[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Who Killed Charlie Kirk? the Case Against Israel

Sen. Grassley announces a whistleblower has exposed the FBI program “Arctic Frost” for targeting 92 Republican groups

Keto, Ivermectin, & Fenbendazole: New Cancer Treatment Protocol Gains Momentum

Bill Ackman 'Hammered' Charlie Kirk in August 'Intervention' for Platforming Israel Critics

"I've Never Experienced Crime Of This Magnitude Before": 20-Year Veteran Austrian Police Spox

The UK is F*CKED, and the people have had enough

No place for hate apeech

America and Israel both told Qatar to allow Hamas to stay in their country

Video | Robert Kennedy brings down the house.

Owner releases video of Trump banner ripping, shooting in WNC

Cash Jordan: Looters ‘Forcibly Evict’ Millionaires… as California’s “NO ARRESTS” Policy BACKFIRES

Dallas Motel Horror: Immigrant Machete Killer Caught

America has been infiltrated and occupied Netanyahu 1980

Senior Trump Official Declares War On Far-Left NGOs Sowing Chaos Nationwide

White House Plans Security Boost On Civil Terrorism Fears

Visualizing The Number Of Farms In Each US State

Let her cry

The Secret Version of the Bible You’re Never Taught - Secret History

Rocker defames Charlie Kirk threatens free speech

Paramount Has a $1.5 Billion South Park Problem

European Warmongers Angry That Trump Did Not Buy Into the ‘Drone Attack in Poland’

Grassley Unveils Declassified Documents From FBI's Alleged 'Political Hit Job' On Trump

2 In 5 Young Adults Are Taking On Debt For Social Image, To Impress Peers, Study Finds

Visualizing Global Gold Production By Region

RFK Jr. About to DROP the Tylenol–Autism BOMBSHELL & Trump tweets cryptic vaccine message

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March

Something BIG is happening (One Assassination Changed Everything)

The Truth About This Piece Of Sh*t

Breaking: 18,000 Epstein emails just dropped.

Memphis: FOUR CHILDREN shot inside a home (National Guard Inbound)


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: Debra Medina agrees that 9/11 truthers' beliefs are 'despicable' (AUDIO)
Source: EXAMINER
URL Source: http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x- ... s-beliefs-are-despicable-AUDIO
Published: Feb 22, 2010
Author: .
Post Date: 2010-02-22 03:00:31 by Artisan
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 29450
Comments: 485

Debra Medina agrees that 9/11 truthers' beliefs are 'despicable' (AUDIO)
February 21, 11:57 PM
LA County Libertarian Examiner Martin Hill

After being interviewed by Glenn Beck and characterized by the talk show host as a '9/11/ Truther',

Debra Medina issued a statement Feb. 11 on her website regarding the Beck interview. She stated in part, "I have never been involved with the 9/11 truth movement, and there is no doubt in my mind that Muslim terrorists flew planes into those buildings on 9/11. I have not seen any evidence nor have I ever believed that our government was involved or directed those individuals in any way.... The real underlying question here, though, is whether or not people have the right to question our government. I think the fact that people are even asking questions on this level gets to the incredible distrust career politicians have fostered ..."

Questioned by Dallas talk show host Mark Davis last week, Medina had stronger and more derisive views of 9/11 truthers, agreeing with the host that anyone who dare would believe that the U.S. government was involved in the 2001 attack is "despicable'. Partial transcript:

Davis: "...it would have been over in a day, if after the Beck thing, you'd have said boy, I'm sorry, I messed up. I should've identified this 9/11 truther movement as the despicable paranoid cult that they are, what a horrible hateful belief to have in your head that 9/11 was an inside job. Why didnt you do that?

[ARTICLE CONTINUES HERE Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 47.

#4. To: Artisan (#0)

These talk show pundits are propaganda specialists. Medina's handlers are telling her to back away from the 9-11 truth issue altogether.

Listening to this Talk pundit (Mark Davis) begin the interview, he loads the conversation with the Beck-Medina 9-11 truther stuff commenting that he only wants to clarify her position and then he throws in the "despicable" terminology twice ... he guided the conversation and she followed.

It would not have done her any good to begin that interview with an argument with the host, however I do think she may have handled the issue without sounding as if truthers were "despicable" ...

The host introduced the despicable term as applying to anyone that would even think that George Bush and Dick Cheney would SLAUGHTER 3000 Americans as an excuse to enter war against Iraq.

While many of us here may think that's exactly what happened (I'm one of those "despicable" types) many truthers are simply asking for a new and complete investigation to get at the truth, which a majority on the 9-11 Commission admitted was incomplete and error filled because the intel agents and agencies lied.

I'd like to see Medina get elected and start an intense investigation into the Kennedy Assassination focusing on George Herbert Walker Bush. All of the terror that has taken place since Kennedy was murdered is related and has been orchestrated by the same rogue elements of the CIA-MOSSAD-MI-6 ... banker owned Intelligence Agencies with old man Bush directing much of it.

That bastard needs to be tried and hung.

noone222  posted on  2010-02-22   5:57:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: noone222, lod, christine (#4)

I don't get you folks. She clearly dissed you and you still support her.

You say he did a hatchet job on her. What the fuck are you talking about. He gave her the opportunity before a large audience to talk about 911 truth. And you guys call it a hatchet job. Then she calls you idiots and you still want to vote for her. I can maybe understand wanting to vote for her. But why dis Beck for bringing up a relevant question?

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-02-22   8:27:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: A K A Stone (#25)

But why dis Beck for bringing up a relevant question?

9/11 Truth is not an issue the state government of Texas can deal with at all. Now if it were the 1960s and we were dealing with the massive conspiracy/coverup that was the JFK assassination, I can see relevance in asking a potential governor about what he or she planned to do about that.

Having said that, I am puzzled, first of all, as to why Beck is interested in taking sides in a Texas GOP gubernatorial primary, as he obviously HAS very openly sided with Rick Perry (Beck wants to "French kiss" him), and also why this would be of interest to his audience outside of Texas. IOW, why did he regionalize his show that day and on following days when he continued to talk about the issue as he tried to equate continuing to question 9/11 with "Holocaust denial" or something?

Of course, the biggest blunder of all was the decision by Debra Medina to talk with Beck at all. Perhaps she was not wanting to give him a chance to demonize her in another way by saying "Debra Medina refused to go on my show." But that would have been preferable to what happened by accepting his invitation.

Why does Beck even have guests? Limbaugh doesn't.

Sam Houston  posted on  2010-02-22   10:13:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 47.

#51. To: Sam Houston (#47)

Here is the way I see it. Beck thinks 911 "truthers" are nuts. That is his right.

He caught wind that Medina is a 911 truther.

So he thinks she is unfit.

So he asks her about it. (freedom of the press and speech)

She likely has some 911 truth sympathies. But she is a wisy washy politician (most are). So she calculates and decides not to mention that she is a closet truther.

All Beck did was ask a question. You may think it is not relevant to the governors race and others may agree. But the question is out there and she could have answered it anyway she wanted. She could have hit a home run out of the park and said she thinks it was an inside job. But she thought that would minimize her chances. So she chose her path. No sense getting mad at Beck, all he did was ask a question. A question people were interested in. I suspect christine and lodwick wouldn't have supported her if she thought 911 truthers were despicable like she said. She sounds like a typical finger in the wind politician.

So here we have it. Her and Beck think the same about 911. But you folks hate Beck and love Medina for that view. It isn't logical.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-02-22 10:25:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 47.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]