[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Nicotine and Fish Genocide Summer Camp, And Other Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix This Can Create Endless Green Energy WITHOUT Electricity Geoengineering: Who’s Behind It and How We Stop It Pam Bondi Ordered Prosecution of Dr. Kirk Moore After Refusing to Dismiss Case California woman bombarded with Amazon packages for over a year CVS ordered to pay $949 MILLION in Medicaid fraud case. Starmer has signed up to the UNs agreement to raise taxes in the UK Magic mushrooms may hold the secret to longevity: Psilocybin extends lifespan by 57% in groundbreaking study Cops favorite AI tool automatically deletes evidence of when AI was used Leftist Anti ICE Extremist OPENS FIRE On Cops, $50,000 REWARD For Shooter With great power comes no accountability. Auto loan debt hits $1.63T. 20% of buyers now pay $1,000+ monthly. Texas delinquency hits 7.92%. Quotable Quotes from the Chosenites Tokara Islands NOW crashing into the Ocean ! Mysterious Swarm continues with OVER 1700 Quakes ! Why Austria Is Suddenly Declaring War on Immigration Rep. Greene Wants To Remove $500 Million in Military Aid for Nuclear-Armed Israel From NDAA Netanyahu Lays Groundwork for Additional Strikes on Iran: 'We Didn't Deal With The Enriched Uranium' Sweden Cracks Down On OnlyFans - Will U.S. Follow Suit? Joe Rogan CALLS OUT Israel's Media CONTROL Communist Billionaire Accused Of Funding Anti-ICE Riots Mysteriously Vanishes 6 Factors That Describe China's Current State Trump Thteatens to Bomb Moscow and Beijing Little Bitty Vertiv Drops After Amazon Unveils In-House Liquid Cooling System, Marking Pivot To Liquid 17 Out-Of-Place Artifacts That Suggest High-Tech Civilizations Existed Thousands (Or Millions) Of Years Ago Hamas Still Killing IDF Soldiers After 642 Days Copper underpins every part of the economy. If you want to destroy the U.S. economy this is how you would do it. Egyptian Pres. Gamal Abdel Nassers Chilling Decades-Old Prediction About Israel-Palstine Conflict. Debt jumps $366B in one day.

Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech Articles

Title: Airplane Abducted By UFO: Caught On Tape
Source: YouTube
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g9cZ8F1KTTM
Published: Aug 11, 2009
Author: jmart714
Post Date: 2010-01-14 20:29:53 by FormerLurker
Keywords: UFO, Abduction
Views: 1030
Comments: 59

Author's Description of Video:

The airplane was approaching Davis Monthan Air Force Base in Tucson Arizona at approximately 4:15PM MST on August 8th, 2009. We first witnessed the object hovering in a locked position, southwest of the base. You can hear my neighbors if you turn the volume up. We thought it was a balloon, until it dropped in elevation a few thousand feet in less then a second. At that point I ran inside and grabbed my digital camera and rushed outside in time to catch the object approaching the airplane from behind. Unfortunately the microphone barely works on the camera, from being dropped so many times, so you can't hear much. But at least there is a little. The object made no sound, completely silent.

There was an attempt to take the video to the media, unfortunately, every affiliate rejected the video due to lack of evidence. There was no report in the city of a missing airplane, nor did the Air Force Base report anything missing. Many of the news affiliates did confirm that they had received calls on August 8th from various sources, claiming they had seen a UFO. They said that they receive calls on a regular basis dealing with UFOs all the time, as well as many hoax videos, and there was no reason to believe my video was anything different. They refused to believe that the Air Force base would withhold information about a missing airplane.

Poster Comment:

Well here's something you don't see everyday...

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 39.

#4. To: FormerLurker (#0) (Edited)

Oh, and the other REALLY big tell, is that the UFO and "Abducted Plane" move up, AFTER the camera starts to pan up after it.

This video, like many others is why hoaxers get over.

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2010-01-14   21:11:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Oh, and the other REALLY big tell, is that the UFO and "Abducted Plane" move up, AFTER the camera starts to pan up after it

Bullshit. Watch again. The camera doesn't pan up until the object and the airplane have already shot upwards out of frame.

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-01-14   21:53:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

No retard, you need to take a look at it. When the supposed abduction takes place, the camera pans up before the actual ship goes up. The untrained retarded eye might miss it, but those of us who actually KNOW what to look for don't.

No camera man should be able to predict where an object that is flying AWAY from him supposedly should be going, especially if it was shot in the backyard by some idiot.

I assure you, that this video was made with After Effects, as the After Effects CODEX is embedded through out the video.

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2010-01-14   22:56:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Oh, and the biggest tell of all, is that the objects pass through the wires, not behind them. Ghost imaging and errant pixelization from a composited image are ALSO the big tell.

Post your stupefyingly retarded videos of UFO's on a site where there isn't someone who actually knows special effects and how they work.

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2010-01-14   22:59:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Oh, and the biggest tell of all, is that the objects pass through the wires, not behind them. Ghost imaging and errant pixelization from a composited image are ALSO the big tell.

Oh, and you're full of shit about that as well.

Besides the fact you're outright wrong, the objects do NOT pass "through" the wires, they pass BEHIND them, have you ever heard of COMPRESSION ARTIFACTS?

The pixellation is a function of the compression utilized not just by the initial compression to MP4 or whatever other codec the guy used, but the YouTube compression as well. Just as in images, when you compress a raw bitmap image to JPG, artifacts are introduced, the severity of which depends on the image quality setting selected at compression.

There is no quality setting when you upload to YouTube, it just does whatever compression is set by default, thus there will always be some loss and possible artifacts, depending on the original resolution and video size.

There are other video hosting sites which do NOT do such heavy compression, which give MUCH better video quality. But they require more storage space for the files for such quality, and YouTube is just a place for the average person to upload whatever they want, so they need to minimize the file size otherwise they'd need more storage than economically feasable.

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-01-15   0:42:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I know what I'm talking about. PERIOD.

If you can get one of the high res copies of this video, I think you can get it at ATS.

When this video came out I was asked to analyze it by a third party.

You're mad because you're one of those brain dead true believer types.

Nearly every camcorder on EARTH records at 24 frames per second. Most HD cameras record at 24 to 32 frames per second.

When you take a video at 24 frames per second, then add secondary objects like this video has there's a codec created in file that tells you that the footage has been edited. The mathematics and the smoothness of the SECOND object in the frame should tell you that it was added in, not to mention its opacity compared to the first object. Of course then there's the winking out which just so happen to be an After Effects Add On.

Why don't you buy The Adobe Creative Suite like I did. That way you could be making your own Fraudulent Vids, instead of posting other people's.

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2010-01-15   1:32:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

The mathematics and the smoothness of the SECOND object in the frame should tell you that it was added in, not to mention its opacity compared to the first object

Have you ever taken the time to read REAL eyewitness reports, such as those mentioned in Project Bluebook? The sliding motion and abrupt movements are HIGHLY TYPICAL, and that is what makes this even MORE believable.

I find no problem with the video at all, and you are SERIOUSLY making shit up and outright lying, for whatever purpose.

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-01-15   1:50:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Do you own Adobe After Effects? Do you own the Adobe Creative Suite? Have you ever bought any of the add-ons or created special effects? Is your job in the special effects industry?

If not, then I would suggest you get acquainted with the various products and software used to create videos just like this one.

If you look at plane, it has artifacts on it. The second object does not. The reason why, is because when you film something in real life, there's discrepancies in the lighting of that object that the CCD's inside the camera may or may not be able to register.

When you CREATE an object and add it to the footage, there are no artifacts, unless you create them, or have filter software that puts them in for you. The movement of the second object has a motion filter used on it. It's why the movement in every frame is consistent, while the movement of the first object is not.

Like I said before, unless you're stepped in this stuff, you won't see it. I myself could duplicate this with minimal effort. In fact, I could actually do a BETTER job making a fake than this.

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2010-01-15   1:55:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#40. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#39)

It is better to be hated for what you are, than loved for what you are not. - Tommy The Mad Artist.

Hi Tommy -

What does your byline actually mean?

buckeroo  posted on  2010-01-15 01:58:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Tell me Tommy, what is the video data rate for a standard camcorder? 24FPS is a FILM frame rate used in old FILM cameras, and still used by Hollywood studios to produce movies with FILM.

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-01-15 02:01:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I really don't know why you've resorted to lying, but I won't entertain a discussion with one who's already lied MANY times on this topic.

It's one thing if you say you don't know or aren't sure, but you stated as FACT that camcorders all use 24 FPS, which they DO NOT. The early camcorders ONLY could record at 60 FPS interlaced, and only recently has 24FPS and 30FPS been introduced.

24FPS is to give an independent filmmaker more of a "film" look to the video, and 30FPS is to give better quality when uploading to YouTube, since Adobe Flash delivers the video at 30FPS no matter what the original frame rate was.

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-01-15 02:13:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]