[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
9/11 See other 9/11 Articles Title: A Message to Glenn Beck: What Are the Dangers of 9/11 Truthers? Your Debra Medina attack really got me asking why it was a top priority for you to expose her 9/11 truther connections. You even asked: Do you have advisors that advise you or people that are around you that are 9/11 Truthers?
Would you, if you found out that there were, would you disavow them like the president should have but I mean, he escorted them out in the middle of the night. Benedict Arnold Glenn Beck Its enough to get me wondering if these truthers are a National Security Threat or what hideous crimes they may have committed against the U.S. of America. Glenn, you seem pretty on top of this, besides thought crimes, what are the crimes or threats posed by 9/11 truthers to the country or yourself? Its a good question
huh, Glenn? I decided to do a Google for 9/11 truther crimes and guess what? It gave me answers like war crimes, 9/11 crimes and crimes against humanity. All crimes truthers are asking questions Of
but NO crimes committed By them
Then I had this crazy thought, you know Glenn
. Im thinking this Glenn Beck guy cant be a Thought-Nazi, can he?
you know
just controlling the reasoning of his viewers for political or monetary gain. Well gosh, Glenn, what should we think? Help us out here
First, have you explained what a 9/11 truther is
you know
your definition of a truther
Yes, I see you have on your popular Fox News show where you are able to tell people how
or, I mean what to think
I mean what you think
Here it is from THE Glenn Beck Show on Sept. 3, 2009: (the intro is classic) BECK (thats you): If you dont know what a 9/11 Truther is, let me quickly tell you about them. Heres a statement from a 9/11 Truther group; after the attacks they demanded: A call for immediate inquiry into evidence that suggests high-level government officials may have deliberately allowed the September 11th attacks to occur. (My comments are in blue) Glenn, if evidence suggests an inquiry
I dont have a problem with an inquiry
do you?
Really, I mean if evidence suggests
would Jefferson? Beck: They also have a list of questions on their site that, I guess, is supposed to peak your interest in the conspiracy theory that the Bush administration let the attacks happen on purpose. Is conspiracy theory a buzz term to trigger bias in the malleable minds of your audience? And your guess is the reason the questions are there
is to peak interest in conspiracy, like a Fox News show would? I mean, thats your thinking? BECK: I too had a lot of questions shortly after 9/11, but none of them had anything to do with the alleged Flight 77 that allegedly blew up at the Pentagon. Nor was I asking if steel can melt or anything like that. So Glenn, what were your insightful question? Why do you say alleged? Is it that you dont believe Flight 77 blew up or that it was a flight? BECK: Heres what Truthers want answers to: How could Flight 77, which reportedly hit the Pentagon, have flown back towards Washington, D.C., for 40 minutes without being detected by the FAAs radar or the even superior radar possessed by the U.S. military? Why did the Secret Service allow Bush to complete his elementary school visit, apparently unconcerned about his safety or that of the schoolchildren? How were the FBI and CIA able to release the names and photos of the alleged hijackers within hours, as well as to visit houses, restaurants, and flight schools they were known to frequent? Why did the Bush administration cover up the fact that the head of the Pakistani intelligence agency was in Washington the week of 9/11 and reportedly had $100,000 wired to Mohamed Atta, considered the ringleader of the hijackers? The Truthers have also questioned things like: Was Flight 93 actually shot down by the military as a cover-up? That last one there, Glenn, about military cover-up
Im not finding that quote anywhere
You wouldnt be just tossing that in for arguments sake? You know like pace, pace, pace
LEAD. And
though, I had not read these prior to you suggesting
the questions asked do look, frankly, pretty reasonable (aside from your psyop) and
Guess what
the 911truth.org site mentions 8 more like
Why were standard operating procedures for dealing with hijacked airliners not followed that day? Why were the extensive missile batteries and air defenses reportedly deployed around the Pentagon not activated during the attack? Why hasnt a single person been fired, penalized, or reprimanded for the gross incompetence we witnessed that day? Why havent authorities in the U.S. and abroad published the results of multiple investigations into trading that strongly suggested foreknowledge of specific details of the 9/11 attacks, resulting in tens of millions of dollars of traceable gains? Why has Sibel Edmonds, a former FBI translator who claims to have knowledge of advance warnings, been publicly silenced with a gag order requested by Attorney General Ashcroft and granted by a Bush-appointed judge? What happened to the over 20 documented warnings given our government by 14 foreign intelligence agencies or heads of state? Why did the 911 Commission fail to address most of the questions posed by the families of the victims, in addition to almost all of the questions posed here? Why was Philip Zelikow chosen to be the Executive Director of the ostensibly independent 911 Commission although he had co-authored a book with Condoleezza Rice? Glenn Beck, even though I never took the time to read all those questions before, I think you might think that if those are legitimate questions then they are questions that can be asked
(did I get that right Glenn?) BECK: If you believed our own government was responsible (as opposed high-level government officials?) for the 9/11 attacks, right there on the 9/11 Truther statement, you could proudly sign your name along with such luminaries as: No. 2: Ed Asner, actor, activist No. 31: Janeane Garofalo, actress, Air America radio No. 51: Mimi Kennedy, actress, progressive activist No. 62: Cynthia McKinney, 5-term congresswoman from Georgia And coming in at No. 46: Van Jones, executive director, Ella Baker Center for Human Rights OK Glenn, naturally you have reached your own understanding of what the 9/11 Truther statement said
and its your show, your boss, so your spin is your (or your bosss) prerogative along with the progressive selection of signers you offer
I did happen to go to the source (yes, I know
few do) and noticed you skipped many of the other signers like: Catherine Austin Fitts, Asst Sec Housing in the first Bush administration Edward L Peck, former US Ambassador, former Deputy Task Force Terrorism Eric H May, former Army military intelligence officer and media essayist Fred Burks, presidential interpreter for Bush, Clinton, Cheney, and Gore J Michael Springmann, former Foreign Service Officer, US Depart of State John McCarthy, former Special Forces, president Veterans Equal Rights Melvin Goodman, Center International Policy, CIA, professor War College Morton Goulder, Deputy Sec Intelligence Warning Nixon, Ford, Carter Philip J Berg, Esquire, former deputy attorney general, Pennsylvania And many more including 1st responders and victims family members
check it out at 911truth.org. BECK: So on top of all the radical, progressive and communist nonsense coming from Obamas green jobs czar Van Jones, you can now add thinks the Bush administration blew up the World Trade Centers and covered it up. Do you know what people are saying about me on the Internet that Im a conspiracy theorist? If you actually believed this stuff forget green jobs wouldnt you want to find out who was trying to kill innocent Americans? Wouldnt that be a top priority? OH MY Glenn, People questioning (with real boldness) the completeness of the official 9/11 Report (same Gov that deny using blackwater) are as bad or worse than Marxists and Communists
I did not know that
and we can thank you, Glenn, for that understanding
truly. BUT WAIT
did I understand people are also calling you a conspiracy theorist? Is that it? You are debunking because people are calling you names? Back to those crazy truthers
They also have this on their site: As Americans of conscience, we ask for four things: 1. An immediate investigation by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer 2. Immediate investigation in Congressional Hearings. 3. Media attention to scrutinize and investigate the evidence. 4. The formation of a truly independent citizens-based inquiry. Looks like it is a top priority for some but Glenn
Im still trying to understand the risk, threat or danger posed by this 9/11 Truther group. Clearly, Glenn, you are alarmed. Why is that? The name calling you receive and being lumped in with other conspiracy theorists, no doubt, is traumatic for you, but beyond that, is there more to your fear of truthers? Again, we have the good fortune of you, Glenn Beck, producing a wildly popular show that tells people what and how to think and of course what not to think
From Jan 20, 2010, where you may have shed some light
(as a side note you used the words President and Danger at least 5 times leading up to this
) BECK: So hes surrounded. By radicals. Surrounded by radicals heres why the republic is in danger. And the president is in danger first. You had also mentioned that there are two groups of radicals surrounding the president. A peaceful activist group and unrepentant bomber William Ayers groups (even though as you point out, he is not actually around the president). BECK: Now why is the president himself in trouble. let me use him as an example 9/11 truther Another guy surrounding the president. Glenn, If you remember, this is where you physically put Van Jones picture next to Ayers to make an association and said: BECK: Okay 9/11 truthers
heres a guy who thought the government was evil enough that it would murder thousands of US citizens just blow it up. Destroy a building and kill 3000 people. I know its semantics to you but is that what he signed? So
for understanding, even though you think all progressives are evil and George Bush is a progressive and you suggest that we currently have eugenicists as advisors
the real alarm for the safety of the Republic and the President is
. BECK: Well gosh. Are these people like you do you think that. Maybe not, but, evidently like someone
Glenn
BECK: Do you think anyone who does think
that we could just kill our own people should be
near the president. Fear-mongering Glenn? And for the record
No I dont think anybody that does think should be near the president
what do you think the THREAT IS? BECK: I mean he (9/11 truther) thinks anybody who sits or sat in the chair of the presidency must be evil. He goes to church with a guy who thinks that America intentionally murdered people all throughout history. BECK: Put yourself in the mindset of a 9/11 truther you have access to the president of the United States the guy who was always been evil. OK, Glenn
Its a good thing that TV is not hypnotic because people could really ramp up the power of suggestive ideas even something as nut job as a view that people seeking truth (truthers) are by default dangerous Marxist Communist wackos that want to wack our leader
To be clear Glenn
The Danger
the National Security Threat of the 9/11 Truth Movement is that the President is in Danger? Glenn, you are asking your audience to intellectually associate everyone that signed (gov officials, celebs, victim families, 1st responders) that 911truth.org petition (truthers) with an intent to murder? Thats what you are saying Glenn Beck?
really? Oh
I see you used a clip from a Air-America shock jock Mike Malloy to support your conspiracy theory
Now, of course his name is not on that list and he is not part of that site
but he IS evidence to support YOUR conspiracy theory
GOT IT. Master of doubletalk you are
It seems to me Glenn, that you being the great champion of Jefferson and the Founding Fathers
It seems Glenn, you, the great self-professed crusader of liberty
You, would want to ask the signers of the 911truth.org
WHY do they question so boldly knowing the consequences of MSM? Instead, you vilify them and accuse them of possessing designs of destruction and murder
You Glenn Beck
take these people and slander them for what? Asking questions? Benedict Beck, it is amazing to witness the seduction of money and power
Will people follow the money
Does your audience even know who bought You? Its interesting to see how Rupert Murdoch just happens to sit as Co-Chair with Lloyd Blankfein(Goldman Sachs CEO) on Rockefellers PFNYC which is the NYC Chamber of Commerce
Which just happens to have influence (power, control that kind of thing) over ALL of media (MSM) and banks (NY FED, JP Morgan, GS)
Also, interesting to notice that the Hearst Corp CEO is a Board Member of PFNYC, which just happens to own National Geo and Popular Mechanics
And, these two Hearst companies, just happen to be the main source of ALL debunking the 9/11 truther questions
You know Popular Mechanics, even you use them as a credible source without any disclosure of interests
But then
thats another post. Makes one even ask questions about you, Glenn Beck, and if it could be possible that you might have personal gain in the positions you take which seem to be almost confusing at times
and then not? (Did I get that right, Glenn?) And for the record Glenn
I was not one who considered myself to be a 911 Truther, but
After actually reading the 911truth.org statement and hearing you slander these people
Add me to the List Glenn Beck
All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent. Thomas Jefferson
Poster Comment: This is an easier read at the url. I didn't take the time to format it.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 17.
#2. To: christine, buckeroo, pickleroo, etc. (#0)
Very good article, thanks for posting it. I believe "truther" is a good thing to be because people like Beck and buckeroo, aka pickleroo, think it is a bad thing.
9-11 was an inside job. Eventually the wool will burn away and people will see the truth. They would not be trying to assassinate the messengers unless they were not terrified of this happening.
The 9/11 "truth" movement is toast. The idea that there's going to be some mass acceptance of an "inside job" conspiracy theory is ludicrous.
The 9/11 "truth" movement is here to stay so get used to it. Only the dumbed-down sheeple believe the government fairy tale.
Of course it's here to stay, there will always be people who want to believe in conspiracies which is why the JFK conspiracy theory is still alive. What you don't realize is that the 9/11 "truth" movement is stagnant. It has not accomplished anything and it never will.
Of course it's here to stay, there will always be people who want to believe in conspiracies which is why the JFK conspiracy theory is still alive. What you don't realize is that the 9/11 "truth" movement is stagnant. It has not accomplished anything and it never will. And there will always be those that trust their government 100% and cannot contemplate that their government would ever do anything wrong or evil.
It must be tough for you knowing that the 9/11 "truth" movement will always be just another fringe conspiracy theory.
There are no replies to Comment # 17. End Trace Mode for Comment # 17.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
[Register]
|