See other Miscellaneous Articles
Title: TooConservative claims that "Nearly all of the Truthers were originally Dim liberals"
Source:
TOS2
URL Source: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=284970
Published: Mar 5, 2010
Author: TooConservative
Post Date: 2010-03-05 12:00:55 by F.A. Hayek Fan
Keywords: None
Views: 3826
Comments: 113
#8. To: Gatlin (#6) One article described Bedell as an "obsessed libertarian" ... but neglected to say what was meant by "obsessed." Nearly all of the Truthers were originally Dim liberals and Bush-haters. Not dissimilar to the IRS plane-bomber. They then tried to use Ron Paul's campaign as their own political vehicle even though they had little success in recruiting the RP folk to their cause. This is when some of them started calling themselves libertarians. They have persisted in this long after Ron Paul repudiated Trutherism across the board. You can see why I keep saying that the Tea Parties need to repel boarders (Birchers, Birthers, Truthers, etc.) who demand that they be allowed to use Tea Party events to promote their own agenda. Too Conservative posted on 2010-03-05 11:48:37 ET Reply Trace
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 10.
#6. To: F.A. Hayek Fan, TooConservative, christine, Rotara, Jethro Tull, wudidiz, TwentyTwelve, Lod, Cynicom, James Deffenbach, farmfriend, CadetD, all (#0)
TooConservative really ought to, for sake of truth in advertising, change its handle to "TooNeoTrotskyConservative". What part of evidence does this creature not get? The evidence presented by the official Government Cover Story for 911 does not square with easily available evidence in the public record. The very minimum one can conclude is that the official fairy tale is not true. Given the extent of time, the continued withholding of the Pentagon Surveillance Videos, and the repeated changes in the explanations to try and account for the contradictions it can only be concluded that it is willfully and intentionally not true. I just love the term "Bush Haters" to describe anyone who points out the serial dishonesty and mass murder of the Bush Junta. Hate? No. The facts, for anyone willing to look at them honestly and objectively, clearly demonstrate that Bush lied, and lied repeatedly. Those lies resulted in the looting of the American Treasury, the unnecessary deaths of thousands of American kids sent off to fight his criminal wars, and the deaths of millions of innocents in Afghanistan and Iran. (Klinton too was guilty of mass murder in Kosovo - just to give equal time.) My record is clear and consistent as a Paleocon/Paleolibertarian and is an open book going back years. Where this moron gets off calling anyone willing to objectively look at what story the facts tell rather than regurgitating propaganda a ((((shudder))))) "lib'rul" is the height of dishonesty. So, let us name TooNeoConservative for what it is: A moron incapable of observing obvious facts or a willing liar. It IS one or the other.
well said.
#14. To: christine (#10)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#10. To: Original_Intent (#6)
I just love the term "Bush Haters" to describe anyone who points out the serial dishonesty and mass murder of the Bush Junta. Hate? No. The facts, for anyone willing to look at them honestly and objectively, clearly demonstrate that Bush lied, and lied repeatedly. Those lies resulted in the looting of the American Treasury, the unnecessary deaths of thousands of American kids sent off to fight his criminal wars, and the deaths of millions of innocents in Afghanistan and Iran. (Klinton too was guilty of mass murder in Kosovo - just to give equal time.)
Replies to Comment # 10.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 10.