See other History Articles
Title: Humans Inhabited Earth for Millions of Years - Masons Try to Suppress Evidence
Source:
Save The Males
URL Source: http://www.henrymakow.com/forbidden_archeology.html
Published: Mar 11, 2010
Author: Henry Makow
Post Date: 2010-03-11 16:34:31 by Original_Intent
Keywords: Forbidden, Archaeology, Darwin, Fraud
Views: 1996
Comments: 98
Humans Inhabited Earth for Millions of Years Masons Try to Suppress Evidence "Anatomically modern humans have been present on the Earth not just for 100,000 years or less (the orthodox version), but for millions of years, and that metal objects of advanced design have been in use at equally early periods." by Cornelius B (for henrymakow.com) The model of human prehistory built-up by scholars over the past two centuries is sadly and completely wrong, and a deliberate tool of disinformation and mind control. This is the thesis of the essay, "Forbidden Archaeology" by Michael Cremo and Richard L. Thompson (http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_forbiddenarcheology.htm) The authors begin with the assumption that archeologists are fundamentally of good faith. Nevertheless, little by little, they demonstrate a systematic destruction of proofs that show another reality than that the official story. Falsifications and even destruction of such proofs has been common for more than two hundred years. In their first essay "The Hidden History of the Human Race", Cremo and Thompson push back our horizons not just thousand years, but millions of years into the past, and show that almost everything we have been taught to believe about the origins and evolution of our species rests on a highly selective sampling of research. The two authors then set the record straight by showing all the other research results that have been edited out, not because there was anything wrong about them, but simply because "they did not fit with prevailing academic opinion." Anomalous and out-of-place discoveries reported by Cremo and Thompson in "The Hidden History of the Human Race" include convincing evidence that anatomically modern humans have been present on the Earth not just for 100,000 years or less (the orthodox version), but for millions of years, and that metal objects of advanced design have been in use at equally early periods. SCIENTIFIC CENSORSHIP The authors describe an ongoing social process of knowledge filtration that at first sight appears quite innocuous, but has a substantial cumulative effect. Certain categories of evidence simply disappear from view. This pattern of data suppression has been going on for a long time. For instance, in 1880, J. D. Whitney, the state geologist of California, published a lengthy review of advanced stone tools found in California gold mines. The implements, including spear points and stone mortars and pestles, were found deep in mine shafts, underneath thick, undisturbed layers of lava, in formations ranging from 9 million to over 55 million years old. W. H. Holmes of the Smithsonian Institution, one of the most vocal critics of these California finds, wrote: "Perhaps if Professor Whitney had fully appreciated the story of human evolution as it is understood today, he would have hesitated to announce the conclusions formulated (that humans existed in very ancient times in North America), notwithstanding the imposing array of testimony with which he was confronted." In other words, if the facts do not agree with the favored theory, then such facts, even an imposing array of them, must be discarded. I shall give here some examples of these discarded paleo-archaeological elements: In a report delivered to the British Association for the Advancement of Science in 1881, H. Slopes, F.G.S. (Fellow of the Geological Society), described a shell, the surface of which bore a carving of a crude but unmistakably human face. The carved shell was found in the stratified deposits of the Red Crag, which is between 2.0 and 2.5 million years old. One should keep in mind that in terms of conventional paleontological opinion, one does not encounter such works of art until the time of fully modern Cro-Magnon man in the Late Pleistocene, about 30,000 years ago. On August 2, 1890, J. H. Neale signed the following statement about discoveries made by him: "In 1877 Mr. J. H. Neale was superintendent of the Montezuma Tunnel Company, and ran the Montezuma tunnel into the gravel underlying the lava of Table Mountain, Tuolumne County. . . . At a distance of between 1400 and 1500 feet from the mouth of the tunnel, or of between 200 and 300 feet beyond the edge of the solid lava, Mr. Neale saw several spear-heads, of some dark rock and nearly one foot in length. On exploring further, he himself found a small mortar three or four inches in diameter and of irregular shape. This was discovered within a foot or two of the spear-heads. He then found a large well formed pestle, now the property of Dr. R. I. Bromley, and near by a large and very regular mortar, also at present the property of Dr. Bromley." Neale's affidavit continued: "All of these relics were found. . . . close to the bed-rock, perhaps within a foot of it. Mr. Neale declares that it is utterly impossible that these relics can have reached the position in which they were found excepting at the time the gravel was deposited, and before the lava cap formed. There was not the slightest trace of any disturbance of the mass or of any natural fissure into it by which access could have been obtained either there or in the neighborhood." The position of the artifacts in gravel close to the bedrock at Tuolumne Table Mountain indicates they were 33-55 million years old. In 1844, Sir David Brewster reported that a nail had been discovered firmly embedded in a block of sandstone from the Kingoodie (Mylnfield) Quarry in Scotland. Dr. A. W. Medd of the British Geological Survey wrote to the authors in 1985 that this sandstone is of "Lower Old Red Sandstone age" (Devonian, between 360 and 408 million years old). Brewster was a famous Scottish physicist. He was a founder of the British Association for the Advancement of Science and made important discoveries in the field of optics. In his report to the British Association for the Advancement of Science, Brewster stated: "The stone in Kingoodie quarry consists of alternate layers of hard stone and a soft clayey substance called 'till'; the courses of stone vary from six inches to upwards of six feet in thickness. The particular block in which the nail was found, was nine inches thick, and in proceeding to clear the rough block for dressing, the point of the nail was found projecting about half an inch (quite eaten with rust) into the 'till,' the rest of the nail lying along the surface of the stone to within an inch of the head, which went right down into the body of the stone." The fact that the head of the nail was buried in the sandstone block would seem to rule out the possibility the nail had been pounded into the block after it was quarried. On June 22, 1844, this curious report appeared in the London Times: "A few days ago, as some workmen were employed in quarrying a rock close to the Tweed about a quarter of a mile below Rutherford-mill, a gold thread was discovered embedded in the stone at a depth of eight feet." Dr. A. W. Medd of the British Geological Survey wrote to the authors in 1985 that this stone is of Early Carboniferous age (between 320 and 360 million years old). (Ed. Note: Cornelius B cites many more examples which I excised in the interest of brevity.) DISINFORMATION AND MIND CONTROL "Forbidden Archeology" was first released in 1993 and quickly became an underground classic. Today it is a bestseller, with foreign editions in over a dozen languages, presenting both accepted and anomalous scientific evidence defying the traditional view of human evolution. This is a fascinating intellectual excavation of a vast store of hidden knowledge. I'll let you judge their proofs sustaining the human evolution. What is the purpose behind this disinformation if not mind control, and therefore social engineering? Science is a method that anyone can learn and apply. In a free and open society, science has to be a democratic process. Instead, we observe a behavior similar to the totalitarian attitude of the ancient priesthood clique in Egypt. To better illustrate this affirmation, I present the case of a science journalist, Richard Milton, initially an ardent believer in Darwinian doctrine until his investigative instincts kicked in one day. After 20 years of studying and writing about evolution, he suddenly realized that there were many disconcerting elements in the theory. He decided to put every main classic proof of Darwinism to the test. The results were hard to believe -- he found that the theory could not even stand up to the rigors of routine investigative journalism. Next, he published a book titled "The Facts of Life: Shattering the Myths of Darwinism". Milton says: "I experienced the witch-hunting activity of the Darwinist police at first hand - it was deeply disappointing to find myself being described by a prominent Oxford zoologist, Richard Dawkins, as "loony", "stupid" and "in need of psychiatric help" in response to purely scientific reporting." Does this sound like stories that came out of the Soviet Union 25 years ago when dissident scientists there started speaking out? Without a doubt Dawkins is part of the "secret societies brotherhood" invested with high power. Richard Dawkins has been appointed to the position of Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University. This advocate of aetheism is a classic "Brain Police" storm-trooper, patrolling the neurological front lines. According to Milton, the process came to a head when the London Times Higher Education Supplement commissioned him to write a critique of Darwinism. The publication foreshadowed his coming piece: "Next Week: Darwinism - Richard Milton goes on the attack". Dawkins caught wind of this and wasted no time in nipping this heresy in the bud. He contacted the editor, Auriol Stevens, and accused Milton of being a "creationist", and prevailed upon Stevens to pull the plug on the article. Milton learned of this behind-the-scenes backstabbing and wrote a letter of appeal to Stevens. In the end, she caved in to Dawkins and scratched the piece. DARWINISM AS MIND CONTROL The Western scientific establishment and mass media pride themselves on being open public forums devoid of prejudice or censorship. However, no television program examining the flaws and weaknesses of Darwinism has ever been aired in Darwin's home country or in America. A scientist who opposes the theory cannot get a paper published. Darwin's theory of evolution is the only theory routinely taught in our public school system that has never been subjected to rigorous scrutiny; nor have any of the criticisms been allowed into the curriculum. This is an interesting fact, because a recent poll showed that "71% of the American public say biology teachers should teach both Darwinism and scientific evidence against Darwinian theory." Nevertheless, there are no plans to implement this balanced approach. Then there is the high-profile case of Dr Virginia Steen-McIntyre, a geologist working for the US Geological Survey (USGS), who was dispatched to an archaeological site in Mexico to date a group of artifacts in the 1970s. This travesty also illustrates how far the « brothers scientists" will go to guard orthodox tenets. McIntyre used state-of-the-art equipment and backed up her results by using four different methods, but her results were off the chart. The lead archaeologist expected a date of 25,000 years or less, and the geologist's finding was 250,000 years or more. The figure of 25,000 years or less was critical to the Bering Strait "crossing" theory, and it was the motivation behind the head archaeologist's tossing Steen-McIntyre's results in the circular file and asking for a new series of dating tests. This sort of reaction does not occur when dates match the expected chronological model that supports accepted theories. Steen-McIntyre was given a chance to retract her conclusions, but because this woman was intellectually honest, she refused. She found it hard thereafter to get her papers published and she lost a teaching job at an American university. CONCLUSION Thus, as we may conclude from the information provided here, Darwinism, the theory of the survival of the fittest and its twin sister, the theory of human evolution, together with the official version of the Paleontology and Archaeology such as they are practiced, are pseudo-sciences. In fact, they are tools for mind control of the masses. Their main purpose is to cut off the roots of the true history of humanity, and promote a naturalistic and mechanistic view of life as "survival of the fittest." They promote atheism as a means of destroying Christian civilization. We find the same hate of God and of Christianity in Marxism and Freudianism. A very interesting read is the book of Richard Wurmbrand "Marx & Satan" where we discover that Marx was a Satanist priest with a deep hate of God and desire for the ruin and annihilation of the human society. How can we explain this deep hated nourished in the hearts of these men? Was it satanic possession? I will close with this fact -- at the funerals of Karl Marx, in his speech Frederich Engels compared Marx to Darwin as titans of the human mind, and this suggests the high probability that Darwin was Karl Marx's "Luciferian brother".
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-22) not displayed.
.
.
.
#23. To: buckeroo, A K A Stone (#21)
Now I've seen it all, you knuckleheads are about to have a knock-down, drag-out bumfight without applying to legal sanctioning body and all that. I'm keeping out of this affair henceforth, but I have to warn you I think you're stirring up a hornet's nest.
“we were respected as the most disinterested and charitable nation in the world.” - Robert A. Taft
Stone doesn't care about anything other than stirring a pot she/he/it can't handle.
"Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves." -- Ronald Reagan, circa 1977
You tell me what you think first.
Buckeroo there are GIGANTIC consequences. When people realize that evolution is junk science just like globullshit warming. Once they realize they should realize that Gods word is true. When they realize that Gods word is true they will start to have different priorities and to live differently. When they start to live differently they will treat other people better. The goodness that can come from defeating the false belief system of atheism and evolution is immeasurable.
I care about the struggle between good and evil. That you can't see that is of no consequence to me or anyone else.
I started to read your little propaganda piece. It was laughable all the half truths and disproved talking points that there was. Keep believing a lie if you want.
One day, a few years ago ... there was a silly, little poster name AKA Stone. Because he is self-proclaimed Christian, he believes that everyone is a homo-sexual; he says it all the time; in fact, everyday... without proof of perspective or comment. And then one day .. GOD sez to AKA Stone .. invent ye, thine own website! And AKA Stone dids't comply. And then GOD sez to AKA Stone .. call everyone a homo-sexual. And AKA Stone dids't comply. And then one day GOD sayeth to AKA Stone ... one of these days, do you want a fine young Jewish girl? And AKA sayeth, "YES" or "Ye" whatever it takes. And from that moment on, AKA Stone has promoted Israel. AMEN.
"Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves." -- Ronald Reagan, circa 1977
Buckeroo it is true I called you a faggot. After you said the same to me. What a hypocritical loser. I'm sorry your life has become so meaningless now that your wife has left you.
I don't use terminology like you use, punk. For a Christian, you are a fucking liar and should burn in HELL like your fabulous fat Hagees and MILF Palin.
"Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves." -- Ronald Reagan, circa 1977
And so what is Your "truth"? While I accord to you, and all, the right to believe as you wish tolerance does not require me to share your belief. Frankly I think the "young earth" creation is preposterous, but feel free to believe as you wish.
"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator
What is preposterous about it. All the evidence lines up with that model. Fire away. Surely you aren't stupid enough to believe that the spontaneous combustion of mud creates life. lol
Define the difference. Let's see how you really "care."
"Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves." -- Ronald Reagan, circa 1977
Lets just take one. Abortion is the killing of innocent human life. It is obviously evil to anyone with a half an ounce of moral fibre in their body. Can we agree on that? If we can't understand a simple truth like that there is no need to go any further.
Are you saying that the "taking of innocent human life" is evil? Is that the starting point you want to discuss?
"Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves." -- Ronald Reagan, circa 1977
purposefully. Yes. I answered your question. So now answer one for me. Is abortion evil?
No, it's only a day older than you. It was all put here just so that you can experience life AKA Stone. It's all an illusion. That story makes about as much sense as yours.
Recorded history goes back 6000 years, so you can't have an Earth that's only 2000 years old. Hell, that's not even old enough to include the events in the New Testament, or the Greek and Roman empires..
It worked in your case
WWGPD? - (What Would General Pinochet Do?)
ehehe
lol. Where did I say 2000 years old. You deceive.
The earliest event in the Bible that can be dated with reasonable certainty is the beginning of Saul's reign as the first king of Israel. It is generally believed to have occurred about 1020 BCE, at a time when Egypt and Assyria were weakened and the Israelites were able to assert domination over their own territory. I'd like to see some documentary corroboration of the existence of Saul independent of Scripture. We have literally tons of it in the case of Egypt and Assyria. If we relied on the Hebrew/Christian/Muslim versions of the human chronology there would only be some dude named "Pharaoh" and the dynastic history of Egypt would just be so much dust. Most young earth creationists believe that "yom" means a day of 24 hours. This puts the date of creation of the universe according to a literal interpretation of the Bible at 4000 to 8000 BCE. However, old earth creationists suggest that each of the six "days" of creation might have taken many hundreds of millions of years. Further, there might have been one or more long intervals of time between some of the "days." Yes, the day might have been anything. It might have been as long as you please. Whatever fits the desired hypothesis is fair game. The world might have been created ten minutes ago along with all the posters here complete with all their memories and battle scars. Anything can be anything if you let imagination run riot. On the original topic of this thread though, while I'm not averse to considering theories of human origins or of cosmology or anything else for that matter that require us to radically rethink our assumptions, I'd like to see a little evidence and a smattering of sound reasoning to back up these controversial claims. For instance, if we assume that modern humans have been around for millions of years and in numbers that would allow the development of a metal working culture, there should be a store of bones around for us to discover and examine. Given what we know about physics and chemistry, the bones of these folk should be in evidence in a state of fossilized preservation. Give us some evidence. Throw us a bone. (No ossuaries please.)
damned your stupid. A day is a day. Now who is the one that is trying to have it as they please or whatever fits your desired hypothesis. double lol on that one.
So it cancels itself out. A day with the lord. It isn't an earth day. Think about it with a little common sense. God creates the grass and the plants. Then what a dark cycle for millions of years. lol You are a great example of quoting out of context.
'A day is like a thousand years' and 'A thousand years is like a day' means the exact same thing. 1000 years = 1 day or conversely; 1 day = 1000 years. Simple logic.
If someone like yourself is deemed to be heaven bound, why would any normal person want to share space with you? Furthermore,who in their right mind would want to meet the decision maker who sees both you, Hagee, and the Tribe members as being on the right side of the human condition?
I'm not saying it ain't, my fine jug-eared friend. I'm just saying that if you try to stretch a "day" to fit some particular cosmology to some particular scripture, you can let your fancy run riot. The length of the "day" you choose will be entirely arbitrary and in the end your effort adds no heft to either your chosen cosmology or your favorite scripture. And I may be "damned your stupid," but at least I can spell most of the time and I recognize when an argument is directed a me or at some other poster. If I had your defective powers of discernment, sir, I would take a long holiday by the sea and drown myself.
Ask your brother there, slim. Mebbe he can read a mite.
1000 years = 1 day or conversely; 1 day = 1000 years. Simple logic. Here let me clue you in. as isn't =. It is simply saying that God is outside of time. Timeless. It has no bearing on the days of creation and the time that the creator created. Sincerely hope that helps.
Makes sense.
Hang on a second.... did you come up with that shit on your own?
Just a second. You agreed with me. You never agree with me. I'm going to have to reevaluate you. :)
I'm not sure. It has been in my thought process for a couple of decates.
Lmao! I can see this is gonna be a weird day...
I learned a new word today. hippopotomonstrosesquippedaliophobia
Reading these posts is quite nearly as amusing as watching Muslim apologists bending themselves into pretzels trying to demonstrate that the Koran has something noteworthy to say about biology or cosmology.
.
That is amusing. So tell us what was "bent".
Comments (64 - 98) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latestcloser to GOD, HIMSELF with every passing breath
#24. To: Dakmar (#23)
"It has been said, 'time heals all wounds'. I do not agree. The wounds remain. In time, the mind, protecting its sanity, covers them with scar tissue and the pain lessens. But it is never gone." ~ Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy
#25. To: Dakmar, AKA Stone (#23)
#26. To: buckeroo (#12)
Exactly when did the Earth start? Exactly when did the Earth start?
#27. To: buckeroo (#21)
Why this is no joke! This is serious stuff we are discussing. Are you aware of the dynamic ramifications of and about your own existence when the Earth was created only a few thousand year ago?
#28. To: buckeroo (#25)
Stone doesn't care about anything other than stirring a pot
#29. To: Original_Intent (#22)
#30. To: A K A Stone (#26)
(Edited)
#31. To: buckeroo (#30)
#32. To: A K A Stone (#31)
#33. To: A K A Stone (#29)
I started to read your little propaganda piece. It was laughable all the half truths and disproved talking points that there was. Keep believing a lie if you want.
#34. To: Original_Intent (#33)
Frankly I think the "young earth" creation is preposterous, but feel free to believe as you wish.
#35. To: A K A Stone (#28)
I care about the struggle between good and evil.
#36. To: buckeroo (#35)
Define the difference. Let's see how you really "care."
#37. To: A K A Stone (#36)
#38. To: buckeroo (#37)
Are you saying that the "taking of innocent human life" is evil? Is that the starting point you want to discuss?
#39. To: A K A Stone (#11)
The earth is a few thousand years old.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#40. To: A K A Stone (#34)
What is preposterous about it. All the evidence lines up with that model.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#41. To: A K A Stone (#34)
spontaneous combustion of mud creates life.
#42. To: Original_Intent (#7)
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams 
#43. To: FormerLurker (#40)
#44. To: Original_Intent (#22)
#45. To: randge (#44)
Yes, the day might have been anything. It might have been as long as you please. Whatever fits the desired hypothesis is fair game.
#46. To: A K A Stone, randge, Original_Intent, FormerLurker, all (#45)
"It has been said, 'time heals all wounds'. I do not agree. The wounds remain. In time, the mind, protecting its sanity, covers them with scar tissue and the pain lessens. But it is never gone." ~ Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy
#47. To: AKA Stone, randge, Original_Intent, FormerLurker, All (#46)
"It has been said, 'time heals all wounds'. I do not agree. The wounds remain. In time, the mind, protecting its sanity, covers them with scar tissue and the pain lessens. But it is never gone." ~ Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy
#48. To: wudidiz (#46)
But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day.
#49. To: A K A Stone (#48)
"It has been said, 'time heals all wounds'. I do not agree. The wounds remain. In time, the mind, protecting its sanity, covers them with scar tissue and the pain lessens. But it is never gone." ~ Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy
#50. To: A K A Stone (#48)
A day with the lord. It isn't an earth day.
#51. To: A K A Stone (#45)
A day is a day.
#52. To: randge (#51)
"Wtf's he talkin' about?"
"It has been said, 'time heals all wounds'. I do not agree. The wounds remain. In time, the mind, protecting its sanity, covers them with scar tissue and the pain lessens. But it is never gone." ~ Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy
#53. To: wudidiz (#52)
#54. To: wudidiz (#49)
'A day is like a thousand years' and 'A thousand years is like a day' means the exact same thing.
#55. To: A K A Stone (#54)
"It has been said, 'time heals all wounds'. I do not agree. The wounds remain. In time, the mind, protecting its sanity, covers them with scar tissue and the pain lessens. But it is never gone." ~ Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy
#56. To: A K A Stone (#54)
It is simply saying that God is outside of time. Timeless. It has no bearing on the days of creation and the time that the creator created.
"It has been said, 'time heals all wounds'. I do not agree. The wounds remain. In time, the mind, protecting its sanity, covers them with scar tissue and the pain lessens. But it is never gone." ~ Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy
#57. To: wudidiz (#55)
Makes sense.
#58. To: wudidiz (#56)
Hang on a second.... did you come up with that shit on your own?
#59. To: A K A Stone (#57)
"It has been said, 'time heals all wounds'. I do not agree. The wounds remain. In time, the mind, protecting its sanity, covers them with scar tissue and the pain lessens. But it is never gone." ~ Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy
#60. To: A K A Stone (#58)
"It has been said, 'time heals all wounds'. I do not agree. The wounds remain. In time, the mind, protecting its sanity, covers them with scar tissue and the pain lessens. But it is never gone." ~ Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy
#61. To: Original_Intent, All (#0)
#62. To: randge (#61)
"It has been said, 'time heals all wounds'. I do not agree. The wounds remain. In time, the mind, protecting its sanity, covers them with scar tissue and the pain lessens. But it is never gone." ~ Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy
#63. To: randge (#61)
Reading these posts is quite nearly as amusing as watching Muslim apologists bending themselves into pretzels trying to demonstrate that the Koran has something noteworthy to say about biology or cosmology.
.
.
.