See other Science/Tech Articles
Title: Scientists broke the law by hiding climate change data: But legal loophole means they won't be prosecuted
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art ... a-global-warming-sceptics.html
Published: Jan 29, 2010
Author: David Derbyshire
Post Date: 2010-01-29 12:25:40 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 130
Comments: 9
By David Derbyshire Accused: Professor Phil Jones asked a colleague to delete emails relating to a report by the IPCC Scientist at the heart of the 'Climategate' email scandal broke the law when they refused to give raw data to the public, the privacy watchdog has ruled. The Information Commissioner's office said University of East Anglia researchers breached the Freedom of Information Act when handling requests from climate change sceptics. But the scientists will escape prosecution because the offences took place more than six months ago. The revelation comes after a string of embarrassing blunders and gaffes for climate scientists and will fuel concerns that key researchers are too secretive and too arrogant. It will pile pressure on the director of the university's climate change unit, Professor Phil Jones, who has stood aside while an investigation is carried out, and make it harder for him to return. The ruling followed a complaint from retired engineer David Holland-66, whose Freedom of Information-requests were ignored. Last night Mr Holland welcomed the watchdog's decision but said it was disappointing the researchers would not be prosecuted. 'All we are trying to do is make the scientists follow their own professional rules by being open, transparent and honest,' he said. 'We are not trying to show that human beings don't affect the climate, but to show that the science is not settled.' Scientists at the University of East Anglia were encouraged to delete emails concerning claims that man-made emissions were causing global warming The Climategate row broke in November when hundreds of stolen emails from the world-renowned Climate Research Unit in Norwich were posted online. The emails appeared to show researchers discussing how to manipulate historical temperature data and dodge requests under the Freedom of Information Act. One request came in 2008 from Mr Holland, a grandfather from Northampton and an engineering graduate. He was seeking evidence that scientists had cherry-picked research when preparing the previous year's UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report. Conducting a full inquiry: Liberal Democrat MP Phil Willis After the request was received, a message from one academic to another on May 28, 2008, said: 'Oh MAN! Will this c**p never end?' In other emails the researchers complained that the unit was being bombarded with FOI requests from sceptics. And in another, researchers appeared to be encouraging each other to delete emails. After the emails were published, Mr Holland complained to the Information Commissioner's Office. An ICO spokesman yesterday confirmed that the UEA breached the Freedom of Information Act. He added: 'The emails which are now public reveal that Mr Holland's requests under the Freedom of Information Act were not dealt with as they should have been under the legislation.' Climate change sceptics welcomed the ruling and called for the Climategate inquiry to be made public. Lord Lawson, head of the Global Warming Policy Foundation, said it should also investigate whether the CRU denied opportunities to scientists trying to publish dissenting views. Last week, the IPCC was forced to apologise after wrongly claiming the Himalayan glaciers could vanish within 25 years. Critics have also accused it of exaggerating the risk of tropical storms and hurricanes. Earlier this week, Britain's chief scientific advisor, Professor John Beddington, called on climate scientists to be more honest about the uncertainties of global warming.
Scientists broke the law by hiding climate change data: But legal loophole means they won't be prosecuted
Last updated at 11:21 PM on 28th January 2010
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 8.
#1. To: Jethro Tull, farmfriend, all (#0)
Good. The Warmists are still on the run - but the truth is gaining on them. We can't let this issue, and evidence, die as they are doing everything they can to wiggle off the hook of being caught lying, falsifying, cooking, and shredding the data which they had which disproves the Glowbull Warming hypothesis*. *For the ignorati - a hypothesis is a proposed explanation of a data set not a factually proven one.
The Warmers pretty much lost the argument when Osama bin Buckeroo joined their side. Of course he deplores GW. He is sitting in some cold cave up in the mountains freezing his chestnuts off. But you're right - we need to keep the HEAT high and expose their delusion once and for all. cc: the Nest
cc: the Nest Speaking of Bucky - since the last exchange over the Glowbull Warming Fraud he seems to have become pretty scarce.
I am watching you. And these political threads attempting to dispel reality are becoming monotonous.
There are no replies to Comment # 8. End Trace Mode for Comment # 8.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#3. To: Original_Intent, Cynicom, all (#1)
#5. To: Jethro Tull, buckeroo (#3)
The Warmers pretty much lost the argument when Osama bin Buckeroo joined their side. Of course he deplores GW. He is sitting in some cold cave up in the mountains freezing his chestnuts off. But you're right - we need to keep the HEAT high and expose their delusion once and for all.
#8. To: Original_Intent (#5)
Speaking of Bucky - since the last exchange over the Glowbull Warming Fraud he seems to have become pretty scarce.
Replies to Comment # 8.