See other 9/11 Articles
Title: EXPLOSIVE NEWS: Push for 911 Investigation
Source:
Washington Times
URL Source: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news ... 2/inside-the-beltway-70128635/
Published: Feb 23, 2010
Author: Jennifer Harper
Post Date: 2010-02-23 17:53:47 by abraxas
Keywords: None
Views: 1427
Comments: 105
By Jennifer Harper INSIDE THE BELTWAY EXPLOSIVE NEWS A lingering technical question about the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks still haunts some, and it has political implications: How did 200,000 tons of steel disintegrate and drop in 11 seconds? A thousand architects and engineers want to know, and are calling on Congress to order a new investigation into the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7 at the World Trade Center. "In order to bring down this kind of mass in such a short period of time, the material must have been artificially, exploded outwards," says Richard Gage, a San Francisco architect and founder of the nonprofit Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Mr. Gage, who is a member of the American Institute of Architects, managed to persuade more than 1,000 of his peers to sign a new petition requesting a formal inquiry. "The official Federal Emergency Management [Agency] and National Institute of Standards and Technology reports provide insufficient, contradictory and fraudulent accounts of the circumstances of the towers' destruction. We are therefore calling for a grand jury investigation of NIST officials," Mr. Gage adds. The technical issues surrounding the collapse of the towers has prompted years of debate, rebuttal and ridicule. He is particularly disturbed by Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper, which was not hit by an aircraft, yet came down in "pure free-fall acceleration." He also says that more than 100 first-responders reported explosions and flashes as the towers were falling and cited evidence of "multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally 600 ft. at 60 mph" and the "mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking." There is also evidence of "advanced explosive nano-thermitic composite material found in the World Trade Center dust," Mr. Gage says. The group's petition at www. ae911truth.org is already on its way to members of Congress. "Government officials will be notified that 'Misprision of Treason,' U.S. Code 18 (Sec. 2382), is a serious federal offense, which requires those with evidence of treason to act," Mr. Gage says. "The implications are enormous and may have profound impact on the forthcoming Khalid Shaikh Mohammed trial."
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-62) not displayed.
.
.
.
#63. To: abraxas (#62)
(Edited)
"You think conditions are going to improve?" I don't know but speculation over the use of implantable microchips does not disturb me. Has there ever been a technology forced upon Americans? It seems to me that the marketplace ultimately determines which technologies thrive. Mister Clean posted on 2006-12-11 15:10:42 ET Reply Trace When did we vote for the surveillance cameras everywhere? When did we sign petitions for all the new tech used to control crowds using pain, sickening sound and staining people with dyes to mark them to be apprehended later? When haven't they forced technologies on us? Did we ask to be seen naked by strangers working security at high tech machines at airports? I et there are many here who can refute this post from LP y him with even better examples then I can come up with off the cuff.
Mike, good to see that your eyes have opened, and that you now know, as MANY other people know, you have been betrayed. Let's see if it gets better. Obama has his chance to change things given this very public disclosure of 9/11 treason. Let's see what he does with it.
I'm not threatened by surveillance cameras. Oh and if you're out in public, your privacy can't be invaded by a surveillance camera.
In some cases, yes. Banning cigarettes is such an example of "socitey over individual."
Who said they did?
LOL, I agree, like at monster truck shows, for instance. Imagine the pollution that would result from bystanders smoking cigarettes as thousands of monster trucks came storming down their streets. That smoke could mix with exhaust fumes and create smog, a deadly killer especially of children and the elderly. I'm glad you and your monster truck legions are looking out for us.
"If you think 9/11 "truth" is on the brink of wide acceptance you are in for a huge disappointment" - Mister Clean 02/22/10
No one should if they're not breaking the law. Sig...heil! :)
"If you think 9/11 "truth" is on the brink of wide acceptance you are in for a huge disappointment" - Mister Clean 02/22/10
When did we vote for the surveillance cameras everywhere? When did we sign petitions for all the new tech used to control crowds using pain, sickening sound and staining people with dyes to mark them to be apprehended later? The market decided that surveillance cameras were a useful tool, it's not an issue you can vote on. And when you have low life anarchists who engage in violence instead of peaceful protest, pain weapons are necessary to crush them. When haven't they forced technologies on us? The person was talking about forced microchipping. They haven't forced that on anyone. Did we ask to be seen naked by strangers working security at high tech machines at airports? Don't fly then or ask for a pat down. Nobody is forced to go into the backscatter machines at US airports.
Do you have some examples of innocent people who have been hurt by surveillance cameras? No? I didn't think you did.
LOL, next time you go to a bar that allows smoking, here's a piece of advice: don't breathe
"If you think 9/11 "truth" is on the brink of wide acceptance you are in for a huge disappointment" - Mister Clean 02/22/10
No? I didn't think you did. Thanks for giving me a chance to answer, flowerhead. Your premise is evil, I shant play except to point out how wrong you are from step 1.
"If you think 9/11 "truth" is on the brink of wide acceptance you are in for a huge disappointment" - Mister Clean 02/22/10
Surveillance cameras don't harm innocent people if they did the anti-surveillance camera crowd would have plenty of examples.
This mr clean jerk is always trying to baffle us with bullshit instead of dazzling us with brilliance. just another insignificant jew.
Fine, cunt. Why don't you come to work for me mining coal for minstrel shows?
"If you think 9/11 "truth" is on the brink of wide acceptance you are in for a huge disappointment" - Mister Clean 02/22/10
That's not even the point Mister Clean. Why should our government have any surveillance on citizens? Why? Why should our taxdollars, without a vote or a say by the people, go to purchase any sort of surveillance to watch We The People? Who's goobermint is this anyway? I sure as hell don't want my taxdollars supporting candid cameras. Why should these camaras be used to extort money from the people for traffic violations or anything else for that matter? Some land of the free. Thank you for yet another stellar example of why you are a goobermint bootlicker.......
"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. ... We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of." Edward Bernays, Father of Public Relations
The same reason a private business should: to catch people breaking the law.
Keep asking, keep questioning what motivates him. I got $5 says its.... :)
"If you think 9/11 "truth" is on the brink of wide acceptance you are in for a huge disappointment" - Mister Clean 02/22/10
Why don't you see if you can put a coherent thought together.
Private businesses charged with enforcing public law? That's a new concept, do you have a link authorizing any of this?
"If you think 9/11 "truth" is on the brink of wide acceptance you are in for a huge disappointment" - Mister Clean 02/22/10
bump (fucking Big Government Statist 911 Fairy Tale Whores should be shot on site IMO)
Why don't you dress up as an Alaskan Doll Sheep and do another little dance for me?
"If you think 9/11 "truth" is on the brink of wide acceptance you are in for a huge disappointment" - Mister Clean 02/22/10
We already pay for highway patrol and police departments for that, which we actually have a say in our taxdollars supporting this effort. Private business pays for thier own damn cameras........We the People shouldn't be paying for NANNY STATE to watch us. Only a goobermint bootlicker would support such insanity.
"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. ... We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of." Edward Bernays, Father of Public Relations
Who said anything about enforcing the law?
We already pay for highway patrol and police departments for that, which we actually have a say in our taxdollars supporting this effort. If you don't speed you won't get busted by a speed camera. If you don't run a red light you won't get busted by a red light camera. See how simple it is? Private business pays for thier own damn cameras........We the People shouldn't be paying for NANNY STATE to watch us. Only a goobermint bootlicker would support such insanity. Have you contacted your representatives and complained about it? I'd bet you haven't.
Uhh, you: "The same reason a private business should: to catch people breaking the law." - MisterClean
"If you think 9/11 "truth" is on the brink of wide acceptance you are in for a huge disappointment" - Mister Clean 02/22/10
Uhh, you: "The same reason a private business should: to catch people breaking the law." - MisterClean I didn't use the word enforce. I said catch. If you don't understand the difference you're an idiot.
The Browns have been sentenced to five and a half years in prison for tax evasion. They skipped their sentencing hearings, and Ed Brown has said he and his wife will refuse to surrender. They belong in jail. The sooner the better. Mister Clean posted on 2007-06-07 13:16:49 ET Reply Untrace Trace Proving with his own words what a government loving stooge he is.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. I forgot, you're an artist, the rest of us are white trash when we beat up burglars. Will you be my lawyer for the fucking rapture, nigger?
"If you think 9/11 "truth" is on the brink of wide acceptance you are in for a huge disappointment" - Mister Clean 02/22/10
Did you figure out the difference between "enforce" and "catch?"
I figured that out after a night in jail for whupping on the nigger that stole my bike.
"If you think 9/11 "truth" is on the brink of wide acceptance you are in for a huge disappointment" - Mister Clean 02/22/10
Here's the difference: a surveillance camera will CATCH a criminal breaking the law and the police/courts will ENFORCE the law by arresting, convicting and punishing the criminal. Understand now?
Whose CAMERA, Herr Lieberman?
"If you think 9/11 "truth" is on the brink of wide acceptance you are in for a huge disappointment" - Mister Clean 02/22/10
Doesn't matter. Again, if you know of any innocent people who have been harmed by those eeeeevil surveillance cameras, do tell.
You, for one, it's given you a permanent hard-on for patriots. I always knew you were a molester at heart.
"If you think 9/11 "truth" is on the brink of wide acceptance you are in for a huge disappointment" - Mister Clean 02/22/10
Too bad
there weren't surveillence cameras working, not only on 9-11 at the the twin
towers, which would have given a looksee, but on and working the last few months
24/7. Our government don't like surveillance cameras when they are lookijg at
things that show government agents breaking the law. Remember that gas station
across from the pentagon on 9-11 that had a working surveilance camera that
filmed the cruise missle that hit the Pentagon. Our government confiscated the
tape and I'm sure has destroyed it. The cops hate being taped breaking the law
and violating peoples rights.
I should have documented it and of course can't find it now of course but I saw a couple weeks ago a clip of a prominent official stating flat out that whatever hit the Pentagon on 9/11 was going 2500 miles per hour when it hit, vaporizing everything in its path, punching a hot vapor hole in the third ring.
"If you think 9/11 "truth" is on the brink of wide acceptance you are in for a huge disappointment" - Mister Clean 02/22/10
Twern't no 757 that's for sure.
Funny thing was that the loon I was watching didn't seem to find anything at all wrong with the idea of a 757 going 2500 miles per hour, which made him all the more amusing.
"If you think 9/11 "truth" is on the brink of wide acceptance you are in for a huge disappointment" - Mister Clean 02/22/10
there were several tapes confiscated. why? i'm asking rhetorically.
It never would have happened if the top people weren't involved. If the media ever reveals that 911 was a false flag then the puppets will be blamed. The top will never be blamed by the media.
God is always good!
I wonder if Cheney and BunnyPants would go down without singing about everything...
Comments (104 - 105) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest#19. To: Redheadedstranger (#17)
Toruk Makto
#64. To: Ferret Mike (#63)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#65. To: abraxas (#62)
Sheesh, you support the goobermint putting citizens on candid camera. You are silly enough to think that such an invasion of privacy is linked to guilt or innocence.......now that's some serious goobermint bootlicking.
#66. To: Ferret Mike (#61)
You are a "society over individual" collectivist, and deserve to be part of the ash heap of history.
#67. To: abraxas (#58)
Why does the IRS deserve support?
#68. To: Mister Clean (#66)
In some cases, yes. Banning cigarettes is such an example of "socitey over individual."
#69. To: Mister Clean (#65)
I'm not threatened by surveillance cameras.
#70. To: Ferret Mike (#63)
#71. To: Dakmar (#69)
No one should if they're not breaking the law.
#72. To: Mister Clean (#70)
Don't fly then or ask for a pat down.
#73. To: Mister Clean (#71)
Do you have some examples of innocent people who have been hurt by surveillance cameras?
#74. To: Dakmar (#73)
Your premise is evil, I shant play except to point out how wrong you are from step 1.
#75. To: Dakmar (#72)
#76. To: Mister Clean (#74)
Surveillance cameras don't harm innocent people if they did the anti-surveillance camera crowd would have plenty of examples.
#77. To: Mister Clean (#74)
Surveillance cameras don't harm innocent people if they did the anti-surveillance camera crowd would have plenty of examples.
#78. To: abraxas (#77)
Why should our government have any surveillance on citizens?
#79. To: LACUMO (#75)
This mr clean jerk is always trying to baffle us with bullshit instead of dazzling us with brilliance.
#80. To: Dakmar (#76)
Why don't you come to work for me mining coal for minstrel shows?
#81. To: Mister Clean (#78)
The same reason a private business should: to catch people breaking the law.
#82. To: abraxas (#77)
mouth FULL of boot
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams 
#83. To: Mister Clean (#80)
Why don't you see if you can put a coherent thought together.
#84. To: Mister Clean (#78)
The same reason a private business should: to catch people breaking the law.
#85. To: Dakmar (#81)
Private businesses charged with enforcing public law?
#86. To: abraxas (#84)
#87. To: Mister Clean (#85)
Who said anything about enforcing the law?
#88. To: Dakmar (#87)
Who said anything about enforcing the law?
#89. To: Ferret Mike (#33)
#24. To: Veritas (#0)
Lord Acton
#90. To: Mister Clean (#88)
(Edited)
I didn't use the word enforce. I said catch. If you don't understand the difference you're an idiot.
#91. To: Dakmar (#90)
I forgot, you're an artist, the rest of us are white trash when we beat up burglars. Will you be my lawyer for the fucking rapture, nigger?
#92. To: Mister Clean (#91)
#93. To: Dakmar (#92)
I figured that out after a night in jail for whupping on the nigger that stole my bike.
#94. To: Mister Clean (#93)
Here's the difference: a surveillance camera will CATCH a criminal
#95. To: Dakmar (#94)
Whose CAMERA, Herr Lieberman?
#96. To: Mister Clean (#95)
Again, if you know of any innocent people who have been harmed by those eeeeevil surveillance cameras, do tell.
#97. To: Dakmar, Mister Clean (#96)
Again, if you know of any innocent people who have been harmed by
those eeeeevil surveillance cameras, do tell.
#98. To: LACUMO (#97)
#99. To: Dakmar (#98)
whatever hit the Pentagon on 9/11
#100. To: LACUMO (#99)
#101. To: LACUMO (#97)
Too bad there weren't surveillence cameras working, not only on 9-11 at the the twin towers, which would have given a looksee, but on and working the last few months 24/7. Our government don't like surveillance cameras when they are looking at things that show government agents breaking the law. Remember that gas station across from the pentagon on 9-11 that had a working surveilance camera that filmed the cruise missle that hit the Pentagon. Our government confiscated the tape and I'm sure has destroyed it. The cops hate being taped breaking the law and violating peoples rights.
#102. To: FormerLurker (#31)
Perhaps, the TOP people were NOT involved, and it WAS a "rogue" operation that a certain faction initiated and carried out. Maybe some traitors WILL hang, who knows...
#103. To: RickyJ (#102)
If the media ever reveals that 911 was a false flag then the puppets will be blamed.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
.
.
.