See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Jesse Ventura's Censored 9/11 Commentary
Source:
Watching the Watchers
URL Source: http://watchingthewatchers.org/news ... nturas-censored-911-commentary
Published: Mar 14, 2010
Author: Jesse Ventura
Post Date: 2010-03-14 22:38:09 by Original_Intent
Keywords: 911, censorship, Huffington, Post
Views: 267
Comments: 11
Jesse Ventura's Censored 9/11 Commentary By Jesse Ventura Sunday, March 14, 2010 at 01:08 PM Editor's Note: The following column by former Minnesota Gov. Jesse Ventura was removed by Huffington Post after it was published March 9 and replaced with a note that states the site "prohibits the promotion and promulgation of conspiracy theories -- including those about 9/11." You didn't see anything about it in the mainstream media, but at a recent conference in San Francisco, more than 1,000 architects and engineers signed a petition demanding that Congress begin a new investigation into the destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9-11. That's right, these people put their reputations in potential jeopardy -- because they don't buy the government's version of events. They want to know how 200,000 tons of steel disintegrated and fell to the ground in 11 seconds. They question whether the hijacked planes were responsible or whether it could have been a controlled demolition from inside that brought down the twin towers and WTC Building 7. Richard Gage, a member of the American Institute of Architects and the founder of Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth, put it like this: "The official Federal Emergency Management [Agency] and National Institute of Standards and Technology [NIST] reports provide insufficient, contradictory and fraudulent accounts of the circumstances of the towers' destruction." He's especially disturbed by Building 7, whose 47 stories came down in "pure free-fall acceleration" that afternoon, even though it was never hit by an aircraft. This is a subject I take up in my new book, American Conspiracies, published by Skyhorse. An excerpt follows: Some people have argued that the twin towers went down, within a half hour of one another, because of the way they were constructed. Well, those 425,000 cubic yards of concrete and 200,000 tons of steel were designed to hold up against a Boeing 707, the largest plane built at the time the towers were completed in 1973. Analysis had shown that a 707 traveling at 600 miles an hour (and those had four engines) would not cause major damage. The twin-engine Boeing 757s that hit on 9-11 were going 440 and 550 mph. Still, we are told that a molten, highly intense fuel mixture from the planes brought down these two steel-framed skyscrapers. Keep in mind that no other such skyscraper in history had ever been known to collapse completely due to fire damage. So could it actually have been the result of a controlled demolition from inside the buildings? I don't claim expertise about this, but I did work four years as part of the Navy's underwater demolition teams, where we were trained to blow things to hell and high water. And my staff talked at some length with a prominent physicist, Steven E. Jones, who says that a "gravity driven collapse" without demolition charges defies the laws of physics. These buildings fell, at nearly the rate of free-fall, straight down into their own footprint, in approximately 10 seconds. An object dropped from the roof of the 110-story-tall towers would reach the ground in about 9.2 seconds. Then there's the fact that steel beams that weighed as much as 200,000 pounds got tossed laterally as far as 500 feet. NIST started its investigation on Aug. 21, 2002. When their 10,000-page-long report came out three years later, the spokesman said there was no evidence to suggest a controlled demolition. But Jones also says that molten metal found underground weeks later is proof that jet fuel couldn't have been all that was responsible. I visited the site about three weeks after 9-11, with Gov. Pataki and my wife Terry. It didn't mean anything to me at the time, but they had to suspend digging that day because they were running into heat pockets of huge temperatures. These fires kept burning for more than three months, the longest-burning structure blaze ever. And this was all due to jet fuel? We're talking molten metal more than 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit. Probably the most conclusive evidence about a controlled demolition is a research paper (two years, nine authors) published in the peer-reviewed Open Chemical Physics Journal in April 2009. In studying dust samples from the site, these scientists found chips of nano-thermite, which is a high-tech incendiary/explosive. Here's what the paper's lead author, Dr. Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen's chemistry department, had to say about the explosive that he's convinced brought down the twin towers and the nearby Building 7: "Thermite itself dates back to 1893. It is a mixture of aluminum and rust powder, which react to create intense heat. The reaction produces iron, heated to 2,500 degrees Centigrade [4,532 degrees Fahrenheit]. This can be used to do welding. It can also be used to melt other iron. So in nano-thermite, this powder from 1893 is reduced to tiny particles, perfectly mixed. When these react, the intense heat develops much more quickly. Nano-thermite can be mixed with additives to give off intense heat, or serve as a very effective explosive. It contains more energy than dynamite, and can be used as rocket fuel." Gage is one of hundreds of credentialed architects and structural engineers who have put their careers on the line to point out the detailed anomalies and many implications of controlled demolition in the building collapses. As he puts it bluntly: "Once you get to the science, it's indisputable." A former Navy Seal, professional wrestler and actor Jesse Ventura was elected governor of Minnesota on the Reform Party ticket in 1998 where he served until 2002. Today, Ventura is best known for hosting the popular television show Conspiracy Theory, which airs on cable television. He is also the author of five books.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: christine, farmfriend, CadetD, wudidiz, Rotara, TwentyTwelve, James Deffenbach, Jethro Tull, IndieTX, Lod, HOUNDDAWG, HighLairEon, Kamala, randge, X-15, scrapper2, HappyToBeMe-4um, Itistoolate, Esso, , ratcat, Cynicom, freepatriot32, abraxas, all (#0)
(((((The truth will out Ping.)))))
"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator
Aluminum is the oxidizer they use in rocket fuel.
"With respect to the words general welfare, I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators." Folks, there comes a time when we say No More Wacos and we mean it. 3000 innocent people were murdered in cold blood on 9-11-2001, some choosing to jump to their deaths rather than burn. (Some choice). There were also 300 first responders murdered and many of the survivors have contracted ill health from breathing the debris and dust that the government said was safe to breathe. Additionally, 4000 soldiers have been killed and 50,000 maimed in an illegal war created in response to the cataclysmic events of 9-11-2001. On top of this we should recognize that another million Iraqis have died as a consequence of the 9-11 BOMBINGS. I guess I'll move on from the fatalities but think I should also mention our loss of freedom here at home through the enactment of countless draconian laws put into effect by the assholes in D.C. The many implications related to what occurred on 9-11 are actually pretty limited. I intended to write about explosives in the buildings but got so pissed off about exclusion of the 9-11 topic at the Huffington Post that I decided to comment on the lack of concern for the victims and our country clearly demonstrated by whomever runs that piece of shit website. The first one that comes immediately to my mind is that the Huffington Post sure has lost sight of its not so obvious purpose. To initiate a blog that ignores this event and its repurcussions is the epitomy of arrogance and inconsideration. The purpose of a blog such as the Huffington Post is to illuminate subjects that the mainstream refuses to cover while at the same time affording those interested with a forum for dialogue. This isn't a political attack upon the Huffington Post, I've never even visited the site, but the more I thought about this notion of eliminating 9-11 from the subject matter adults are allowed to discuss there, the angrier I became. Unless the Huffington Post is sponsored by the very people that carried out 9- 11, why should that subject be off-limits ? All of those people that were ill- effected by 9-11 and their families has to be hundreds of thousands in the U.S. and multi-millions when the arab population is considered. If I had ever been associated with the Huffington Post that association would have ended the moment they decided to ban 9-11 as an intolerable subject for discussion. Jesse Ventura's offering was NEWS that's not being made public by the MSM. His post contained the the appraisal of the building collapses made by over 1000 PROFESSIONALS willing to risk their credentials in the interest of truth and ultimately freedom. Regardless of their "policy" concerning the topic of 9-11, when 1000 professionals DEMAND a new investigation the policy needs to be reviewed and changed. It strikes me as seriously flawed for a group that surely considers themselves to be "intellectuals" have become liars by omission and pompous frauds beyond description. I think Jesse Ventura should resubmit a shortened version of his original post stripped of all irrelevancy or unallowable content. A simple "fuck you" should suffice.
The World is being held hostage by an international terrorist organization best described as INTERNATIONAL (JEWISH) BANKERS. Their willing accomplices in government and media should swing from the rope just like the banking elites.
Good article. Thanks for the ping. Hard to believe that the ptb at Huf Po censored this.* It was well written and he didn't say anything tens or hundreds of thousands of the rest of us haven't said and posted, at least I don't think so. *Not to say I have any use for the Huffington Post because I don't. The only reason I would ever read it would be if it had an article like this that someone provided a link for.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. neocon huffy post bump
BUMP
A simple "fuck you" should suffice. To the point, and appropriately phrased.
"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator
You're welcome. It does tell us one thing about the Huff-n-puff Post - "everything is under control".
"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator
It does tell us one thing about the Huff-n-puff Post - "everything is under control". Including the ho who runs the thing.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Righto! Same as at FreepTard Rezpublik. If there was at any time an opportunity to get truthful information out to a broad audience everything has been done to ensure it doesn't. Ditto the "Daily Kos" and the controlled dialogue there. As well as at Defective Underground. "You fill belief vhat der guferment says und you vill like it. Hiff you dare to think fee vill squash you." /Fascism
"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator
Yeah, sad. All the places where they would have you believe that they were all for free speech--right up to the moment you broach a forbidden subject.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
#2. To: Original_Intent (#0)
It is a mixture of aluminum and rust powder,
James Madison, Letter to James Robertson, April 20, 1831
#3. To: Original_Intent (#0)
Gage is one of hundreds of credentialed architects and structural engineers who have put their careers on the line to point out the detailed anomalies and many implications of controlled demolition in the building collapses.
#4. To: Original_Intent (#1)
Lord Acton
#5. To: Original_Intent (#1)
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams 
#6. To: Original_Intent (#1)
#7. To: noone222 (#3)
I think Jesse Ventura should resubmit a shortened version of his original post stripped of all irrelevancy or unallowable content.
#8. To: James Deffenbach (#4)
#9. To: Original_Intent (#8)
You're welcome.
Lord Acton
#10. To: James Deffenbach (#9)
#11. To: Original_Intent (#10)
Lord Acton
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest