[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Dead Constitution See other Dead Constitution Articles Title: White Nationalism — The Only Realistic Solution The entire conservative and libertarian movements have mobilized everything they have against the passage of ObamaCare. At this time, it looks like the Democrats will still succeed. Even if, by some miracle, the bill is defeated, socialist health care in this country is an inevitability. The Republicans are not even a useful opposition on issues of limited government; indeed, the most likely presidential nominee in 2012 passed some form of socialist health care in his own state. Republicans can also not be counted on to be of any use in the looming battle over amnesty, as many of the most “extreme” conservatives (Dick Armey, Grover Norquist, and Sarah Palin) are all on the other side. Conservatism, as an electoral force, is finished. The constituency for it is disappearing and the social order it once exemplified has disintegrated. The battle to restrain the size of the state has failed massively, and as National Review columnist Mark Steyn notes in an excellent column, once an entitlement like health care is passed, there is no going back. Similarly, regardless of whether amnesty for illegal aliens is passed this session or in the future, the demographic battle has already been lost. California, the state that gave us Ronald Reagan and Richard Nixon, will never again elect anything resembling a conservative governor. Within fifteen years, Texas will be similarly lost to anything resembling conservatism. There are essentially three responses about what to do with the large rump of white, conservative voters that will still be in an America that they no longer have any chance of governing through democratic means. The first is what the conservative movement will undoubtedly do, which is continue its program of foreign wars, cheap labor, deficit spending, and blaming the bigotry of its own supporters for its failure to win any minority votes. Conservatives are incapable of promoting white interests even for reasons of self preservation. Hence, we get GOP head Ken Mehlman (Jew) apologizing for the “Southern Strategy,” which delivered innumerable victories to the Republican Party. We get Michael Steele (token Negro) installed as the new head of the Republican party, who promptly blows millions on a comically bad website filled with token minorities. He then manages to shovel money to failed candidates that endorse the Democrats and alternatively insults both the blacks he’s trying to recruit and the gullible whites that prop him up. We get Mel Martinez, a Latino who attacked the GOP’s own base to try to win amnesty for illegal immigration. We get silly buffoons like Dick Armey, leader of FreedomWorks and self appointed Tea Party pontiff who declares that his number one foreign policy priority is to protect Israel (not America) and who thinks that if all the anti-immigration members of the Republican Party are kicked out, socially conservative Hispanics (who for some reason have higher rates of out of wedlock birth, abortion, and crime) will vote for the party of tax cuts for millionaires. Not even the average Mexican illegal immigrant, who has less than a high school education, is as stupid as Dick Armey. The second response is more interesting, and clearly the movement that is growing right now. This is the radically anti-state Right, exemplified by Ron Paul and the Campaign for Liberty and the less respectable elements such as the various constitutional militias and media figures such as Alex Jones. The problem with this movement is obvious. For one, the culture of a “free state” would likely be even more degraded and degenerate than that farce of a culture that we have today, which is at least restrained by the timid remnants of a conservative, Christian, bourgeois society. However, even ignoring the question of culture altogether, libertarianism contains within it the seeds of its own destruction. Libertarians refuse to recognize the existence of race, they are just as defensive and cowardly as the Republicans when it comes to issues of political correctness, and they simply do not have the constituency that can actually lead them to victory. Leftists are fundamentally correct when they note that the Constitution and the abstractions about “rights” that libertarians hold to be sacred are manifestations of white privilege. They are. They were created by white men for a white nationalist society. They do not work and do not apply in any other context. In a libertarian society that has no recognition of race, a colored underclass would quickly develop as the facts of racial difference in intelligence manifest themselves in the economy. Many Whites, absent civil rights laws and the fist of the managerial state, will associate with themselves and exclude blacks, Hispanics and Asians from certain establishments. While race mixing and miscegenation would undoubtedly continue, it would be far less prevalent. Class divisions would be even more associated with racial divisions than today. The white working class that would exist would have little stake in preserving a system that offers no guarantees for unemployment, medical care, social security, poverty relief, food stamps, or other social services, that, for better or worse, workers have come to expect and which serve as a deterrent from socialist radicalism. Absent these services, left wing extremists would be far more able to co-opt the white working class. Ultimately, the libertarian society would need an active domestic security force and a radically limited franchise in order to prevent the colored masses from either voting in socialism or overthrowing the system. To his credit, paleolibertarian Murray Rothbard (Jew) noted that the truth about racial differences should be shouted from the rooftops in order to preserve a libertarian society. He stated that “if you scratch an egalitarian, you will find a statist” and held that opposition to Martin Luther King Jr. was true mark of a libertarian. He even endorsed something approaching the ethnostate. Unfortunately, this paleolibertarian movement that Rothbard exemplified is dead. As the leftward migration of LewRockwell.com shows, even the better libertarians feel the need to mouth politically correct platitudes about racial egalitarianism. Today, they overtly champion the Hispanic Conquest of the American Southwest and mass immigration. They deny racial differences because there are no races, only autonomous “individuals” that sprang fully formed from the ether. (Racial identity for non whites, however, is ok.) They champion Rothbard only so far as he remains within the boundaries of permissible debate. When challenged, they fall all over themselves in their willingness to prostrate themselves before the gods of egalitarianism. It has been said that a capitalist will sell a rope to a Communist on Friday, even if he will be hanged with that rope on Sunday. Capitalists will always give in to their lust for cheap labor (read, colored labor) even if it dooms them in the long run. A society that has as its only standard of morality the profit motive will not be able to resist the profit motive. Any libertarian utopia that did exist would not last very long. There is only one realistic alternative to the problems facing the white masses that built this country. That alternative is white nationalism. White nationalism is not racial realism, or conservatism, or immigration restriction. Realizing that race exists and that there are differences between them means that you have transcended ignorance, but does not make you a white nationalist. White nationalism is far more radical. It is a political, cultural, and social movement that demands, as a matter of right and survival, an ethnostate that is explicitly designated for white people. Despite this radicalism, it is far more practical and realistic to work for a white homeland than to be a moderate reformist. White victory will be difficult, and, frankly, our odds are not good. That said, a Southern homeland, or a Midwestern homeland, or even an Aryan empire in the Northwest led by Harold Covington will happen long before “true conservatives” do something like secure the border, or scrap the income tax, or even cut entitlements in the most trivial way. All the scribblers and self appointed philosophers simply are irrelevant. Conservatism, libertarianism, and the rest of these reformist approaches are not just immoral, they are fundamentally impractical. They have never worked, and they will never work. Conservatism and libertarianism were tried and they failed. They are only useful insofar as they serve as stepping stones to the white republic. That is not just the Sorelian myth that we need. That is simply reality.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
#2. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#0)
Exactly. But not only do they not work or apply in any other context, they are damaging to us when we try and apply them to others. Whites built it, and other races are destroying it, one neighborhood at a time. They are not fit to live here any more than I am fit to live in Africa with the zulus. IMO it will be a white nationalist nation after the current system crashes. We are the only people that will work for higher ideals and sacrifice to make them happen. Everyone else says "gibs me dat!"
Can y'all explain the huge numbers of white people in every level of government? Many tens of millions of white Americans support the governments that are destroying everything. How will a white nationalist nation deal with both the non-white people + the white people who support or have no beef with non-white people + the sizable chunk of the militia/patriot types who not only neutral or friendly to non-whites but who are willing to die for their liberty? Funny you say that as you advocate for seizing part or all of our country as well as part or all of the life, liberty, and property of a good chunk of the population. You are just another thief - an egalitarian - someone who feels the need to demean other people in an attempt to bring them down to their own level.
They are to deep in their own wallow of irrational hatred that creates these little wedge issues built on the outrageous lie that some folk are better than others purely for being pastie in color. There is nothing wrong with any racial group of humans, nor is mixed blood a bad thing in any way. There is just reputation and social standing of others people like PSUSA and Prefrontal Vortex like to steal with creative applications of scapegoating hatred and self serving lies. That is why they hate; they are thieves; vampires who try to tear others down to vainly attempt to build themselves up.
There is nothing wrong with any racial group of humans, nor is mixed blood a bad thing in any way. There is just reputation and social standing of others people like PSUSA and Prefrontal Vortex like to steal with creative applications of scapegoating hatred and self serving lies. That is why they hate; they are thieves; vampires who try to tear others down to vainly attempt to build themselves upThey are to deep in their own wallow of irrational hatred that creates these little wedge issues built on the outrageous lie that some folk are better than others purely for being pastie in color. There is nothing wrong with any racial group of humans, nor is mixed blood a bad thing in any way. There is just reputation and social standing of others people like PSUSA and Prefrontal Vortex like to steal with creative applications of scapegoating hatred and self serving lies. That is why they hate; they are thieves; vampires who try to tear others down to vainly attempt to build themselves up Not one of your better mental exercises Mike. Hate knows no boundaries, that includes color or the lack thereof. Using color as a gauge of hate is a bit disingenuous.
#8. To: Cynicom (#7)
Quite true. But I was speaking of specific individuals who have put their irrational hatred on display here in a way that is not nuanced. I stand by my words.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||