[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

You Know What Happens Next Cash Jordan: Half-Built Tower Abandoned… as ICE Deports Entire ‘Migrant Workforce’ Heavy rainfall causes flash flooding Tuesday night, some cars stuck in high water on Chicago's West Biden Doctor PLEADS THE FIFTH, Refuses To Testify To Congress, Biden Pardons ARE VOID Joe Rogan says FBI director Kash Patel played him for a fool and maga for fools with the Jeff Epstein files Elon's AI System "Grok" Went Rogue And Has Been SHUT DOWN in an Emergency! Earthquake Swarms at One of the MOST DANGEROUS Volcanoes in the USA Ben Shapiro Declares Epstein Case CLOSED: ‘Facts on the Ground Have Changed’ Iran receives 40 Chinese J10-C Fighter Jets China’s Railgun Is Now Battle-Ready, Thanks to Nuclear Power Chinese Hypersonic Advancements! Deadly new missile could decimate entire US fleet in 20 minutes Iran Confirms Massive Chinese HQ 9 B Missile Deal Why Is Europe Hitting 114°F And Still Rising? The INCREDIBLE Impacts of Methylene Blue The LARGEST Eruptions since the Merapi Disaster in 2010 at Lewotobi Laki Laki in Indonesia Feds ARREST 11 Leftists For AMBUSH On ICE, 2 Cops Shot, Organized Terror Cell Targeted ICE In Texas What is quantum computing? 12 Important Questions We Should Be Asking About The Cover Up The Truth About Jeffrey Epstein TSA quietly scraps security check that every passenger dreads Iran Receives Emergency Airlift of Chinese Air Defence Systems as Israel Considers New Attacks Russia reportedly used its new, inexpensive Chernika kamikaze drone in the Ukraine Iran's President Says the US Pledged Israel Wouldn't Attack During Previous Nuclear Negotiations Will Japan's Rice Price Shock Lead To Government Collapse And Spark A Global Bond Crisis Beware The 'Omniwar': Catherine Austin Fitts Fears 'Weaponization Of Everything' Roger Stone: AG Pam Bondi Must Answer For 14 Terabytes Claim Of Child Torture Videos! 'Hit Us, Please' - America's Left Issues A 'Broken Arrow' Signal To Europe Cash Jordan Trump Deports ‘Thousands of Migrants’ to Africa… on Purpose Gunman Ambushes Border Patrol Agents In Texas Amid Anti-ICE Rhetoric From Democrats Texas Flood Why America Built A Forest From Canada To Texas

Miscellaneous
See other Miscellaneous Articles

Title: TooConservative claims that "Nearly all of the Truthers were originally Dim liberals"
Source: TOS2
URL Source: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=284970
Published: Mar 5, 2010
Author: TooConservative
Post Date: 2010-03-05 12:00:55 by F.A. Hayek Fan
Keywords: None
Views: 3854
Comments: 113

#8. To: Gatlin (#6)

One article described Bedell as an "obsessed libertarian" ... but neglected to say what was meant by "obsessed."

Nearly all of the Truthers were originally Dim liberals and Bush-haters. Not dissimilar to the IRS plane-bomber.

They then tried to use Ron Paul's campaign as their own political vehicle even though they had little success in recruiting the RP folk to their cause. This is when some of them started calling themselves libertarians.

They have persisted in this long after Ron Paul repudiated Trutherism across the board.

You can see why I keep saying that the Tea Parties need to repel boarders (Birchers, Birthers, Truthers, etc.) who demand that they be allowed to use Tea Party events to promote their own agenda.

Too Conservative posted on 2010-03-05 11:48:37 ET Reply Trace

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 32.

#6. To: F.A. Hayek Fan, TooConservative, christine, Rotara, Jethro Tull, wudidiz, TwentyTwelve, Lod, Cynicom, James Deffenbach, farmfriend, CadetD, all (#0)

TooConservative really ought to, for sake of truth in advertising, change its handle to "TooNeoTrotskyConservative".

What part of evidence does this creature not get?

The evidence presented by the official Government Cover Story for 911 does not square with easily available evidence in the public record. The very minimum one can conclude is that the official fairy tale is not true. Given the extent of time, the continued withholding of the Pentagon Surveillance Videos, and the repeated changes in the explanations to try and account for the contradictions it can only be concluded that it is willfully and intentionally not true.

I just love the term "Bush Haters" to describe anyone who points out the serial dishonesty and mass murder of the Bush Junta. Hate? No. The facts, for anyone willing to look at them honestly and objectively, clearly demonstrate that Bush lied, and lied repeatedly. Those lies resulted in the looting of the American Treasury, the unnecessary deaths of thousands of American kids sent off to fight his criminal wars, and the deaths of millions of innocents in Afghanistan and Iran. (Klinton too was guilty of mass murder in Kosovo - just to give equal time.)

My record is clear and consistent as a Paleocon/Paleolibertarian and is an open book going back years. Where this moron gets off calling anyone willing to objectively look at what story the facts tell rather than regurgitating propaganda a ((((shudder))))) "lib'rul" is the height of dishonesty.

So, let us name TooNeoConservative for what it is: A moron incapable of observing obvious facts or a willing liar. It IS one or the other.

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-03-05   12:21:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I just love the term "Bush Haters" to describe anyone who points out the serial dishonesty and mass murder of the Bush Junta.

I reject the word outright. I look upon Bush and his party with contempt, not hate. I hate no man. I do not see how any self-proclaimed conservative Republican can feel anything but contempt by the actions of Bush and the Republican party. The actions of Bush and his party is a textbook example of betrayal. Bush-hater is just another way to slime those who refuse to toe the line of the two-party fraud.

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2010-03-05   12:33:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I just love the term "Bush Haters" to describe anyone who points out the serial dishonesty and mass murder of the Bush Junta.

I reject the word outright. I look upon Bush and his party with contempt, not hate. I hate no man. I do not see how any self-proclaimed conservative Republican can feel anything but contempt by the actions of Bush and the Republican party. The actions of Bush and his party is a textbook example of betrayal. Bush-hater is just another way to slime those who refuse to toe the line of the two-party fraud.

Love here is intended in the ironical sense.

As you I hate no one and will not succumb to the vice of hate, as it is counterproductive coloring every thought and move with negative emotion.

Bush-hater is just another way to slime those who refuse to toe the line of the two-party fraud.

That is true, but it is even more insidious as it is meant to intimidate people from criticizing the obvious and repeated dishonesties and murders. And the Bush mal-Administration was one of the most wantonly murderous regimes since Adolf Hitler. To attempt to color it any other way is to stand in defense of mass murder perpetrated by a deranged mind.

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-03-05   12:53:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#99. To: Original_Intent, F.A. Hayek Fan, TooConservative, christine, Rotara, Jethro Tull, wudidiz, TwentyTwelve, Lod, Cynicom, James Deffenbach, CadetD (#32)

TooConservative claims that "Nearly all of the Truthers were originally Dim liberals"

I don't think anyone would call me dim but liberal?

Classical liberalism is a political ideology that developed in the 19th century in England, Western Europe, and the Americas. It is committed to the ideal of limited government and liberty of individuals including freedom of religion, speech, press, and assembly, and free markets.[1] Notable individuals who have contributed to classical liberalism include Jean-Baptiste Say, Thomas Malthus, and David Ricardo. There was a revival of interest in classical liberalism in the 20th century led by Friedrich Hayek, Milton Friedman and other economists.[2] [3][4]

The phrase classical liberalism is also sometimes used to refer to all forms of liberalism before the 20th century. And, after 1970, the phrase began to be used by libertarians to describe their belief in the primacy of economic freedom and minimal government. It is sometimes difficult to tell which meaning is intended in a given source.

I can live with that!

farmfriend  posted on  2010-03-05 20:49:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]