[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

They Just Revealed EVERYTHING... [Project 2029]

Trump ACCUSED Of MASS EXECUTING Illegals By DUMPING Them In The Ocean

The Siege (1998)

Trump Admin To BAN Pride Rainbow Crosswalks, DoT Orders ALL Distractions REMOVED

Elon Musk Backing Thomas Massie Against Trump-AIPAC Challenger

Skateboarding Dog

Israel's Plans for Jordan

Daily Vitamin D Supplementation Slows Cellular Aging:

Hepatitis E Virus in Pork

Hospital Executives Arrested After Nurse Convicted of Killing Seven Newborns, Trying to Kill Eight More

The Explosion of Jewish Fatigue Syndrome

Tucker Carlson: RFK Jr's Mission to End Skyrocketing Autism, Declassifying Kennedy Files

Israel has killed 1,000 Palestinians in the West Bank since October 7, 2023

100m Americans live in areas with cancer-causing 'forever chemicals' in their water

Scientists discover cancer-fighting bacteria that "soak up" forever chemicals in the body

Israel limits entry of baby formula in Gaza as infants die of hunger

17 Ways mRNA Shots May CAUSE CANCER, According to Over 100 STUDIES

Report: Pentagon Halts Some Munitions Shipments To Ukraine Over Concerns That US Stockpiles Are Too Low

Locals Fear Demolitions as Israeli Troops Set Up New Base in Syrias Quneitra

Russian forces discover cache of Ukrainian chemical drone munitions FSB

Clarissa Ward: Gaza is what is turning people overseas against the US

What Parents Wish Their Children Could Grow Up Without

WHY SO MANY FOREIGN BASES IN AFRICA?

Trump called Candace Owens about Brigitte Macron's P*NIS?

New Mexico Is The Most-Dependent State On The Federal Govt, New Jersey The Least

"This Is The Next Level": AI-Powered "Digital Workers" Deployed At Major Bank To Work Alongside Humans

Cash Jordan: ICE Raids Taco Trucks... Deports 'Entire Parking Lot' of Migrants

Jaguar Went Woke & The Results Were Catastrophic

Trump Threatens To DEPORT ELON MUSK Over Big Beautiful Bill Feud, Elon NEVER Wanted EV Mandates

If Trump Cared About Israel, He would Stop the Genocide


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: Debra Medina agrees that 9/11 truthers' beliefs are 'despicable' (AUDIO)
Source: EXAMINER
URL Source: http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x- ... s-beliefs-are-despicable-AUDIO
Published: Feb 22, 2010
Author: .
Post Date: 2010-02-22 03:00:31 by Artisan
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 24250
Comments: 485

Debra Medina agrees that 9/11 truthers' beliefs are 'despicable' (AUDIO)
February 21, 11:57 PM
LA County Libertarian Examiner Martin Hill

After being interviewed by Glenn Beck and characterized by the talk show host as a '9/11/ Truther',

Debra Medina issued a statement Feb. 11 on her website regarding the Beck interview. She stated in part, "I have never been involved with the 9/11 truth movement, and there is no doubt in my mind that Muslim terrorists flew planes into those buildings on 9/11. I have not seen any evidence nor have I ever believed that our government was involved or directed those individuals in any way.... The real underlying question here, though, is whether or not people have the right to question our government. I think the fact that people are even asking questions on this level gets to the incredible distrust career politicians have fostered ..."

Questioned by Dallas talk show host Mark Davis last week, Medina had stronger and more derisive views of 9/11 truthers, agreeing with the host that anyone who dare would believe that the U.S. government was involved in the 2001 attack is "despicable'. Partial transcript:

Davis: "...it would have been over in a day, if after the Beck thing, you'd have said boy, I'm sorry, I messed up. I should've identified this 9/11 truther movement as the despicable paranoid cult that they are, what a horrible hateful belief to have in your head that 9/11 was an inside job. Why didnt you do that?

[ARTICLE CONTINUES HERE Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 121.

#4. To: Artisan (#0)

These talk show pundits are propaganda specialists. Medina's handlers are telling her to back away from the 9-11 truth issue altogether.

Listening to this Talk pundit (Mark Davis) begin the interview, he loads the conversation with the Beck-Medina 9-11 truther stuff commenting that he only wants to clarify her position and then he throws in the "despicable" terminology twice ... he guided the conversation and she followed.

It would not have done her any good to begin that interview with an argument with the host, however I do think she may have handled the issue without sounding as if truthers were "despicable" ...

The host introduced the despicable term as applying to anyone that would even think that George Bush and Dick Cheney would SLAUGHTER 3000 Americans as an excuse to enter war against Iraq.

While many of us here may think that's exactly what happened (I'm one of those "despicable" types) many truthers are simply asking for a new and complete investigation to get at the truth, which a majority on the 9-11 Commission admitted was incomplete and error filled because the intel agents and agencies lied.

I'd like to see Medina get elected and start an intense investigation into the Kennedy Assassination focusing on George Herbert Walker Bush. All of the terror that has taken place since Kennedy was murdered is related and has been orchestrated by the same rogue elements of the CIA-MOSSAD-MI-6 ... banker owned Intelligence Agencies with old man Bush directing much of it.

That bastard needs to be tried and hung.

noone222  posted on  2010-02-22   5:57:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: noone222, lod, christine (#4)

I don't get you folks. She clearly dissed you and you still support her.

You say he did a hatchet job on her. What the fuck are you talking about. He gave her the opportunity before a large audience to talk about 911 truth. And you guys call it a hatchet job. Then she calls you idiots and you still want to vote for her. I can maybe understand wanting to vote for her. But why dis Beck for bringing up a relevant question?

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-02-22   8:27:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: A K A Stone (#25)

But why dis Beck for bringing up a relevant question?

9/11 Truth is not an issue the state government of Texas can deal with at all. Now if it were the 1960s and we were dealing with the massive conspiracy/coverup that was the JFK assassination, I can see relevance in asking a potential governor about what he or she planned to do about that.

Having said that, I am puzzled, first of all, as to why Beck is interested in taking sides in a Texas GOP gubernatorial primary, as he obviously HAS very openly sided with Rick Perry (Beck wants to "French kiss" him), and also why this would be of interest to his audience outside of Texas. IOW, why did he regionalize his show that day and on following days when he continued to talk about the issue as he tried to equate continuing to question 9/11 with "Holocaust denial" or something?

Of course, the biggest blunder of all was the decision by Debra Medina to talk with Beck at all. Perhaps she was not wanting to give him a chance to demonize her in another way by saying "Debra Medina refused to go on my show." But that would have been preferable to what happened by accepting his invitation.

Why does Beck even have guests? Limbaugh doesn't.

Sam Houston  posted on  2010-02-22   10:13:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: Sam Houston (#47)

Here is the way I see it. Beck thinks 911 "truthers" are nuts. That is his right.

He caught wind that Medina is a 911 truther.

So he thinks she is unfit.

So he asks her about it. (freedom of the press and speech)

She likely has some 911 truth sympathies. But she is a wisy washy politician (most are). So she calculates and decides not to mention that she is a closet truther.

All Beck did was ask a question. You may think it is not relevant to the governors race and others may agree. But the question is out there and she could have answered it anyway she wanted. She could have hit a home run out of the park and said she thinks it was an inside job. But she thought that would minimize her chances. So she chose her path. No sense getting mad at Beck, all he did was ask a question. A question people were interested in. I suspect christine and lodwick wouldn't have supported her if she thought 911 truthers were despicable like she said. She sounds like a typical finger in the wind politician.

So here we have it. Her and Beck think the same about 911. But you folks hate Beck and love Medina for that view. It isn't logical.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-02-22   10:25:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: A K A Stone (#51)

Beck's question to Medina is as relevant to Texas politics as is what brand of wacky religion she does or doesn't belong to. Medina's mistake was to not have refered Beck to one hooked nosed Jew, Larry Silverstein, and his "pull it" comment (not to mention the many billions of dollars his $25 million personal investment made him in a mere 6-weeks)

Jethro Tull  posted on  2010-02-22   10:32:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: Jethro Tull (#52)

It is not up to you to decide what is relevant. Your just pissed because Medina turned out to be like the rest of them.

She shares Becks view of 911.

She is also against abortion like Beck.

Beck is right on most conservative issues. Except it bugs you guys and me that he is for the war and disses 911 truthers. Well guess what. You give a pass for Medina for having the same views.

Or do you think she is lying about her views on 911?

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-02-22   10:37:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: A K A Stone (#54) (Edited)

The system is set up to let anyone who looks like they will get a top government job know that they will be toast if they expose the crimes of the false flag operations of 9 11. She still should win as I would rather see someone win who is troubled by lies their arms were twisted to utter then an idiot who has no clue in the first place.

9-11 was an inside job, and until the truth is freely known and the criminals caught, prosecuted and hung there is no freedom in the United States. make no mistake about it.

Ferret Mike  posted on  2010-02-22   10:42:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: Ferret Mike (#57)

9-11 was an inside job, and until the truth is freely known and the criminals caught, prosecuted and hung there is no freedom in the United States. make no mistake about it.

Amen to that. It is a litmus test issue for EVERY politickian everywhere and all the time.

Rotara  posted on  2010-02-22   11:03:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#94. To: Rotara, Ferret Mike, A K A Stone, Lod, Cynicom, PSUSA, noone222, Jethro Tull, Eric Stratton, Artisan, Esso (#69)

Amen to that. It is a litmus test issue for EVERY politickian everywhere and all the time.

to say i'm disappointed is a vast understatement. 9/11 is a litmus test for me too though, in this case, i could swallow a candidate's disbelief for the state's issues she would bring to the table. yeah, i'm choosing the lesser of 3 evils-- something i swore i'd never do again. well, my vote's been cast and i'm back in the f'ing system.

and what's really chapping my rear end is that Medina thinks i'm despicable. that means she also thinks that the families of the 9/11 victims who are asking questions are despicable too.

christine  posted on  2010-02-22   11:33:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#110. To: christine (#94) (Edited)

so the only thing we can do is keep chipping away.

the logic of the situation is becoming so transparent, it's unlikely the gatekeepers will be able to keep this bottled up forever.

but once a critical mass of americans figures things out, then comes the hard part.

groundresonance  posted on  2010-02-22   11:48:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#117. To: groundresonance (#110)

but once a critical mass of americans figures things out

How long shall we hold our breath awaiting critical mass? The dumbing down of the masses is working against the critical mass theory, IMHO.

abraxas  posted on  2010-02-22   11:58:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#121. To: abraxas (#117) (Edited)

so i guess the solution lies in censoring the dogpoop out of the internet, doesnt it?

then we've arrived at such an obvious situation that anyone who's been a potential member of the "critical mass" will become a full-fledged member at the stroke of a pen.

groundresonance  posted on  2010-02-22   12:07:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 121.

#123. To: groundresonance (#121)

so i guess the solution lies in censoring the dogpoop out of the internet, doesnt it?

Censoring is not a solution. Critical thinking is.....but I don't have a game plan to get the masses interested in it. There is much information at their fingertips, what is lacking is interest.

abraxas  posted on  2010-02-22 12:09:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 121.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]