See other (s)Elections Articles
Title: Voter Fraud looks as if it will be an issue in MA
Source:
The Post & Mail
URL Source: http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/01 ... tt-brown-should-be-victorious/
Published: Jan 19, 2010
Author: John Charlton
Post Date: 2010-01-19 14:40:37 by randge
Keywords: Scott Brown, Martha Coakley, Special election, Massachusetts
Views: 298
Comments: 33
SURFS TOWARDS VICTORY ON WAVE OF POPULAR DISCONTENT WITH OBAMA REGIME by John Charlton (Jan. 19, 2010) — The American public has tasted Obama’s Marxist-Lite and is rejecting it with decisive force. The special election in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts is just one case in point, but a stunning case it is. Scott Brown leads Martha Coakley by 5% in exit polls in the first hours of the day. And this on the vigil of the first anniversary of Obama’s ascension to power. Indeed, Massachusetts residents are generally more gleeful than they have ever been at the thought that for the first time in 50 years, they have the chance to participate in a free election, to choose their own U.S. Senator and free themselves from the dominance and manipulation of the Kennedy family. The candidate favored to win, Scott Brown of Wrentham, is a locally, well-known conservative who has been lambasted in the liberal media and political halls of the Bay State. He was expected to have a hard time winning against the politically-entrenched Attorney General Martha Coakley. Martha Coakley, MA Attorney General But Coakley turned out to be the wrong candidate in the wrong year. Renowned for her acidic character and outrageous liberalism, she was already a weak candidate in respect to women voters of moderate and conservative views, who detested her. She is pro-abortion, anti-marriage, and in favor of teaching the youngest of children how to practice perverse sex acts. Obviously, she is the political darling of the Democrat regime in Massachusetts; a state infamous for manipulating the electorate ever since a former governor invented the concept and practice of Gerrymandering districts. Scott Brown, on the other hand, was widely known and respected among Republicans and conservatives for his stands against homosexual instruction in the schools and other socially conservative issues, like opting out Catholic hospitals from a state law which would obligate them to provide emergency contraceptives to women alleging to be rape victims. The desperation of Marxists and sodomites nationwide at the thought of Brown’s victory as a U.S. Senator is palpable. One group out of D.C. is calling Massachusetts residents and claiming to represent Massachusetts Citizens for Life; the impersonation is to attempt to convince Brown supporters that he is not pro-life because of his opposition to Obama’s Health Care Reform Bill. The truth is that Massachusetts Citizens for Life endorses Scott Brown adamantly. Google Images is doing its share to disrupt Brown supporters by means of featuring on nearly every page of their archive for Brown swimsuit images of the U.S. Senator to be. The depth of hatred for the Obama regime was manifested most pointedly yesterday when local members of the SEIU at Logan Airport came out in support of Scott Brown, the Republican! Voter Fraud looks as if it will be an issue in MA Noted liberals on MSNBC (Schultz: “I’d cheat to keep Brown from winning!”) and radio have even called for voter fraud to prevent the Brown victory. Voter fraud is a major problem in Massachusetts, where anyone can walk into any polling station, claim to be anyone who is on the voter rolls, and vote in their stead, as no identification whatsoever is asked for. The only way to know if voter fraud has been committed is for the real voter to go and vote and find his name already crossed off the registration lists as having voted. In such a case, the voter then must show his ID and prove that he has not voted! On one conservative blog, a MA resident spoke with young liberals from South Boston who openly admitted that they had cased the voter lists for those who are registered and do not vote and they intend to vote ten times each at different polling stations across South Boston by impersonating such individuals. Another report says that upwards of 3,000 citizens will be bringing their video cameras to polling stations to record any voter intimidation which might occur outside. Massachusetts law, it must be noted, prohibits photographing or videotaping voters inside polling stations or within 100 feet of the exits. © 2010, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. www.thepostemail.com/2010...own-should-be-victorious/
Poster Comment: "On one conservative blog, a MA resident spoke with young liberals from South Boston who openly admitted that they had cased the voter lists for those who are registered and do not vote and they intend to vote ten times each at different polling stations across South Boston by impersonating such individuals." Lickspittle bolshie traitor scum want us to shoulder all the burdens of all the onerous laws passed by that despicable sausage machine in DC while they laughingly stomp all over fed and state election laws. There's only one way to fight those with no regard for law or the spirit of equity.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: randge (#0)
(Edited)
While not apologizing for it this it is retail fraud as opposed to the wholesale fraud committed with Electronic Votefraud Machines - such as by Diebold and Sequoia.
"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator
Got Rope?
"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator
Voter fraud is rampant in the USA. Nothing new here. Why aren't there requirements about the individual voters in any election here in the USA? I guess, since the masses think they are free to predispose a significant effort usurping the US Constitution with nothing more than gullible tripe down the American People's throats, they are more free? Good golly, Ms. Molly!
“Gold is the money of kings; silver is the money of gentlemen; barter is the money of peasants; but debt is the money of slaves.”
i knew it. this is the reason i was so upset when Ron Paul didn't address this issue in NH. without legitimate elections in this country, we've got nothing. imo, he could have done more for this country by illuminating it than anything else.
CyniChrissy! Shame on you. :P
When even MSM leftie talk show hosts like Ed Schultz and Chris Matthews openly encourage cheating and voting multiple times to keep Scott Brown from winning, that message ultimately connects even with the most gullible of the Dembot foot soldiers ie. "young liberals from South Boston." [ nevermind that cheating is second nature to the hardened Dembot lieutenants like ACORN and unions]
From the looks of it, it wouldn't really matter WHO won the election as they are just two sides of the same coin, just as always. One side is pro-abortion, pro-Obama healthcare, and pro-spending our national treasure to oblivion, and the other side is pro-unnecessary war, pro "enhanced interrogation", and pro-welfare for the elite... In practice, I doubt either one would vote much differently as a Senator.
It was surely discouraging to see him shrug it off. Perhaps he didn't understand the extent of the corruption, perhaps he thought it didn't matter, there were still many other states left to go. That's what made me question his fitness for the job at hand, as with some of the great ideas he had, and his willingness to turn over rocks with more than a few vermin hiding under them, he'd need some serious courage and insight to go after actual acts of corruption, but he seems to have side stepped any real head-on confrontation that would have made a difference.
One side is pro-abortion, pro-Obama healthcare, and pro-spending our national treasure to oblivion, and the other side is pro-unnecessary war, pro "enhanced interrogation", and pro-welfare for the elite... In practice, I doubt either one would vote much differently as a Senator. FL, did you bother to check Brown's and Coakley political positions per the way they voted on issues? There are significant differences between the 2 candidates on several issues. You seem to be hung up on the fact that Brown supports the Afghan War - he's been active with the Army National Guard for about thirty years - what do you expect his Afghan War position would be? - at least Brown has walked the talk unlike chicken hawks in both the Dem and GOP parties. I think you need to look at how Coakley and Brown have positioned themselves on issues outside of abortion and the Afghan War because federal senators vote on a variety of subjects not just two things. www.ontheissues.org/senate/Scott_Brown.htm VERSUS
Exactly. To this day, I don't understand not challenging the NH process and vote-count.
VERSUS www.ontheissues.org/Senate/Martha_Coakley.htm Uh, they both seem to be stereotypical candidates of the parties they represent. Where did you find any deviation in their records in terms of party affiliation? My point is, since they both ARE the stereotypical SideA/SideB candidates, NEITHER of them will be any different than the rest...
Brown will take the veto proof majority away from the Senate and will vote "NO" on Obamacare which will perhaps kill it, unless the House votes for the Senate version, which seems unlikely. Furthermore, his election will be a magnitude 10 political earthquake to Obama and his radial leftists toadies. If an R can be elected in liberal MA, Ds aren't safe anywhere (can you say Barbara Boxer?)
I'm sure he'd make up for it by introducing some "enhanced" version of the Patriot Act.
The reality is he can stop Obama and the radical leftists from taking over the health care industry. Agree? As to him introducing a new and improved version of the Patriot act, that's coming already with Obama and the Zionists. Like ObamaCare maybe he'd stop that too. Agree? To take away that veto proof majority from leftist d'bags is no small achievement.
If it comes to voter fraud, and I'm sure there will be plenty on both sides screaming it at each other, it will be time to verify every voter, and then prosecute those who did not vet the so called voters in their districts. If not fraud, at the very least dereliction or malfeasance of duty as a steward of the state. We never see anyone prosecuted, for FAILING to do their job. We always hear the words, "anomalies", or "irregularities". "Mistakes were made." We never hear, "You've defied the will of the people, and have broken the law where it counts most, and you will be held responsible." If you're one of the lowly citizens and you don't pay your taxes, you go to jail. If you knowingly, and fraudulently vote 3 times in an election for a representative that isn't even yours, nothing happens to you. We need the government to prosecute those who knowingly defy the electoral processes, with the same kind of zeal that we see them chase down a dollar from one of the lowly working poor.
It is better to be hated for what you are, than loved for what you are not. - Tommy The Mad Artist.
I just don't place much faith in members of the one-party fraud.
Have you guys ever heard of THIS Joseph Kennedy? Probably not, since his voice was muted by the same people who muted Ron Paul... Massachusetts: Independent Libertarian Joe Kennedy participates in third of five debates Right now, there's not a damned thing we can do about all the abuses that were foisted on us in the wake of 911. But globalism's latest onslaught perepetrated by vermin like Soros, his armies of joyless activists, and in particular his BOY ZERO will have suffered a major setback in their plans if Coakley bites the dust. Brown has said no to carbon caps and trading in addition to his express opposition to this health care monstrosity. Thanks, scrapper, for the link. here it is again if y'all missed it.
This from the "non-existent" candidate, Joe Kennedy... We're STUCK with these two STUPID parties until something LARGE happens. Thanks for the link on the Libertarian Party candidate. I'm as frustrated as you are that the public at large is inimical to fresh ideas and sound principles.
Yes I read about him. He seemed like a good candidate. Btw, I don't think he was muted because of his message. He received little media coverage because his campaign chest was even more limited than that of Scott Brown's. Imo, that was a major reason why Ron Paul decided to run as an R rather than a Libertarian in 2008 - to get some free media visibility running as a Pres candidate for the GOP and to get initial basic campaign funding from the GOP. The Libertarian Party could not provide much in either area for Joe Kennedy. Joe Kennedy also had 2 other disadvantages - not really his "fault" per se but nonetheless it hurt him, I think: 1. a Kennedy last name even though he was not related to swimmer - Independent voters seemed more than ready for a "change" from the Kennedy Clan regime 2. he had no previous track record vis-a -vis holding political office for voters to compare his talk to his walk
I've heard of Kennedy, and I interviewed Harry Browne 2x when I did a half assed radio show in Bucks county PA in the early, mid 90s. He was a free trader and open border guy then. He later adjusted his position. The Ls then, as they do now, get app 1% of national votes. State votes they average 2-3%. I hate it, but that's the hand we're dealt. Given the inevitable, why shouldn't we stop an odious program like ObamaCare?
Well JT, more than likely we'll get to see how well Brown delivers on his promise to stop the Obamacare bill. I can just see him having some second thoughts, and "coming around" to some form of Obamacare in the near future... That, and his full undying love for torture and illegal wars.
Yeah, the name thing was sort of a strange coincidence that didn't help him any... The fact is, NO independent candidate is usually allowed to be a viable candidate in important elections, unless they support the main precepts of one of the two-party frauds. Look at Leahy from Vermont for example.
From what I know, that's about all he promised. I expect nothing else as I'm sure he's just another side of the same coin as you said. But, if he delivers and helps kill this POS, he can stay in Boston for the remainder of his term and I'll be quite satisfied. Hang in FL. The national political landscape is changing like nothing I've seen since Perot. I'll be in DC to see what Traficant offers by way of a 3rd party and we have folks in TX who will be bringing to the forum info regarding the Melina (sp), who is running against Perry and Hutchinson. This Spring and Summer will be huge for folks like us to unite in DC. I hope we get to meet there.
Thanks Jethro. Ya got that Cyni. You are always harping that Ron Paul should drop out of the freaking pubby party and run as a third party candidate. Had he done that, we wouldn't be hearing anything from or about our country's problems as he seems to be the only one addressing them on either side. Maybe someone else might not get her panties in a wad if she reads and understands what Jethro is saying.
I'll be going to DC too.
www.kansascity.com/444/story/1694745.html Mass. secretary of state dismissed vote problems The Associated Press The Massachusetts secretary of state is discounting reports of voter irregularities in the state's Senate special election. A spokesman for Secretary of State William Galvin said Tuesday two reports of spoiled ballots could not be verified or found to be widespread. In one case, someone voting in Cambridge claimed a ballot had already been marked for Republican Scott Brown. There was no way to verify the claim, but the ballot was destroyed. In another case, a person in Boston reported finding a ballot inside a privacy folder also marked for Brown. Officials say it may have been left inadvertently by an earlier voter. Aides to Democrat Martha Coakley called a news conference to raise voter awareness of the concerns.
How funny! Duh, Martha dear - the usual suspects for voter fraud are ACORN and unions, who happen to be working for you. What a dumb broad Martha is!
www.kansascity.com/437/story/1693735.html Mass. voters brave snow, rain in Senate race The Associated Press Massachusetts voters are facing a backup at some polling places as they cast their ballots in the pivotal race to fill the Senate seat held by the late Sen. Edward Kennedy. Boston election officials reported Tuesday they were having over double the turnout from December's party primaries. Voters in Andover and North Andover were greeted with big traffic backups. Secretary of State William Galvin says he expected from 1.6 million to 2.2 million people to vote - a spread of between 40 percent and 55 percent of registered voters. Light snow and rain fell across the state as voters picked between Republican Scott Brown, Democrat Martha Coakley and independent Joseph L. Kennedy. National Weather Service meteorologist Charlie Foley called the weather "kind of an annoyance."
How funny! Duh, Martha dear - the usual suspects for voter fraud are ACORN and unions, who happen to be working for you. What a dumb broad Martha is! The wheel's spinning, but the hamster's dead.
Brown 53% - Coakley 46% - Kennedy 1% E-mail Print (42) Comments Text size Share Buzz up!According to results culled from cities and towns and around the Web, the race for the open Massachusetts Senate seat between Republican Scott Brown, Democrat Martha Coakley, and independent Joseph Kennedy currently stands at....Brown 53% - Coakley 46% - Kennedy 1% with 63% reporting. Unofficial results from the City of Boston show Brown 34% - Coakley 65% - Kennedy 1% with 52% of the city’s precincts reporting. Unofficial results from the City of Springfield show Coakley 62% - Brown 37% - Kennedy 1% with 98% pr precincts reporting bostonherald.com/news/pol...19brown_54_-_coakley_45_- _kennedy_1/
"On one conservative blog, a MA resident spoke with young liberals from South Boston who openly admitted that they had cased the voter lists for those who are registered and do not vote and they intend to vote ten times each at different polling stations across South Boston by impersonating such individuals."
#2. To: randge (#0)
There's only one way to fight those with no regard for law or the spirit of equity.
#3. To: randge (#0)
#4. To: randge (#0)
#5. To: christine (#4)
i knew it.
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.
My Man Godfrey (1936)
#6. To: randge (#0)
#7. To: Original_Intent, randge, christine, buckeroo, TommyTheMadArtist (#1)
"On one conservative blog, a MA resident spoke with young liberals from South Boston who openly admitted that they had cased the voter lists for those who are registered and do not vote and they intend to vote ten times each at different polling stations across South Boston by impersonating such individuals."
#8. To: randge (#0)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#9. To: christine (#4)
i knew it. this is the reason i was so upset when Ron Paul didn't address this issue in NH. without legitimate elections in this country, we've got nothing. imo, he could have done more for this country by illuminating it than anything else.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#10. To: FormerLurker, randge, Jethro Tull, Original_Intent, All (#8)
From the looks of it, it wouldn't really matter WHO won the election as they are just two sides of the same coin, just as always.
#11. To: christine. all (#4)
this is the reason i was so upset when Ron Paul didn't address this issue in NH. without legitimate elections in this country, we've got nothing. imo, he could have done more for this country by illuminating it than anything else.
#12. To: scrapper2, randge, Jethro Tull, Original_Intent, All (#10)
www.ontheissues.org/senate/Scott_Brown.htm
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#13. To: FormerLurker (#12)
My point is, since they both ARE the stereotypical SideA/SideB candidates, NEITHER of them will be any different than the rest...
#14. To: Jethro Tull (#13)
Brown will take the veto proof majority away from the Senate and will vote "NO" on Obamacare which will perhaps kill it
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#15. To: FormerLurker (#14)
#16. To: scrapper2 (#7)
#17. To: Jethro Tull (#15)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#18. To: Jethro Tull, scrapper2 (#15)
(Edited)
Mr. Kennedy said he would propose laws to end all current wars, audit the federal reserve operations, seek repayment of all federal bailout money and roll back a 43 percent increase in spending during the Bush years. He also said Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano should be fired in light of her handling of the Christmas Day attempted bombing of an international flight to Detroit.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#19. To: FormerLurker, Jethro Tull, scrapper2 (#14)
I'm sure he'd make up for it by introducing some "enhanced" version of the Patriot Act.
#20. To: All (#18)
(Edited)
We Need To Cut Spending
We do not need targeted plans and complicated programs to cut taxes. Those only complicate the issues, leave loopholes to be abused, and only benefit specific segments of the population, be they the wealthy, the poor, or large corporations. If we genuinely want to end the recession, we will have to cut spending and cut taxes. We can accomplish this with simple, but broad strokes.
To cut taxes we must cut spending, and I pledge to do the following in Washington:
For Massachusetts, I am currently drafting a bill, which I will ask to be sponsored by any State Representative or State Senator on Beacon Hill willing to end the Massachusetts Income Tax. We had a referendum last year on the ballot and many people on Beacon Hill including Senator Brown opposed that referendum. That bill would have meant an average of $3,700.00 back to the working families of Massachusetts. Think of how much $3,700.00 per year could do for the working families of Massachusetts. How many homes could be saved from foreclosure? How much more money would consumers have to put into the economy and stimulate jobs?
If they weren’t serious about cutting government last year during the deepest depths of the recession, then why should we be fooled into thinking they would do it now? Empty rhetoric and half-hearted campaign promises will not fix the problems Massachusetts and the nation faces; only swift and determined action will!
If State Senator Brown were truly serious about cutting taxes, then he would be submitting legislation to do so at the state level right now. And, one would think, he would have done so already, in the years preceding his candidacy. He is not, and has not done so, not now, not then. So it stands to reason, that he will not do so in the future either.
Attorney General Coakley, on the other hand, unabashedly supports a dramatic expansion of government entitlement programs, and therefore a dramatic increase in government spending! Her support for all those fiscally irresponsible programs would have to be eradicated if she was truly serious about cutting spending or taxes.
In short, if you’re not willing to put forth the legislation, then you are just paying lip service to the problem and making empty promises to the voters. I will do more than just talk the talk, I will walk the walk! I am working on the legislation right now, and I ask any State Representative or State Senator on Beacon Hill who is willing to submit it after the winter recess. If you can’t cut overall spending you can’t cut taxes. Talk is cheap. Actions are clear.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#21. To: FormerLurker (#18)
#22. To: FormerLurker (#18)
Have you guys ever heard of THIS Joseph Kennedy? Probably not, since his voice was muted by the same people who muted Ron Paul...
#23. To: FormerLurker (#17)
#24. To: Jethro Tull (#23)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#25. To: scrapper2 (#22)
a Kennedy last name even though he was not related to swimmer - Independent voters seemed more than ready for a "change" from the Kennedy Clan regime
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#26. To: FormerLurker (#24)
Well JT, more than likely we'll get to see how well Brown delivers on his promise to stop the Obamacare bill.
#27. To: Jethro Tull, Cynicom (#23)
The Ls then, as they do now, get app 1% of national votes. State votes they average 2-3%. I hate it, but that's the hand we're dealt.
#28. To: Jethro Tull (#26)
I'll be in DC to see what Traficant offers
#29. To: Jethro Tull (#6)
#30. To: TwentyTwelve (#29)
Aides to Democrat Martha Coakley called a news conference to raise voter awareness of the concerns.
#31. To: Original_Intent (#2)
#32. To: scrapper2 (#30)
Aides to Democrat Martha Coakley called a news conference to raise voter awareness of the concerns.
#33. To: TwentyTwelve, All (#32)
By Herald staff
Tuesday, January 19, 2010 - Updated 1m ago
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest