Any questions folks as to why anyone would actually believe in Alex Jones?
He is OWNED.
He does what his masters tell him to do.
He is NOT relevant. He is a puppet, and if anyone actually believes he isn't, shame on you for not using the brain God gave you.
Exactly. Surely a man as successful and as high profile as Jones would be so big a threat to the elites as to fall foul of a fabricated scandal, if not and 'accident'? There are men who've managed to rise a lot higher than him (eg JFK) only to be done away with. Yet, here he is, alive and well, doing what he's been doing for years and years.
I wasn't aware that I was lying, thanks for informing me. I just thought I was making an observation....
I was just being sarcastic. I meant nothing by it.
One Alex Jones or a David Icke screaming about a laboratory-based flu epidemic or claiming that the 'Illuminati' are demon-worshiping global controllers with lizard DNA is hardly enough to make any difference. It's more entertainment than anything else.
I disagree with you on that. It does make a difference, to their respective audiences. They aren't even a blip on the MSM radar. They aren't meant to be. We are the audience. The difference they make is to us, to distract us into looking into fables. THink of all that wasted energy going into looking into total bullshit that would otherwise go into practical solutions.
Jones and his minions are going to be just as responsible for the bloodshed as our "leaders" are.
If you think I'm pessimistic, I am.
I'm optimistic. When you're honest there is a strength in that. Lie, and you're weak and will fail. We'll win. I never said it will be easy.
On our own we can do otherwise. It's a choice we all have to make.
Agreed. I just don't look to make any converts. That is a waste of time. That is a hard learned lesson. Either they see it or they don't.
David Ick is either nuts or a plant. Maybe both. His function seems to be to taint information by having it associated with him i.e., guilt by association. The lizard people shit is just that - shit. I believe its function is most likely to create the aura of kookiness needed to throw valid ideas and observations into disrepute by having Ick's name associated with them.
Why is he either? He's making a good living. People love him. They're buying his product. What evidence do you have for suggesting that he's nuts or a provocateur?
Why is he either? He's making a good living. People love him. They're buying his product. What evidence do you have for suggesting that he's nuts or a provocateur?
Because of the shape-shifting alien crap. Ick, while putting out some good information, admixes it with the really kooky stuff for which there is no proof other than his apparent surmises. Knowing how PsyOps operates I thus infer that the association is likely (and I said "likely" not proved) intentional so as to discredit the good information. The tactic is called "Dead Agent" i.e., to refute something so as to reclassify it as unreliable. The tactic has both valid and invalid uses. It would not surprise me to learn that Icke works for MI-5.