[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
(s)Elections See other (s)Elections Articles Title: Voter Fraud looks as if it will be an issue in MA SURFS TOWARDS VICTORY ON WAVE OF POPULAR DISCONTENT WITH OBAMA REGIME by John Charlton (Jan. 19, 2010) — The American public has tasted Obama’s Marxist-Lite and is rejecting it with decisive force. The special election in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts is just one case in point, but a stunning case it is. Scott Brown leads Martha Coakley by 5% in exit polls in the first hours of the day. And this on the vigil of the first anniversary of Obama’s ascension to power. Indeed, Massachusetts residents are generally more gleeful than they have ever been at the thought that for the first time in 50 years, they have the chance to participate in a free election, to choose their own U.S. Senator and free themselves from the dominance and manipulation of the Kennedy family. The candidate favored to win, Scott Brown of Wrentham, is a locally, well-known conservative who has been lambasted in the liberal media and political halls of the Bay State. He was expected to have a hard time winning against the politically-entrenched Attorney General Martha Coakley. Martha Coakley, MA Attorney General But Coakley turned out to be the wrong candidate in the wrong year. Renowned for her acidic character and outrageous liberalism, she was already a weak candidate in respect to women voters of moderate and conservative views, who detested her. She is pro-abortion, anti-marriage, and in favor of teaching the youngest of children how to practice perverse sex acts. Obviously, she is the political darling of the Democrat regime in Massachusetts; a state infamous for manipulating the electorate ever since a former governor invented the concept and practice of Gerrymandering districts. Scott Brown, on the other hand, was widely known and respected among Republicans and conservatives for his stands against homosexual instruction in the schools and other socially conservative issues, like opting out Catholic hospitals from a state law which would obligate them to provide emergency contraceptives to women alleging to be rape victims. The desperation of Marxists and sodomites nationwide at the thought of Brown’s victory as a U.S. Senator is palpable. One group out of D.C. is calling Massachusetts residents and claiming to represent Massachusetts Citizens for Life; the impersonation is to attempt to convince Brown supporters that he is not pro-life because of his opposition to Obama’s Health Care Reform Bill. The truth is that Massachusetts Citizens for Life endorses Scott Brown adamantly. Google Images is doing its share to disrupt Brown supporters by means of featuring on nearly every page of their archive for Brown swimsuit images of the U.S. Senator to be. The depth of hatred for the Obama regime was manifested most pointedly yesterday when local members of the SEIU at Logan Airport came out in support of Scott Brown, the Republican! Voter Fraud looks as if it will be an issue in MA Noted liberals on MSNBC (Schultz: “I’d cheat to keep Brown from winning!”) and radio have even called for voter fraud to prevent the Brown victory. Voter fraud is a major problem in Massachusetts, where anyone can walk into any polling station, claim to be anyone who is on the voter rolls, and vote in their stead, as no identification whatsoever is asked for. The only way to know if voter fraud has been committed is for the real voter to go and vote and find his name already crossed off the registration lists as having voted. In such a case, the voter then must show his ID and prove that he has not voted! On one conservative blog, a MA resident spoke with young liberals from South Boston who openly admitted that they had cased the voter lists for those who are registered and do not vote and they intend to vote ten times each at different polling stations across South Boston by impersonating such individuals. Another report says that upwards of 3,000 citizens will be bringing their video cameras to polling stations to record any voter intimidation which might occur outside. Massachusetts law, it must be noted, prohibits photographing or videotaping voters inside polling stations or within 100 feet of the exits. © 2010, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. www.thepostemail.com/2010...own-should-be-victorious/
Poster Comment: "On one conservative blog, a MA resident spoke with young liberals from South Boston who openly admitted that they had cased the voter lists for those who are registered and do not vote and they intend to vote ten times each at different polling stations across South Boston by impersonating such individuals." Lickspittle bolshie traitor scum want us to shoulder all the burdens of all the onerous laws passed by that despicable sausage machine in DC while they laughingly stomp all over fed and state election laws. There's only one way to fight those with no regard for law or the spirit of equity.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 3.
#3. To: randge (#0)
Voter fraud is rampant in the USA. Nothing new here. Why aren't there requirements about the individual voters in any election here in the USA? I guess, since the masses think they are free to predispose a significant effort usurping the US Constitution with nothing more than gullible tripe down the American People's throats, they are more free? Good golly, Ms. Molly!
There are no replies to Comment # 3. End Trace Mode for Comment # 3.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||