[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!] 1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires. Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed Local Governments Can Be Ignorant Pissers!! Cash Jordan: Gangs PLUNDER LA Mall... as California’s “NO JAILS” Strategy IMPLODES Margin Debt Tops Historic $1 Trillion, Your House Will Be Taken Blindly Warns Dohmen Tucker Carlson LIVE: America After Charlie Kirk Charlie Kirk allegedly recently refused $150 million from Israel to take more pro Israel stances "NATO just declared War on Russia!"Co; Douglas Macgregor If You're Trying To Lose Weight But Gaining Belly Fat, Watch Insulin Arabica Coffee Prices Soar As Analyst Warns of "Weather Disasters" Risk Denting Global Production Candace Owens: : I Know What Happened at the Hamptons (Ackman confronted Charlie Kirk) Illegal Alien Drunk Driver Mows Down, Kills 16-Year-Old Girl Who Rejected His Lewd Advances STOP Drinking These 5 Coffees – They’re Quietly DESTROYING Your Gut & Hormones This Works Better Than Ozempic for Belly Fat Cinnamon reduces fat How long do health influencers live? Episode 1 of 3. 'Armed Queers' Marxist Revolutionaries Under Investigation For Possible Foreknowledge Of Kirk's Assassination Plot Who Killed Charlie Kirk? the Case Against Israel Sen. Grassley announces a whistleblower has exposed the FBI program “Arctic Frost” for targeting 92 Republican groups Keto, Ivermectin, & Fenbendazole: New Cancer Treatment Protocol Gains Momentum Bill Ackman 'Hammered' Charlie Kirk in August 'Intervention' for Platforming Israel Critics "I've Never Experienced Crime Of This Magnitude Before": 20-Year Veteran Austrian Police Spox The UK is F*CKED, and the people have had enough No place for hate apeech America and Israel both told Qatar to allow Hamas to stay in their country Video | Robert Kennedy brings down the house. Owner releases video of Trump banner ripping, shooting in WNC Cash Jordan: Looters ‘Forcibly Evict’ Millionaires… as California’s “NO ARRESTS” Policy BACKFIRES Dallas Motel Horror: Immigrant Machete Killer Caught

Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: I do not have nor desire Health insurance .
Source: self
URL Source: [None]
Published: Mar 23, 2010
Author: self
Post Date: 2010-03-23 03:12:36 by titorite
Keywords: None
Views: 412
Comments: 32

I do not have nor do I desire to purchase health insurance. I look after my own health. When things required me to go to a clinic or hospital I have always paid out of pocket. I was fine with this.

Now I no longer have a right to my privacy. Now I will be required to share my private personal medical data with a government run entity. If I refuse to comply I will be punished by law, with a fine, until I come into compliance.

Why is their no option to opt out?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 4.

#1. To: titorite (#0)

Why is their no option to opt out?

Because you most likely cannot guarantee self insurance.

Many businesses and even political entities self insure their employees.

Society via your elected representatives has decided they will not accept the possibility that you might become a financial liability to others.

Cynicom  posted on  2010-03-23   4:44:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

You are correct. I can not guarantee self insurance. I do not try too. I do not want health insurance. Understand? I feel comfortable being uninsured and paying any medical expenses I may incur out of pocket.

No where in the Constitution did I read anything saying I must own insurance of any kind. I do not want insurance. It should not be forced on me if I do not want it.

titorite  posted on  2010-03-23   6:17:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#13. To: titorite (#4) (Edited)

No where in the Constitution did I read anything saying I must own insurance of any kind. I do not want insurance. It should not be forced on me if I do not want it.

Which Constitution are you reading? There are at least two. Under one you're a Sovereign, a King on the land. Under the other you're a subject and can be compelled to do the bidding of the Beast.

Intro:

Sovereigns v UNITED STATES
Sovereigns verses inferior Commercialized Courts within the entire sub-Corporatism STATES/TERRITORIES UNDER THE UNITED STATES CORPORATION. By Ed Brannum

http://discharge-debt.com/id151.htm

Are you a Sovereign or a "person" under the 14th Amendment? http://discharge-debt.com/id158.htm [CORPORATIONS are persons.]

More in-dephth:

The Two United States and the Law

EXCERPT

"....Our national Congress works for two nations foreign to each other, and by legal cunning both are called The United States. One is the Union of Sovereign States, under the Constitution, termed in this article the Continental United States. The other is a Legislative Democracy which has its origin in Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution, here termed the Federal United States. Very few people, when they see some "law" passed by Congress, ask themselves, "Which nation was Congress working for when it passed this or that so-called law?" Or, few ask, "Does this particular law apply to the Continental citizenry of the Republic, or does this particular law apply only to residents of the District of Columbia and other named enclaves, or territories, of the Democracy called the Federal United States?"

Since these questions are seldom asked by the uninformed citizenry of the Republic, it was an open invitation for "cunning" political leadership to seek more power and authority over the entire citizenry of the Republic through the medium of "legalese." Congress deliberately failed in its duty to provide a medium of exchange for the citizenry of the Republic, in harmony with its Constitutional mandate. Instead, it created an abundance of commercial credit money for the Legislative Democracy, where it was not bound by Constitutional limitations. Then, after having created an emergency situation, and a tremendous depression in the Republic, Congress used its emergency authority to remove the remaining substance (gold and silver) from the medium of exchange belonging to the Republic, and made the negotiable instrument paper of the Legislative Democracy (Federal United States) a legal tender for Continental United States citizenry to use in the discharge of debts.

At the same time, Congress granted the entire citizenry of the two nations the "benefit" of limited liability in the discharge of all debts by telling the citizenry that the gold and silver coins of the Republic were out of date and cumbersome. The citizens were told that gold and silver (substance) was no loner needed to pay their debts, that they were now "privileged" to discharge debt with this more "convenient" currency, issued by the Federal United States. Consequently, everyone was forced to "go modern," and to turn in their gold as a patriotic gesture. The entire news media complex went along with the scam and declared it to be a forward step for our democracy, no longer referring to America as a Republic.

From that time on, it was a falling light for the Republic of 1776, and a rising light for Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal Democracy, which overcame the depression, which was caused by a created shortage of real money. There was created an abundance of debt paper money, so-called, in the form of interest-bearing negotiable instrument paper called Federal Reserve Notes, and other forms of paperwork credit instruments.

Since all contracts since Roosevelt's time have the colorable consideration of Federal Reserve Notes, instead of a genuine consideration of silver and gold coin, all contracts are colorable contracts, and not genuine contracts. [According to Black's Law Dictionary (1990), colorable means "That which is in appearance only, and not in reality, what it purports to be, hence counterfeit, feigned, having the appearance of truth."]

Consequently, a new colorable jurisdiction, called a statutory jurisdiction, had to be created to enforce the contracts. Soon the term colorable contract was changed to the term commercial agreement to fit circumstances of the new statutory jurisdiction, which is legislative, rather than judicial, in nature. This jurisdiction enforces commercial agreements upon implied consent, rather than full knowledge, as it is with the enforcement of contracts under the Common Law.

All of our courts today sit as legislative Tribunals, and the so- called "statutes" of legislative bodies being enforced in these Legislative Tribunals are not "statutes" passed by the legislative branch of our three-branch Republic, but as "commercial obligations" to the Federal United States for anyone in the Federal United States or in the Continental United States who has used the equitable currency of the Federal United States and who has accepted the "benefit," or "privilege," of discharging his debts with the limited liability "benefit" offered to him by the Federal United States ... EXCEPT those who availed themselves of the remedy within this commercial system of law, which remedy is today found in Book 1 of the Uniform Commercial Code at Section 207.

When used in conjunction with one's signature, a stamp stating "Without Prejudice U.C.C. 1-207" is sufficient to indicate to the magistrate of any of our present Legislative Tribunals (called "courts") that the signer of the document has reserved his Common Law right. He is not to be bound to the statute, or commercial obligation, of any commercial agreement that he did not enter knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally, as would be the case in any Common Law contract.

Furthermore, pursuant to U.C.C. 1-103, the statute, being enforced as a commercial obligation of a commercial agreement, must now be construed in harmony with the old Common Law of America, where the tribunal/court must rule that the statute does not apply to the individual who is wise enough and informed enough to exercise the remedy provided in this new system of law. He retains his former status in the Republic and fully enjoys his unalienable rights, guaranteed to him by the Constitution of the Republic, while those about him "curse the darkness" of Commercial Law government, lacking the truth needed to free themselves from a slave status under the Federal United States, even while inhabiting territory foreign to its territorial venue.

ADDENDUM

U.C.C. 1-207:4 Sufficiency of reservation.

Any expression indicating any intention to preserve rights is sufficient, such as "without prejudice," "under protest," "under reservation," or "with reservation of all our rights."

The Code states an "explicit" reservation must be made. "Explicit" undoubtedly is used in place of "express" to indicate that the reservation must not only be "express" but it must also be "clear" that such a reservation was intended.

The term "explicit" as used in U.C.C. 1-207 means "that which is so clearly stated or distinctively set forth that there is no doubt as to its meaning." ...

U.C.C. 1-207:7 Effect of reservation of rights.

The making of a valid reservation of rights preserves whatever rights the person then possesses and prevents the loss of such right by application of concepts of waiver or estoppel ....

U.C.C. 1-207:9 Failure to make reservation.

When a waivable right or claim is involved, the failure to make a reservation thereof causes a loss of the right and bars its assertion at a later date ....

U.C.C. 1-103:6 Common law.

The Code is "Complementary" to the common law which remains in force except where displaced by the Code ....

A statute should be construed in harmony with the common law unless there is a clear legislative intent to abrogate the common law. ... "The Code cannot be read to preclude a common law action."

EXAMPLE

Your Honor, my use of "Without Prejudice UCC 1-207" above my signature on this document indicates that I have exercised the "Remedy" provided for me in the Uniform Commercial Code in Book 1 at Section 207, whereby I may reserve my Common Law right not to be compelled to perform under any contract, or agreement, that I have not entered into knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally. And, that reservation serves notice upon all administrative agencies of government -- national, state and local -- that I do not, and will not, accept the liability associated with the "compelled" benefit of any unrevealed commercial agreement.

http://www.supremelaw.org/library/freeman.html

"Without Prejudice UCC 1-207"

Note: I am still learning the ins and outs of this. I believe I heard from Tim Turner [see http://www.truthsetsusfree.com / http://americacanbefree.com ] they have changed the Code number. I think it might be UCC 1-307, but don't quote me on that. I am not sure if this is the same thing as the following, and the more I think about it, it may not be...but I'm not sure.

Discharging Debt....How It Works

"...the INCORPORATED UNITED STATES is bankrupt and under the terms of that bankruptcy the UNITED STATES is required to pay all your debts because there really is no lawful money after 1933 when president Roosevelt took away the gold standard.

What you are doing with the bonding of debts process is sending an I.O.U. to the finance company or court etc.. This is a complex process in law but to this simply, this tells them that the UNITED STATES must by law of the bankruptcy pay your debts, when they redeem those bonds it reduces the national deficit by the amount of the bond. Paying a debt with debt instruments (I.E. Federal Reserve Notes) is like running a car on gas, which pollutes the air, but a bond is like running the same car on hydrogen, which actually cleans the dirty air it draws into the motor. You are killing two birds with one stone with a bond, first you are eliminating your debts and second you are reducing the national deficit...." http://discharge-debt.com/id122.htm

My main problem at this point with this "health" bill [because I don't intend to be a part of it], is that I don't want to discharge debts for murdering unborn children or the elderly or the weak or whomever, nothwithstanding anything that comes out of the mouths of Obama or the whores in Congress to the contrary. They are all proven liars. Maybe the UCC 1-207 (or whatever) is my out to refuse to cooperate with the IRS at all:

"You have rights antecedent to all earthly governments; rights that cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws; rights derived from the Great Legislator of the Universe."

-- John Adams, Second President of the United States. (1792-1801)

The US Supreme Court has stated that because these rights existed antecedent [prior to] the formation of either the states or the national government they are outside the government's power to alter, modify, or abolish.

edit: ...With these powerful rights in our hands, one might wonder what sort of "rights" are possessed by "citizens of the United States".

The Poor Stepchild "citizen"

If the Citizens of the states of the Union have their "unalienable rights", what then do "citizens of the United States" have? Frankly, not much of value. For the balance of this section, we will use the term "federal citizen" to denote a "citizen of the United States".

A federal citizen has only those rights that have been granted to him by Congress by way of the numerous and various civil rights acts, and such rights as may have been invested in him by an activist US Supreme Court that felt it could legislate from the bench.

Let's be clear - the "rights" of federal citizens are not given to them by God, as are our unalienable rights. Their rights are given to them by Congress alone, and the most significant point to understand and keep in mind is that, "What Congress giveth, Congress may taketh away". It has always been this way and it will always be this way. The only thing that may be surprising in all of this is that this is the first time you're hearing it! Most Americans have no idea that there are two "classes of citizenship", nor do they understand the vast distinction between the two, and what it means in their lives. ......" [ www.originalintent.org/edu/citizenship.php (another really good website)].

==============

God's law says Thou shalt not murder. Exodus 20:13.

CorpUSA's "law" says the UNITED STATES was founded on the "Noahide Laws", wherein one may kill Christians and others who will not worship the Jews [and their god Lucifer] with impunity.

See Merry Christmas AND OFF WITH YOUR HEAD http://www.public-action.com/christmas.html

Now the Government Can Legally Kill Christians BY BEHEADING! by Dr. Lorraine Day [ http://www.takebackourrights.org/docs/noahidelaw.html ], and the same title by former Congressman Dannemeyer http://www.takebackourrights.org/docs/Christians.html

The Noahide Laws are straight out of the Satanic Talmud: See the Truth About the Talmud, Judaism's Holiest Book by Michael Hoffman. http://www.revisionisthistory.org/talmudtruth.html

Search this: "Let your sons grow up to be lawyers that they may take Christians' property, and sons grow up to be doctors that they may take away Christians' lives."

The bill calls for persons to be marked with an RFID chip on the back of the hand [Mark of the Beast?], and the Census has marked your door with GPS. Once all your information is in the national database, anytime the Jews' need the liver, or an eyeball, or kidney, all they have to do is check the database of cattle/chattel, and arrive at your door for you or your child or whomever. Search this: "If a Jew needs a liver Noachide cephas ministry".

Search "Satan on Our Dollar http://jesus-is-savior.com "

God told us to come out of Babylon.

Time is getting real short. This "health" care bill is total Judeo-Masonic-British Communism. They have stolen our gold, our jobs, and they are killing our children. This is in total agreement with what God said they would do. He said they would raise up the staff against us AFTER THE MANNER OF EGYPT. What did they do there? They took the Israelites' straw and told them to produce the same tally of bricks, and they told the midwives to kill the newborn sons of the Israelites. See Isaiah 10:24/Exodus 1 and 5.

==============

U.C.C. 1-103:6 Common law.

The Code is "Complementary" to the common law which remains in force except where displaced by the Code ....

A statute should be construed in harmony with the common law unless there is a clear legislative intent to abrogate the common law. ... "The Code cannot be read to preclude a common law action."

Interesting, but to be expected I guess....this government was founded on Lucifer, and has totally given itself over to him, or at least that's the way I see it. Now they're going up against the King of Kings.

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2010-03-23 10:11:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

No where in the Constitution did I read anything saying I must own insurance of any kind.

I think it falls under "interstate commerce". You not having it affects interstate commerce, so the feds can regulate your having it.

Or so they claim. Totally pathetic.

Pinguinite  posted on  2010-03-23 10:49:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I do not want health insurance. Understand?

I understand quite well.

However as I stated before, society governed by those you helped elect, has decided that if you cannot or will not insure yourself, they will force it upon you.

Thats not my view, that is the will of society.

Their argument, whether right or wrong, is now the law of the land.

The only argument we have is that, medical care should be provided for those in need, not make it a welfare program for millionaires.

The person worth millions pays the exact same rate for medicare as I do.

Rename Social Security and Medicare as Social Welfare, based on need, that is the only way out of this quagmire. Will it happen??? Of course not.

Cynicom  posted on  2010-03-23 13:57:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]