Title: Debra Medina on KLIF after the Beck Show (YouTube) Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Feb 11, 2010 Author:. Post Date:2010-02-11 23:42:19 by christine Keywords:None Views:1315 Comments:108
Debra Medina self-destructs on Glenn Beck radio show Texas gubernatorial candidate Debra Medina appeared on the Glenn Beck radio show this morning and made a lot of news when she wouldn't take a position on whether the US government was behind the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center.
Beck: "Rick, I think you and I could French kiss right now," he said of Texas's current governor, Rick Perry who is running for re-election.
"Wow," Beck continued. "Wow. The fastest way back to four percent," he said of Medina's one-time standing in the polls. A recent survey showed her only four points behind Hutchison with 24 percent of the vote.
What I meant to say was...
Medina quickly put out a statement clarifying what she meant, which just so happens not to sound anything like what she said.
"I was asked a question on the Glenn Beck show today regarding my thoughts on the so-called 9/11 truth movement. I have never been involved with the 9/11 truth movement, and there is no doubt in my mind that Muslim terrorists flew planes into those buildings on 9/11. I have not seen any evidence nor have I ever believed that our government was involved or directed those individuals in any way. No one can deny that the events on 9/11 were a tragedy for all Americans and especially those families who lost loved ones."
When Beck derides truthers and birthers as dangerous people he may be guilty of inciting a riot should they become violent ... or maybe he's a prophet trying to make his prophesy come true.
Or maybe he's compiling a list for his zio-nazi handlers from the e-mails he receives.
When Beck derides truthers and birthers as dangerous people
Beck has a point of view worth mentioning, birther and truthers are crazy. These same folks beg speculation upon inconsequential details that don't go anywhere. I there was any truth to their claims, why hasn't there been more investigations?
Beck has a point of view worth mentioning, birther and truthers are crazy.
These same folks beg speculation upon inconsequential details that don't go anywhere.
The terms birther and truther may be crazy, but the fact that people are asking questions related to 9-11 or Obama's "constitutional" legitimacy aren't crazy simply because they ask for answers to relevant questions that have serious consequences to freedom.
The speculation of which you speak was Beck's speculation. Beck insinuated that anyone that doesn't believe the fairy tale spun by the witch doctors in D.C. MUST BELIEVE THAT OUR GOVERNMENT DID IT.
While I do believe that elements within the CIA and MOSSAD DID DO IT and that Bush and others knew it, I wasn't the one being interviewed, Debra Medina was.
Debra Medina could think that there are important questions that need to be addressed without believing that the government did it. It's really that simple.
The terms birther and truther may be crazy, but the fact that people are asking questions related to 9-11 or Obama's "constitutional" legitimacy aren't crazy simply because they ask for answers to relevant questions that have serious consequences to freedom.
You are defending "keeping your eye off the ball" by lack of fact and plenty of fiction. Both the birther and truther movements have helped lose America.
Since 2001, America has subdued more personal rights while our mutual and respective tax base(s) have gone up.
I might add, the nation is near dead because of poor government and petty political nuisances nothing to do with birthers or truthers.
You are defending "keeping your eye off the ball" by lack of fact and plenty of fiction. Both the birther and truther movements have helped lose America.
I'll respond to your post even though I hesitate to waste the time.
The birther and truther "movements" (if they can be called movements)are aimed at transparency in a government established upon a constitution that has been overtly ignored for such a long time that an idiot like you might dare attempt to blame the decline of America on those adherents to the very principles upon which the nation achieved whatever greatness it ever enjoyed.
You mention that I defend "keeping one's eye off the ball" ... how so ? What exactly is the "ball" that one should keep his/her eye upon ?
I have resisted calling you out for the obvious moron that you are, out of respect for Christine's effort to provide a forum for intelligent dialogue. I think she should make everyone take an I.Q. Test before becoming a 4UM member so that dipshits like you could be avoided.
I might add, the nation is near dead because of poor government and petty political nuisances nothing to do with birthers or truthers.
The above statement contradicts your initial response and causes me to wonder why you posted anything at all unless you're just a troublemaker without the intellect necessary to avoid publicly arguing with yourself. Besides that, the reason the country is in the condition presently enjoyed is criminal government, not poor government. Spending trillions of dollars of American people's pensions funds and retirements is not petty nuisance it's GRAND FUCKING LARCENY.
Killing millions of innocent people in our name internationally is not a petty nuisance, it's MASS MURDER by PROXY.
Someone killed 3000 Americans on September 11, 2001. The U.S. spends some 40 billion dollars of taxpayers hard earned money on intelligence annually (probably more), and some people are interested enough in their families, their fellow citizens and their posterity to DEMAND SOME FUCKING ANSWERS. I can see by your post that you are not one of these folks.
I guess it would be nearly impossible for you to see the relevance of legally requiring the compliance of all candidates with constitutional mandates, especially those running for office on issues such as transparency in government as did Obubba. [The phrase "you can lead a horses ass to water but you can't make it think", reminds me of you.]
If the U.S. Govt. cannot operate within the framework upon which it was founded then it should be abolished and another established with the changes necessary to the nation's betterment. The continued cooperation of the general public in support of an out of control police state makes no sense.
To facilitate ones own demise "IS THE DEFINITION OF SUICIDE".