[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Pepe Escobar: BRICS, The Rise Of China, And How The Hegemon Buried The Concept Of "Security"

Life of Dax

"Nothing Will Slow Me Down" - Trump Reacts After Second Assassination Attempt

The Latest Attempt On Trumps Life Is Yet Another Example Of The Extreme Chaos That Is Plaguing Our Society

Best of the Anti-Aging Supplements

BREAKING NEWS: Donald Trump shooting, Secret Service investigates after shots fired near golf course

Chinese EV fire EPIDEMIC - MGUY EV News 15 September 2024 | MGUY Australia

Houthis target Israeli forces with ‘hypersonic ballistic missile’; Netanyahu vows strong response

September 2001 Interview with Osama bin Laden. Categorically Denies his Involvement in 9/11

Trump will SAVE the white parts!

MAGA Marxism

Scott Hayes CHARGED! Another Soros-Funded DA Criminalizing SELF-DEFENSE in Massachusetts? Viva Frei

The Japanese Secret to Healthy Blood Pressure? (Nattokinase)

Border Czar Kamala Harris Purposely Sent At Least 80% of Haitian and CHNV Migrants to Red States That Did Not Vote for Her

Ukraine was planning to hit Kursk, but everyone was told 'not to panic' because 'those above know better'

Australia's Wild, Draconian New Speech Law Targeting Misinformation'

Chomsky: US now a “totalitarian culture which has never existed in my lifetime”

House Passes Bill to Stop White House from Unilaterally Imposing W.H.O. Pandemic Treaty

Sheriff: Mobile County inmate awoke at hospital to find corrections officer sexually assaulting him

Suspect faces judge for assault of 81-year-old German tourist gravely injured

First generation Gen Z’ers are moving abroad for a better life

Lott: Don't Jail Parents For School Shootings – Arm Teachers

Watch: Kamala Harris Gives Trainwreck Answers To Simple Questions In First Solo Interview

Chinese cooking trick

Gaetz: Merrick Garland's DOJ Pep Rally Proves Trump Won The Debate

"Riots Coming Soon" - Douglas Murray’s CHILLING Prediction For America’s Migrant Crisis

Wayne Kramer's Flagrant Disregard For Authority - The 'Lexington' Interview

9/11 Hijacking Myth EXPOSED!

Former ICE Official Warns: Venezuelan Prison Gang Preparing For "Big Gang War" In Colorado

"Is This Kamala's Fastest Flip-Flop?"


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Voter Fraud looks as if it will be an issue in MA
Source: The Post & Mail
URL Source: http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/01 ... tt-brown-should-be-victorious/
Published: Jan 19, 2010
Author: John Charlton
Post Date: 2010-01-19 14:40:37 by randge
Keywords: Scott Brown, Martha Coakley, Special election, Massachusetts
Views: 371
Comments: 33

SURFS TOWARDS VICTORY ON WAVE OF POPULAR DISCONTENT WITH OBAMA REGIME by John Charlton

(Jan. 19, 2010) — The American public has tasted Obama’s Marxist-Lite and is rejecting it with decisive force. The special election in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts is just one case in point, but a stunning case it is. Scott Brown leads Martha Coakley by 5% in exit polls in the first hours of the day.

And this on the vigil of the first anniversary of Obama’s ascension to power.

Indeed, Massachusetts residents are generally more gleeful than they have ever been at the thought that for the first time in 50 years, they have the chance to participate in a free election, to choose their own U.S. Senator and free themselves from the dominance and manipulation of the Kennedy family.

The candidate favored to win, Scott Brown of Wrentham, is a locally, well-known conservative who has been lambasted in the liberal media and political halls of the Bay State. He was expected to have a hard time winning against the politically-entrenched Attorney General Martha Coakley.

Martha Coakley, MA Attorney General But Coakley turned out to be the wrong candidate in the wrong year. Renowned for her acidic character and outrageous liberalism, she was already a weak candidate in respect to women voters of moderate and conservative views, who detested her. She is pro-abortion, anti-marriage, and in favor of teaching the youngest of children how to practice perverse sex acts. Obviously, she is the political darling of the Democrat regime in Massachusetts; a state infamous for manipulating the electorate ever since a former governor invented the concept and practice of Gerrymandering districts.

Scott Brown, on the other hand, was widely known and respected among Republicans and conservatives for his stands against homosexual instruction in the schools and other socially conservative issues, like opting out Catholic hospitals from a state law which would obligate them to provide emergency contraceptives to women alleging to be rape victims.

The desperation of Marxists and sodomites nationwide at the thought of Brown’s victory as a U.S. Senator is palpable. One group out of D.C. is calling Massachusetts residents and claiming to represent Massachusetts Citizens for Life; the impersonation is to attempt to convince Brown supporters that he is not pro-life because of his opposition to Obama’s Health Care Reform Bill. The truth is that Massachusetts Citizens for Life endorses Scott Brown adamantly.

Google Images is doing its share to disrupt Brown supporters by means of featuring on nearly every page of their archive for Brown swimsuit images of the U.S. Senator to be.

The depth of hatred for the Obama regime was manifested most pointedly yesterday when local members of the SEIU at Logan Airport came out in support of Scott Brown, the Republican!

Voter Fraud looks as if it will be an issue in MA Noted liberals on MSNBC (Schultz: “I’d cheat to keep Brown from winning!”) and radio have even called for voter fraud to prevent the Brown victory.

Voter fraud is a major problem in Massachusetts, where anyone can walk into any polling station, claim to be anyone who is on the voter rolls, and vote in their stead, as no identification whatsoever is asked for. The only way to know if voter fraud has been committed is for the real voter to go and vote and find his name already crossed off the registration lists as having voted. In such a case, the voter then must show his ID and prove that he has not voted!

On one conservative blog, a MA resident spoke with young liberals from South Boston who openly admitted that they had cased the voter lists for those who are registered and do not vote and they intend to vote ten times each at different polling stations across South Boston by impersonating such individuals.

Another report says that upwards of 3,000 citizens will be bringing their video cameras to polling stations to record any voter intimidation which might occur outside. Massachusetts law, it must be noted, prohibits photographing or videotaping voters inside polling stations or within 100 feet of the exits.

© 2010, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified.

www.thepostemail.com/2010...own-should-be-victorious/


Poster Comment:

"On one conservative blog, a MA resident spoke with young liberals from South Boston who openly admitted that they had cased the voter lists for those who are registered and do not vote and they intend to vote ten times each at different polling stations across South Boston by impersonating such individuals."

Lickspittle bolshie traitor scum want us to shoulder all the burdens of all the onerous laws passed by that despicable sausage machine in DC while they laughingly stomp all over fed and state election laws.

There's only one way to fight those with no regard for law or the spirit of equity.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 8.

#8. To: randge (#0)

From the looks of it, it wouldn't really matter WHO won the election as they are just two sides of the same coin, just as always.

One side is pro-abortion, pro-Obama healthcare, and pro-spending our national treasure to oblivion, and the other side is pro-unnecessary war, pro "enhanced interrogation", and pro-welfare for the elite...

In practice, I doubt either one would vote much differently as a Senator.

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-01-19   15:25:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 8.

#10. To: FormerLurker, randge, Jethro Tull, Original_Intent, All (#8)

From the looks of it, it wouldn't really matter WHO won the election as they are just two sides of the same coin, just as always.

One side is pro-abortion, pro-Obama healthcare, and pro-spending our national treasure to oblivion, and the other side is pro-unnecessary war, pro "enhanced interrogation", and pro-welfare for the elite...

In practice, I doubt either one would vote much differently as a Senator.

FL, did you bother to check Brown's and Coakley political positions per the way they voted on issues? There are significant differences between the 2 candidates on several issues. You seem to be hung up on the fact that Brown supports the Afghan War - he's been active with the Army National Guard for about thirty years - what do you expect his Afghan War position would be? - at least Brown has walked the talk unlike chicken hawks in both the Dem and GOP parties. I think you need to look at how Coakley and Brown have positioned themselves on issues outside of abortion and the Afghan War because federal senators vote on a variety of subjects not just two things.

www.ontheissues.org/senate/Scott_Brown.htm

VERSUS

www.ontheissues.org/Senate/Martha_Coakley.htm

scrapper2  posted on  2010-01-19 15:53:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 8.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]