[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Massive Property Tax Fraud Exposed - $5.1 Trillion Bond Scam Will Crash System

Israel Sold American Weapons to Azerbaijan to Kill Armenian Christians

Daily MEMES YouTube Hates | YouTube is Fighting ME all the Way | Making ME Remove Memes | Part 188

New fear unlocked while stuck in highway traffic - Indian truck driver on his phone smashes into

RFK Jr. says the largest tech companies will permit Americans to access their personal health data

I just researched this, and it’s true—MUST SEE!!

Savage invader is disturbed that English people exist in an area he thought had been conquered

Jackson Hole's Parting Advice: Accept Even More Migrants To Offset Demographic Collapse, Or Else

Ecuador Angered! China-built Massive Dam is Tofu-Dreg, Ecuador Demands $400 Million Compensation

UK economy on brink of collapse (Needs IMF Bailout)

How Red Light Unlocks Your Body’s Hidden Fat-Burning Switch

The Mar-a-Lago Accord Confirmed: Miran Brings Trump's Reset To The Fed ($8,000 Gold)

This taboo sex act could save your relationship, expert insists: ‘Catalyst for conversations’

LA Police Bust Burglary Crew Suspected In 92 Residential Heists

Top 10 Jobs AI is Going to Wipe Out

It’s REALLY Happening! The Australian Continent Is Drifting Towards Asia

Broken Germany Discovers BRUTAL Reality

Nuclear War, Trump's New $500 dollar note: Armstrong says gold is going much higher

Scientists unlock 30-year mystery: Rare micronutrient holds key to brain health and cancer defense

City of Fort Wayne proposing changes to food, alcohol requirements for Riverfront Liquor Licenses

Cash Jordan: Migrant MOB BLOCKS Whitehouse… Demands ‘11 Million Illegals’ Stay

Not much going on that I can find today

In Britain, they are secretly preparing for mass deaths

These Are The Best And Worst Countries For Work (US Last Place)-Life Balance

These Are The World's Most Powerful Cars

Doctor: Trump has 6 to 8 Months TO LIVE?!

Whatever Happened to Robert E. Lee's 7 Children

Is the Wailing Wall Actually a Roman Fort?

Israelis Persecute Americans

Israelis SHOCKED The World Hates Them


Resistance
See other Resistance Articles

Title: Lindsey Graham: White House mulling indefinite detention
Source: Politico
URL Source: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0210/32998.html
Published: Feb 17, 2010
Author: JOSH GERSTEIN
Post Date: 2010-02-17 08:56:27 by bush_is_a_moonie
Keywords: None
Views: 105
Comments: 6

The White House is considering endorsing a law that would allow the indefinite detention of some alleged terrorists without trial as part of efforts to break a logjam with Congress over President Barack Obama’s plans to close the Guantanamo Bay prison, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said Monday.

Last summer, White House officials said they had ruled out seeking a “preventive detention” statute as a way to deal with anti-terror detainees, saying the administration would hold any Guantanamo prisoners brought to the U.S. in criminal courts or under the general “law of war” principles permitting detention of enemy combatants.

However, speaking at a news conference in Greenville, S.C., Monday, Graham said the White House now seems open to a new law to lay out the standards for open-ended imprisonment of those *** alleged *** to be members of or fighters for Al Qaeda or the Taliban.

“We’re beginning to look at the idea we need to change our laws, come up with better guidance” for judges handling cases of enemy combatants, Graham said. “I’ve been talking to the administration for the last couple of days. I’m encouraged that we’re going to sit down and do some of the hard things we haven’t done as a nation after Sept. 11.”

“I think we need to change our laws to give our judges better guidance — rules of the road,” Graham said. “We need a statute to deal with that.”

Asked whether the White House is again considering a preventive detention statute, spokesman Ben LaBolt said: “Sen. Graham has expressed interest in habeas reform and other policy ideas. We will review constructive proposals from Sen. Graham and other members of Congress that are consistent with the national security imperative that we close Guantanamo and ensure the swift and certain justice the families of victims have long deserved.”

Graham also suggested that administration officials who recently completed the review of all prisoners at Guantanamo believe that a new law would be a better way to keep those inmates locked up if they are transferred to the U.S.

“I think the Obama administration, after they looked at the cases at Guantanamo Bay, understands the need for a statute like that,” he said.

In Germany they first came for the Communists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant.

Then they came for me — and by that time no one was left to speak up

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 5.

#1. To: bush_is_a_moonie (#0)

The White House is considering endorsing a law that would allow the indefinite detention of some alleged terrorists without trial as part of efforts to break a logjam with Congress over President Barack Obama’s plans to close the Guantanamo Bay prison, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said Monday.

Clearly unconstitutional. Graham is despicable. I wish he was eaten alive by hungry ants.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-02-17   9:01:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: A K A Stone (#1)

While I agree completely with your opinion of Graham, I find it curious that you would say such a thing after your comments concerning what people were saying about Lautenberg.

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2010-02-17   9:23:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: F.A. Hayek Fan (#2)

While I agree completely with your opinion of Graham, I find it curious that you would say such a thing after your comments concerning what people were saying about Lautenberg.

You kind of got me there don't you. Oh well I'm not completely consistent.

Let me add this though. It was reported that Lautenbert was dead. After they are dead I tend to give then a little of a break because it is in Gods hand at that point.

I also know more about Graham. He had such potential, and I have come to despise him.

Hope that makes sense.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-02-17   9:40:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: A K A Stone (#4)

You kind of got me there don't you. Oh well I'm not completely consistent.

I wasn't trying to get you. It was just something I noticed. I don't think any of us is 100% consistent with our beliefs.

Let me add this though. It was reported that Lautenbert was dead. After they are dead I tend to give then a little of a break because it is in Gods hand at that point.

Understandable. I was once told by a devout Christian whom I respected that (at least in his eyes) it's OK to badmouth the dead as long as you don't wish hell upon them. He considered that to be a no-no because that would be a type of judgment that he had no right to make. I have no idea what the correct answer is.

I also know more about Graham. He had such potential, and I have come to despise him.

Yes, he definitely is not the same Graham that he was during the Clinton impeachment era. He was a hero then.

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2010-02-17   10:14:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 5.

        There are no replies to Comment # 5.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 5.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]