[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

'Hit Us, Please' - America's Left Issues A 'Broken Arrow' Signal To Europe

Cash Jordan Trump Deports ‘Thousands of Migrants’ to Africa… on Purpose

Gunman Ambushes Border Patrol Agents In Texas Amid Anti-ICE Rhetoric From Democrats

Texas Flood

Why America Built A Forest From Canada To Texas

Tucker Carlson Interviews President of Iran Mosoud Pezeshkian

PROOF Netanyahu Wants US To Fight His Wars

RAPID CRUSTAL MOVEMENT DETECTED- Are the Unusual Earthquakes TRIGGER for MORE (in Japan and Italy) ?

Google Bets Big On Nuclear Fusion

Iran sets a world record by deporting 300,000 illegal refugees in 14 days

Brazilian Women Soccer Players (in Bikinis) Incredible Skills

Watch: Mexico City Protest Against American Ex-Pat 'Invasion' Turns Viole

Kazakhstan Just BETRAYED Russia - Takes gunpowder out of Putin’s Hands

Why CNN & Fareed Zakaria are Wrong About Iran and Trump

Something Is Going Deeply WRONG In Russia

329 Rivers in China Exceed Flood Warnings, With 75,000 Dams in Critical Condition

Command Of Russian Army 'Undermined' After 16 Of Putin's Generals Killed At War, UK Says

Rickards: Superintelligence Will Never Arrive

Which Countries Invest In The US The Most?

The History of Barbecue

‘Pathetic’: Joe Biden tells another ‘tall tale’ during rare public appearance

Lawsuit Reveals CDC Has ZERO Evidence Proving Vaccines Don't Cause Autism

Trumps DOJ Reportedly Quietly Looking Into Criminal Charges Against Election Officials

Volcanic Risk and Phreatic (Groundwater) eruptions at Campi Flegrei in Italy

Russia Upgrades AGS-17 Automatic Grenade Launcher!

They told us the chickenpox vaccine was no big deal—just a routine jab to “protect” kids from a mild childhood illness

Pentagon creates new military border zone in Arizona

For over 200 years neurological damage from vaccines has been noted and documented

The killing of cardiologist in Gaza must be Indonesia's wake-up call

Marandi: Israel Prepares Proxies for Next War with Iran?


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: Debra Medina agrees that 9/11 truthers' beliefs are 'despicable' (AUDIO)
Source: EXAMINER
URL Source: http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x- ... s-beliefs-are-despicable-AUDIO
Published: Feb 22, 2010
Author: .
Post Date: 2010-02-22 03:00:31 by Artisan
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 26514
Comments: 485

Debra Medina agrees that 9/11 truthers' beliefs are 'despicable' (AUDIO)
February 21, 11:57 PM
LA County Libertarian Examiner Martin Hill

After being interviewed by Glenn Beck and characterized by the talk show host as a '9/11/ Truther',

Debra Medina issued a statement Feb. 11 on her website regarding the Beck interview. She stated in part, "I have never been involved with the 9/11 truth movement, and there is no doubt in my mind that Muslim terrorists flew planes into those buildings on 9/11. I have not seen any evidence nor have I ever believed that our government was involved or directed those individuals in any way.... The real underlying question here, though, is whether or not people have the right to question our government. I think the fact that people are even asking questions on this level gets to the incredible distrust career politicians have fostered ..."

Questioned by Dallas talk show host Mark Davis last week, Medina had stronger and more derisive views of 9/11 truthers, agreeing with the host that anyone who dare would believe that the U.S. government was involved in the 2001 attack is "despicable'. Partial transcript:

Davis: "...it would have been over in a day, if after the Beck thing, you'd have said boy, I'm sorry, I messed up. I should've identified this 9/11 truther movement as the despicable paranoid cult that they are, what a horrible hateful belief to have in your head that 9/11 was an inside job. Why didnt you do that?

[ARTICLE CONTINUES HERE Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 92.

#4. To: Artisan (#0)

These talk show pundits are propaganda specialists. Medina's handlers are telling her to back away from the 9-11 truth issue altogether.

Listening to this Talk pundit (Mark Davis) begin the interview, he loads the conversation with the Beck-Medina 9-11 truther stuff commenting that he only wants to clarify her position and then he throws in the "despicable" terminology twice ... he guided the conversation and she followed.

It would not have done her any good to begin that interview with an argument with the host, however I do think she may have handled the issue without sounding as if truthers were "despicable" ...

The host introduced the despicable term as applying to anyone that would even think that George Bush and Dick Cheney would SLAUGHTER 3000 Americans as an excuse to enter war against Iraq.

While many of us here may think that's exactly what happened (I'm one of those "despicable" types) many truthers are simply asking for a new and complete investigation to get at the truth, which a majority on the 9-11 Commission admitted was incomplete and error filled because the intel agents and agencies lied.

I'd like to see Medina get elected and start an intense investigation into the Kennedy Assassination focusing on George Herbert Walker Bush. All of the terror that has taken place since Kennedy was murdered is related and has been orchestrated by the same rogue elements of the CIA-MOSSAD-MI-6 ... banker owned Intelligence Agencies with old man Bush directing much of it.

That bastard needs to be tried and hung.

noone222  posted on  2010-02-22   5:57:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: noone222, lod, christine (#4)

I don't get you folks. She clearly dissed you and you still support her.

You say he did a hatchet job on her. What the fuck are you talking about. He gave her the opportunity before a large audience to talk about 911 truth. And you guys call it a hatchet job. Then she calls you idiots and you still want to vote for her. I can maybe understand wanting to vote for her. But why dis Beck for bringing up a relevant question?

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-02-22   8:27:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: A K A Stone (#25)

But why dis Beck for bringing up a relevant question?

9/11 Truth is not an issue the state government of Texas can deal with at all. Now if it were the 1960s and we were dealing with the massive conspiracy/coverup that was the JFK assassination, I can see relevance in asking a potential governor about what he or she planned to do about that.

Having said that, I am puzzled, first of all, as to why Beck is interested in taking sides in a Texas GOP gubernatorial primary, as he obviously HAS very openly sided with Rick Perry (Beck wants to "French kiss" him), and also why this would be of interest to his audience outside of Texas. IOW, why did he regionalize his show that day and on following days when he continued to talk about the issue as he tried to equate continuing to question 9/11 with "Holocaust denial" or something?

Of course, the biggest blunder of all was the decision by Debra Medina to talk with Beck at all. Perhaps she was not wanting to give him a chance to demonize her in another way by saying "Debra Medina refused to go on my show." But that would have been preferable to what happened by accepting his invitation.

Why does Beck even have guests? Limbaugh doesn't.

Sam Houston  posted on  2010-02-22   10:13:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: Sam Houston (#47)

Here is the way I see it. Beck thinks 911 "truthers" are nuts. That is his right.

He caught wind that Medina is a 911 truther.

So he thinks she is unfit.

So he asks her about it. (freedom of the press and speech)

She likely has some 911 truth sympathies. But she is a wisy washy politician (most are). So she calculates and decides not to mention that she is a closet truther.

All Beck did was ask a question. You may think it is not relevant to the governors race and others may agree. But the question is out there and she could have answered it anyway she wanted. She could have hit a home run out of the park and said she thinks it was an inside job. But she thought that would minimize her chances. So she chose her path. No sense getting mad at Beck, all he did was ask a question. A question people were interested in. I suspect christine and lodwick wouldn't have supported her if she thought 911 truthers were despicable like she said. She sounds like a typical finger in the wind politician.

So here we have it. Her and Beck think the same about 911. But you folks hate Beck and love Medina for that view. It isn't logical.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-02-22   10:25:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: A K A Stone (#51)

Beck's question to Medina is as relevant to Texas politics as is what brand of wacky religion she does or doesn't belong to. Medina's mistake was to not have refered Beck to one hooked nosed Jew, Larry Silverstein, and his "pull it" comment (not to mention the many billions of dollars his $25 million personal investment made him in a mere 6-weeks)

Jethro Tull  posted on  2010-02-22   10:32:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: Jethro Tull (#52)

Besides you don't even vote. So what do you care. You're a sit there and take it kind of guy. A lot of talk but no action.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-02-22   10:42:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: A K A Stone (#56)

I would have voted - I did contribute money - for her before she became Christian-like and showed herself to be a fraud. Now I hope she flip-flops on abortion so she can help pare down the ghetto dwellers and Hageeites.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2010-02-22   10:59:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: Jethro Tull (#64)

I would have voted - I did contribute money - for her before she became Christian-like and showed herself to be a fraud. Now I hope she flip-flops on abortion so she can help pare down the ghetto dwellers and Hageeites.

You always swore up and down and bragged you hadn't voted since like Buchanan or something. Now you say you would have voted for her. Then you talked about giving her money. Sounds like you feel suckered. I mean coming out and considering voting for a candidate for the first time in more then a decade. then give her money. Then Beck brought you back to reality.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-02-22   11:04:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#77. To: A K A Stone (#72)

You always swore up and down and bragged you hadn't voted since like Buchanan or something. Now you say you would have voted for her

Correct. The election of the Marxist has forced me to change strategy.

Now, stop yelling at me and lets agree on what we agree on and push the rest to the side.

Time is short.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2010-02-22   11:09:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#81. To: Jethro Tull (#77)

Correct. The election of the Marxist has forced me to change strategy.

Now, stop yelling at me and lets agree on what we agree on and pust the rest to the side.

Time is short.

Ok. Fair enough.

If you changed strategy then why can't you admit that Beck is in favor of a lot of the stuff that we have been asking for and wanting? He falls short on the war issue, but neither party is stopping it. He seems passionate and true about his beliefs that he does champion. I can see it in his face and hear it in his voice. And the things that he agrees with me on are many. The dems agree with me on zero.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-02-22   11:14:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#92. To: A K A Stone (#81)

IMO, with Beck it isn't just one issue. Honestly? I think his ADD is a real drawback to his personal and professional life. His amusement value for me has ended. Had he stayed in teaching mode (impossible; see his ADD) afa the constitution, the Fed, etc. and stopped the damn crying, and references to his alcoholism, he would have made a difference. Like Medina, he damaged himself especially since his speech Saturday at CPAC. It will take months for me to know if I'm right, but I'm thinking his rally on 8/28 will flop as will his events that precede it.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2010-02-22   11:32:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 92.

        There are no replies to Comment # 92.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 92.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]