[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them

America Is Reaching A Boiling Point

The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses

This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!

Mike Johnson Holds 'Private Meeting' With Jewish Leaders, Pledges to Screen Out Anti-Israel GOP Candidates

Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!]

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.

Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed

Local Governments Can Be Ignorant Pissers!!

Cash Jordan: Gangs PLUNDER LA Mall... as California’s “NO JAILS” Strategy IMPLODES

Margin Debt Tops Historic $1 Trillion, Your House Will Be Taken Blindly Warns Dohmen

Tucker Carlson LIVE: America After Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk allegedly recently refused $150 million from Israel to take more pro Israel stances

"NATO just declared War on Russia!"Co; Douglas Macgregor

If You're Trying To Lose Weight But Gaining Belly Fat, Watch Insulin

Arabica Coffee Prices Soar As Analyst Warns of "Weather Disasters" Risk Denting Global Production

Candace Owens: : I Know What Happened at the Hamptons (Ackman confronted Charlie Kirk)


ObamaNation
See other ObamaNation Articles

Title: Obama down to 44%
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Feb 26, 2010
Author: Rasmussen
Post Date: 2010-02-26 10:14:28 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 829
Comments: 73

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows that 23% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty-three percent (43%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -20. For President Obama, the Approval Index has been lower only once (see trends).

Data for these updates is collected via nightly telephone interviews and reported on a three-day rolling average basis. As a result, just one-third of the interviews for today’s update were collected following the President’s health-care summit. Sunday morning will be the first update based entirely upon interviews conducted after the summit.

By a 46% to 29% margin, Democrats say it would be better for workers if they were dropped from their employers health insurance coverage and enrolled in a government plan. Republicans and unaffiliated voters disagree. Voters are divided on support for a “public option.”

Fifty percent (50%) see China as a long-term threat to the United States.

The Presidential Approval Index is calculated by subtracting the number who Strongly Disapprove from the number who Strongly Approve. It is updated daily at 9:30 a.m. Eastern (sign up for free daily e-mail update). Updates are also available on Twitter and Facebook.

Overall, 44% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the President's performance. That matches the lowest level of total approval yet measured for this President. Fifty-five percent (55%) disapprove.

See what Dick Morris, Joe Trippi, Bill Kristol and others have to say about Scott Rasmussen’s new book. In Search of Self-Governance is available from Rasmussen Reports and at Amazon.com.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 27.

#6. To: christine (#0)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-02-26   13:34:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Eric Stratton (#6)

Great, then let Dims have that, just don't tax those that don't want it.

Let's have a 20-year experiment on people calling themselves Democrats, as to how their ever loving Government provides their healthcare for them.

Also, it's too bad during the last 20 years that this formula was not reversed so that only those calling themselves Republicans had to pay for all the wars and "defense" appropriations.

Many times during the 2000s I wanted to stop paying to kill innocent civilians from the air, but it went on in my name anyhow. Still does. "I" killed a bunch of Afghani women and children traveling down a road in a convoy from high altitude earlier this week.

Sam Houston  posted on  2010-02-27   7:30:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Sam Houston (#9)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-02-27   8:46:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Eric Stratton (#11)

As I've said before, the problem is that the economic powers that be have decided they do not need to employ all that many people anymore, especially at the wage levels mandated by law in the U.S.

Free trade is their religion. So most jobs which can be exported have been and will continue to be.

The interesting sociological question is how long 20 to 30 percent of the potential work force will just sit there taking it. A good experiment would be if Senator Bunning's "hold" on the jobless benefits extension dragged on for several months. Then we'd see what the unemployed are willing to do about the situation. Will they resort to crime? Or will they do something constructive such as march on D.C. a la the Bonus March of the military veterans during the Hoover administration? Right now they are being placated by government checks.

It is my view that the U.S. has way exceeded its economic "carrying capacity" given that it is going to be a jobless future for many. When I was growing up, it only had about 200 million people. That was enough.

When we exceeded 300 million not long ago, I began to feel like I was in a potential China or India in the making. Ironically, I think Russia has a lot better prospects than does the U.S. and one reason is that it is down to only 140 million people. Another is its vast energy/natural resources.

The most important reason, though, is that it only spends about five percent of what "we" do on so- called "defense." If none of the other factors above had occurred, the fact that "we" have been commissioned to try to establish a "Greater Israel" world empire for what is now still "Lesser Israel" would have still economically destroyed us.

Sam Houston  posted on  2010-02-27   9:10:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Sam Houston (#12)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-02-27   9:29:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Eric Stratton (#13)

What is so interesting about your point that the Christian world view has been discounted is that the Christian voters have only themselves to blame for this.

The "Moral Majority" elected Reagan and it was he who first began to push the free trade religion. It was during his administration that the U.S. became a net debtor nation to the rest of the world for the first time since the infancy of the republic.

He also helped make the so-called "defense" budget sacrosanct. I still say if none of the other trends had occurred, the fact that the first $1.1 trillion of federal revenue has to go to the Pentagon and related agencies would have destroyed the U.S. as a First World country.

And it has. This is a country on the way irreversibly to the Third World.

Sam Houston  posted on  2010-02-27   10:01:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Sam Houston (#15)

All the product of WASP universalist culture, doomed from the start. People don't want to admit that it's their culture that is destroying them. They want to politicize it.

Deasy  posted on  2010-02-27   10:07:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Deasy (#16)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-02-27   10:18:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Eric Stratton (#18)

We got to this moment one day at a time, one decision, one fork in the road at a time. Decade passed into century. Century passed into another century, and then another. We, and others, forced our decisions based on certain criteria. Look around you. This America is us. It's what we've made, and fate. Religion was at the heart of those choices. It drove us forward. Even today it compels us, like an unseen hand building reactions and laying down sets of rules for us to follow.

Our culture is imploding on us. Don't blame anyone else for that. It's futile.

Deasy  posted on  2010-02-27   10:31:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Deasy (#20)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-02-27   10:55:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Eric Stratton (#22)

Then our task is to find out where we (that is roughly speaking the founding elements of America) went wrong. We were Protestants. We were Scots-Irish Presbyterians. We were Catholic. We had God on our side. Well? It's damned obvious that retrospective, reactionary WASPs and Jesuits aren't going to help us now. It'll be more of the same.

We thought we were inventing a new country, with universal values that were appropriate for all peoples. Was it?

Deasy  posted on  2010-02-27   11:01:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Deasy (#23)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-02-27   13:33:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Eric Stratton, Prefrontal Vortex (#24)

Actually, the general morality that the FFs deferred to was of a Biblical Christian variety.

To some extent you're correct. I'm assuming you refer to the New Testament, and not the old (except in the case of American racially befuddled exceptionalism). And you're not talking about Christ's example of practicing non-violence. Certainly you're not talking about the idea that all men are created equal in the eyes of their monotheistic "God," although revisiting their Bibles during the 1800s led to a civil war that killed more than a half million Americans in the name of God. And of course fighting the godless Huns in two world wars was for the Christians in foreign lands. The modern American conservative movement does tend to rewrite history. It's done this to a large extent because of the undeniable godlessness of communism. Or is it the making of the state into a god? That would never happen here, would it? Christians then and now would never do a thing like that? How could they?

For more on the subject of just how Christian we were at the founding, and yes we were, see this page:

THE CLASSICAL TEMPLE ARCHITECTURE AND PAGAN SYMBOLISM OF WASHINGTON, DC.

Deasy  posted on  2010-02-27   14:07:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Deasy (#25)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-02-27   14:27:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Eric Stratton (#26)

Which Christ was it that helps you in American politics? Be clear in your answer.

Deasy  posted on  2010-02-27   14:29:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 27.

#28. To: Deasy (#27)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-02-27 14:30:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 27.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]