[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Consequences of Mild, Moderate & Severe Plagiarism

Plagiarism: 5 Potential Legal Consequences

When Philadelphia’s Foul-Mouthed Cop-Turned-Mayor Invented White Identity Politics

Trump Wanted to Pardon Assange and Snowden. Blocked by RINOs.

What The Pentagon Is Planning Against Trump Will Make Your Blood Run Cold Once Revealed

How Trump won the Amish vote in Pennsylvania

FEC Filings Show Kamala Harris Team Blew Funds On Hollywood Stars, Private Jets

Israel’s Third Lebanon War is underway: What you need to know

LEAK: First Behind-The-Scenes Photos Of Kamala After Getting DESTROYED By Trump | Guzzling Wine!🍷

Scott Ritter Says: Netanyahu's PAINFUL Stumble Pushes Tel Aviv Into Its WORST NIGHTMARE

These Are Trump's X-Men | Dr. Jordan B. Peterson

Houthis (Yemen) Breached THAAD. Israel Given a Dud Defense!!

Yuma County Arizona Doubles Its Outstanding Votes Overnight They're Stealing the Race from Kari Lake

Trump to withdraw U.S. troops from northern Syria

Trump and RFK created websites for the people to voice their opinion on people the government is hiring

Woke Georgia DA Deborah Gonzalez pummeled in re-election bid after refusing Laken Riley murder case

Trump has a choice: Obliterate Palestine or end the war

Rod Blagojevich: Kamala’s Corruption, & the Real Cause of the Democrat Party’s Spiral Into Insanity

Israel's Defense Shattered by Hezbollah's New Iranian Super Missiles | Prof. Mohammad Marandi

Trump Wins Arizona in Clean Sweep of Swing States in US Election

TikTok Harlots Pledge in Droves: No More Pussy For MAGA Fascists!

Colonel Douglas Macgregor:: Honoring Veteran's Day

Low-Wage Nations?

Trump to pull US out of Paris climate agreement NYT

Pixar And Disney Animator Bolhem Bouchiba Sentenced To 25 Years In Prison

Six C-17s, C-130s deploy US military assets to Northeastern Syria

SNL cast members unveil new "hot jacked" Trump character in MAGA-friendly cold open

Here's Why These Geopolitical And Financial Chokepoints Need Your Attention...

Former Army Chief Moshe Ya'alon Calls for Civil Disobedience to Protest Netanyahu Government

The Deep State against Trump


Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech Articles

Title: Airplane Abducted By UFO: Caught On Tape
Source: YouTube
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g9cZ8F1KTTM
Published: Aug 11, 2009
Author: jmart714
Post Date: 2010-01-14 20:29:53 by FormerLurker
Keywords: UFO, Abduction
Views: 758
Comments: 59

Author's Description of Video:

The airplane was approaching Davis Monthan Air Force Base in Tucson Arizona at approximately 4:15PM MST on August 8th, 2009. We first witnessed the object hovering in a locked position, southwest of the base. You can hear my neighbors if you turn the volume up. We thought it was a balloon, until it dropped in elevation a few thousand feet in less then a second. At that point I ran inside and grabbed my digital camera and rushed outside in time to catch the object approaching the airplane from behind. Unfortunately the microphone barely works on the camera, from being dropped so many times, so you can't hear much. But at least there is a little. The object made no sound, completely silent.

There was an attempt to take the video to the media, unfortunately, every affiliate rejected the video due to lack of evidence. There was no report in the city of a missing airplane, nor did the Air Force Base report anything missing. Many of the news affiliates did confirm that they had received calls on August 8th from various sources, claiming they had seen a UFO. They said that they receive calls on a regular basis dealing with UFOs all the time, as well as many hoax videos, and there was no reason to believe my video was anything different. They refused to believe that the Air Force base would withhold information about a missing airplane.


Poster Comment:

Well here's something you don't see everyday...

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 40.

#4. To: FormerLurker (#0) (Edited)

Oh, and the other REALLY big tell, is that the UFO and "Abducted Plane" move up, AFTER the camera starts to pan up after it.

This video, like many others is why hoaxers get over.

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2010-01-14   21:11:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#4)

Oh, and the other REALLY big tell, is that the UFO and "Abducted Plane" move up, AFTER the camera starts to pan up after it

Bullshit. Watch again. The camera doesn't pan up until the object and the airplane have already shot upwards out of frame.

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-01-14   21:53:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: FormerLurker (#6)

No retard, you need to take a look at it. When the supposed abduction takes place, the camera pans up before the actual ship goes up. The untrained retarded eye might miss it, but those of us who actually KNOW what to look for don't.

No camera man should be able to predict where an object that is flying AWAY from him supposedly should be going, especially if it was shot in the backyard by some idiot.

I assure you, that this video was made with After Effects, as the After Effects CODEX is embedded through out the video.

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2010-01-14   22:56:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: All (#12)

Oh, and the biggest tell of all, is that the objects pass through the wires, not behind them. Ghost imaging and errant pixelization from a composited image are ALSO the big tell.

Post your stupefyingly retarded videos of UFO's on a site where there isn't someone who actually knows special effects and how they work.

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2010-01-14   22:59:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#13) (Edited)

Oh, and the biggest tell of all, is that the objects pass through the wires, not behind them. Ghost imaging and errant pixelization from a composited image are ALSO the big tell.

Oh, and you're full of shit about that as well.

Besides the fact you're outright wrong, the objects do NOT pass "through" the wires, they pass BEHIND them, have you ever heard of COMPRESSION ARTIFACTS?

The pixellation is a function of the compression utilized not just by the initial compression to MP4 or whatever other codec the guy used, but the YouTube compression as well. Just as in images, when you compress a raw bitmap image to JPG, artifacts are introduced, the severity of which depends on the image quality setting selected at compression.

There is no quality setting when you upload to YouTube, it just does whatever compression is set by default, thus there will always be some loss and possible artifacts, depending on the original resolution and video size.

There are other video hosting sites which do NOT do such heavy compression, which give MUCH better video quality. But they require more storage space for the files for such quality, and YouTube is just a place for the average person to upload whatever they want, so they need to minimize the file size otherwise they'd need more storage than economically feasable.

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-01-15   0:42:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: FormerLurker (#23)

I know what I'm talking about. PERIOD.

If you can get one of the high res copies of this video, I think you can get it at ATS.

When this video came out I was asked to analyze it by a third party.

You're mad because you're one of those brain dead true believer types.

Nearly every camcorder on EARTH records at 24 frames per second. Most HD cameras record at 24 to 32 frames per second.

When you take a video at 24 frames per second, then add secondary objects like this video has there's a codec created in file that tells you that the footage has been edited. The mathematics and the smoothness of the SECOND object in the frame should tell you that it was added in, not to mention its opacity compared to the first object. Of course then there's the winking out which just so happen to be an After Effects Add On.

Why don't you buy The Adobe Creative Suite like I did. That way you could be making your own Fraudulent Vids, instead of posting other people's.

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2010-01-15   1:32:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#28)

The mathematics and the smoothness of the SECOND object in the frame should tell you that it was added in, not to mention its opacity compared to the first object

Have you ever taken the time to read REAL eyewitness reports, such as those mentioned in Project Bluebook? The sliding motion and abrupt movements are HIGHLY TYPICAL, and that is what makes this even MORE believable.

I find no problem with the video at all, and you are SERIOUSLY making shit up and outright lying, for whatever purpose.

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-01-15   1:50:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: FormerLurker (#34)

Do you own Adobe After Effects? Do you own the Adobe Creative Suite? Have you ever bought any of the add-ons or created special effects? Is your job in the special effects industry?

If not, then I would suggest you get acquainted with the various products and software used to create videos just like this one.

If you look at plane, it has artifacts on it. The second object does not. The reason why, is because when you film something in real life, there's discrepancies in the lighting of that object that the CCD's inside the camera may or may not be able to register.

When you CREATE an object and add it to the footage, there are no artifacts, unless you create them, or have filter software that puts them in for you. The movement of the second object has a motion filter used on it. It's why the movement in every frame is consistent, while the movement of the first object is not.

Like I said before, unless you're stepped in this stuff, you won't see it. I myself could duplicate this with minimal effort. In fact, I could actually do a BETTER job making a fake than this.

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2010-01-15   1:55:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#39)

It is better to be hated for what you are, than loved for what you are not. - Tommy The Mad Artist.

Hi Tommy -

What does your byline actually mean?

buckeroo  posted on  2010-01-15   1:58:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 40.

        There are no replies to Comment # 40.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 40.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]