[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them

America Is Reaching A Boiling Point

The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses

This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!

Mike Johnson Holds 'Private Meeting' With Jewish Leaders, Pledges to Screen Out Anti-Israel GOP Candidates

Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!]

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.

Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed

Local Governments Can Be Ignorant Pissers!!

Cash Jordan: Gangs PLUNDER LA Mall... as California’s “NO JAILS” Strategy IMPLODES

Margin Debt Tops Historic $1 Trillion, Your House Will Be Taken Blindly Warns Dohmen

Tucker Carlson LIVE: America After Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk allegedly recently refused $150 million from Israel to take more pro Israel stances

"NATO just declared War on Russia!"Co; Douglas Macgregor

If You're Trying To Lose Weight But Gaining Belly Fat, Watch Insulin

Arabica Coffee Prices Soar As Analyst Warns of "Weather Disasters" Risk Denting Global Production

Candace Owens: : I Know What Happened at the Hamptons (Ackman confronted Charlie Kirk)


ObamaNation
See other ObamaNation Articles

Title: Obama down to 44%
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Feb 26, 2010
Author: Rasmussen
Post Date: 2010-02-26 10:14:28 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 932
Comments: 73

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows that 23% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty-three percent (43%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -20. For President Obama, the Approval Index has been lower only once (see trends).

Data for these updates is collected via nightly telephone interviews and reported on a three-day rolling average basis. As a result, just one-third of the interviews for today’s update were collected following the President’s health-care summit. Sunday morning will be the first update based entirely upon interviews conducted after the summit.

By a 46% to 29% margin, Democrats say it would be better for workers if they were dropped from their employers health insurance coverage and enrolled in a government plan. Republicans and unaffiliated voters disagree. Voters are divided on support for a “public option.”

Fifty percent (50%) see China as a long-term threat to the United States.

The Presidential Approval Index is calculated by subtracting the number who Strongly Disapprove from the number who Strongly Approve. It is updated daily at 9:30 a.m. Eastern (sign up for free daily e-mail update). Updates are also available on Twitter and Facebook.

Overall, 44% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the President's performance. That matches the lowest level of total approval yet measured for this President. Fifty-five percent (55%) disapprove.

See what Dick Morris, Joe Trippi, Bill Kristol and others have to say about Scott Rasmussen’s new book. In Search of Self-Governance is available from Rasmussen Reports and at Amazon.com.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-20) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#21. To: Sam Houston (#19)

deleted

The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-02-27   10:47:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Deasy (#20)

deleted

The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-02-27   10:55:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Eric Stratton (#22)

Then our task is to find out where we (that is roughly speaking the founding elements of America) went wrong. We were Protestants. We were Scots-Irish Presbyterians. We were Catholic. We had God on our side. Well? It's damned obvious that retrospective, reactionary WASPs and Jesuits aren't going to help us now. It'll be more of the same.

We thought we were inventing a new country, with universal values that were appropriate for all peoples. Was it?

Deasy  posted on  2010-02-27   11:01:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Deasy (#23)

deleted

The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-02-27   13:33:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Eric Stratton, Prefrontal Vortex (#24)

Actually, the general morality that the FFs deferred to was of a Biblical Christian variety.

To some extent you're correct. I'm assuming you refer to the New Testament, and not the old (except in the case of American racially befuddled exceptionalism). And you're not talking about Christ's example of practicing non-violence. Certainly you're not talking about the idea that all men are created equal in the eyes of their monotheistic "God," although revisiting their Bibles during the 1800s led to a civil war that killed more than a half million Americans in the name of God. And of course fighting the godless Huns in two world wars was for the Christians in foreign lands. The modern American conservative movement does tend to rewrite history. It's done this to a large extent because of the undeniable godlessness of communism. Or is it the making of the state into a god? That would never happen here, would it? Christians then and now would never do a thing like that? How could they?

For more on the subject of just how Christian we were at the founding, and yes we were, see this page:

THE CLASSICAL TEMPLE ARCHITECTURE AND PAGAN SYMBOLISM OF WASHINGTON, DC.

Deasy  posted on  2010-02-27   14:07:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Deasy (#25)

deleted

The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-02-27   14:27:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Eric Stratton (#26)

Which Christ was it that helps you in American politics? Be clear in your answer.

Deasy  posted on  2010-02-27   14:29:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Deasy (#27)

deleted

The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-02-27   14:30:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Deasy (#23)

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

James Deffenbach  posted on  2010-02-27   14:32:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Eric Stratton (#28)

Before I answer that, define what you mean by "helps you in American politics?"

I'm asking which Christ was it who gave you the values for your political ideals?

Deasy  posted on  2010-02-27   14:35:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Deasy (#30)

deleted

The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-02-27   14:51:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Eric Stratton (#31)

The golden rule. Was that at work when the founding fathers worked out amendments on slavery? What about their treatment of the American Indians? Was it at work in the shooting of deserters at Valley Forge? Is that what Christ would do?

Deasy  posted on  2010-02-27   14:53:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Deasy (#32)

deleted

The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-02-27   16:47:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Eric Stratton (#33)

So see, in your world since no one is perfect, game off.

Wrong. I'm just wondering how to run a government based on your Christ. I can't figure out how to do it. I don't think most of the Founding Fathers even tried. One could get very confused in the process, which is where the Moral Majority and the GOP are today.

Deasy  posted on  2010-02-27   16:56:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Deasy (#34)

deleted

The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-02-27   17:30:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Eric Stratton (#35)

So George Washington was wrong when he had the deserters shot?

Deasy  posted on  2010-02-27   17:32:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Deasy (#36)

deleted

The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-02-27   17:36:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Deasy (#36)

So George Washington was wrong when he had the deserters shot?

Not at all and I'm sure if he was still alive he'd have you shot too.

WWGPD? - (What Would General Pinochet Do?)

Flintlock  posted on  2010-02-27   17:36:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: Deasy (#36)

deleted

The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-02-27   17:36:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: Eric Stratton (#37)

I'm sorry, I didn't realize that George Washington was a reincarnation of Christ.

So you can't do better than post a link to a religious right website? I think I've made my point: Americans are still very confused about the role of their religion in government. That's how we're being undone.

Deasy  posted on  2010-02-27   17:39:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: christine (#0)

As if it matters. Come election time the majority of Democans will do exactly like most of the Republicrats did. They will vote for whomever the party puts on the ballet. If it's Obama, then the Democans will vote for him. Period, end of story. When it comes to politics, the American people are human versions of Pavlov's dog.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Director, CIA 1973–1976

Nothing in the State, everything outside the State, everything against the State - Jan Lester, Escape From Leviathan

"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that justifies it." - Frederic Bastiat

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2010-02-27   17:41:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: Deasy (#40)

deleted

The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-02-27   17:41:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: Deasy (#40)

deleted

The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-02-27   17:43:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: Eric Stratton (#42)

I'm sorry, are we now talking about religion? Because I thought our original point of contention is about morality.

We're talking about why America is going to hell in a hand basket. Its original guiding principles were shot full of inconsistencies.

Deasy  posted on  2010-02-27   17:43:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: Deasy (#40)

So you can't do better than post a link to a religious right website?

And you can do no better than be critical of Americans? There's a reason that the territory you claim to be from is nothing more than a third world backwater and watering hole for donkeys.

WWGPD? - (What Would General Pinochet Do?)

Flintlock  posted on  2010-02-27   17:44:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: Deasy (#44)

deleted

The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-02-27   17:44:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: Eric Stratton (#46)

An irreconcilable admixture of Christianity, exceptionalism, humanism, and universalism.

Deasy  posted on  2010-02-27   17:46:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: Deasy (#47)

deleted

The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-02-27   17:49:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: Eric Stratton (#48)

I'm not being vague. America's founding principles were doomed from the start. Either we face that and move on, or we continue to collapse. We can blame recent developments for the problems, ignoring the long arc of history, or we can face the mistakes and learn from them.

Deasy  posted on  2010-02-27   17:53:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: Deasy (#44)

Its original guiding principles were shot full of inconsistencies.

More nonsense

Show me, show us all what they are.

WWGPD? - (What Would General Pinochet Do?)

Flintlock  posted on  2010-02-27   17:55:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: Deasy (#49)

deleted

The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-02-27   18:02:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: Lod (#3)

Yesterday I went to Hillsboro to make a trade wearing a Median cap. Turned out the guy was also a despicable truther.

There seems to be quite a few of us "despicable truthers."

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

James Deffenbach  posted on  2010-02-27   18:05:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: Eric Stratton (#51)

For starters, the FFs gave us every imaginable fucking warning about what to avoid.

Like the civil war, central banks, and open immigration? That pretty much takes us through the gamut. The civil war was fought on both sides who claimed God as their mascot. How would you have avoided the civil war given our constitution?

Deasy  posted on  2010-02-27   18:08:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: Deasy (#53)

deleted

The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-02-27   18:13:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: Eric Stratton (#54)

You seem to think the FF's were perfect. I've just illustrated how they weren't. Madison and Jefferson disagreed on the banking issue. They were all deeply conflicted over the slavery issue. This betrayed their deeper confusion about the future of America's ethnicity, which up until then was clearly Anglo-Saxon, Dutch, German, and Scots-Irish.

Deasy  posted on  2010-02-27   18:16:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: Deasy (#55)

deleted

The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-02-27   18:19:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: Eric Stratton (#56)

Their views on Christ aside (and mine, as you know what they are), one could argue that the clock started running down when the Federalists won out.

Samuel Gray  posted on  2010-02-27   18:24:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: Eric Stratton (#56)

I'm just asking you to recognize that the founding fathers were themselves confused about America's identity. You said they warned us about everything to avoid. Yet they themselves were pitting us against each other with the Three-Fifths compromise.

Deasy  posted on  2010-02-27   18:25:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: Deasy (#58)

You're seriously trying to advance a cogent argument about early US history by using a citation from Wiki?

That's the academic/intellectual equivalent of Godwin's Law.

Samuel Gray  posted on  2010-02-27   18:33:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: Eric Stratton (#54)

What you seek is utopia my friend. Go over to Democratic Underground and join the eternal ingrates in their perpetual bitch and gripe session over how the world's not perfect and we need your version of whatever TF government should be in place to see to it that we all achieve your status of perfection.

Your patriotism is touching. What side would you have taken when the Founding Fathers lost their cool at the Whiskey rebellion?

Deasy  posted on  2010-02-27   18:33:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: Samuel Gray (#59)

The definition there of the 3/5th's compromise is all I needed.

Deasy  posted on  2010-02-27   18:33:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (62 - 73) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]