[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Russia's Dark Future A Missile Shield for America - A Trillion Dollar Fantasy? Kentucky School Board Chairman Resigns After Calling for People to ‘Shoot Republicans’ These Are 2025's 'Most Livable' Cities Nicotine and Fish Genocide Summer Camp, And Other Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix This Can Create Endless Green Energy WITHOUT Electricity Geoengineering: Who’s Behind It and How We Stop It Pam Bondi Ordered Prosecution of Dr. Kirk Moore After Refusing to Dismiss Case California woman bombarded with Amazon packages for over a year CVS ordered to pay $949 MILLION in Medicaid fraud case. Starmer has signed up to the UNs agreement to raise taxes in the UK Magic mushrooms may hold the secret to longevity: Psilocybin extends lifespan by 57% in groundbreaking study Cops favorite AI tool automatically deletes evidence of when AI was used Leftist Anti ICE Extremist OPENS FIRE On Cops, $50,000 REWARD For Shooter With great power comes no accountability. Auto loan debt hits $1.63T. 20% of buyers now pay $1,000+ monthly. Texas delinquency hits 7.92%. Quotable Quotes from the Chosenites Tokara Islands NOW crashing into the Ocean ! Mysterious Swarm continues with OVER 1700 Quakes ! Why Austria Is Suddenly Declaring War on Immigration Rep. Greene Wants To Remove $500 Million in Military Aid for Nuclear-Armed Israel From NDAA Netanyahu Lays Groundwork for Additional Strikes on Iran: 'We Didn't Deal With The Enriched Uranium' Sweden Cracks Down On OnlyFans - Will U.S. Follow Suit? Joe Rogan CALLS OUT Israel's Media CONTROL Communist Billionaire Accused Of Funding Anti-ICE Riots Mysteriously Vanishes 6 Factors That Describe China's Current State Trump Thteatens to Bomb Moscow and Beijing Little Bitty Vertiv Drops After Amazon Unveils In-House Liquid Cooling System, Marking Pivot To Liquid 17 Out-Of-Place Artifacts That Suggest High-Tech Civilizations Existed Thousands (Or Millions) Of Years Ago

Miscellaneous
See other Miscellaneous Articles

Title: TooConservative claims that "Nearly all of the Truthers were originally Dim liberals"
Source: TOS2
URL Source: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=284970
Published: Mar 5, 2010
Author: TooConservative
Post Date: 2010-03-05 12:00:55 by F.A. Hayek Fan
Keywords: None
Views: 4032
Comments: 113

#8. To: Gatlin (#6)

One article described Bedell as an "obsessed libertarian" ... but neglected to say what was meant by "obsessed."

Nearly all of the Truthers were originally Dim liberals and Bush-haters. Not dissimilar to the IRS plane-bomber.

They then tried to use Ron Paul's campaign as their own political vehicle even though they had little success in recruiting the RP folk to their cause. This is when some of them started calling themselves libertarians.

They have persisted in this long after Ron Paul repudiated Trutherism across the board.

You can see why I keep saying that the Tea Parties need to repel boarders (Birchers, Birthers, Truthers, etc.) who demand that they be allowed to use Tea Party events to promote their own agenda.

Too Conservative posted on 2010-03-05 11:48:37 ET Reply Trace

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 20.

#4. To: TooConservative (#0) (Edited)

Nearly all of the Truthers were originally Dim liberals and Bush- haters

oh, really? not in my experience. i can't think of any Truther i know who was ever a "dim liberal." Constitutional Truthseekers would be a more accurate label. it's amazing how the word truth(er) is being redefined as something bad. how wicked people are who dare to question the government and who seek truth. what a sick, evil culture this is.

Edit: i just love how you and others are making 9/11 a Republican/Democrat issue. it's not. it's a truth versus lies issue.

christine  posted on  2010-03-05   12:18:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Nearly all of the Truthers were originally Dim liberals and Bush-haters

oh, really? not in my experience. i can't think of any Truther i know who was ever a "dim liberal." Constitutional Truthseekers would be a more accurate label. it's amazing how the word truth(er) is being redefined as something bad. how wicked people are who dare to question the government and who seek truth. what a sick, evil culture this is.

Whenever I see someone use the planted PsyOp/Negative PR term "truther" (an intentional diminuitive used to degrade someone for seeking a true explanation for 911 that makes sense and squares with the easily available facts), or the term "Bush Hater" for that criminal "occupant" of the White House, it immediately classifies them as one of two things:

1. A moron incapable of observing the obvious.

2. Intellectually dishonest either because they are unwilling to decide based on facts and prefer the comfort of a propaganda fairy tale or because they are in the employ of someone who finds the truth "inconvenient" or dangerous.

There really are no other choices.

When such an entity feels the need to degrade others by telling lies, and casting aspersions it demonstrates one thing and one thing clearly: D-I-S-H-O-N-E-S-T-Y.

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-03-05   12:28:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Whenever I see someone use the planted PsyOp/Negative PR term "truther" (an intentional diminuitive used to degrade someone for seeking a true explanation for 911 that makes sense and squares with the easily available facts)

All of these groups and their websites, virtually without exception, use the words "9/11" and "Truth" in their names.

What are we supposed to call them?

TooConservative  posted on  2010-03-05   12:37:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#26. To: TooConservative (#20)

All of these groups and their websites, virtually without exception, use the words "9/11" and "Truth" in their names.

What are we supposed to call them?

You are avoiding the point.

Applying a diminuitive label to a group or cause is effectively an Argumentum Ad Hominem attack to disparage the viewpoint without actually disproving anything. It is nothing more than a sophisticated form of name calling aimed at discrediting without having to actually address inconvenient things like the hundreds of contradictions between easily observable facts and the official fairy tale. It also is an attempt to sidestep the proven evidence that there physical anomalies which can, and have been, be shown to exist between the "Official Fairy Tale" and the cold hard evidence.

Your choice of language is up to you. You may, if you wish, regurgitate planted terms invented to establish a blanket Argumentum Ad Hominem or you may actually look at the easily available facts and decide based upon the weight of evidence.

However, it would appear you have already made a decision to be a regurgitator rather than an honest seeker of truth.

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-03-05 12:46:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]