[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

FBI recovers funds for victims of scammed banker

Mark Felton: Can Russia Attack Britain?

Notre Dame Apologizes After Telling Hockey Fans Not To Wear Green, Shamrocks, 'Fighting Irish'

Dear Horse, which one of your posts has the Deep State so spun up that's causing 4um to run slow?

Bomb Cyclone Pacific Northwest

Death Certificates Reveal FBI 'Revised' Murder Stats Still Bogus

A $110B bubble on $500M earnings. History warns: Bubbles always burst.

Joy Behar says people like their show because they tell the truth, unlike "dragon believer" Joe Rogan.

Male Passenger Disappointed After Another Flight Ends Without A Stewardess Frantically Asking If Anyone Can Land The Plane

Could the Rapid Growth of AI Boost Gold Demand?

LOOK AT MY ASS!

Elon Musk Responds As British Government "Summons" Him To 'Disinformation' Hearing

MSNBC Contributor Panics Over Trump Nominating Bondi For AG: Dangerous Because Shes Competent

House passes dangerous bill that targets nonprofits, pro-Palestine groups

Navy Will Sideline 17 Support Vessels to Ease Strain on Civilian Mariners

Israel carries out field executions, massacres in north Gaza

AOC votes to back Israel Lobby's bogus anti-Semitism definition

Biden to launch ICE mobile app, further disrupting Trump's mass deportation plan: Report

Panic at Mar-a-Lago: How the Fake Press Pool Fueled Global Fear Until X Set the Record Straight

Donald Trumps Nominee for the FCC Will Remove DEI as a Priority of the Agency

Stealing JFK's Body

Trump plans to revive Keystone XL pipeline to solidify U.S. energy independence

ASHEVILLE UPDATE: Bodies Being Stacked in Warehouses & Children Being Taken Away

American news is mostly written by Israeli lobbyists pushing Zionist agenda

Biden's Missile Crisis

British Operation Kiss kill Instantly Skripals Has Failed to Kill But Succeeded at Covering Up, Almost

NASA chooses SpaceX and Blue Origin to deliver rover, astronaut base to the moon

The Female Fantasy Exposed: Why Women Love Toxic Love Stories

United States will NOT comply with the ICC arrest warrant for Prime Minister Netanyahu:

Mississippi’s GDP Beats France: A Shocking Look at Economic Policy Failures (Per Capita)


Miscellaneous
See other Miscellaneous Articles

Title: Video Shot by Pilot Flying Along side several Chemtrail Planes
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Mar 13, 2010
Author: kevin604bc
Post Date: 2010-03-13 16:18:34 by wudidiz
Keywords: None
Views: 23943
Comments: 715

.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-169) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#170. To: FormerLurker (#166) (Edited)

how much does a gallon of gasoline weigh? ...say 7 pounds.

how much does the co2 weigh as a combustion product of burning 7 pounds of gas?

over 19 pounds? ...how can that be?

well, it cant be if you're ignorant of chemistry, can it?

groundresonance  posted on  2010-03-13   23:34:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#171. To: groundresonance (#164)

if the airplane is visible, and it's producing contrails of equal or greater cubiic feet, we have to assume the contrail will be visible.

Yeah, and so what?


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-03-13   23:35:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#172. To: groundresonance (#170)

how much does a gallon of gasoline weigh? ...say 7 pounds.

So you're saying you can get more water from a gallon of gas than you can from a gallon bottle of water, correct?


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-03-13   23:36:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#173. To: FormerLurker (#171)

if an airplane occupies thousands of cubic feet, and is visible from the ground, then, if the airplane is producing a contrail that occupies thousands of cubic feet every second, it's likely that contrail will be visible.

groundresonance  posted on  2010-03-13   23:37:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#174. To: groundresonance (#170)

Hell, those fires in the WTC towers should have just put themselves right out with all that water than came from the fire, eh?


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-03-13   23:38:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#175. To: groundresonance (#173)

if an airplane occupies thousands of cubic feet, and is visible from the ground, then, if the airplane is producing a contrail that occupies thousands of cubic feet every second, it's likely that contrail will be visible.

And if a coin has two sides, it has more than one side. Are you trying the philosophical approach now?


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-03-13   23:39:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#176. To: FormerLurker (#172) (Edited)

you're saying you can get more water from a gallon of gas

apparently you cant read.

i said you got 19 pounds of co2, not water, from burning 7 pounds of gasoline.

you get just a little less water from burning a gallon of gas than you'd get from a gallon jug of water, assuming your water supplier is honest.

groundresonance  posted on  2010-03-13   23:40:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#177. To: groundresonance (#176)

i said you got 19 pounds of co2, not water, from burning 7 pounds of gasoline.

You said you get 50,000 gallons of water from 48,445 gallons of kerosene, don't lie.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-03-13   23:45:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#178. To: FormerLurker (#177)

You said you get 50,000 gallons of water from 48,445 gallons of kerosene, don't lie.

kerosene is not gasoline.

kerosene produces more water than gasoline when it burns, not much, but some.

groundresonance  posted on  2010-03-13   23:47:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#179. To: groundresonance (#154)

a 747 only holds 48,445 gallons of fuel

and when that fuel is burned, it produces about 50,000 gallons of water

Are you trying to say you didn't make the above post?


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-03-13   23:48:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#180. To: FormerLurker (#179)

are you saying that you cant read?

groundresonance  posted on  2010-03-13   23:49:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#181. To: groundresonance (#178)

kerosene produces more water than gasoline when it burns, not much, but some.

So you're saying I can get more water from a glass of kerosene than I can from a glass of water, eh?


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-03-13   23:49:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#182. To: groundresonance (#180)

are you saying that you cant read?

I'm saying that you are full of shit, and that's not even counting the gas/kerosene to water thing.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-03-13   23:50:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#183. To: FormerLurker (#181)

So you're saying I can get more water from a glass of kerosene than I can from a glass of water, eh?

yup.

if your combustion is complete, and you have a good way to condense the water out of the combustion exhaust, you will get more water from burning a glass of kerosene than you would from the same glass filled with water.

groundresonance  posted on  2010-03-13   23:52:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#184. To: FormerLurker (#182)

are you saying that you cant read?

I'm saying that you are full of shit, and that's not even counting the gas/kerosene to water thing.

"Beeeautiful Brown Eyes
Beautiful Brown Eyes ..."

"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-03-13   23:55:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#185. To: groundresonance, FormerLurker, wudidiz (#183)

So you're saying I can get more water from a glass of kerosene than I can from a glass of water, eh?

yup.

if your combustion is complete, and you have a good way to condense the water out of the combustion exhaust, you will get more water from burning a glass of kerosene than you would from the same glass filled with water.

And the formula for that chemical equation is?

"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-03-13   23:57:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#186. To: groundresonance (#180)

Even IF there was a unity conversion or slightly higher in terms of transforming kerosene to water, there is barely enough fuel capacity on a 747 to fly 1000 miles or so according to your kerosene to water and contrail density claims, yet it has an actual range of 6100 miles.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-03-13   23:57:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#187. To: Original_Intent (#185) (Edited)

And the formula for that chemical equation is?

C12H26:

C12H26(l) + 37/2 O2(g) [4; 12 CO2(g) + 13 H2O(g); g0;HÚ = -7513 kJ

groundresonance  posted on  2010-03-13   23:58:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#188. To: FormerLurker, gruntresonance (#186)

Why should he let a little trifle like physical impossibility get in the way of a good disinformation line?

"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-03-13   23:59:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#189. To: groundresonance (#187)

C12H26:

C12H26(l) + 37/2 O2(g) [4; 12 CO2(g) + 13 H2O(g); g0;HÚ = -7513 kJ

Not even a good cut and paste job, it's not even a valid equation with all the HTML remnants you have in there. You do realize the result of the equation is in terms of energy (Joules, or kilo Joules to be specific), not gallons or pounds, right?


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-03-14   0:02:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#190. To: FormerLurker (#186)

is barely enough fuel capacity on a 747 to fly 1000 miles

if a 747 holds 48,000 gallons, and it burns a gallon a second (meanwhile, producing a gallon of water each second), that 747 will have enough fuel to fly 13 hours.

groundresonance  posted on  2010-03-14   0:02:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#191. To: FormerLurker (#189) (Edited)

Not even a good cut and paste job, it's not even a valid equation with all the HTML remnants you have in there.

take it up with wikipedia, or look up the reaction elsewhere.

Today kerosene is mainly used in fuel for jet engines (more technically Avtur, Jet A, Jet A-1, Jet B, JP-4, JP-5, JP-7 or JP-8). One form of the fuel known as RP-1 is burned with liquid oxygen as rocket fuel. These fuel grade kerosenes meet specifications for smoke points and freeze points.

The combustion reaction can be approximated as follows, with the molecular formula C12H26:

C12H26(l) + 37/2 O2(g) [4; 12 CO2(g) + 13 H2O(g); g0;HÚ = -7513 kJ

groundresonance  posted on  2010-03-14   0:05:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#192. To: groundresonance (#190)

if a 747 holds 48,000 gallons, and it burns a gallon a second (meanwhile, producing a gallon of water each second), that 747 will have enough fuel to fly 13 hours.

No shit Sherlock, but for it to create the amount of water you claim exists in a contrail, even WITH the conversion of kerosene to water which you claim (you're claiming the engine is combusting the kerosene COMPLETELY and running at 100% efficiency for your conversion claims to "hold water"), for the contrails formed to have the density you claim, the 747 would have to burn a LOT more fuel than the 1 gallon per second that it DOES burn.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-03-14   0:06:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#193. To: FormerLurker (#192)

the water is formed by a combination of hydrogen in the fuel and oxygen in the air.

just as the co2 is formed by a combination of carbon in the fuel and oxygen in the air.

you are too ignorant of chemistry to understand the basic mechanisms at work, here... which is why you have no business posting on this thread.

groundresonance  posted on  2010-03-14   0:10:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#194. To: groundresonance (#187) (Edited)

C12H26(l) + 37/2 O2(g) [4; 12 CO2(g) + 13 H2O(g); g0;HÚ = -7513 kJ

Close but no cigar. The combustion reaction in a Jet Engine (Aviation Fuel) in general terms is:

CnH2n+2 + (3n+1)/2 O2 => n CO2 + (n + 1) H2O

Which does not account for your claim on the production of water vapor (before crystalization) as being greater than unity.

However, this is all a diversion from the main point which is that it does not demonstrate how contrails are formed at altitudes under 33,000 feet since the atmospheric temperature is not cold enough to promote the rapid formation of ice cystals from the water vapor exiting the exhaust.

"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-03-14   0:12:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#195. To: Original_Intent (#194) (Edited)

being greater than unity.

"unity" has nothing to do with it, seeing as how the chemical reaction is sustained by grabbing oxygen out of the atmosphere.

groundresonance  posted on  2010-03-14   0:15:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#196. To: FormerLurker (#189)

You do realize the result of the equation is in terms of energy (Joules, or kilo Joules to be specific), not gallons or pounds, right?

Don't give it away - I was having a good laugh.

"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-03-14   0:16:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#197. To: groundresonance (#195)

Still dodging and weaving. Sigh.

"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-03-14   0:17:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#198. To: Original_Intent (#197) (Edited)

here's another equation for the combustion of kerosene:

2C12H26 (l) + 37O2(g) ---> 24CO2(g) + 26H2O(g) [AH.rxn = -1.50 x104 kJ]

so it looks like we take two molecules of kerosene and 37 molecules of O2 oxygen, then burn them to get 24 molecules of co2 and 26 molecules of water.

now then, you can plug in the atomic weights and densities and all that and calculate how much water, in volume of liquid water, you get from a gallon of kerosene.

groundresonance  posted on  2010-03-14   0:22:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#199. To: Original_Intent (#197) (Edited)

but really, the operative thing here is the fact that the water is expelled as water vapor, which spreads out into thousands of cubic feet as it's expelled into the atmosphere, where it condenses and freezes to form "condensation trails", aka "contrails".

neat how that works, huh?

groundresonance  posted on  2010-03-14   0:27:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#200. To: groundresonance (#191)

C12H26(l) + 37/2 O2(g) [4; 12 CO2(g) + 13 H2O(g); g0;HÚ = -7513 kJ

The proper formula is as follows;

C12H26(l) + 37/2 O2(g) → 12 CO2(g) + 13 H2O(g); Δ H° = -7513 kJ

And the result is in units of energy (ie. energy produced by the combustion), not mass.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-03-14   0:28:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#201. To: groundresonance (#199)

but really, the operative thing here

but really, the operative thing here is that not enough water is produced from the total fuel capacity of a 747 to fly a little over 1000 miles if your claims on contrail density are correct.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-03-14   0:30:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#202. To: FormerLurker (#201)

the operative thing here is that not enough water is produced from the total fuel capacity of a 747 to fly a little over 1000 miles if your claims on contrail density are correct.

i will explain one more time: the fuel aboard the aircraft combines, during combustion, with air in the atmosphere to produce more mass, after combustion, than is carried on the airplane.

groundresonance  posted on  2010-03-14   0:32:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#203. To: groundresonance (#199)

neat how that works, huh?

You certainly think you're convincing people here with your smoke and mirrors, eh? The fact is, it is UNKNOWN what the CHEMTRAILS consist of, and it may well not be water vapor. If they were, then there wouldn't be any problem, but it wouldn't make sense to go to the expense of producing water based trails DELIBERATELY. Other gases react differently than water, such as CO2 as it melts from dry ice to gas, or various other fogs created for stage events for instance. I'm sure there are a few other fogs that can be created that have nothing to do with water vapor, and utilize much less material than that needed to form REGULAR contrails.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-03-14   0:35:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#204. To: FormerLurker (#201)

apparently every molecule of kerosene grabs 16 and a half molecules of O2 out of the atmosphere during combustion.

since kerosene has more hydrogen in it than gasoline, and the hydrogen combines with atmospheric oxygen to form water, kerosene produces more water than gasoline does, and even produces more volume of water than the original volume of kerosene.

now that's just how it is, and no amount of ignorance can obscure that fact.

groundresonance  posted on  2010-03-14   0:36:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#205. To: FormerLurker (#203)

is UNKNOWN what the CHEMTRAILS consist of

good.

we're making headway.

groundresonance  posted on  2010-03-14   0:36:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#206. To: groundresonance (#202)

i will explain one more time: the fuel aboard the aircraft combines, during combustion, with air in the atmosphere to produce more mass, after combustion, than is carried on the airplane.

You have already said that. Thing is, there is a very slight difference between the original mass of fuel and the final mass of water, under COMPLETE and CLEAN combustion. Even WITH that in mind, your claims don't add up.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-03-14   0:37:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#207. To: FormerLurker (#203)

now then, seeing as how "chemtrails" are such a dire, if undocumented threat to human life, why hasnt someone chartered a jet to go up and sample those supposed "chemtrails"?

groundresonance  posted on  2010-03-14   0:38:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#208. To: groundresonance (#205)

we're making headway.

Thing is, you were trying to equate the mass required to form CHEMTRAILS with that required to lay down 5 miles of flame retardant powder. YOU started this BS with that absurd claim, and your numbers STILL don't add up in terms of fuel required to create REGULAR contrails if the contrail density is as you claim.

But again, that is just a non-sequitor you tossed out to confuse the discussion.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-03-14   0:40:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#209. To: groundresonance (#207)

why hasnt someone chartered a jet to go up and sample those supposed "chemtrails"?

Call your nearest Air Force base and ask them.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-03-14   0:42:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (210 - 715) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]