights when you pack piles of people together? The Earth can not sustain the ever increasing population base of humanity. And governments can't work out the issues either so forget your tooth faerie helping out in a pinch.

buckeroo  posted on  2009-12-21   1:04:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: buckeroo (#25)

I have heard this silly and preposterous argument way too often to even consider it plausible. Are you aware of what happens to individual rights when you pack piles of people together? The Earth can not sustain the ever increasing population base of humanity. And governments can't work out the issues either so forget your tooth faerie helping out in a pinch.

I am not advocating we do that. All I am saying is that the earth is NOT overpopulated.

Care to take a stab at my other questions?

echo5sierra  posted on  2009-12-21   1:09:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: buckeroo (#30)

The Earth can not sustain the ever increasing population base of humanity.

So when are you checking out? You must do your part for Earth. Or are you just a hypocrite? You overpopulation wackos need to do us all a favor, go to the moon. :)

RickyJ  posted on  2009-12-21   1:18:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 33.

        There are no replies to Comment # 33.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 33.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]