See other Miscellaneous Articles
Title: Cop Says “Open Carry” Advocates Should Be Shot
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://republicbroadcasting.org/?p=6759
Published: Feb 13, 2010
Author: KTVU
Post Date: 2010-02-13 20:36:29 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 391
Comments: 29
A controversy was brewing in East Palo Alto Tuesday night after a police detective made apparently joking comments through his Facebook account saying “open carry” advocates who visibly carry guns in public should be shot. Now East Palo Alto has become a reluctant testing ground for a battle of constitutional amendments: one police officer’s ‘freedom of speech’ versus a group’s ‘right to bear arms.’ Area resident Adnan Shahab is an “open carry” advocate who frequently goes out in public displaying an unloaded gun on his belt. Such activity is legal in California with certain restrictions, such as staying clear of schools. Shahab said he was offended by Facebook remarks posted by East Palo Alto detective Rod Tuason. Tuason published a comment that said he agreed with a friend that open carry advocates should come to Oakland, Richmond and East Palo Alto and — in an apparent joke — said officers should shoot the advocates.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 24.
#2. To: christine (#0)
i just dont have much hope left for a legal political solution to these problems. during WWII, the italians solved their problems like this... in a just world, there'd be a thousand neocons hanging there with benito and clara... but that's kinda rough justice.
In a world where we're being, tased, shot, and otherwise, abused; isn't it about time, Claire? How much more?
well, that's the problem... the russian people endured this kind of treatment for hundreds of years, and i'm wondering if americans will be any different. the situation is gonna be radically different, especially if peak oil turns out to be the real thing... i guess, if it does turn out to be the real thing, then we can expect gas rationing, at gunpoint, as oil is reserved for use by the elite and their protectors. i dont know.
If they get us into another oil shortage, trust and believe me, it will be totally and completely contrived This planet is still awash in oil and natural gas.
maybe you can explain what the oil companies were doing up in the arctic islands in the 1960s, looking for oil and gas when there was no way of getting the stuff to market. was that just another tax writeoff? does that mean that the global peak oil conspiracy has been going on for fifty or sixty years? why did american oil production peak? why, when the price of oil went up to nearly $150 per barrel, did production remain flat? why are oil companies spending hundreds of millions of dollars to drill wells 200 miles offshore, in two miles of water, and two or three miles of dirt under that, so distant from pipelines that they'll have to spend more hundreds of millions on plumbing, and then crow about discoveries that will only last the world a month? none of it makes sense if the world is "awash in oil". i'm really really sorry, but it doesnt make any sense. the really pitiful thing about it is: the only people peak oil denial makes sense to are the people who were motivated by peak oil to commit 9/11. if you deny your motive exists, you've eliminated one of the key parameters that investigators use to compile a suspect list, that parameter being "motive". then you got the prime denier of peak oil, exxon, allied with the AEI, which spawned PNAC, which admitted they needed a new pearl harbor as a pretext to occupy the middle east/caspian/central asian oil patch. what's a poor boy to think?
I'll try to give you my take on it tomorrow. But the short story is, let's keep our reserves untapped, while making war to drill and pump the rest of the world's reserves. It's brilliant in a nut-job sort of way...especially if you're BigOil, and their buddies.
anyhow, what it boils down to, is: a police state will emerge in america in response to peak oil, as it becomes necessary to ration oil consumption in response to falling supplies of oil. you can harp on and on about the new world order, or benevolent global hegemony, or tikkun olam, or whatever lame scheme you want... but they're all red herrings designed to obscure knowledge of peak oil, which was the neocons' motive for doing 9/11. as the oil supply continues to fall, it will become necessary to ensure that police are on the right side... they must reliably protect the elite as the american standard of living deteriorates and common people no longer have access to oil. what are people going to do as the whole works collapses? how do you stop a hungry kid from crying?
There are no replies to Comment # 24. End Trace Mode for Comment # 24.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#7. To: groundresonance. all (#2)
(Edited)
in a just world, there'd be a thousand neocons hanging there with benito and clara... but that's kinda rough justice.
#11. To: Lod (#7)
How much more?
#14. To: groundresonance, all (#11)
the situation is gonna be radically different, especially if peak oil turns out to be the real thing...
#18. To: Lod (#14)
(Edited)
awash in oil
#21. To: groundresonance (#18)
#24. To: Lod (#21)
(Edited)
Replies to Comment # 24.