[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!

Mike Johnson Holds 'Private Meeting' With Jewish Leaders, Pledges to Screen Out Anti-Israel GOP Candidates

Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!]

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.

Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed

Local Governments Can Be Ignorant Pissers!!

Cash Jordan: Gangs PLUNDER LA Mall... as California’s “NO JAILS” Strategy IMPLODES

Margin Debt Tops Historic $1 Trillion, Your House Will Be Taken Blindly Warns Dohmen

Tucker Carlson LIVE: America After Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk allegedly recently refused $150 million from Israel to take more pro Israel stances

"NATO just declared War on Russia!"Co; Douglas Macgregor

If You're Trying To Lose Weight But Gaining Belly Fat, Watch Insulin

Arabica Coffee Prices Soar As Analyst Warns of "Weather Disasters" Risk Denting Global Production

Candace Owens: : I Know What Happened at the Hamptons (Ackman confronted Charlie Kirk)

Illegal Alien Drunk Driver Mows Down, Kills 16-Year-Old Girl Who Rejected His Lewd Advances

STOP Drinking These 5 Coffees – They’re Quietly DESTROYING Your Gut & Hormones

This Works Better Than Ozempic for Belly Fat

Cinnamon reduces fat

How long do health influencers live? Episode 1 of 3.

'Armed Queers' Marxist Revolutionaries Under Investigation For Possible Foreknowledge Of Kirk's Assassination Plot


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: Obscure Law Could Cost Hillary Clinton Her Cabinet Post
Source: alternet
URL Source: http://www.alternet.org/rights/1457 ... lary_clinton_her_cabinet_post/
Published: Feb 24, 2010
Author: By Stephanie Mencimer
Post Date: 2010-02-24 12:07:13 by abraxas
Keywords: None
Views: 168
Comments: 7

Obscure Law Could Cost Hillary Clinton Her Cabinet Post

Conspiracy theorists who started the birther lie are now targeting Clinton's eligibility for office, over an obscure provision in the Constitution. February 23, 2010 |

Advertisement Ever since Barack Obama started running for the White House, he's been plagued by lawsuits from detractors who claim that he is not a natural-born citizen, and thus is ineligible to serve as president. Now the devoted conspiracy theorists of the so-called "eligibility movement" have a fresh target: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. And there's a chance that the Supreme Court might hear their challenge.

In January 2009, a longtime foreign service officer named David C. Rodearmel sued Hillary Clinton in federal court in DC arguing that an obscure provision of the Constitution blocks her from serving in Obama's Cabinet because of her previous stint in the U.S. Senate. This argument isn't as nutty as those used in the numerous lawsuits disputing Obama's citizenship -- in fact, it previously prevented Orrin Hatch from becoming a Supreme Court justice.

Rodearmel is relying on what's known as the Emoluments Clause, which bars members of Congress from taking a federal civil job if Congress raised the salary for that job while they were still in office. The secretary of state's salary went up in 2008, while Clinton was still in the Senate. The provision, which was designed to combat corruption, has long been a headache for presidents seeking to tap members of Congress for their Cabinets. They've typically solved the problem by resorting to what's known as the "Saxbe fix" -- a move named after William Saxbe, a Republican Ohio senator Richard Nixon installed as attorney general during the Watergate scandal.

The fix is simple. All Congress has to do is repeal any pay raises for a given position so that the salary is the same as it was before the nominee's last term of elected office. Most modern presidents have adopted this solution, and after Obama nominated Clinton for secretary of state, Congress duly repealed the pay raises for the position that had gone into effect while she was serving in the Senate. Yet the fix has always been somewhat controversial. In 1987, President Ronald Reagan decided that the Emoluments Clause barred him from nominating Utah Senator Orrin Hatch to a Supreme Court seat, and he nominated Anthony Kennedy instead. Now, Rodearmel thinks the clause should be enforced against Clinton -- as well as all the other former senators in the Obama administration.

Rodearmel himself says he's just doing his best to protect the Constitution, although he's no stranger to conservative political causes: In 2004, he donated $250 to Swift Boat Veterans for Truth. And he's supported by some familiar Clinton antagonists, namely the conservative legal group Judicial Watch, which filed numerous suits against both Hillary and Bill Clinton when they occupied the White House. His quest has also been cheered on by WorldNetDaily, the leading online promoter of the birthers' cause, who seem eager to open up a new front in the "eligibility" fight.

Rodearmel's case could become an irritation for the Obama administration. The U.S. district court in DC tossed his complaint out last fall on the grounds that Rodearmel lacked standing -- meaning he couldn't actually demonstrate that he'd suffered any injury from working for a supposedly ineligible boss. (This fatal flaw has also prevented any of the birther lawsuits from going forward.) The court didn't buy Rodearmel’s arguments that working for Clinton would violate his oath to "bear true faith and allegiance" to the Constitution. But thanks to a quirk in federal law, such eligibility cases can now be appealed directly to the Supreme Court. So Rodearmel recently asked the high court to consider his case.

Many legal experts out there think the Emoluments Clause is a non-issue. Chief among them is Obama's former constitutional law professor from Harvard, Laurence Tribe, who has pointed out that the clause implies that a member of Congress is only ineligible for a civil job if they personally voted for a pay raise for that position. In Clinton’s case, the raise for the secretary of state was essentially a routine cost of living adjustment, mandated by a law passed in 1990 rather than a vote that Clinton participated in. But in swinging for the high fences, it's clear that Rodearmel is seeking to persuade one justice in particular -- and it's not who you might think.

As it turns out, one of the most prominent critics of the Saxbe fix during the Watergate scandal was none other than liberal Justice Stephen Breyer, who was, of course, appointed to the bench by Bill Clinton. As a law professor, Breyer wrote a letter to Sen. Robert Byrd concluding that the "fix" Nixon was proposing in order to install Saxbe was unconstitutional. (Defending the idea, oddly enough, was Robert Bork.) Rodearmel is clearly hoping that Breyer might be intrigued enough to want to revisit the issue after all these years. And standing behind him are a host of conservative activists, hoping that this legal long-shot might just work when all the others have failed.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: abraxas (#0) (Edited)

Not a problem ... if Hillary accepts only the old salary, rolling back the increase that was enacted while she was in the Senate (the salary increase is available to whomever follows her as Secretary of State - if that person was not also in Congress). This is called the Saxbe Fix. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saxbe _fix

Shoonra  posted on  2010-02-24   12:34:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: abraxas (#0)

This won't dislodge Hitlery. Unless Obummer wants to get rid of her but he won't dump her until it is too late for her to run in 2012.

TooConservative  posted on  2010-02-24   13:09:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: TooConservative (#2)

This won't dislodge Hitlery.

I know.....but a girl can still dream. : )

"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. ... We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of." Edward Bernays, Father of Public Relations

abraxas  posted on  2010-02-24   13:27:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: abraxas (#3)

Neutralizing Hitlery by making her SoS was one of Obummer's smarter moves IMO. And she's no bigger a disaster than any other Dim SoS would be. He can dump her any time. Well, any time after spring 2012 when it's too late for her to run against a failed Obummer presidency as the Dim party's only hope.

The Xlinton and Obummer factions all think about this quite a bit, I think.

TooConservative  posted on  2010-02-24   13:52:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: abraxas (#0)

This argument isn't as nutty as those used in the numerous lawsuits disputing Obama's citizenship

Uh huh. The man spends upwards of 2 MILLION dollars to keep his actual birth certificate under wraps when he could produce it for 20 dollars (or less) and the arguments about his eligibility to serve as president are "nutty." uh huh.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

James Deffenbach  posted on  2010-02-24   19:53:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: abraxas (#0)

RODEARMEL CASE

Rodearmel v. Clinton , DC Dist Ct, 1-09-cv-00171, was DISMISSED on October 29, 2009 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

See:

Docket Report

Doc 34 - Memorandum Opinion

Doc 35 - ORDER

A Notice of Appeal to SCOTUS was filed on November 3, 2009.

Doc 36 - Notice of Appeal

The Appeal was filed with SCOTUS on December 31, 2009.

APPEAL to SCOTUS

nolu_chan  posted on  2010-02-27   1:31:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: nolu_chan (#6)

Thanks for the info. nulo!! Seems the author of this article didn't do a very good investigation into the subject matter.

"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. ... We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of." Edward Bernays, Father of Public Relations

abraxas  posted on  2010-02-27   11:49:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]