[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

BBC Under Fire for CENSORING Gaza Medic Documentary US is Agreement Incapable Blow to Israeli Intelligence. taping Israelis in bathrooms “They have 500 mRNA shots in the pipeline.” A US federal judge has DENIED Gavin Newsom's request to stop Trump from using the National Guard in Los Angeles. Have You Noticed That Seismic Activity Has Been Going Nuts All Over The Globe The Vax was meant to CAUSE cancer.... listen to this - this clip from RFK Jr's site CNN Immediately Cuts Off Panelist Who Tells the Truth About the LA Riots Army Secretary declares war on the military industrial complex Former Israeli PM Threatens U.S. Will Get 'A Re-Run Of 9-11' If It Doesn't Fight Israel's Wars 7 Examples Of The “Mostly Peaceful” Los Angeles Riots Becoming Even More “Peaceful” Biden Admin and ActBlue Funded Group Behind Abolish ICE Protests in LA Murderers, rapists, gang members: ICE busts 12 of LA's 'worst' illegal alien criminals amid riots LA Mayor Karen Bass Threatens Feds: Withdraw From LA Or the Violence Will Escalate – Woman points gun at police and finds out EXCLUSIVE: Rep. Ronny Jackson Accuses Biden Doctor Kevin O’Connor Of Sexual Misconduct WHAT YOU’RE WITNESSING IN LOS ANGELES ISN’T JUST UNREST—IT’S MORAL COLLAPSE Anna Paulina Luna Exposes the Guy Behind the Anti-ICE Riots Mike Huckabee Working To Keep Netanyahu in Power Israeli Military and Israeli-Backed Gang Shoot Aid Seekers in Gaza, Killing 14 Only 68 Building Permits Issued for Pacific Palisades After Wildfires Destroyed 6800 Structures Violent Rioters Fire Off Exploding Projectiles at Police Horses Use Fireworks and Explosives to Attack Police ICE Just Shattered Records With One Massive Operation That Has Democrats Fuming Nolte: Insurrectionist Democrats Plan Another Summer of Blue City-Riots Violent riots have now been reported in over 30 American cities. Heres a full list: Mass shooter opened fire at graduation party was an migrant who was busted in LA ICE raids: Cash Jordan: ICE Raids Home Depot... as California Collapses Silver Is Finally Soaring: Here's Why New 4um Interface Coming Soon Attack of the Dead-2025.

Neocon Nuttery
See other Neocon Nuttery Articles

Title: 46% Say Airport Security Procedures Not Strict Enough [Pinch Up!]
Source: Rasmussen Reports
URL Source: http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub ... y_procedures_not_strict_enough
Published: Dec 31, 2009
Author: N/A
Post Date: 2009-12-31 11:46:22 by Eric Stratton
Keywords: None
Views: 1872
Comments: 30

46% Say Airport Security Procedures Not Strict Enough
Monday, December 28, 2009

Following the failed terrorist attempt to blow up an airliner landing in Detroit on Christmas Day, Americans are a lot less critical of airport security procedures.

In fact, a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 46% of U.S. voters believe current airport security procedures are not strict enough, a 13-point increase from April 2008. Just 11% say they are too strict.

Thirty-seven percent (37%) of voters believe the current level of airport security is about right. Women feel more strongly than men that U.S. airport security procedures are not strict enough.

Republicans are more inclined to agree than Democrats and voters not affiliated with either major party.

Click for Full Text!

Poster Comment:

If "health care" could get passed on half the support, pinch up that sphincter!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 12.

#7. To: Eric Stratton (#0)

Americans are a lot less critical of airport security procedures

Stop the insanity!! Yeah, more goobermint restrictions will save the day. That's the ticket. More waste and delay. Bring on the bogus security schmucks peeking into our luggage and conducting full body scans will do the trick. Take your shoes off, leave your shampoo at home and lick nanny state boots.

Solve this issue with simplicity. Every pilot packing heat and schooled in using his/her firearm. I'd even go so far as arming the stewardesses. Cheaper and far more effective than adding on more nanny state to regulate the majority of law abiding citizens.

abraxas  posted on  2009-12-31   15:52:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Solve this issue with simplicity. Every pilot packing heat and schooled in using his/her firearm. I'd even go so far as arming the stewardesses. Cheaper and far more effective than adding on more nanny state to regulate the majority of law abiding citizens.

Why just arm the flight attendants? I believe that anyone who can legally own a gun--21 or older, no criminal record and no record of mental illness--should be allowed to bring their own handgun on a plane. It was not all that many years ago that they could. Just in my lifetime you could order guns through the mail and no one thought anything of it.

James Deffenbach  posted on  2009-12-31   16:01:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Why just arm the flight attendants? I believe that anyone who can legally own a gun--21 or older, no criminal record and no record of mental illness--should be allowed to bring their own handgun on a plane. It was not all that many years ago that they could. Just in my lifetime you could order guns through the mail and no one thought anything of it.

Because I believe that a private airline has a right to defend their property as they see fit. Arming the employees is the best way to accomplish this goal. They fly inter-state and international where the CCW laws no longer apply for the average citizen. Also, they would need to have bullets that can kill but not blow a hole in the plane--special order. Your average Joe would not have this sort of bullet handy, nor even be aware of the dangers of blowing a hole in the plane.

I'm for my 2A all the way, James. You know that. But, let's face it, not all who carry are bright enough to be trusted at 30K feet in an aircraft because they will not necessarily understand that the bullet in the pistol could bring that plane down.

abraxas  posted on  2009-12-31   16:23:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

a private airline has a right to defend their property as they see fit

After 9/11, didn't many airlines take bigtime $ from Congress to keep them out of banqruptcy? Those that did so are no longer "private" airlines. Also airlines require licensing by the FAA so they need to abide by gov't requirements or licensing might become a hassle.

That's not to justify gov't meddling in private airlines' business but only to point out why airlines "choose" to comply with gov't regs and requirements.

scrapper2  posted on  2009-12-31   16:49:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#13. To: scrapper2 (#12)

After 9/11, didn't many airlines take bigtime $ from Congress to keep them out of banqruptcy? Those that did so are no longer "private" airlines

I forgot about that hand out, Scrapper. So many hand outs, so little time. What the hell is still private anymore? We should have let them all fail and refused to subsidize.....but that's just not the Fascist Way.

abraxas  posted on  2009-12-31 16:55:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]