See other Editorial Articles
Title: A personal expierence related to property
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Feb 27, 2010
Author: ME
Post Date: 2010-02-27 16:40:46 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 369
Comments: 28
A couple years ago I payed my tax accessor a visit to check on a property tax program in my state. The assessment and reduction is directly related to one's income and age. After clearing up the concern I started complaining about local school and property taxes. After some 'agreement' by the accessor I stated that I thought we didn't have to pay yearly on the aforementioned school and property taxes. I went through about 6 or 8 commonly owned item someone might have and asked the local accessor if he payed yearly 'tax' on them. His answer was no to all of them. I might add that while he was talking to me he was typing away on his computer and not even looking in my direction. All of a sudden he pushed himself away from the desk and walked over to me and said: "I know where you're going with this. All the property in the US is owned by the Royal Family and we're just paying rent' I was floored by his statement, not because of the nature of it but because of his 'admission'. So what I did was go to the county offices and looked up my deed for the property. It was only a copy and when I asked the county employee where the ORIGINAL was he said he didn't know and said he was never asked that question. I saw that the son of the lawyer that handled my legal details (he was also a Judge) possessed my ORIGINAL DEED. His title was a British Title of Nobility, ESQUIRE. Evidently as soon as they pass the BAR Exame THEY GET THAT TITLE.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Itistoolate (#0)
Easy there. I may need more information to be certain about this, but another way to look at it is that he had heard your kind of logic before. The tax protest movement has had all sorts of strange ideas about the Bank of England and the end of the revolutionary war. The assessor had heard them long before he met you. Anyway, Esquire in the USA can even be used as a title for those who don't even have a title. I respect your concern about the ultimate legality of any particular tax, but I don't think you proved anything about the Crown owning America or anything like that in this incident.
The BAR stands for British Accredited Registry
Uh, yeah. Not that it has any significance.
he who wants bread is the servant of the man that will feed him, if a man thus feeds a whole people, they are under his control.
It also stands for Browning Automatic Rifle.
he who wants bread is the servant of the man that will feed him, if a man thus feeds a whole people, they are under his control.
Hiding behind the BAR www.angelfire.com/az/sthu...iding_Behind_the_BAR.html
I payed [sic] my tax accessor [sic] So far we can safely conclude that this was written by an illiterate. That's a good start. All the property in the US is owned by the Royal Family and we're just paying rent' Right. And I'm the Queen of England. Surely there is someone else around here who can actually detect utter BS.
I'll bet you don't have you original deed (if you own property)
hehehehe
"Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves." -- Ronald Reagan, circa 1977
I'll bet you don't have you [sic] original deed (if you own property) Now, why would I want to have an "original deed" to my property? I'm not the original owner, I'm the owner in due course. All I give a shit about is whether or not the title insurance company will pay if it turns out that my title is somehow impaired (they guarantee that it isn't) when I want to sell it to someone else. Other than that, I couldn't possibly care less, I'm not the Queen or the BAR or the Illuminati or any other illiterate tax protester fantasy.
expierence Ha. Good one. I missed that low-hanging fruit, there were too many to choose from.
On the deed for my property it says I'm the 'Tenent'.
ROTFL
"Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves." -- Ronald Reagan, circa 1977
On the deed for my property it says I'm the 'Tenent'. You might want to call your lawyer and/or your title insurance company, as it appears that whoever typed that can't spell, which might be indicative of deeper problems. A 'tenant' in common or jointly or otherwise wouldn't be unusual, but any 'tenent' would.
Don't you know that to 'pay someone a visit' doesn't mean you give them money.
So, this really is your sad personal tale of trying to duck your obligations? Has your personal "expierence" convinced you that you don't owe property taxes? Are you really as stupid and illiterate as you appear to be?
"...Attorney - one who transfers or assigns, within the bar, another's rights & property acting on behalf of the ruling crown (government) It's very clear that an attorney is not a lawyer. The lawyer is a learned counselor who advises. The ruling government appoints an attorney as one who transfers a tenant's rights, allegiance, and title to the land owner (government). Feudal Tenancy If you think you are a landowner in America, take a close look at the warranty deed or fee title to your land. You will almost always find the words "tenant" or "tenancy." The title or deed document establishing your right as a tenant, not that of a landowner, has been prepared for transfer by a licensed BAR Attorney, just as it was carried out within the original English feudal system we presumed we had escaped from in 1776. A human being is the tenant to a feudal superior. A feudal tenant is a legal person who pays rent or services of some sort for the use and occupation of another's land. The land has been conveyed to the tenant's use, but the actual ownership remains with the superior. If a common person does not own what he thought was his land (he's legally defined as a "feudal tenant," not the superior owner), then a superior person owns the land and the feudal tenant - person pays him to occupy the land. This is the hidden Feudal Law in America. When a person (a.k.a. human being, corporation, natural person, partnership, association, organization, etc.) pays taxes to the tax assessor of the civil county or city government (also a person), it is a payment to the superior land owner for the right to be a tenant and to occupy the land belonging to the superior. If this were not so, then how could a local government sell the house and land of a person for not rendering his services (taxes)? We used to think that there was no possible way feudal law could be exercised in America, but the facts have proven otherwise....." Bible says you are right. Genesis 15:13-14/Galatians 3:16,17....29/Micah 4 /Psalm 2/First Virginia Charter and Cross at Cape Henry 1607/etc. etc. Genesis 15:13 Then He said unto Abram, know that your seed [Galatians 3:16,17..29] will be servants in a land not their own and they will be afflicted 400 years..... I was at Jamestown recently. Queen Elizabeth had come over in 2007 to celebrate the 400th anniversary of Jamestown's founding. Wish I had gotten a picture of the plaque that was placed there at the same time of the coats-of-arms of the Inns of Court, or Middle Temple or Esquire "whatevers" that indicated British ownership. There was no other reason for that plaque to be there. "Truth goes through three stages. First it is ridiculed; then it is violently opposed. Finally it is accepted as self-evident."
"...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speech http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm
I love authentic gibberish. Keep it up.
After leaving the Office of Public Trust, The Office of the President of the
If you actually want to learn something about "The Most Honourable Order of the Bath" or even just read some interesting, obscure knighthood stuff, try this site: http://www.heraldicsculptor.com/bath.html "Admission to the Civil Division is through personal services rendered to the performance of public duties or which merit Royal favour. Numbers in each class are normally limited but may be increased in the event of war or other special circumstances. Foreigners can be admitted as Honorary Members on recommendation by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, these high honours have included Two former Presidents of the United States of America Ronald Reagan in 1989 and George Bush Senior in 1993 and the former Mayor of New York Rudolph Giuliani in 2002." Sorry, no conspiracy theories are included, but there are some great pictures.
Don't think I'm finished with this. My computer is trying to crash, and I am slooowly saving information/windows before I continue. Keep hitting them over the head with the truth.
"...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speech http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm
Good, you keep hitting them with the Truth also.
http://www.heraldicsculptor.com/bath.html "Admission to the Civil Division is through personal services rendered to the performance of public duties or which merit Royal favour. Numbers in each class are normally limited but may be increased in the event of war or other special circumstances. Foreigners can be admitted as Honorary Members on recommendation by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, these high honours have included Two former Presidents of the United States of America Ronald Reagan in 1989 and George Bush Senior in 1993 and the former Mayor of New York Rudolph Giuliani in 2002." Sorry, no conspiracy theories are included, but there are some great pictures. [my computer has been "processing" since I posted to Itistoolate] If you actually are not a NWO shill, and YOU actually want to learn something, you might stop criticizing Itisoolate for his spelling, and research the Original [MISSING] 13th Amendment. The Original 13th Article of Amendment The United States is still a British Colony (2) The United States is still a British Colony The trouble with history is, we weren't there when it took place and it can be changed to fit someones belief and/or traditions, or it can be taught in the public schools to favor a political agenda, and withhold many facts. I know you have been taught that we won the Revolutionary War and defeated the British, but I can prove to the contrary. I want you to read this paper with an open mind, and allow yourself to be instructed with the following verifiable facts. You be the judge and don't let prior conclusions on your part or incorrect teaching, keep you from the truth. I too was always taught in school and in studying our history books that our freedom came from the Declaration of Independence and was secured by our winning the Revolutionary War. I'm going to discuss a few documents that are included at the end of this paper, in the footnotes. The first document is the first Charter of Virginia in 1606 (footnote #1). In the first paragraph, the king of England granted our fore fathers license to settle and colonize America. The definition for license is as follows. "In Government Regulation. Authority to do some act or carry on some trade or business, in its nature lawful but prohibited by statute, except with the permission of the civil authority or which would otherwise be unlawful." Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1914. Keep in mind those that came to America from England were British subjects. So you can better understand what I'm going to tell you, here are the definitions for subject and citizen. "In monarchical governments, by subject is meant one who owes permanent allegiance to the monarch." Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1914. "Constitutional Law. One that owes allegiance to a sovereign and is governed by his laws. The natives of Great Britain are subjects of the British government. Men in free governments are subjects as well as citizens; as citizens they enjoy rights and franchises; as subjects they are bound to obey the laws. The term is little used, in this sense, in countries enjoying a republican form of government." Swiss Nat. Ins. Co. v. Miller, 267 U.S. 42, 45 S. Ct. 213, 214, 69 L.Ed. 504. Blacks fifth Ed. I chose to give the definition for subject first, so you could better understand what definition of citizen is really being used in American law. Below is the definition of citizen from Roman law. "The term citizen was used in Rome to indicate the possession of private civil rights, including those accruing under the Roman family and inheritance law and the Roman contract and property law. All other subjects were peregrines. But in the beginning of the 3d century the distinction was abolished and all subjects were citizens; 1 sel. Essays in Anglo-Amer. L. H. 578." Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1914. The king was making a commercial venture when he sent his subjects to America, and used his money and resources to do so. I think you would admit the king had a lawful right to receive gain and prosper from his venture. In the Virginia Charter he declares his sovereignty over the land and his subjects and in paragraph 9 he declares the amount of gold, silver and copper he is to receive if any is found by his subjects. There could have just as easily been none, or his subjects could have been killed by the Indians. This is why this was a valid right of the king (Jure Coronae, "In right of the crown," Black's forth Ed.), the king expended his resources with the risk of total loss. If you'll notice in paragraph 9 the king declares that all his heirs and successors were to also receive the same amount of gold, silver and copper that he claimed with this Charter. The gold that remained in the colonies was also the kings. He provided the remainder as a benefit for his subjects, which amounted to further use of his capital. You will see in this paper that not only is this valid, but it is still in effect today. If you will read the rest of the Virginia Charter you will see that the king declared the right and exercised the power to regulate every aspect of commerce in his new colony. A license had to be granted for travel connected with transfer of goods (commerce) right down to the furniture they sat on. A great deal of the king's declared property was ceded to America in the Treaty of 1783. I want you to stay focused on the money and the commerce which was not ceded to America. This brings us to the Declaration of Independence. Our freedom was declared because the king did not fulfill his end of the covenant between king and subject. The main complaint was taxation without representation, which was reaffirmed in the early 1606 Charter granted by the king. It was not a revolt over being subject to the king of England, most wanted the protection and benefits provided by the king. Because of the kings refusal to hear their demands and grant relief, separation from England became the lesser of two evils. The cry of freedom and self determination became the rallying cry for the colonist. The slogan "Don't Tread On Me" was the standard borne by the militias. The Revolutionary War was fought and concluded when Cornwallis surrendered to Washington at Yorktown. As Americans we have been taught that we defeated the king and won our freedom. The next document I will use is the Treaty of 1783, which will totally contradict our having won the Revolutionary War. (footnote 2). I want you to notice in the first paragraph that the king refers to himself as prince of the Holy Roman Empire and of the United States. You know from this that the United States did not negotiate this Treaty of peace in a position of strength and victory, but it is obvious that Benjamin Franklin, John Jay and John Adams negotiated a Treaty of further granted privileges from the king of England. Keep this in mind as you study these documents. You also need to understand the players of those that negotiated this Treaty. For the Americans it was Benjamin Franklin Esgr., a great patriot and standard bearer of freedom. Or was he? His title includes Esquire. An Esquire in the above usage was a granted rank and Title of nobility by the king, which is below Knight and above a yeoman, common man. An Esquire is someone that does not do manual labor as signified by this status, see the below definitions. [ATKHWDI Note: See Genesis 15:13-14 in my previous post and Ezekiel 39:6 KJV, in reference to "those who live leisurely in the Isles". Also look up the" Lord Mayor's Show Gog and Magog", and note the statues "Gog and Magog" are guardians of The City of London. Connect the dots if you dare. God is not mocked. He foretold this eons ago. You might also look up Psalm 2 wherein God God names the key enemies of His people as the "kings of the earth, the rulers (and every President is related to the British monrchy), and the judges (Esquires all). ] "Esquires by virtue of their offices; as justices of the peace, and others who bear any office of trust under the crown....for whosever studieth the laws of the realm, who studieth in the universities, who professeth the liberal sciences, and who can live idly, and without manual labor, and will bear the port, charge, and countenance of a gentleman, he shall be called master, and shall be taken for a gentleman." Blackstone Commentaries p. 561-562 "Esquire - In English Law. A title of dignity next above gentleman, and below knight. Also a title of office given to sheriffs, serjeants, and barristers at law, justices of the peace, and others." Blacks Law Dictionary fourth ed. p. 641 Benjamin Franklin, John Adams and John Jay as you can read in the Treaty were all Esquires and were the signers of this Treaty and the only negotiators of the Treaty. The representative of the king was David Hartley Esqr.. Benjamin Franklin was the main negotiator for the terms of the Treaty, he spent most of the War traveling between England and France. The use of Esquire declared his and the others British subjection and loyalty to the crown. In the first article of the Treaty most of the kings claims to America are relinquished, except for his claim to continue receiving gold, silver and copper as gain for his business venture. Article 3 gives Americans the right to fish the waters around the United States and its rivers. In article 4 the United States agreed to pay all bona fide debts. If you will read my other papers on money you will understand that the financiers were working with the king. Why else would he protect their interest with this Treaty? I wonder if you have seen the main and obvious point? This Treaty was signed in 1783, the war was over in 1781. If the United States defeated England, how is the king granting rights to America, when we were now his equal in status? We supposedly defeated him in the Revolutionary War! So why would these supposed patriot Americans sign such a Treaty, when they knew that this would void any sovereignty gained by the Declaration of Independence and the Revolutionary War? If we had won the Revolutionary War, the king granting us our land would not be necessary, it would have been ours by his loss of the Revolutionary War. To not dictate the terms of a peace treaty in a position of strength after winning a war; means the war was never won. Think of other wars we have won, such as when we defeated Japan. Did McArther allow Japan to dictate to him the terms for surrender? No way! All these men did is gain status and privilege granted by the king and insure the subjection of future unaware generations. Worst of all, they sold out those that gave their lives and property for the chance to be free. When Cornwallis surrendered to Washington he surrendered the battle, not the war. Read the Article of Capitulation signed by Cornwallis at Yorktown (footnote 3) Jonathan Williams recorded in his book, Legions of Satan, 1781, that Cornwallis revealed to Washington during his surrender that "a holy war will now begin on America, and when it is ended America will be supposedly the citadel of freedom, but her millions will unknowingly be loyal subjects to the Crown."...."in less than two hundred years the whole nation will be working for divine world government. That government that they believe to be divine will be the British Empire." All the Treaty did was remove the United States as a liability and obligation of the king. He no longer had to ship material and money to support his subjects and colonies. At the same time he retained financial subjection through debt owed after the Treaty, which is still being created today; millions of dollars a day. And his heirs and successors are still reaping the benefit of the kings original venture. If you will read the following quote from Title 26, you will see just one situation where the king is still collecting a tax from those that receive a benefit from him, on property which is purchased with the money the king supplies, at almost the same percentage: -CITE- 26 USC Sec. 1491 HEAD- Sec. 1491. Imposition of tax -STATUTE- There is hereby imposed on the transfer of property by a citizen or resident of the United States, or by a domestic corporation or partnership, or by an estate or trust which is not a foreign estate or trust, to a foreign corporation as paid-in surplus or as a contribution to capital, or to a foreign estate or trust, or to a foreign partnership, an excise tax equal to 35 percent of the excess of - (1) the fair market value of the property so transferred, over (2) the sum of - (A) the adjusted basis (for determining gain) of such property in the hands of the transferor, plus (B) the amount of the gain recognized to the transferor at the time of the transfer. -SOURCE- (Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 365; Oct. 4, 1976, Pub. L. 94-455, title X, Sec. 1015(a), 90 Stat. 1617; Nov. 6, 1978, Pub. L. 95-600, title VII, Sec. 701(u)(14)(A), 92 Stat. 2919.) -MISC1- AMENDMENTS 1978 - Pub. L. 95-600 substituted 'estate or trust' for 'trust' wherever appearing. 1976 - Pub. L. 94-455 substituted in provisions preceding par. (1) 'property' for 'stocks and securities' and '35 percent' for '27 1/2 percent' and in par. (1) 'fair market value' for 'value' and 'property' for 'stocks and securities' and in par. (2) designated existing provisions as subpar. (A) and added subpar. (B). EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1978 AMENDMENT Section 701(u)(14)(C) of Pub. L. 95-600 provided that: 'The amendments made by this paragraph (amending this section and section 1492 of this title) shall apply to transfers after October 2, 1975.' EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1976 AMENDMENT Section 1015(d) of Pub. L. 94-455 provided that: 'The amendments made by this section (enacting section 1057 of this title, amending this section and section 1492 of this title, and renumbering former section 1057 as 1058 of this title) shall apply to transfers of property after October 2, 1975.' A new war was declared when the Treaty was signed. The king wanted his land back and he knew he would be able to regain his property for his heirs with the help of his world financiers.Here is a quote from the king speaking to Parliament after the Revolutionary War had concluded. (Six weeks after) the capitulation of Yorktown, the king of Great Britain, in his speech to Parliament (Nov. 27, 1781), declared "That he should not answer the trust committed to the sovereign of a free people, if he consented to sacrifice either to his own desire of peace, or to their temporary ease and relief, those essential rights and permanent interests, upon the maintenance and preservation of which the future strength and security of the country must forever depend." The determined language of this speech, pointing to the continuance of the American war, was echoed back by a majority of both Lords and Commons. In a few days after (Dec. 12), it was moved in the House of Commons that a resolution should be adopted declaring it to be their opinion "That all farther *** attempts to reduce the Americans to obedience by force would be ineffectual, and injurious to the true interests of Great Britain." The rest of the debate can be found in (footnote 4). What were the true interests of the king? The gold, silver and copper. The new war was to be fought without Americans being aware that a war was even being waged, it was to be fought by subterfuge and key personnel being placed in key positions. The first two parts of "A Country Defeated In Victory," go into detail about how this was done and exposes some of the main players. Every time you pay a tax you are transferring your labor to the king, and his heirs and successors are still receiving interest from the original American Charters. The following is the definition of tribute (tax). "A contribution which is raised by a prince or sovereign from his subjects to sustain the expenses of the state. A sum of money paid by an inferior sovereign or state to a superior potentate, to secure the friendship or protection of the latter." Blacks Law Dictionary forth ed. p. 1677 As further evidence, not that any is needed, a percentage of taxes that are paid are to enrich the king/queen of England. For those that study Title 26 you will recognize IMF, which means Individual Master File, all tax payers have one. To read one you have to be able to break their codes using file 6209, which is about 467 pages. On your IMF you will find a blocking series, which tells you what type of tax you are paying. You will probably find a 300-399 blocking series, which 6209 says is reserved. You then look up the BMF 300-399, which is the Business Master File in 6209. You would have seen prior to 1991, this was U.S.-U.K. Tax Claims, non-refile DLN. Meaning everyone is considered a business and involved in commerce and you are being held liable for a tax via a treaty between the U.S. and the U.K., payable to the U.K.. The form that is supposed to be used for this is form 8288, FIRPTA - Foreign Investment Real Property Tax Account, you won't find many people using this form, just the 1040 form. The 8288 form can be found in the Law Enforcement Manual of the IRS, chapter 3. If you will check the OMB's paper - Office of Management and Budget, in the Department of Treasury, List of Active Information Collections, Approved Under Paperwork Reduction Act, you will find this form under OMB number 1545-0902, which says U.S. withholding tax-return for dispositions by foreign persons of U.S. real property interests-statement of withholding on dispositions, by foreign persons, of U.S. Form #8288 #8288a. These codes have since been changed to read as follows; IMF 300-309, Barred Assement, CP 55 generated valid for MFT-30, which is the code for 1040 form. IMF 310-399 reserved, the BMF 300-309 reads the same as IMF 300-309. BMF 390-399 reads U.S./U.K. Tax Treaty Claims. The long and short of it is nothing changed, the government just made it plainer, the 1040 is the payment of a foreign tax to the king/queen of England. We have been in financial servitude since the Treaty of 1783. Another Treaty between England and the United States was Jay's Treaty of 1794 (footnote 5). If you will remember from the Paris Treaty of 1783, John Jay Esqr. was one of the negotiators of the Treaty. In 1794 he negotiated another Treaty with Britain. There was great controversy among the American people about this Treaty. In Article 2 you will see the king is still on land that was supposed to be ceded to the United States at the Paris Treaty. This is 13 years after America supposedly won the Revolutionary War. I guess someone forgot to tell the king of England. In Article 6, the king is still dictating terms to the United States concerning the collection of debt and damages, the British government and World Bankers claimed we owe. In Article 12 we find the king dictating terms again, this time concerning where and with who the United States could trade. In Article 18 the United States agrees to a wide variety of material that would be subject to confiscation if Britain found said material going to its enemies ports. Who won the Revolutionary War? That's right, we were conned by some of our early fore fathers into believing that we are free and sovereign people, when in fact we had the same status as before the Revolutionary War. I say had, because our status is far worse now than then. I'll explain. Early on in our history the king was satisfied with the interest made by the Bank of the United States. But when the Bank Charter was canceled in 1811 it was time to gain control of the government, in order to shape government policy and public policy. Have you never asked yourself why the British, after burning the White House and all our early records during the War of 1812, left and did not take over the government. The reason they did, was **** to remove the greatest barrier to their plans for this country. ***** That barrier was the newly adopted 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution. ***** The purpose for this Amendment was to stop anyone from serving in the government who was receiving a Title of nobility or honor. ********** It was and is obvious that these government employees would be loyal to the granter of the Title of nobility or honor. The War of 1812 served several purposes. It delayed the passage of the 13th Amendment by Virginia, allowed the British to destroy the evidence of the first 12 states ratification of this Amendment, and it increased the national debt, which would coerce the Congress to reestablish the Bank Charter in 1816 after the Treaty of Ghent was ratified by the Senate in 1815." NEXT: ... http://www.civil-liberties.com/books/colony2.html For the entire quote from Cornwallis to George Washington, see THE BIGGEST HOAX - THE UNION JACK "...a HOLY WAR will now begin against America [see Psalm 2]...her churches will be used to teach the Jews' religion...she will be working for divine government which is the BRITISH EMPIRE, under the all-seeing eye of FREEMASONRY..." [paraphrased]..... search at http://sweetliberty.org . I started to mention and didn't, that along with the plaque at Jamestown honoring the ESQUIRES, was a HUGE JUDEO-MASONIC OBELISK, which was the MOST incongrous thing at First Landing.....although maybe not....the TRUE First Landing was NOT at JAMESTOWN, but at CAPE HENRY, WHERE THEY PLANTED THE CROSS. See The Enduring Legacy of the First Landing at http://wnd.com [Matthew 13:24,31,37 etc. If the cross represents the mustard seed; that obelisk that came later represents the LEAVEN Matthew 13:33(two "good" Masonic numbers),38,39] I could stop here, but I'm not done yet. Unfortunately, my computer is running REALLY slowly. ======== edit. I saw a few spelling errors. I corrected one. sorry. BTW, that obelisk had not one but FOUR [NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, and WEST] EAGLES on it. Ezekiel 17:1-10/Matthew 15:13. Jesus is the TRUE vine; His Father [or Jesus; Isaiah 9:6-7] is the husbandman/planter/FIRST EAGLE [John 15:1-2/Ezekiel 17:1-6]. The MERHANTS [Ezekiel 17:4] are in the First Virginia Charter. That obelisk is just one of many representations of the second eagle [Ezekiel 17:7-10]. Amazing how the battle that began in Genesis 3:15 has been secretly raging in America since that cross was planted. It is evident at Williamsburg as well, where the Union Jack and the British Crown are prominently displayed everywhere. Itistoolate, it seems to me that your conversation with the tax assessor shows that America is waking up to the truth.
"...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speech http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm
Good. While I'm working on saving info and adding to this thread, let me repeat what I said: Genesis 15:13-14/Galatians 3:16,17....29/Micah 4 /Psalm 2/First Virginia Charter and Cross at Cape Henry 1607/etc. etc. Genesis 15:13 Then He said unto Abram, know that your seed [Galatians 3:16,17..29] will be servants in a land not their own and they will be afflicted 400 years..... I was at Jamestown recently. Queen Elizabeth had come over in 2007 to celebrate the 400th anniversary of Jamestown's founding. Wish I had gotten a picture of the plaque that was placed there at the same time of the coats-of-arms of the Inns of Court, or Middle Temple or Esquire "whatevers" that indicated British ownership. There was no other reason for that plaque to be there. "Truth goes through three stages. First it is ridiculed; then it is violently opposed. Finally it is accepted as self-evident." ============================ Genesis 15:14.....And also that nation whom they serve will I judge;, andafterward shall they "come out" with much substance. [See Micah 4:13]
"...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speech http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm
Nice copy and paste job. You read it on the internet, so it must be true, huh? It is, however, gibberish. Just not yours, so it's not authentic.
Doc Marquis---Arrival of the Antichrist part 3 Doc Marquis---Arrival of the Antichrist part 17
The unwritten rule of private property is, no matter what deed, lease or backroom deals you have made, you only "own" as much property as what you can control and protect. The global elitists are about to learn this rule the hard way as they bankrupt and piss off three quarters of the human population of the planet.
"Jonathan Williams recorded in his LEGIONS OF SATAN, 1781, that Cornwallis revealed to Washington that, "A holy war will now begin on America, and when it is ended America will be supposedly the citadel of freedom, but her millions will unknowingly be loyal subjects to the Crown." "Cornwallis went on to explain what would seem to be a self contradiction "Your churches will be used to teach the Jew's religion and in less than two hundred years the whole nation will be working for divine world government. That government that they believe to be divine will be the British Empire. All religions will be permeated with Judaism without even being noticed by the masses, and they will all be under the invisible all-seeing eye of the Grand Architect of Freemasonry." The ruling elite of the World Revolution - Zionism in alliance with another of its tools, Freemasonry - has whipped the American people into a war frenzy of revenge on an as yet unidentified enemy. The New War has been dubbed a Holy War. It appears the battle will be between Judaized Christians and Muslims, so in lock-step with the plan of the Ruling Sect, we'll kill one another off for them. The higher echelon Freemasons and the Zionist elite who are fomenting the 'protracted' war will, as always, stay out of harms way while the herd dives headlong into a mutual slaughter. ...... www.sweetliberty.org/pers...e/jewishpersecution19.htm ========================== Nice copy and paste job. You read it on the internet, so it must be true, huh? It is, however, gibberish. Just not yours, so it's not authentic. Here' some more "gibberish".... from The Congressional Record: "What You Need to Know About the British Israel World Federation Movement | Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | The following two images are taken from the Congressional Record of the United States of America, 76th Congress, Third Session, dated April [?] 19, 1940. ..... Steps Toward British Union, a World State, and International Strife Remarks of HON. G THORKELSON OF MONTANA In the House of Representatives, Monday, August 19, 1940 Mr. Thorkelson. Mr. Speaker, in order that the American people may have a clearer understanding of those who over a period of years have been undermining this Republic, in order to return it to the British Empire, I have inserted in the Record a number of articles to prove this point. These articles are entitled "Steps Toward British Union, a World State, and International Strife." This is Part I, and in this I Include a hope expressed by Mr. Andrew Carnegie, in his book entitled "Triumphant Democracy." In this he expresses himself in this manner: Let men say what they will, I say that as surely as the sun in the heavens once shone upon Britain and America united so surely is it one morning to rise, to shine upon, to greet again the reunited states - the British-American Union......" [btw, interesting that Obama's logo of the rising sun ties in so nicely with this, seeing how he is related to the Merovingian bloodline] Please don't let the fact that things are going according to plan get in the way of your bias against the truth: "What You Need to Know About the British Israel World Federation Movement | Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | In the late 1930s, the British Israel World Federation Movement's Destiny Magazine published articles identifying September 2001 as the target date for beginning their planned global theocratic state -- a "Kingdom of Heaven on Earth."....." jordanmaxwell What did Cornwallis say, again? "A holy war will now begin on America, and when it is ended America will be supposedly the citadel of freedom, but her millions will unknowingly be loyal subjects to the Crown." "Your churches will be used to teach the Jew's religion and in less than two hundred years the whole nation will be working for divine world government. That government that they believe to be divine will be the British Empire. All religions will be permeated with Judaism without even being noticed by the masses, **** and they will all be under the invisible all-seeing eye of the Grand Architect of Freemasonry." ============ Here's your Judeo-Masonic-British "Divine Government" [i.e., POLICE STATE], as exposed by http://www.freemasonrywatch.org/freemasonry_in_usa.html [EXCERPTS]: FEMA logo [see FEMA FLYERS (we're all terrorists now) http://www.freemasonrywatch.org/fema_flyers.html ] 'The great majority of active Masons conceal their membership from the Non-Masonic, they just don't want the fact that they are Freemasons widely publicized, for most of them it is something they guard quite closely, especially for Masons who are public officials. Masonry doesn't want the Non-Masonic becoming aware of their 'pillar of mutual support', the network of favoritism in business, careers, social-religious, and politics. The real secret of Freemasonry is that it is a real secret society.' [ATKHWDI: note the upside-down/broken crosses in the stylized masonic compasses, signifying a defeated Jesus Christ. Can it be any clearer that the US Government is not Christian, but AntiChrist? Note Horse's recent article about Christians being persecuted and slaughtered in Iraq since the War of Terror began....they were MUCH FREER under Saddam Hussein! Revelation 20:7-9] [ATKHWDI note....looks almost British!] 'Suddenly, it dawned on Homer why Grampa never gets traffic tickets'... Law enforcement by the way, is trained by the Jewish Anti-Defamation League. Did you notice the police AND THE FIREMEN in NEW YORK are under the Masons? "Always conceal, never reveal the crimes of your fellow masons", is their motto, even when it comes to sacrificing a few of their own, it appears. Let that be a lesson to you masons out there. You probably already know all this. Maybe you're a high-level mason.
"...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speech http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm
Amazing videos! Thanks! Re: the second video and the Baptist Church. See its European/Jewish/Satanic roots: ANABAPTIST UNITARIANS watch.pair.com/TR-15-anabaptist-unitarians.html I know a lot of wonderful Baptists, but I've come to see that religion, along with a lot of other so-called Christian relgions, as a cult. Some Baptist churches are more like a coven of witches waging war for "Israel" than anything else. "Many will say, Lord, Lord, didn't we prophecy in your name and do many wonderful works? And I will say, get away from me. I never knew you, you who work iniquity." - Matthew 7:21-23
"...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speech http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm
All of a sudden he pushed himself away from the desk and walked over to me and said: "I know where you're going with this. All the property in the US is owned by the Royal Family and we're just paying rent'
#2. To: Deasy (#1)
#3. To: Itistoolate (#0)
Evidently as soon as they pass the BAR Exame THEY GET THAT TITLE.
#4. To: Itistoolate (#2)
#5. To: DeaconBenjamin (#3)
#6. To: Itistoolate (#0)
#7. To: Farked (#6)
#8. To: Farked (#6)
expierence
#9. To: Itistoolate (#7)
#10. To: buckeroo (#8)
#11. To: Farked (#9)
#12. To: Itistoolate (#11)
'Tenent'.
#13. To: Itistoolate (#11)
#14. To: Farked (#13)
#15. To: Itistoolate (#14)
#16. To: Itistoolate (#5)
Hiding behind the BAR www.angelfire.com/az/sthu...iding_Behind_the_BAR.html
#17. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#16)
#18. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#16)
United States, President George H.W. Bush was KNIGHTED BY THE QUEEN OF
ENGLAND for his efforts once again returning AMERICAN CITIZENS as SUBJECTS
OF THE QUEEN/CROWN OF ENGLAND
www.theantechamber.net/V_K_Durham/ActsOfTreason.html provides the necessary proof by THE QUEEN'S OWN RECORDS & DOCUMENTS.
#19. To: Itistoolate (#18)
#20. To: Itistoolate (#18)
#21. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#20)
#22. To: Farked, Itistoolate (#19)
(Edited)
If you actually want to learn something about "The Most Honourable Order of the Bath" or even just read some interesting, obscure knighthood stuff, try this site:
10, 1812. Before a thirteenth State could ratify, the War of 1812 broke out and ..... http://www.civil-liberties.com/13/ ...http://www.apfn.org/apfn/13th.htm
#23. To: Farked (#17)
I love authentic gibberish. Keep it up.
#24. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#22)
#25. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#23)
(Edited)
#26. To: Itistoolate (#0)
#27. To: Farked (#24)
Six months before Senator Joseph McCarthy's mouth was closed forever, he presented an article titled George Washington's Surrender, in which he quoted British General Cornwallis. The full article can be found in The Union Jack - Epilogue:
#28. To: Itistoolate (#25)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest