[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

“The government wants to make sure that that does not come out. A huge part of our political system is predicated on blackmail,”

You Know What Happens Next

Cash Jordan: Half-Built Tower Abandoned… as ICE Deports Entire ‘Migrant Workforce’

Heavy rainfall causes flash flooding Tuesday night, some cars stuck in high water on Chicago's West

Biden Doctor PLEADS THE FIFTH, Refuses To Testify To Congress, Biden Pardons ARE VOID

Joe Rogan says FBI director Kash Patel played him for a fool and maga for fools with the Jeff Epstein files

Elon's AI System "Grok" Went Rogue And Has Been SHUT DOWN in an Emergency!

Earthquake Swarms at One of the MOST DANGEROUS Volcanoes in the USA

Ben Shapiro Declares Epstein Case CLOSED: ‘Facts on the Ground Have Changed’

Iran receives 40 Chinese J10-C Fighter Jets

China’s Railgun Is Now Battle-Ready, Thanks to Nuclear Power

Chinese Hypersonic Advancements! Deadly new missile could decimate entire US fleet in 20 minutes

Iran Confirms Massive Chinese HQ 9 B Missile Deal

Why Is Europe Hitting 114°F And Still Rising?

The INCREDIBLE Impacts of Methylene Blue

The LARGEST Eruptions since the Merapi Disaster in 2010 at Lewotobi Laki Laki in Indonesia

Feds ARREST 11 Leftists For AMBUSH On ICE, 2 Cops Shot, Organized Terror Cell Targeted ICE In Texas

What is quantum computing?

12 Important Questions We Should Be Asking About The Cover Up The Truth About Jeffrey Epstein

TSA quietly scraps security check that every passenger dreads

Iran Receives Emergency Airlift of Chinese Air Defence Systems as Israel Considers New Attacks

Russia reportedly used its new, inexpensive Chernika kamikaze drone in the Ukraine

Iran's President Says the US Pledged Israel Wouldn't Attack During Previous Nuclear Negotiations

Will Japan's Rice Price Shock Lead To Government Collapse And Spark A Global Bond Crisis

Beware The 'Omniwar': Catherine Austin Fitts Fears 'Weaponization Of Everything'

Roger Stone: AG Pam Bondi Must Answer For 14 Terabytes Claim Of Child Torture Videos!

'Hit Us, Please' - America's Left Issues A 'Broken Arrow' Signal To Europe

Cash Jordan Trump Deports ‘Thousands of Migrants’ to Africa… on Purpose

Gunman Ambushes Border Patrol Agents In Texas Amid Anti-ICE Rhetoric From Democrats

Texas Flood


Miscellaneous
See other Miscellaneous Articles

Title: TooConservative claims that "Nearly all of the Truthers were originally Dim liberals"
Source: TOS2
URL Source: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=284970
Published: Mar 5, 2010
Author: TooConservative
Post Date: 2010-03-05 12:00:55 by F.A. Hayek Fan
Keywords: None
Views: 3905
Comments: 113

#8. To: Gatlin (#6)

One article described Bedell as an "obsessed libertarian" ... but neglected to say what was meant by "obsessed."

Nearly all of the Truthers were originally Dim liberals and Bush-haters. Not dissimilar to the IRS plane-bomber.

They then tried to use Ron Paul's campaign as their own political vehicle even though they had little success in recruiting the RP folk to their cause. This is when some of them started calling themselves libertarians.

They have persisted in this long after Ron Paul repudiated Trutherism across the board.

You can see why I keep saying that the Tea Parties need to repel boarders (Birchers, Birthers, Truthers, etc.) who demand that they be allowed to use Tea Party events to promote their own agenda.

Too Conservative posted on 2010-03-05 11:48:37 ET Reply Trace

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 55.

#4. To: TooConservative (#0) (Edited)

Nearly all of the Truthers were originally Dim liberals and Bush- haters

oh, really? not in my experience. i can't think of any Truther i know who was ever a "dim liberal." Constitutional Truthseekers would be a more accurate label. it's amazing how the word truth(er) is being redefined as something bad. how wicked people are who dare to question the government and who seek truth. what a sick, evil culture this is.

Edit: i just love how you and others are making 9/11 a Republican/Democrat issue. it's not. it's a truth versus lies issue.

christine  posted on  2010-03-05   12:18:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: christine, TooConservative (#4)

Nearly all of the Truthers were originally Dim liberals and Bush-haters

oh, really? not in my experience. i can't think of any Truther i know who was ever a "dim liberal." Constitutional Truthseekers would be a more accurate label. it's amazing how the word truth(er) is being redefined as something bad. how wicked people are who dare to question the government and who seek truth. what a sick, evil culture this is.

Whenever I see someone use the planted PsyOp/Negative PR term "truther" (an intentional diminuitive used to degrade someone for seeking a true explanation for 911 that makes sense and squares with the easily available facts), or the term "Bush Hater" for that criminal "occupant" of the White House, it immediately classifies them as one of two things:

1. A moron incapable of observing the obvious.

2. Intellectually dishonest either because they are unwilling to decide based on facts and prefer the comfort of a propaganda fairy tale or because they are in the employ of someone who finds the truth "inconvenient" or dangerous.

There really are no other choices.

When such an entity feels the need to degrade others by telling lies, and casting aspersions it demonstrates one thing and one thing clearly: D-I-S-H-O-N-E-S-T-Y.

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-03-05   12:28:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Original_Intent (#13)

Whenever I see someone use the planted PsyOp/Negative PR term "truther" (an intentional diminuitive used to degrade someone for seeking a true explanation for 911 that makes sense and squares with the easily available facts)

All of these groups and their websites, virtually without exception, use the words "9/11" and "Truth" in their names.

What are we supposed to call them?

TooConservative  posted on  2010-03-05   12:37:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: TooConservative (#20)

All of these groups and their websites, virtually without exception, use the words "9/11" and "Truth" in their names.

What are we supposed to call them?

You are avoiding the point.

Applying a diminuitive label to a group or cause is effectively an Argumentum Ad Hominem attack to disparage the viewpoint without actually disproving anything. It is nothing more than a sophisticated form of name calling aimed at discrediting without having to actually address inconvenient things like the hundreds of contradictions between easily observable facts and the official fairy tale. It also is an attempt to sidestep the proven evidence that there physical anomalies which can, and have been, be shown to exist between the "Official Fairy Tale" and the cold hard evidence.

Your choice of language is up to you. You may, if you wish, regurgitate planted terms invented to establish a blanket Argumentum Ad Hominem or you may actually look at the easily available facts and decide based upon the weight of evidence.

However, it would appear you have already made a decision to be a regurgitator rather than an honest seeker of truth.

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-03-05   12:46:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Original_Intent (#26)

Applying a diminuitive label to a group or cause is effectively an Argumentum Ad Hominem attack to disparage the viewpoint without actually disproving anything. It is nothing more than a sophisticated form...blah-blah-blah...dissemble...distract...philosophize...complain...blah-blah-blah...

Just answer the question.

If "Truther" is so damned offensive, what are we supposed to call you?

You all call yourselves Truthers among yourselves. I know it. You can't deny it. So you try to deflect this.

TooConservative  posted on  2010-03-05   12:48:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: TooConservative (#28)

Applying a diminuitive label to a group or cause is effectively an Argumentum Ad Hominem attack to disparage the viewpoint without actually disproving anything. It is nothing more than a sophisticated form...blah-blah-blah...dissemble...distract...philosophize...complain...blah-blah-blah...

Just answer the question.

If "Truther" is so damned offensive, what are we supposed to call you?

You all call yourselves Truthers among yourselves. I know it. You can't deny it. So you try to deflect this.

Context and intent is everything - which you should know.

A term used ironically and a term used disparagingly have obvious and opposite meanings - to the discerning.

It is in fact you who is evading the point in that your usage of the term was clearly and obviously meant as a disparagement.

I do not use the term "truther" except in jest, but I generally eschew its use altogether as I do not disparage people who are only seeking an honest accounting of facts and an explanation which accomodates them.

You obviously wish to avoid the facts and to damn by use of disparaging terms.

You show yourself to be at least intellectually dishonest and unwilling to take any viewpoint other than the "Party Lyin'".

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-03-05   12:59:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: Original_Intent (#38)

Context and intent is everything - which you should know.

A term used ironically and a term used disparagingly have obvious and opposite meanings - to the discerning.

It is in fact you who is evading the point in that your usage of the term was clearly and obviously meant as a disparagement.

I do not use the term "truther" except in jest, but I generally eschew its use altogether as I do not disparage people who are only seeking an honest accounting of facts and an explanation which accomodates them.

You obviously wish to avoid the facts and to damn by use of disparaging terms.

You show yourself to be at least intellectually dishonest and unwilling to take any viewpoint other than the "Party Lyin'".

My goodness, what a lot of keystrokes to avoid answering a simple question.

What are we supposed to call "The Group Formerly Known As Truthers"?




The Artist Formerly Known as Prince

TooConservative  posted on  2010-03-05   13:11:36 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: TooConservative (#42) (Edited)

Again your argument does not dispute a single, fact, observation, or criticism of the Truth Movement.

Your entire argument rests solely and only on Logical Fallacies such as Argumentum Ad Hominem, Red Herring, Strawman Argument, and Guilt by Association.

Anyone checking the listed references will find that there is TRUTH in what I have writ.

Your argument is insubstantial and amounts to nothing more than name calling coupled with an attempt to keep people from asking questions, getting the data for themselves, and deciding their position based upon that data.

In short I can find no honesty or truth in you.

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-03-05   13:19:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: Original_Intent (#47)

Again your argument does not dispute a single, fact, observation, or criticism of the Truth Movement.

So you now assert that "Truthers" are supposed to be officially known as "The Truth Movement"?

Is that just your name for it or do you have unanimous agreement among the rest of "The Truth Movement"?

TooConservative  posted on  2010-03-05   13:22:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: TooConservative (#49)

Again you move into logical evasion never once addressing any point of fact but seeking only to keep the questioning upon one of disparaging terms.

You may choose freely your own words, but be it known that I am well versed in the ways of the liar and you will not divert me from pointing out the ways in which you are lying and evading.

I think we have played this little game long enough to ask the obvious question.

So, are you a Hasbara or Government Employee?

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-03-05   13:25:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: Original_Intent (#53)

So, are you a Hasbara or Government Employee?

Not an employee of the government or this Hasbara (whoever they are).

TooConservative  posted on  2010-03-05   13:28:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 55.

#57. To: TooConservative (#55) (Edited)

So, are you a Hasbara or Government Employee?

Not an employee of the government or this Hasbara (whoever they are).

nope.

you're just another jewish mama's boy, spoiled to the point that you think you're entitled to rule the world, and convinced that it would be a good thing to blow up the world if you dont get your way.

groundresonance  posted on  2010-03-05 13:30:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: TooConservative (#55)

So, are you a Hasbara or Government Employee?

Not an employee of the government or this Hasbara (whoever they are).

Although any denials you make at this point no longer have any credibility since your entire quiver consists of logical fallacies there are, of course, other possibilities:

You could be a "hired gun" for a PR Agency on a contract.

A pathological liar.

Or slack jawed and credulous.

Whatever the case you have been tried in the balance and found wanting.

And whatever the case you are not, as you would like to misrepresent, an objective poster. You have an agenda, and that agenda does not include a pursuit of the truth.

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-03-05 13:42:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: TooConservative, Original_Intent (#55)

Not an employee of the government or this Hasbara (whoever they are).

so that would make you an independent contractor for the liar movement.

IRTorqued  posted on  2010-03-05 14:13:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 55.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]