See other (s)Elections Articles
Title: Tancredo: Palin not fit for the presidency
Source:
HotAir via El Pee
URL Source: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=284730
Published: Mar 1, 2010
Author: Ed Morrissey The Neocon Cock Smoker by "
Post Date: 2010-03-01 14:26:09 by Rotara
Keywords: None
Views: 242
Comments: 24
Tancredo: Palin not fit for the presidency posted at 10:55 am on March 1, 2010 by Ed Morrissey The decision by Sarah Palin to campaign for John McCain has opened up a Tea Party tiff between two of its firebrand conservatives. Former Congressman Tom Tancredo, who has campaigned among Tea Party activists for his long-standing fight against comprehensive immigration reform, declares Palin unfit for the presidency and an unprincipled politician for supporting his bete noir in his re-election bid: After her speech at the Nashville convention, Palin said she is considering a run for the presidency in 2012. Tancredo however, does not believe she is fit for the presidency. “I really don’t have this feeling about her as being presidential,” he Tancredo said. “I don’t know what it is exactly. I don’t know if the issues really are that difficult for her or not.” He questions if she has what it takes, and whether she really wants it. “As governor of the state of Alaska, she doesn’t have all that kind of experience. She can get better. But I don’t know if she is really looking to do it.’’ It could all be a commercial thing, just a way to sell books? “Sure. Make a lot of money and stay in the mix. I think that’s a great idea.’’ John McCain has brought over his former running mate to campaign for him in Arizona, where the Tea Party movement is challenging his seat in the Senate. She will campaign against J.D. Hayworth, a friend of yours who is on your side in the immigration debate. What does that tell you about Palin? “That tells me she is a Republican. I am not. I mean, I am a member of that party and that will always stay that way. But to me it’s only a mechanism, a way to get on the ballot and all that. But she is a real Republican.’’ She has to do this to rise in the party ranks? “I think so.’’ So she is just as much an unprincipled politician as all the rest of them? “To a large extent.’’ It’s important to remember that Tancredo ran for the Presidency in 2008, and may try again in 2012, too. He will want to set up a contrast with Palin — and, by extension, the rest of the Republican candidates — and so he’s not likely to be an objective observer on any of them. Tancredo explains that his falling out with McCain came from a supposed verbal fight over Tancredo’s refusal to give the BCRA quid pro quo support after McCain did some fundraising for Tancredo to get him elected, and this kind of story allows Tancredo to make himself into the “not business as usual” candidate … even though the entirety of Tancredo’s resume comes from his work inside the Beltway as Congressman. Palin’s support for McCain has gotten her some criticism, but it’s difficult to see what other choice she could make. She has talked endlessly about her admiration for the man who put her on a national ticket, including supporting most of McCain’s policy choices. During the campaign, Palin expressed support for McCain’s immigration policies, which not only puts her at loggerheads with Tancredo but also with McCain’s primary opponent J. D. Hayworth. If Palin wants to build herself into a presidential contender, she has to get involved in Senate and House races this cycle, and it would have been impossible for her to legitimately stay neutral in Arizona. Taking a neutral position would have been tantamount to an endorsement of Hayworth. As far as Tea Party credibility goes, Tancredo has his own problems: But there you were, staunch conservative Tom Tancredo in one of his last days in Congress, supporting a huge government program for the financial sector on the side of all the liberals you loathed your whole life. “Oh, it was very strange. It was bizarre! But let me tell you the interesting aspect from my point of view. There were several people that essentially said to me (and many, many, many more who didn’t say it), ‘I can’t vote for it, but my God, I hope it passes’.’’ … Do the Tea Party people realise that you supported the bailout? “I don’t know.’’ And if they knew, wouldn’t they be angry with you? “Yeah, I am sure that would take the lustre off.’ As it happens, I have more sympathy for Tancredo on this point. Congress voted to buy up the toxic mortgage-backed securities to stabilize the lending markets, not bailouts of financial institutions (I originally supported the original idea, while critics rightly predicted it would turn into a blank check). The Bush and Obama administrations used that money for a completely different purpose, as Tancredo correctly explains, although Congress buckled under to supplying the language that allowed Treasury to do that. That, however, is a nuanced point — and more importantly, the policy turned out to be against the main thrust of the Tea Party movement for limiting government interventions. Tancredo’s experience shows the need for nuanced understanding of political decisions … a point which he completely misses with Palin, mainly to benefit himself. Poster Comment: Tancredo endorsed Romney when he withdrew in 2008. Tancredo has whined that he should be reimbursed by the government for the loss of his $1.1M savings with Agile, who had invested Tancredo's money with Madoff. However, he rejected such policy with the Enron investors and others.
Poster Comment: tancredo became a zero-nothing-nobody when he voted for various anti-American, war-mongering, Zio-Police-State measures such as the NDAA and MCA, for starters. it was no surprise he endorsed the shit head from Massofchewspit when his pathetic campaign (managed by bay buchanan) whizzled. sarah palinsky, the Zio-Trash repubican ho from Alaska is a very SPECIAL kind of fuck up, though. maybe 'cuz she has tits ?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: tooconservative, tooZIO, FRAUD, pretender (#0)
You're a pathetic sack of dung. But you knew that...
That, and she's zio-approved on that gosh-darn pesky border thing, dontcha know? Tancredo is just bitter because he was hot back in 2005 and he's yesterday's garbage now. _________________________________________________________________________ I'm going to throw a HUGE HUGE HUGE party on the Caribbean coast if and when the campaign plane carrying palinsky/mcCain goes down killing all Globalist ZIOtrash on board...you're all invited and the rum is on me. Maybe a little 'smoke' too, eh ?? ehehe
But the left still hates her -- hates her -- far more than Tancredo. Ergo, immigration is not the problem. There are already enough brown folk here to make a neocon paradise.
Q: Why don't blacks major in math? Irrelevant.
Q: Why don't blacks major in math? Anyone, and I mean anyone, who has made the trip to TelAviv is off my list to support in any way.
Yeah, the 'NEOCON paradise' that 'WHITEY' created...color ain't the problem, culture and despicable people with power are. It flows downhill as opposed to many contrary and false assumptions.
What if they only made a visit for an organ transplant ? lol
Ron Paul is for liberty and for peace, and demonstrates it in all his votes in Congress he is the only one in our government who obeys the Constitution He is a true patriot Love, Palo palo verde posted on 2010-03-01 13:55:41 ET Reply Trace You might have everyone else snowed, snow FLAKE, but I've ALWAYS known that you're a repubican whore...just like palinsky you dumb flakey bitch.
I am? I did? Thanks for the name-calling. It is wildly humorous that you hate TOS1 so much yet seem to spend so much effort trolling over there. Then drag it all back here. Maybe you need a new hobby. LOL.
Woh, that's strong language for you, palo. Don't take the Tanc so seriously. I thought people should be aware he's saying this stuff, also that he spoke to the Tea Party (who never did understand that Tanc supported the bailouts). Tancredo got lots of attention here and on other forums but Duncan Hunter was the better man. Just as tough on illegals and very conservative. And Hunter was the one who got the fence bill passed in 2006, not Tancredo. Maybe you are simply an ignoramus partisan hack-moran like the other palinsky suck asses on this board (few, fortunately). duncan hunter is an enemy of America, but then so are you repubiziobot. But your shtick ain't going to cut it over here with critical thinkers, unlike your Israel-first forum run by the Talmudist Sally...whose site happens to be using Neil McIver's software. I hope you, duncan hunter and every SINGLE scumbag like YOU shows up for the dance...
ping
Want to look at a new way to make some moola?click here and enter code 4d6a55744e5451354e7a673d-2
2) Thanks for the name-calling. 3) It is wildly humorous that you hate TOS1 so much yet seem to spend so much effort trolling over there. Then drag it all back here. 4) Maybe you need a new hobby. 5) LOL. 1) Maybe you didn't. Now you do. 2) Name calling ? I hope every fucktard like you is tortured before death. Kept alive only to be tortured more and more then ultimately thrown in a tree shredder feet first. 3) It sucks having to go over to IsraelPost.org to keep up with you lying mother fucking Traitors, but once in awhile I'm up to it. I bring it here to expose what a MOTHER FUCKER you are... 4) I've had one. I'm proficient up to almost 1.5 miles now. Sleep tight. 5) Shouldn't you giggle or snicker like your NEOCON hack butt thumpers from IsraelFirst.org ?
I'll raise you one ping. PING
She's not but I still might vote for her under the following circumstances 1 - She chooses Ron Paul as a running mate WWGPD? - (What Would General Pinochet Do?)
What does her support of Paul, Bachmann and Kasich tell us? You're just bitter, I now understand, because you have to wipe ass ALL DAY and NIGHT...
I wouldn't vote for that NEOCON whore even if YOUR LIFE depended on it. Never. And if Ron Paul joined her ticket, I would consider him a TOTAL write off as opposed to what I already think of him. This coming from a former State Executive to his campaign and true believer once upon a time.
TANCREDO is a cut and run candidate. He ran for the Presidency, got millions in contributions, went thru all the debates...and then... DROPPED OUT BEFORE A SINGLE VOTE WAS CAST HE TOOK THE MILLION$$ AND RAN.... HE has NO authority to say anything about ANY candidate who runs for President. NONE!!! Goldi-Lox posted on 2010-03-01 15:18:50 ET Reply Trace Sally, you ignorant Talmudist SLUT...does the palinsky get your wheat gluten affliction all stirred up ?
Gasp! There'll be no rapture for you.
WWGPD? - (What Would General Pinochet Do?)
I just realized that you post under the handle McCain_Rocks over at TOS1.
Which goes to show that you're not only an ignoramus partisan hack ZIO-Traitor but ALSO a retard...
What the heck is TOS1?
If you were to swab Alberto Gonzalez, George Bush Jr, and George Bush Sr, you'd find out that the Bush Jr, and Alberto are brothers. Certain traits, and things are a dead give away. Just like there are a half dozen other people who I know have to be related by DNA. Robert Downey Jr. Javier Bardem, and Jeffrey Dean Morgan. They all share the same paternal DNA. It's not random chance that people who look alike, or act alike, seem to fall into similar professions. Especially where money and power are concerned.
It is better to be hated for what you are, than loved for what you are not. - Tommy The Mad Artist.
TOS=That Other Site. A shorthand way for freepers to refer to LP or for LPers to refer to FR. Of course, LP isn't the only TOS. So I call it TOS1. A few times I've called 4um "TOS2". After all, not all banned freepers go to LP.
ping
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams 
#2. To: Rotara (#0)
sarah palinsky, the Zio-Trash repubican ho from Alaska is a very SPECIAL kind of fuck up, though. maybe 'cuz she has tits ?
"This man is Jesus,” shouted one man, spilling his Guinness as Barack Obama began his inaugural address. “When will he come to Kenya to save us?”
-Schweizerische Schuetzenzeitung (Swiss Shooting Federation) April, 1941
#3. To: X-15 (#2)
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
#4. To: Rotara (#0)
During the campaign, Palin expressed support for McCain’s immigration policies
A: Amba-lamba calculus be racis'.
#5. To: X-15 (#2)
That, and she's zio-approved on that gosh-darn pesky border thing, dontcha know?
A: Amba-lamba calculus be racis'.
#6. To: Prefrontal Vortex. all (#5)
#7. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#4)
There are already enough brown folk here to make a neocon paradise.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
#8. To: Lod (#6)
Anyone, and I mean anyone, who has made the trip to TelAviv is off my list to support in any way.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
#9. To: palo verde (#0)
Well Tancredo is just going to have to lump it, Sarah Palin is gonna be our President in 2012 I personally never liked Tancredo, Ron Paul was my candidate in the GOP Primaries but the owner of this site and many posters were passionate for TT TT did poorly in primaries, dropped out quickly, and then threw his support to Romney he never liked Ron Paul
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
#10. To: Rotara (#1)
You're a pathetic sack of dung. But you knew that...
#11. To: tooconservative, tooNEOCON, toostoooooopid, tooZIO, toadie, hack, shill, Israel-first POS (#10)
TWO 'ACTS' OF TYRANNY ON THE SAME DAY!
By Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D.
December 7, 2006
Latest Update September 21, 2008
On October 17, 2006, 'a date which will live in infamy' . . . there were two acts of tyranny committed. The first was a public signing of the 'Military Commissions Act of 2006' which suspended habeas corpus allowing the president to declare you an 'enemy combatant' and end your rights to seek legal or judicial relief from unlawful imprisonment.
The second act of tyranny took place in a private Oval Office ceremony, in which the president signed into law the 'John Warner National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2007' which essentially eliminates the protections of the Posse Comitatus Act and re-wrote the Insurrection Act. The NDAA will allow the president to declare a 'public emergency' and take control of state-based National Guard units without the consent of the governor or local authorities, in order to 'suppress public disorder'!
About The Military Commissions Act of 2006 . . .
"A writ of habeas corpus which is Latin for 'you have the body' [as proof] is a judicial mandate to a prison official ordering that an inmate be brought to the court so it can be determined whether or not that person is imprisoned lawfully and whether or not he should be released from custody."(1)
"The writ of habeas corpus serves as an important check on the manner in which state courts pay respect to federal constitutional rights. The writ is 'the fundamental instrument for safeguarding individual freedom against arbitrary and lawless state action'."(1)
The Signing of the Military Commissions Act (MCA) of 2006
Expressing the pessimist's view was law professor Jonathan Turley who wrote: "The Congress just gave the president despotic powers and you could hear a yawn across the country [. . . ] People clearly don't realize what a fundamental change it is about who we are as a country. What happened today changed us. And I'm not too sure we're going to change back anytime soon."(2)
Turley also said that: "What, really, a time of shame this is for the American system. What the Congress did and what the president signed today essentially revokes over 200 years of American principles and values."(3)
You can watch this MSNBC video where Keith Olbermann and guest Jonathon Turley, Constitutional Law professor at George Washington University discuss the Military Commissions Act here.
About the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2007 . . .
The NDAA essentially eliminated the Posse Comitatus Act and re-wrote the Insurrection Act so that the president can declare a 'public emergency' and take control of state-based National Guard units without the consent of the governor or local authorities, in order to 'suppress public disorder'!
"The historic and ominous re-writing of the Insurrection Act, accomplished in the dead of night, which gives Bush the legal authority to declare martial law, is now an accomplished fact."(4)
"In a stealth maneuver, President Bush has signed into law a provision which, according to Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont), will actually encourage the President to declare federal martial law. It does so by revising the Insurrection Act, a set of laws that limits the President’s ability to deploy troops within the United States. The Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C.331 -335) has historically, along with the Posse Comitatus Act (18 U.S.C.1385), helped to enforce strict prohibitions on military involvement in domestic law enforcement. With one cloaked swipe of his pen, Bush is seeking to undo those prohibitions."(4)
The Signing of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2007
What 'Rights' Have Been Taken From You?
"On September 28, by a vote of 65-34, the Senate formally passed S. 3930, the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (MCA). The next day, the House of Representatives followed suit, passing the act by a vote of 250-170, . . . [whereby] "alien unlawful enemy combatants ... [to be] subject to trial by military commissions" without the constitutional safeguards American citizens possess against illegal detainment and judicial railroading."(5)
As far as an American citizen is concerned the definition of the term 'unlawful enemy combatant' has ominous import for them. The law states the following:
"(1) UNLAWFUL ENEMY COMBATANT - (A) The term 'unlawful enemy combatant' means--"(6) "(i) a person who has engaged in hostilities or who has purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States or its co-belligerents who is not a lawful enemy combatant (including a person who is part of the Taliban, al-Qaeda, or associated forces); or "(6)
"Notice that this definition contains no exception for Americans; it throws the blanket over citizen and alien alike by using the word 'person' rather than 'alien'."(5)
"(ii) a person who, before, on, or after the date of the enactment of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, has been determined to be an unlawful enemy combatant by a Combatant Status Review Tribunal or another competent tribunal established under the authority of the president or the secretary of defense ."(6)
All Americans should know that the suspension of the 'writ of habeas corpus' by the 'Military Commissions Act of 2006' is a violation of Article 1, Section 9 of the U. S.Constitution which states: "The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it."
Gonzales: ‘There Is No Express Grant of Habeas Corpus In The Constitution’
Yesterday, [1/18/07] during Senate Judiciary Committee hearings, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales . . . was debating Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) about whether the Supreme Court’s ruling on Guantanamo detainees last year cited the constitutional right to habeas corpus. Gonzales claimed the Court did not cite such a right, [Specter disagreed] then [Gonzales] added, “There is no express grant of habeas in the Constitution.”
Specter pushed back. “Wait a minute. The constitution says you can’t take it away, except in the case of rebellion or invasion. Doesn’t that mean you have the right of habeas corpus, unless there is an invasion or rebellion?”
You MUST watch this EXTREMELY DISTURBING video: http://www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com/videos/GonzalesOnHabeas.html#Title
Ominously, the full text of the 'Military Commissions Act of 2006' was published by the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations). The fact that the CFR published the 'Act' would appear to be prima facie evidence of the Shadow Government's support for its genesis!(6)
The Center for Constitutional Rights commented that the: "Congress is now rubber-stamping a bill that was written by the President which gives the President expansive power to detain without judicial oversight. If the Military Commissions Act is passed, it will grant the President the privilege of kings, allowing him to imprison any critics as alleged ‘enemy combatants,’ never to see the inside of a court room or to have the chance to challenge their detention or their treatment. What would we say if another country passed a law making it legal to snatch U.S. citizens and detain them indefinitely?”(7)
Sadly, the American Forces Press Service, propagandized the signing by utilizing the most common form of deception . . . omission. Read how they announced the signing but uttered not one peep about the potentially devastating future it has unleashed.(8)
Senator John Warner
Martial Law Now Stalks America . . .
On October 17, 2006, "Public Law 109-364, or the 'John Warner National Defense Authorization Act of 2007' (H.R.5122) (2), which was signed by the commander in chief on October 17th, 2006, in a private Oval Office ceremony, allows the President to declare a 'public emergency' and station troops anywhere in America and take control of state-based National Guard units without the consent of the governor or local authorities, in order to 'suppress public disorder'.”(5)
What the National Defense Authorization Act does is end the Posse Comitatus Act of 1787. Posse Comitatus is Latin for 'power of the country.' It WAS a "law, [that] was championed by far-sighted Southern lawmakers in 1878. They had experienced a fifteen year military occupation by the US Army in post-Civil War law enforcement. They understood the heel of a jackboot."(9)
"In a nutshell, this act bans the Army, Navy, Airforce and Marines from participating in arrest, searches, seizure of evidence and other police-type activity on U.S. soil. The Coast Guard and National Guard troops under the control of state governors are excluded from the act."(9)
All these new tyrannical laws have been created obsessively to combat the amorphous concept of 'fighting terrorism' . . . an undefined and ever present boogey man. So not only is the military now permitted to be used around the country, the president can take over the National Guard and the Coast Guard too. It can happen under ANY pretext, at which time the president will become the dictator-in-chief.
According to Gen. Tommy Franks, martial law will replace the Constitution after the next terror attack. In an interview with Cigar Aficionado he said: “It means the potential of a weapon of mass destruction and a terrorist, massive, casualty-producing event somewhere in the Western world – it may be in the United States of America – that causes our population to question our own Constitution and to begin to militarize our country in order to avoid a repeat of another mass, casualty-producing event. Which in fact, then begins to unravel the fabric of our Constitution. Two steps, very, very important.”(10)
Written Dissent to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2007:
No matter your opinion of Cynthia McKinney, her 26 page dissent of the NDAA of 2007 is very compelling and highlights the damage and erosion, of tasks and performance, taking place between the police and the military in direct contradiction of our Constitution. The following excerpt is from the section concerning the issue of Posse Comitatus [pp. 30-31 .pdf (pp. 528-529)] which can be found here: (11)
This Authorization should also have reaffirmed the principle of Posse Comitatus for military forces, police and contracted security or combat forces. This Constitutional principle creates a bright line between military and police functions.
In the wake of the attacks on September 11, 2001, the Bush administration has continued to make widespread and unnecessary changes in laws and administrative powers that undermine the most basic Constitutional principles and protected rights of citizens in a democracy [ours is a Constitutional Republic].
Recently, both President Bush and Senator Mark Warner (VA) have renewed calls to undermine or reverse the Posse Comitatus Act of 1867 [sic - i.e.,1878], which re-established the Constitutional principle and practice of separating military and police functions in a democracy [ours is a Constitutional Republic].
The experience of the founding fathers with the British model that combined the functions was enough to cause them to set that division sharply in administrative powers and civilian command of the military.
The principles began to be eroded in the period following the end of the Civil War, and the effective occupation of areas of the south by federal troops who were holding military tribunals, carrying out executions of citizens and usurping local police and judicial control. Their excesses came to the attention of the post-war Congress and they passed the Posse Comitatus Act to forbid the military being used to enforce laws.
Further erosion followed the end of the Vietnam War, when police departments were increasingly militarized in training and equipment as well as employing a large number of returning war veterans. SWAT teams were created, a clearly militarized police function, getting training on military bases with advanced weapons.
When President George H.W. Bush came into office in the 1980s, his programs made increased use of military troops and equipment in the war against drugs, supporting police and collecting intelligence in regard to civilian crimes. Joint Military Task Forces were created that combined DoD, FBI, SWAT, ATF and local police in sieges at Wounded Knee, Waco, Texas and against MOVE in Philadelphia, using tanks and military explosives.:,
President Bush has ample authority under provisions of existing laws on disaster response to mobilize and command any and all federal assets, including military forces. State directed National Guard units have always worked in conjunction with federal troops without being put under federal control themselves. Both National Guard and regular military forces are authorized under federal and state laws to use force to protect lives, property and public safety during a declared emergency. Police functions have been wisely left to local police and state National Guard forces, except when the situation was so dire they could not function.Well Tancredo is just going to have to lump it
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
#12. To: Rotara, *Sarah Palin 2012* (#0)
#13. To: tooconservative (#10)
1) I am? I did?
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
#14. To: freepatriot32 (#12)
ping
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
#15. To: Rotara (#0)
Palin not fit for the presidency
2 - She takes up Alligator wrestling & Base Jumping for hobbies.
#16. To: yukon (#0)
#10. To: anthonomis (#2)
Palin's support for John McCain should tell us all we need to know about her.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
#17. To: Flintlock (#15)
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
#18. To: Goldi-Lox (#0)
#11. To: TooConservative (#0)
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
#19. To: Rotara (#17)
I wouldn't vote for that NEOCON whore even if YOUR LIFE depended on it.
#20. To: Rotara (#13)
#21. To: tooconservative (#20)
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
#22. To: TooConservative (#20)
I just realized that you post under the handle McCain_Rocks over at TOS1.
#23. To: Rotara (#11)
#24. To: Rube Goldberg (#22)
What the heck is TOS1?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest