It's obvious that the chemtrail is at a MUCH lower altitude than the contrail formed by the high altitude aircraft. I'd approximate the chemtrail to be between 7000 and 12,000 feet, whereas the aircraft leaving the contrail would be at around 35,000 feet.
Being that there is no way in hell the temperature between 7000 to 12,000 feet would be anywhere close to the -35 C to -45 C temperature range, I'd say it'd be impossible for that chemtrail to actually be a contrail.
You're guessing. What some here are saying is that you cannot guess and hope to come to a correct conclusion. You have no way of knowing the altitude of anything, or of any conditions out there.
We don't have to prove they don't exist. You have to prove that they do. Pics or vids without specific information are not proof.
You're guessing. What some here are saying is that you cannot guess and hope to come to a correct conclusion. You have no way of knowing the altitude of anything, or of any conditions out there.
Use a bit of logic. Compare the width of the contrail left by the high altitude aircraft (commercial aircraft cruise at ~ 35,000 feet) with that which is apparently a chemtrail.
The contrail left by the high altitude jet is about a wingspan in width. If you look at the width of the larger chemtrail, it's about 5 times the width.
So if it's 5 times the size, then it'd be 1/5 of the higher aircraft's altitude, which would be 35,000 feet / 5 = 7,000 feet in altitude.
See, it's not rocket science PSUSA, and it does NOT involve simply taking a guess either....
PS: I estimated the altitude to be from 7000 to 12,000 feet, since the chemtrail may have expanded thus be wider than a normal contrail as left by the high altitude aircraft. I allowed for expansion to be up to about 1 3/4 the width.
A) Do or do not commercial aircraft (airliners, cargo planes) cruise at approximately 35,000 feet? B) Do you think the larger trail is the same size (as seen visually in the sky) as the smaller one? C) Since it's obvious to all but the most brain dead that the larger one IS larger than the smaller one, is not the larger one approximately 5 times the width of the smaller one? D) If it is 5 times the width, would it not be a valid assumption that it would be approximately 1/5 the altitude of the smaller contrail?
Even if the higher flying aircraft were at 40,000 feet, the lower altitude trail would be at 8,000 feet, still nowhere close to a valid altitude for contrails.
That is not even a factor in contrails.
So now you're trying to say that altitude is not a factor? Well let me fill you in on something. -35 C (-37 F) is a pretty normal temperature for 35,000 feet, but NOT for 7,000 to 12,000 feet. The temperature at that altitude is normally about 0 C (32 F), only about 70 degrees Fahrenheit too hot than the temperature necessary for MAYBE leaving a contrail...
A) Do or do not commercial aircraft (airliners, cargo planes) cruise at approximately 35,000 feet?
So by the video you can tell it is at cruising alt? NOt climbing or descending?
B) Do you think the larger trail is the same size (as seen visually in the sky) as the smaller one?
I can't tell.
So now you're trying to say that altitude is not a factor? Well let me fill you in on something. -35 C (-37 F) is a pretty normal temperature for 35,000 feet, but NOT for 7,000 to 12,000 feet. The temperature at that altitude is normally about 0 C (32 F), only about 70 degrees Fahrenheit too hot than the temperature necessary for MAYBE leaving a contrail...
35,000 feet is 6.6 miles. Go to your nearest airport, measure out 6.6 miles out from the airport, where you can still see the runway (LOL!) and try and see a plane at that distance with only your Mk1 eyeballs.
Let me fill you in on something.
Temp depends on where you are and the time of year.
All you have is another silly video. You have no further info on what is shown.
If you people want to believe in chemtrails, OK. But when you start trying to convince others, you will meet resistance.