[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Are US Troops Combat Ready for Israel?

Now that's an edit - Russian Power

Shirley Temple On How Hollywood Is Run by Pedophiles

The UN Just Adopted The Pact For The Future Which Lays The Foundation For A New Global Order

Vermont State Police Detain O'Keefe Over Questions About Cease-and-Desist Letter to Whistleblower

Kamala Harris repeats vague talking points with little substance in softball MSNBC interview

Are They Trying To Start World War 3 Before The Election In November?

Trump Triggers Jimmy Kimmel's Goofball Wife

🚨BREAKING: MISSILE STRIKE Against Trump Force One Exposed! Emergency Protocols Activated!

TikTok-Owner ByteDance Remains The World's Highest-Valued Startup

NY Appellate Judges Skeptical of Letitia James’ Civil Fraud Case Against Trump,

Federal Judge Rules Fluoride In Drinking Water is Unsafe

Hezbollah Turns The Tide: Will Israel Risk It All ?

Sirens Blare Overnight As Yemeni Houthis Target Tel Aviv With Ballistic Missile

Which Universities Produced The Most Startup Founders?

Have the DEMS Turned On One Of Their Own? Why This Mayor and This Corruption?

10 year-old Gets Kamala Harris on CNN (VIDEO)

Admiral Chester Nimitz: WWII Naval Mastermind (S1, E1) | Full Episode

Bibi Embarrasses Biden Once Again: What Ceasefire In Lebanon?

FDA Says Monkeypox Vaxx Sheds To Unvaccinated

Melania Trump sits down for exclusive interview: 'I want to put the record straight'

"Putin has already lost"

"Come out and take it, you dirty, yellow-bellied rat, or I'll give it to ya through the door!"

Catherine Zeta-Jones Nude at Age 55 (Men you need your girlfriend's permission to click)

CDC finally admits FLUORIDE is TOXIC to humans, especially babies,

How the UK is becoming a ‘third-world’ economy

Keir Starmer freebies scandal

US Navy Not Ready for Prime Time

New York City Education Scandal: Employees Abuse Funds Meant For Homeless Students On Personal Vacations

A Look at Kamala Harris’s ‘Middle Class’ Childhood


Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech Articles

Title: Haste Leaves Anthrax Case Unconcluded
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/25/u ... ter.html?ref=us&pagewanted=all
Published: Feb 25, 2010
Author: RICHARD BERNSTEIN
Post Date: 2010-02-25 06:35:38 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 135
Comments: 2

NEW YORK — Probably not very many readers of this space are subscribers to the scientific journal Aerosol Science and Technology. Neither am I. But an article in that publication published in March 2008 has acquired considerable significance in light of the announcement by the F.B.I. last week that it would close its nine-year investigation of the 2001 anthrax attacks in the United States.

Aerosol Science and Technology reported on an attempt by a group of scientists at the Dugway Proving Ground in Utah to reproduce the dry, powderized substance that was found in one of the anthrax-laden envelopes mailed by the perpetrator of the attacks, in which 5 people were killed, 17 were sickened and the country, reeling from the Sept. 11 attacks of just a few weeks before, was sent into high alert.

The title of the paper, “Development of an Aerosol System for Uniformly Depositing Bacillus Anthrax Spore Particles on Surfaces,” demonstrated that to create anthrax in a dry aerosol form of the sort that can be dispersed through the air is a long and difficult process involving a lot of highly specialized machinery.

The original culture has to be incubated; spore pellets are then collected with a centrifuge; those spores are dried “by a proprietary azeotropic method,” before an “amorphous silica-based flow enhancer” is added to turn the otherwise sticky anthrax spores into an aerosol, after which the material has to be passed through a series of ever finer mesh screens that are activated by a pneumatic vibrator.

The point, as one scientist specializing in fine particle chemistry told me, blows a large hole through the 92-page summary of the investigation released last week by the F.B.I. and the Justice Department, the main conclusion of which is that Bruce E. Ivins, a scientist at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick, in Maryland, was the anthrax mailer.

“Note that the proprietary azeotropic drying technique and the pneumatic mill are both superspecialized pieces of equipment, neither of which is at Detrick,” the specialist in fine particles, Stuart Jacobsen, said in an e-mail message.

But the F.B.I.’s entire case against Mr. Ivins is that he was able to manufacture the anthrax used in the attacks at his Fort Detrick lab, working late at night on the days before the actual anthrax mailings so nobody would see what he was doing.

At first, reading the F.B.I. report is to be swept up in the conclusion that the perpetrator of the deadly anthrax attacks was indeed Mr. Ivins. After all, somebody did mail the envelopes containing deadly anthrax bacilli. Mr. Ivins had worked for 27 years on anthrax, and, indeed, he had created the very flask of anthrax bacillus that, using cutting-edge scientific techniques, the F.B.I. determined to be the sole source of the material used in the attacks.

Several hundred other scientists over the years have had access to the material in that particular flask, but according to the F.B.I., all of them except for Mr. Ivins were exonerated. Mr. Ivins committed suicide two years ago just as prosecutors were moving to indict him — an act that seems, under the circumstances, to be highly incriminating.

And yet, when you look a bit closer at the F.B.I.’s report, doubts persist, and they lend a good deal of credibility to the arguments of those, including some of Mr. Ivins’s former colleagues, that the F.B.I.’s case, as Representative Rush D. Holt of New Jersey put it last week, is “barely circumstantial.”

The report, for example, makes much of the fact that Mr. Ivins worked late at night in his lab in the days prior to the mailing of the anthrax, something he had not usually done, and that he had no alibi for what the F.B.I. report calls the “mailing windows,” the stretches of time when the perpetrator of the attacks deposited the anthrax-laden envelopes into a post office box in Princeton, New Jersey, a three-hour drive from Mr. Ivins’s lab.

That information seems very damning at first glance, but according to Jeffrey Adamovicz, Mr. Ivins’s supervisor at Usamriid, as the Fort Detrick facility is known, the F.B.I.’s claim that Mr. Ivins rarely worked at night — and only did so in the days before the anthrax was mailed — is simply untrue.

“Although I cannot directly dispute the hours the F.B.I. has shown for access to B3/4” — Mr. Ivins’s anthrax lab — “Bruce was well known for working late and early,” Mr. Adamovicz said in an e-mail message this week. “He may not have been in B3/4 but instead in his office or the BSL-2 labs. I think a broader examination of his access to all areas of the lab would confirm this.”

Beyond that, Mr. Adamovicz said, “the F.B.I. seems to be locked into the concept that the spores had to be prepared in the week before each of the mailings.”

“I’m unclear as to why they believe this other than that period matches to hours that Bruce was in suite B3/4 at night,” he said. “These spore preps could have been made anytime between 1997 and 2001, in my estimation.”

But most important is the failure of the F.B.I. to demonstrate that the anthrax used in the attack was actually produced in Mr. Ivins’s lab at Fort Detrick, or even that it could have been produced there. In a recent opinion article in The Wall Street Journal that poked holes in the F.B.I.’s case, an investigative reporter, Edward Jay Epstein, cites a letter written by the F.B.I. director, Robert S. Mueller III, in which Mr. Mueller says that the mailed anthrax contained 1.4 percent silicon — without which the anthrax would be a clumpy, sticky mess, according to Dr. Jacobsen, the fine-particles specialist.

Mr. Adamovicz said in his e-mail message: “This is very strong evidence that a process more sophisticated than Bruce Ivins or Usamriid possessed was used in making the spore preparations. I and others have calculated that it would take several weeks to months to grow the 5-10 grams of spores required for the letters using common lab protocols and laboratory capabilities present in Usamriid for growing spores.” He added, “The F.B.I. to date has provided no information on how this could be done.”

The point is not that Mr. Ivins wasn’t the anthrax mailer. Perhaps he was. But some of the F.B.I.’s arguments seem like conclusions in search of arguments, while other aspects of the report — notably its failure to deal with the silicon question — are conspicuously incomplete.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Ada (#0)

Perhaps the spores were prepared in a private, U.S.Government-operated facility; perhaps they arrived in a pouch, carried to the U.S. with diplomatic immunity, from a foreign country. Perhaps.

"The 'uniter' has brought the entire world together - to despise and deride us." lodwick ('uniter' = G.W.)

Bub  posted on  2010-02-25   8:16:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Bub (#1)

You have Porton Downs in mind?

Ada  posted on  2010-02-26   15:26:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]