[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Trump’s Project 2025 and Big Tech could put 30% of jobs at risk by 2030

Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman

China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead

FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call

France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence

Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis

Fooling Us Badly With Psyops

The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong

Put Castor Oil Here Before Bed – The Results After 7 Days Are Shocking

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them

America Is Reaching A Boiling Point

The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses

This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!

Mike Johnson Holds 'Private Meeting' With Jewish Leaders, Pledges to Screen Out Anti-Israel GOP Candidates

Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!]

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.

Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed


War, War, War
See other War, War, War Articles

Title: Army charges single mom who refused deployment
Source: http://www.sfgate.com
URL Source: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/artic ... l/a075733S15.DTL&feed=rss.news
Published: Jan 15, 2010
Author: RUSS BYNUM
Post Date: 2010-01-15 15:30:19 by freepatriot32
Ping List: *Jack-Booted Thugs*     Subscribe to *Jack-Booted Thugs*
Keywords: Army, charges, single mom, jackbooted thugs
Views: 186
Comments: 7

The Army said Wednesday it has filed criminal charges against a single-mom soldier who refused to deploy to Afghanistan last year, arguing she had no family able to care for her infant son.

Spc. Alexis Hutchinson, a 21-year-old Army cook, could face a prison sentence and a dishonorable discharge if she is convicted by a court-martial. But first, an officer will be appointed to decide if there's enough evidence to try a case against her.

Hutchinson's attorney, Rai Sue Sussman, said she still hopes the case can be settled without a military trial. She said the Army should consider Hutchinson's reason for not deploying overseas — that she was afraid of what would happen to her baby.

"There are other routes if they really want to punish her," Hutchinson's attorney, Rai Sue Sussman, said Wednesday. "I don't think the situation was serious enough to warrant a criminal matter."

Hutchinson of Oakland, Calif., was scheduled to deploy from Hunter Army Airfield in Savannah on Nov. 5. She skipped her unit's flight, saying the only relative she had to take care of her 10-month-old son — her mother — was overwhelmed by the task and backed out a few days before Hutchinson's departure date.

Kevin Larson, a spokesman for Hunter Army Airfield in Savannah, said that Hutchinson was charged Tuesday with missing movement — for missing her overseas flight — being absent without leave, dereliction of duty and insubordinate conduct.

The stiffest charge, missing movement, carries a maximum penalty of two years in prison and a dishonorable discharge.

"The charges against Spc. Hutchinson stem from the fact she didn't do her duty," Larson said. "They know their deployment dates. They have to show up. Otherwise, they have to face the consequences."

Sussman said Hutchinson was at her apartment outside the Army post when her unit deployed, but was in touch with her commanders by phone. The soldier returned to the post about a day later, she said, and was arrested.

Sussman said the soldier was afraid to show up for her overseas flight because one of her superiors had told her she would have to deploy and turn her child over to the state foster care system.

Larson said the Army would not deploy a single parent with no one to care for her child.

The decision to charge Hutchinson was far different than the Army's handling of another recent case involving a military mom.

Lisa Pagan of Davidson, N.C., was granted a discharge after she fought being recalled to the Army, under the military's "individual ready reserve" program, four years after she left active duty.

Pagan reported for duty at Fort Benning in west Georgia last February with her two young children in tow. She argued that her husband traveled for business too often to care for their children alone. While Pagan and her attorney battled the Army through appeals, she was never accused of refusing orders.

The Army requires all single-parent soldiers to submit a care plan for dependent children before they can deploy to a combat zone.

Hutchinson had such a plan — her mother, Angelique Hughes, had agreed to care for the boy. Hughes said she kept the boy for about two weeks in October before deciding she couldn't keep him for a full year.

According to the Defense Department's latest demographic report, there are more than 70,500 single parents on active duty in the U.S. military — about 5 percent of all service members. Nearly half of military single parents are in the Army.

Cases like Hutchinson's, where a conflict between deployment orders and parental duties lead to a prosecution, appear to be rare, said Lory Manning, a retired Navy captain a who studies how military policies affect women for the nonprofit Women's Research and Education Institute.

"There are thousands upon thousands of single parents that have deployed since the war in Afghanistan started," Manning said. "Things don't fall apart that often. Sometimes the family care plan doesn't work for whatever reason, but overall it works well."

Hutchinson's commanders granted her a leave last month so she could spend the holidays at her mother's home in California. Before that, she had been prohibited from leaving the Army post.

Hutchinson, who is assigned to the 3rd Combat Aviation Brigade of the Army's 3rd Infantry Division, joined the Army in 2007 and had no previous deployments. Sussman said Hutchinson is no longer in a relationship with her son's father.

Hughes said she's already taking care of her ailing mother and sister, as well as a daughter with special needs. She also runs a daycare center at her home, keeping about 14 children during the day.

Hughes said she returned Kamani to his mother in Georgia a few days before her November deployment.

She said they told her daughter's commanders they needed more time to find another family member or close friend to help Hughes care for the boy, but Hutchinson was ordered to deploy on schedule.

Hutchinson's son, Kamani, was placed into custody overnight with a daycare provider on the Army post after she was arrested and jailed briefly in November for skipping her flight. Hutchinson's mother picked up the child a few days later and took him back to her home in California.

Hutchinson is not in custody. Sussman said Wednesday that Hutchinson's son, who had his first birthday this month, returned home with his mother to Georgia after the holidays.

___

Russ Bynum has covered the military based in Georgia since 2001. Subscribe to *Jack-Booted Thugs*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: freepatriot32 (#0)

Here's an idea: if ya wanna be in the army, be in the army. If ya wanna be a single mom, do that. Any fool knows ya can't do both. Hard to see the foul here.

Thanks for nuthin', Jr.

Old Fud  posted on  2010-01-15   17:04:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Old Fud (#1)

I had four WM's in my air wing electronic maintenance platoon in 2003. Of the four, three were single mothers. One of the mothers deployed with us, but was constantly scheming to get back to her kid. She eventually did, by lying and deceiving everyone around her.

This army whore in this story is described as not being in a relationship with the child's father. If the situation is just not wanting to get married, I have no sympathy for her, and I hope they put her away, bread and water, hard labor.

Why can't the father care for the child? Burn her!!

echo5sierra  posted on  2010-01-15   17:21:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: freepatriot32 (#0)

Man how things have changed since I was in!

ndcorup  posted on  2010-01-15   19:22:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: freepatriot32 (#0)

turn her child over to the state foster care system.

Doesn't this really mean "turn her child over to Nazicare."?

The Nazis who run "Nazicare" probably had plans to "brainwash" her kid at an ealy age by "torturing" him with films of Obummer praising himself and the NWO.

Those Nazi state foster care system workers were also probably looking forward to "pushing" their ususal regiment of toxic vacines on the little helpless kid too.

I bet there's more to this story than is being reported here.

sizzlerguy  posted on  2010-01-15   20:15:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: freepatriot32 (#0)

The Army is just being nasty. The needs of a member of a soldier's family can serve as a reason for early discharge under Honorable Conditions (not necessarily an Honorable Discharge, could be a General Discharge but it still provides vets' benefits). One would think a female soldier - whose participation in active combat roles is limited - could be most readily spared this way.

Shoonra  posted on  2010-01-15   21:33:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: freepatriot32 (#0)

This is a contract issue. She agreed to do something. She knew her subsequent behavior might thwart her abiltiy to do what she agreed to. But she she went ahead and did things *her* way.

Now she cries about being held to what she agreed to. No sale.

Thanks for nuthin', Jr.

Old Fud  posted on  2010-01-15   23:43:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: freepatriot32 (#0)

Spc. Alexis Hutchinson, a 21-year-old Army cook

bible.cc/1_samuel/8-13.htm / http://kidjacked.com/states.asp?st=California / possibly this: judicial-inc.biz/84al_zi...n_is_typical_benefici.htm

for this:

judicial-inc.biz/h.aifa_super_pipeline.htm

"...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speech http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2010-01-16   16:15:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]