#4. To: randge, TommyTheMadArtist, all (#0)(Edited)
He is NOT relevant. He is a puppet, and if anyone actually believes he isn't, shame on you for not using the brain God gave you.
A mere puppet? Maybe. But IMO his treachery goes deeper than that.
Our "leaders" know that a certain segment will see thru their BS. Those people still need to be contained. Jones contains them. He does that by telling some truth to gather extremely loyal followers. But when a reaction is desired from his followers, he lies, he disrupts, he makes his followers look like fools by spreading his bad information. We get lumped in with his followers and that decreases OUR effectiveness. It's quite brilliant.
Top:
I like their flag.
Oh shit. At 2:26 guess who makes his appearance. Jones, that fucking attention whore. Someone needs to forcibly remove that bastards bullhorn and wrap that damn thing around his neck!
That worthless son of a bitch purposefully disrupted this demonstration.
I'll watch the other 2 later. I need a smoke break.
#36. To: PSUSA, randge, TommyTheMadArtist, farmfriend, christine, ratcat, CadetD, all (#4)
Our "leaders" know that a certain segment will see thru their BS. Those people still need to be contained. Jones contains them. He does that by telling some truth to gather extremely loyal followers. But when a reaction is desired from his followers, he lies, he disrupts, he makes his followers look like fools by spreading his bad information. We get lumped in with his followers and that decreases OUR effectiveness. It's quite brilliant.
That is the function of a disinformation outlet. To tell the truth almost all of the time while misleading, intentionally drawing wrong conclusions, and omitting vital data. And that is the pattern that Jones is falling into. Limbaugh is a master of the art - which is why he is paid more than his program makes in advertising revenue.
Jones is falling into a pattern (just as Limbaugh did) and it is a repetition of the same old tactics.
First build an audience through telling the audience the truth and what they want to hear (while being careful not to reveal any of the insider data that they don't already have). That is one of the keys to unlocking the Jones puzzle - while he does introduce some apparently new data he does not introduce much if anything that elements of his audience did not already know.
Blunt the effectiveness of the opposition by becoming a "leader" and then use the positional authority to control and lead the opposition into ineffective or less effective avenues. Another of his PsyOp tactics is to bloviate endlessly on the NWO, get people agitated and strung out on edge, and use that to exhaust their nervous energy. I've noticed that listening to Jones on a regular basis, which I did for about 6 months until I began to understand his schtick, tends to leave a person continually agitated and a lower tone thus inactive.
Another is to speak in generalities when describing the players - for Limbaugh it is "the liberals" and for Jones it is the "New World Order". All have names, and while Jones will occasionally mention the Rothschilds and Rockefellers he does not clearly point the arrows back to them illustrating how they run the operation. Jones is a holding agent - holding people in check and getting them to spend their energies on useless pyrotechnics rather than building effective organizations in opposition. Which brings us to "advocate ineffective means of opposing" them and attack anyone who does. Notice how the "We are Change" movement was effectively gelded by first associating himself with the leaders of it and then after having it tightly associated with himself then de-emphasizing it. Jones is right about one thing, another of those self evident truths that he trumpets as though it was an original insight, that we are in an information war. The problem is that he is on the other side.
The connections are very tenuous as he operates in deep cover, has to for his function, but the little snippets are accumulating - his sharing of an attorney with the Bronfmans being one, and his syndicator for his Sunday Shoe another. He is a tool of the same people who control the Zionists (and again only the top levels of Zionism know the true game and the rest of the schmucks are being taken for a little ride).
I especially see the 2nd tactic as being more obvious. You cant be alert 24/7.
The connections are very tenuous as he operates in deep cover, has to for his function, but the little snippets are accumulating
I'm not sure his cover is that deep. And some of those little snippets are rather large. But it takes time and effort to dig things up. Sometimes all it takes is to read a bill he is bitching about to see he lied. Other times its how he words articles on his site. He likes to use trigger words and phrases like he did here: http://surrealworld.wordpress.com/2009/03/27/has-alex-jones-gone-off-the-deep-end/
He is a tool of the same people who control the Zionists (and again only the top levels of Zionism know the true game and the rest of the schmucks are being taken for a little ride).
I think he is aware of what he's doing. I think he is many things, but he isn't stupid. You don't pull a stunt, like he did at that demonstration, on a whim. It was deliberate. It had to have been.
I especially see the 2nd tactic as being more obvious. You cant be alert 24/7.
Thanks for the kind words. Yes, that was the one that first got me to wondering about him. It was a little too much, laid on just a little too thick. The issues he covers are ones we all need be concerned about, but it is the manner in which he does. And as you say you can't be on alert 24/7 - all that does is lead to exhaustion. Which of course is what he is doing.
I think he is aware of what he's doing. I think he is many things, but he isn't stupid. You don't pull a stunt, like he did at that demonstration, on a whim. It was deliberate. It had to have been.
Agreed. Here, I think the conclusion stands out better than in some other instances. Here, his antics display what he was actually doing i.e., disrupting.