See other Resistance Articles
Title: Ya' Gotta Dance With Them That Brung Ya'
Source:
Texian Blog
URL Source: http://www.texianranch.com/2010/02/ ... e-with-them-that-brung-ya.html
Published: Feb 24, 2010
Author: Ed Boyd
Post Date: 2010-02-24 11:30:28 by farmfriend
Keywords: None
Views: 325
Comments: 22
Wednesday, February 24, 2010 … as the old backwoods saying goes. This recent foot-in-mouth statement by Debra Medina on the Mark Davis radio show certainly brings that old saying to mind. It seems that we spent our whole paycheck on renting the limo, securing the tux, buying the best corsage, driving her to the prom and then she drops us like a rusty penny at the door of the ballroom. Debra, you're shooting yourself in the foot with this “despicable” thing. You really do need to keep dancing with we who brung ya'. Being a Medina Campaign 'Team Leader' Coordinator for a six County area in central Texas, I do have a dog in this fight and an opinion to go along with it. I've spent countless hours and finances that I can scarcely afford to give on this campaign and to be “thanked” by calling me “despicable” is hardly the gratitude I would have expected. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't rather miffed about this slur against my integrity. Not to worry though, Mrs. Medina, you haven't lost my support nor will you see a waning in my efforts and this is why: For starters, I feel sorry for you and those like you who still “don't get it” that our government is almost entirely comprised of criminals hell-bent on destroying what We the People have oft referred to as The American Dream. It seems that the split second anybody questions the “official” story presented by our government about practically any issue, they're labeled as somehow “hating” America. This seems to me to be a great way to execute a plan for tyranny: Steer the Sheeple on whatever path you wish for them to follow and then label anybody who questions that path as unpatriotic or even “terrorists.” When most people discuss the act of patriotism nowadays, they seem to confuse love-of-country (patriotism) with love-of-government (foolhardiness). But what do I know, I'm just a poor, dumb carpenter from the 21st century. Maybe, however, you'd be more inclined to believe somebody like this guy, or maybe this guy … or how 'bout this guy or even this guy, since they were in essence the actual founders of the so-called Truth Movement? They demanded – and eventually got – the “truth” to come out about the oppression they were subjected to by King George and through sheer diligence they eventually awakened their fellow citizens to these truths. After victory was achieved and independence established, they then put into place the many checks and balances into their own new government to help keep such oppressions from ever happening again. That wasn't enough to satisfy them, though and they almost all went on to warn future generations to remain ever vigilant in order to retain the freedoms they paid such a high price to achieve. With the history lesson concluded, let's analyze what is likely going on with Mrs. Medina's remarks: First, I'm guessing that she, like so many others in our nation, is still under the impression that our government can do no wrong; or more accurately, that if criminal actions are uncovered, that “the forces of good” in the government will ride in on their white horses and nip it in the bud. These are the naïve notions of people who get their daily dose of propaganda from mainstream “news” sources rather than taking the initiative to research the issue-in-question on their own. The problem with that is that almost 100% of mainstream “news” is owned and operated by the exact same elitist-collectivist masters who own and operate the political establishment. A second guess is that there also may be “handlers” within the upper-management of her campaign who are “guiding” her into saying these things for political reasons. Who knows? Maybe all of the above? My guess though is that her statements stem from sheer ignorance of the questions surrounding 911 or other such events that demand attention by an ever vigilant society. She also may have an ill-conceived notion that “truthers” are a pack of radical communist flower-children, chomping at the bit to be the first in line to support Al-CIAda (no apologies to you actual commie flower-child Al-Qaeda supporters out there) and as such is unaware of the thousands of PhD-level engineers, architects, scientists and physicists who are loudly demanding answers with regards to the many discrepancies in the official story about 911? These people are about as far removed from the propaganda-disseminated version of a “truther” that one can get, yet they are ushered into the same false category of bona-fide “nut job” tin-foil-hat-wearing idiots. Regardless of the reason or reasons for her misunderstanding of the truth movement, I do still feel that we need to keep backing her bid for governor. I do feel that her heart really is in the right place with respect to her desire to implement a constitutionally adherent government in Texas. Once she's in the governor's seat, we'll be able to feed her plenty of crow with regards to her ignorance of the true nature of the federal government and it's handlers/masters in the international banking community. Lest we forget, we all had our serving of crow at some point in our political evolution. My guess is that she'll see that light soon enough even without our help, given the fact that much of the same fascist control mechanism is firmly in place within our own state government (thanks to Rick Perry, Dubya and other big-government, collectivism-promoting, fed-appeasing former governors). We can train her after the fact, but we most definitely can't train the likes of Rick Perry or Kay Hutchison. It's not really a “lesser of two evils” choice either, since I honestly don't feel that any of Debra's intentions are “evil” in any way. She's simply ignorant and/or misled and that can be changed in someone who is truly a lover of freedom. To sum this all up: please continue to back this noble effort to get her elected, but just remember that – like so many other Americans – Debra is a “tenderfoot fighter” in the freedom-and-truth movement. Treat her as such. Guide her and she'll eventually “find the way” into the reality-zone.
Ya' Gotta Dance With Them That Brung Ya'
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: farmfriend (#0)
I gon't live in Texas anymire but I have serious doubts about her 911 Truther statements. I also do admire her refernce to the CAFR funds that could solve Texas financial problems.
The Truth of 911 Shall Set You Free From The Lie
Outstanding letter. Thank you.
Debra already stuck the proverbial fork in and twisted repeatedly. She's done. She "forked" herself. It's going to be "Governor For Life" Rick Perry. Look at it this way. Texas A&M hardly ever wins at anything. Might as well let them have our "weak governorship" as a consolation prize. I am warning you in the rest of the country. Don't FALL FOR the trick again of having people tell you our governor ought to be President because he has "run Texas." The Governor doesn't do squat in Texas but make appointments and allow people to be executed.
“I would give no thought of what the world might say of me, if I could only transmit to posterity the reputation of an honest man.” - Sam Houston
To sum this all up: please continue to back this noble effort to get her elected, but just remember that – like so many other Americans – Debra is a “tenderfoot fighter” in the freedom-and-truth movement. Treat her as such. Guide her and she'll eventually “find the way” into the reality-zone. Excellent observation by the author. I would NOT bet the farm on Medina finding her way etc etc. To my thinking she would clarify and compromise herself into nothing being changed. Somewhere along her path, she and her handlers let her down as there was no excuse for the Beck debacle. On a state level of politics, one has to be swift of foot and tongue.
outstanding. thanks for posting it, maggie.
Most welcome.
"With respect to the words general welfare, I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators." Sarah Palin thinks the same way. It's a woman thing. Women ought to stay outta politics, leave the heavy lifting to men, stay barefoot and pregnant so we have a steady supply of grunts to fight all the wars for the jews. A repeal of the 19th amendment would go a long way toward solving some of our nations problems by eliminating the need to choose which shade of lipstick to choose.
There is a lot of credibility with that comment. Still, Americans are fucked as you offered no solutions.
"Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves." -- Ronald Reagan, circa 1977
I never claimed to be a know-it-all. Maybe you have the solution(s).
Everything I have said for decades is easy to read.
"Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves." -- Ronald Reagan, circa 1977
The only thing I can think of that may be part of a solution is to get the jews outta our government and if necessary get therm out of the country as well.
How about getting the USA outta the UN? The UN sanctioned Israel as a sovereign nation. Yet, you don't seem to know or understand that bogus power. Why is that? Why do you persist in ways and means that go no where without addressing the root cause of failure?
"Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves." -- Ronald Reagan, circa 1977
A repeal of the 19th amendment would go a long way toward solving some of our nations problems by eliminating the need to choose which shade of lipstick to choose. "With respect to the words general welfare, I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators." But I do my friend. Why just today on this very forum I read where over 100 countries have thrown the jews out. Problem(s) for the most part solved. That UN is for one world government I've heard some say. Ya gotta understand, I don't get any newspapers, watch any tv not don't listen to the radio after I heard that rush lamebrain one time claiming he kicked the shit outta someone with half his brain tied behind his back. that scared the hell outta me right there.
Good article. If I lived in Texas I would vote for her over Perry or Hutchinson. I already know what they are. But I would also write her and tell her that if she expects to do much in a political sense that she has to know not to throw her supporters under the bus because some msm talking head asked her a question she was not prepared for.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Go you know why women have smaller feet than men? It's an evolutionary thingy. It gets them closer to the kitchen sink.
Really? Yet all this time since 1948 you waved your little tattered, flags and POMS-POMS begging some controlling arrangement for the establishment and further control for the creation of artificial nations?
"Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves." -- Ronald Reagan, circa 1977
Does that mean they are made outta something like play dough? and if they are artificial does that mean they really aren't there?
Yeah, now ya got the story. Kinda like "Republicans and Democrats" that control the US Constitution.
"Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves." -- Ronald Reagan, circa 1977
Thanx for the edukayshun.
Curtsy.
"Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves." -- Ronald Reagan, circa 1977
"With respect to the words general welfare, I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators."
#2. To: farmfriend (#0)
To sum this all up: please continue to back this noble effort to get her elected, but just remember that – like so many other Americans – Debra is a “tenderfoot fighter” in the freedom-and-truth movement. Treat her as such. Guide her and she'll eventually “find the way” into the reality-zone.
#3. To: farmfriend (#0)
#4. To: farmfriend (#0)
(Edited)
She's simply ignorant and/or misled and that can be changed in someone who is truly a lover of freedom.
#5. To: farmfriend (#0)
#6. To: christine (#5)
outstanding. thanks for posting it, maggie.
James Madison, Letter to James Robertson, April 20, 1831
#7. To: farmfriend (#0)
First, I'm guessing that she, like so many others in our nation, is still under the impression that our government can do no wrong; or more accurately, that if criminal actions are uncovered, that “the forces of good” in the government will ride in on their white horses and nip it in the bud.
#8. To: LACUMO (#7)
A repeal of the 19th amendment would go a long way toward solving some of our nations problems by eliminating the need to choose which shade of lipstick to choose.
#9. To: buckeroo (#8)
There is a lot of credibility with that comment. Still, Americans are fucked as you offered no solutions.
#10. To: LACUMO (#9)
Maybe ....
#11. To: buckeroo (#10)
Everything I have said for decades is easy to read.
#12. To: LACUMO (#11)
(Edited)
#13. To: LACUMO (#7)
Sarah Palin thinks the same way. It's a woman thing. Women ought to stay outta politics, leave the heavy lifting to men, stay barefoot and pregnant so we have a steady supply of grunts to fight all the wars for the jews.
James Madison, Letter to James Robertson, April 20, 1831
#14. To: buckeroo (#12)
Why do you persist in ways and means that go no where without addressing the root cause of failure?
#15. To: farmfriend (#0)
Lord Acton
#16. To: farmfriend (#13)
#17. To: LACUMO (#14)
That UN is for one world government I've heard some say.
#18. To: buckeroo (#17)
artificial nations?
#19. To: LACUMO (#18)
Does that mean they are made outta something like play dough? and if they are artificial does that mean they really aren't there?
#20. To: buckeroo (#19)
Yeah, now ya got the story. Kinda like "Republicans and Democrats" that control the US Constitution.
#21. To: LACUMO (#20)
#22. To: LACUMO (#16)
Go you know why women have smaller feet than men? It's an evolutionary thingy. It gets them closer to the kitchen sink.
James Madison, Letter to James Robertson, April 20, 1831
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest