Title: Gays Have Made More Progress Than "Truthers" Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Mar 7, 2010 Author:Mister Clean Post Date:2010-03-07 09:04:26 by Mister Clean Keywords:None Views:2397 Comments:123
Face the facts, "truthers," gays have made more progress than all of you.
Gay marriage is being sanctioned all over the country and "don't ask, don't tell" is on the verge of being repealed.
They think so much of our effectiveness that we're terrorists now.
Do you work for Cass Sunstein? I bet you know who he is. He is a fucking jew. How surprising! Read about him here (I am writing to others here that might not know who he is.I bet you do.) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cass_Sunstein
Here is a very interesting abstract this jew wrote.
Second, we suggest a distinctive tactic for breaking up the hard core of extremists who supply conspiracy theories: cognitive infiltration of extremist groups, whereby government agents or their allies (acting either virtually or in real space, and either openly or anonymously) will undermine the crippled epistemology of those who subscribe to such theories. They do so by planting doubts about the theories and stylized facts that circulate within such groups, thereby introducing beneficial cognitive diversity.49
That whole abstract is rather interesting. Instead of addressing the issues head on, he wants to infiltrate and undermine. Typical jew tactics.
Abstract: Many millions of people hold conspiracy theories; they believe that powerful people have worked together in order to withhold the truth about some important practice or some terrible event. A recent example is the belief, widespread in some parts of the world, that the attacks of 9/11 were carried out not by Al Qaeda, but by Israel or the United States. Those who subscribe to conspiracy theories may create serious risks, including risks of violence, and the existence of such theories raises significant challenges for policy and law. The first challenge is to understand the mechanisms by which conspiracy theories prosper; the second challenge is to understand how such theories might be undermined. Such theories typically spread as a result of identifiable cognitive blunders, operating in conjunction with informational and reputational influences. A distinctive feature of conspiracy theories is their self-sealing quality. Conspiracy theorists are not likely to be persuaded by an attempt to dispel their theories; they may even characterize that very attempt as further proof of the conspiracy. Because those who hold conspiracy theories typically suffer from a crippled epistemology, in accordance with which it is rational to hold such theories, the best response consists in cognitive infiltration of extremist groups. Various policy dilemmas, such as the question whether it is better for government to rebut conspiracy theories or to ignore them, are explored in this light.