[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Tulsi Gabbard Warns of “Nuclear Holocaust” in Chilling 3-Minute Plea LBMA Silver Short Position Now 2nd Largest In History Chumbawamba - Tubthumping Something BIG is happening right now in the Middle East, Israel ready to attack Iran AMERICA ON FIRE: Riots & Chaos as Trump Quadruples ICE Raids! THE BANKRUPTCY OF THE UNITED STATES (Emergency Banking Act) In France, young women are starting to buy pet pigs to avoid being harassed by Muslim men Elderly Veteran kills 3 Home Invaders Number One Longevity Food Inflation Highest In Democrat States, Lowest In Republican Deep South TikToker admits to being paid $150 a day to protest Trump’s deportation policies in LA A GREAT update on the Trump fraud case ($454.2 million judgment) at the appellate court. Mexican Senate President Revives Territorial Claims Amid Los Angeles Civil Unrest Rooftop Korean' issues chilling threat about LA's future 30 years after Rodney King riots Bystanders jump in front of ICE vehicles with arrested migrants inside Israeli companies struggling to find customers amid Gaza genocide: Farmers are being pressured to sell their land to this. Not good! Palantir EXPOSED: The New Deep State Military Overview: Ukrainian Fronts Crumble Under Multi-Axis Assault ICE prepares full assault on five Democrat cities as LA goes into lockdown amid immigration riots Invisible Missile Triggers MILITARY PANIC! (This is the Russian Zircon) Mass arrests as defiant immigration protesters ignore lockdown orders in LA Visit California: It's America's Future FBI Director Kash Patel sues MSNBC columnist Frank Figliuzzi The Ukraine war did not "bleed out" Russia. It bled US taxpayers America Is Full. Time To Close The Door. Golden Dome Idiocy Israeli Media: Trump Told Netanyahu To Permanently End War in Gaza 21 days left till BASEL III is implemented. VIDEO EXPLANATION China’s bottom half holds twice the wealth of America’s.

Neocon Nuttery
See other Neocon Nuttery Articles

Title: 46% Say Airport Security Procedures Not Strict Enough [Pinch Up!]
Source: Rasmussen Reports
URL Source: http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub ... y_procedures_not_strict_enough
Published: Dec 31, 2009
Author: N/A
Post Date: 2009-12-31 11:46:22 by Eric Stratton
Keywords: None
Views: 1883
Comments: 30

46% Say Airport Security Procedures Not Strict Enough
Monday, December 28, 2009

Following the failed terrorist attempt to blow up an airliner landing in Detroit on Christmas Day, Americans are a lot less critical of airport security procedures.

In fact, a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 46% of U.S. voters believe current airport security procedures are not strict enough, a 13-point increase from April 2008. Just 11% say they are too strict.

Thirty-seven percent (37%) of voters believe the current level of airport security is about right. Women feel more strongly than men that U.S. airport security procedures are not strict enough.

Republicans are more inclined to agree than Democrats and voters not affiliated with either major party.

Click for Full Text!

Poster Comment:

If "health care" could get passed on half the support, pinch up that sphincter!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 21.

#7. To: Eric Stratton (#0)

Americans are a lot less critical of airport security procedures

Stop the insanity!! Yeah, more goobermint restrictions will save the day. That's the ticket. More waste and delay. Bring on the bogus security schmucks peeking into our luggage and conducting full body scans will do the trick. Take your shoes off, leave your shampoo at home and lick nanny state boots.

Solve this issue with simplicity. Every pilot packing heat and schooled in using his/her firearm. I'd even go so far as arming the stewardesses. Cheaper and far more effective than adding on more nanny state to regulate the majority of law abiding citizens.

abraxas  posted on  2009-12-31   15:52:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Solve this issue with simplicity. Every pilot packing heat and schooled in using his/her firearm. I'd even go so far as arming the stewardesses. Cheaper and far more effective than adding on more nanny state to regulate the majority of law abiding citizens.

Why just arm the flight attendants? I believe that anyone who can legally own a gun--21 or older, no criminal record and no record of mental illness--should be allowed to bring their own handgun on a plane. It was not all that many years ago that they could. Just in my lifetime you could order guns through the mail and no one thought anything of it.

James Deffenbach  posted on  2009-12-31   16:01:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Why just arm the flight attendants? I believe that anyone who can legally own a gun--21 or older, no criminal record and no record of mental illness--should be allowed to bring their own handgun on a plane. It was not all that many years ago that they could. Just in my lifetime you could order guns through the mail and no one thought anything of it.

Because I believe that a private airline has a right to defend their property as they see fit. Arming the employees is the best way to accomplish this goal. They fly inter-state and international where the CCW laws no longer apply for the average citizen. Also, they would need to have bullets that can kill but not blow a hole in the plane--special order. Your average Joe would not have this sort of bullet handy, nor even be aware of the dangers of blowing a hole in the plane.

I'm for my 2A all the way, James. You know that. But, let's face it, not all who carry are bright enough to be trusted at 30K feet in an aircraft because they will not necessarily understand that the bullet in the pistol could bring that plane down.

abraxas  posted on  2009-12-31   16:23:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I'm for my 2A all the way, James. You know that. But, let's face it, not all who carry are bright enough to be trusted at 30K feet in an aircraft because they will not necessarily understand that the bullet in the pistol could bring that plane down.

I used to be a member of another board and we had at least one member who was a pilot--if I remember correctly either FED EX or UPS--and he said that people who thought you could bring down a plane with a bullet from a handgun, with what he laughingly called "explosive decompression," had been watching too many James Bond movies. I wish I had copied and kept his post but I just have it in my memory. If I am remembering his post correctly he said that there was a little hole in the fuselage of the plane, in the area of the cockpit, and that they propped it open with a pencil or something when they wanted to smoke.

But I would certainly agree that the pilots and flight attendants should be armed. I don't know why anyone should have to give up the right to defend themselves because of the method of transportation they choose.

James Deffenbach  posted on  2009-12-31   16:37:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I used to be a member of another board and we had at least one member who was a pilot--if I remember correctly either FED EX or UPS--and he said that people who thought you could bring down a plane with a bullet from a handgun, with what he laughingly called "explosive decompression," had been watching too many James Bond movies.

Correct.

During our adventure in the jungle I did enough dollar and dime repairs on the skins of C-130s to assure you that a round though the skin will NOT down a plane.

There can be problems if a round strikes an electrical or hydraulic line. But nothing to make the plane fall from the sky like a rock.

Lod  posted on  2009-12-31   17:10:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Correct.

lol.....I've been duped by Goldfinger.

I'd like to dedicate this song.........

abraxas  posted on  2009-12-31   17:15:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

lol.....I've been duped by Goldfinger.

We all make mistakes.

James Deffenbach  posted on  2009-12-31   17:22:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Unless hit with a SAM, or more serious weapon, our aircraft are pretty resilient vessels.

A pistol will not, in 99.999p/c of the times bring one down.

Lod  posted on  2009-12-31   20:58:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Unless hit with a SAM, or more serious weapon, our aircraft are pretty resilient vessels.

That's why a lot of this bs at the airport doesn't make a lot of sense. A real terrorist with connections could get a stinger, never set foot on airport property, and blow a plane out of the sky.

James Deffenbach  posted on  2009-12-31   21:04:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

A real terrorist with connections could get a stinger, never set foot on airport property, and blow a plane out of the sky.

Or on the ground.

This TSA/DHS crap is for the truly weak-minded among us.

How many billions of dollars each year is this goofiness costing us?

Lod  posted on  2009-12-31   21:50:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#22. To: Lod (#21)

How many billions of dollars each year is this goofiness costing us?

Way too much and it is all just as useless as the government itself.

James Deffenbach  posted on  2009-12-31 21:51:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]