See other Miscellaneous Articles
Title: The year is 2012 - Ronald Reagan assesses our circumstances after almost four years with Barack Obama in the oval office.
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Apr 1, 2010
Author: RR
Post Date: 2010-04-01 10:32:18 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 1992
Comments: 226
The year is 2012 - Ronald Reagan assesses our circumstances after almost four years with Barack Obama in the oval office.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-99) not displayed.
.
.
.
#100. To: James Deffenbach (#95)
I am confident that you think you just got an atta-boy.
You two mentally challenged twerps are annoying when you're not comical. I, being one of those who don't have you on bozo, have noticed your antics. You should knock it off.
why cant you guys come up with valid arguments? why are you reduced to namecalling?
buckeroo: Then, as a publick admission: you don't care about the issues being brought forward on this thread. Fyi, buckeroo, whenever I want to make any "publick" admission, I am quite familiar with using a computer keyboard and the post function at 4um. I don't need any help from you regarding what I want to express. Focus, buck, please. As I noted to you earlier, there is ONLY ONE ISSUE under discussion from my point of view. That issue is ground's disrespectful/abuse of SLO's free speech rights on this thread wherein ground impuned SLO's character with inflammatory allegations and malicious mis-statements of what SLO actually stated ON THIS THREAD. Right from the start of this thread, for no reason, ground made several rude, and provocative statements to and about SLO. It was quite bizarre and that's when I involved myself. I have not paid much attention to comments by ground or SLO on other threads and as I told you, I don't have any interest in what might be an attempt on your part to obscure ground's objectionable net behavior here and now ON THIS THREAD alone by posting cut and paste, out of context comments by the 2 of them from other threads. So this is the last time I'm going to tell you this, buck, so pay close attention, please. I do not see any other "issues" as in plural in this thread. The only single issue that prompted my involvement in THIS THREAD is ground's flagrant disregard for SLO's free speech rights. If you see other issues, go for it. Maybe you'll get lucky and you will engage another poster, besides ground, that is. But that other poster won't be me, that's for sure.
sol has posted exactly what he wanted to post. too bad sol and the rest of you zionists have such a flagrant disregard for the truth when it comes to israel's control of american media, foreign policy, and politics. too bad you so flagrantly disregard israel's role in trying to expand the wars.
sol tries to set himself up as some heroic resistance leader, a latterday che... he's real good at complaining, he's real good at flowery speeches... sound and fury, signifying nothing. but when it comes down to the truth of what's gone haywire, sol cant bring himself to face the facts. why is that?
Wrong. None were in admission. You created further problems believing in further tooth-faeries.
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one. "You've got to put right and wrong above legal and illegal. Because when tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty; and it is not rebellion at all, it is submission to the higher law that our government is in rebellion to. We're not the rebels, they're the rebels."
Let's put an end to this namby-pamby horseshit, shall we, it's cluttering up the comments grid! Which post? Given the time of day, he probably doesn't even know. Of course that could be true any time of the day.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. So now you're calling me a Zionist? This latest allegation just takes my breath away. Oh my, now tears are running down my cheeks as I try to type. I don't know what more I can add other than wow, just wow, you're a serious out-of-control, irrational, nutty babbling gnat of a poster.
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one. "You've got to put right and wrong above legal and illegal. Because when tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty; and it is not rebellion at all, it is submission to the higher law that our government is in rebellion to. We're not the rebels, they're the rebels."
You seem to be confident about a great many things, including that bs about global warming. Most people have already figured that one out though, it was just a scam to make a few efs like Al Gore rich. It may even dawn on you someday.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one. "You've got to put right and wrong above legal and illegal. Because when tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty; and it is not rebellion at all, it is submission to the higher law that our government is in rebellion to. We're not the rebels, they're the rebels."
This thread is simply far too hilarious! Yes, it's turned into quite a spectacular train wreck and though I know I should avert my eyes and drive on by, I can't resist stopping for a closer view, so to speak.
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one. "You've got to put right and wrong above legal and illegal. Because when tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty; and it is not rebellion at all, it is submission to the higher law that our government is in rebellion to. We're not the rebels, they're the rebels."
But your support of SoL is everlasting, 'eh? Sol wants to kick ass on a government he/she can't understand. And you are right there behind him.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. More plagiarism ..... what else do you do when given an opportunity ... suck up bandwidth?
And there you are, buck, making totally false, malicious and rather dangerous allegations about me. And here I am reporting you to christine for abusing my free speech rights and violating her forum's rules of conduct.
Good job. It won't be the last time I was banned *ANYWHERE* under the Sun with or without your commitment.
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one. "You've got to put right and wrong above legal and illegal. Because when tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty; and it is not rebellion at all, it is submission to the higher law that our government is in rebellion to. We're not the rebels, they're the rebels."
Anyone ever tell you to E.S.A.D., buck?
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Only, clown like, to come back under a new name.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. LOL!
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. The USSR had thermonuclear tipped ICBMs both land based and on subs pointed at us. The Warsaw Pact had the largest concentration of tanks in the history of modern warfare pointed at western Europe. Cuba had (and still has) tactical nukes pointed at south Florida and Nikita Khrushchev said "We will bury you". You call that a minor threat? Nonsense, Eric. Consider yourself placed on double secret probation until you burden yourself with the facts. WWGPD? - (What Would General Pinochet Do?)
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one. "You've got to put right and wrong above legal and illegal. Because when tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty; and it is not rebellion at all, it is submission to the higher law that our government is in rebellion to. We're not the rebels, they're the rebels."
A simple apology for blatantly mis-reprepresenting my views and a voluntary deletion of your falsehoods about me might have gone a long way to convincing me of your sincere regret for your outrageous conduct and I would have considered withdrawing my complaint to christine. But since it appears you want to own your lies and suffer the consequences, frankly I would feel relieved if christine decided to ban you, buckeroo. It's not fair to me or to other posters to have to worry about an unprincipled loose cannon like you, who shows no regret whatsoever for posting slanderous allegations about them anytime he pleases.
Naw.
He's been banned from this board before--and probably just about every board he has ever posted on--but it does no good. Buck is one of those people who has no respect for private property, just changes screen names and comes back posting the same bs. He is like happy fun ball/squirrel nuts/fifty screen names in that regard.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. I was here before you, Jimmy ... and I will be here long after you retire. And I make sense. I make credible opinion. But you don't. That is the problem with you;, Jimmy you just believe in anything on the Internet that fits your motto at the moment of discovery and when questioned about your same or similar viewpoints, you can't back up your own opinions or statements. You are defensive.
I wasn't expecting an apology from you at this stage. Like I said before: "But since it appears you want to own your lies and suffer the consequences, frankly I would feel relieved if christine decided to ban you, buckeroo."
Buckeroo has no respect for Truth. If a person does not respect Truth, a very basic human value, it stands to reason that other kinds of disrespectful attitudes will be demonstrated.
Who ever told you a lie like that? Was it at one of your globaloney warming™ conferences where everyone in attendance was a dingbat?
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. If a person does not respect Truth, a very basic human value, it stands to reason that other kinds of disrespectful attitudes will be demonstrated. You got it.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Why should I achieve your expectations? Because you believe in some kind of majiick? Why not get to the core of debate? Why not stand up as a man? But no, you chose to rattle the forum mistress based upon some personal grief that is not only unreal but lack of substance.
In a sense, you have my personal opinion correctly established. But let me modify your apparent consideration: Hope you got it, pal.
Groundresonance only asked straight forward questions; he continuously prodded the same and never got an answer from thread to thread to thread; it is obvious he seeks some sort of understanding of the comments since he asked to begin with. Now, lets ask a meaningful question that is about all of us here on 4um or any chit-chat channel. We want to know and understand each other's opinions and when queried why are some of us rebuffed? What does SoL have to hide?
Go mutter on a Chemtrail thread. It is too phunney.
Perhaps you have been living under a rock for the past 9 years. Let me bring you up to speed. We live in uncertain times. By virtue of legislation called the Patriot Act and the Military Commissions Act, our government has empowered NSA, DHS brown-shirts to scour the Internet looking for any signs of trouble makers, turrerists, whatever suits their whim at the moment. I have zero tolerance for a lying, loose cannon clown like yourself making dangerous, slanderous allegations about me at the best of times, never mind during these very tense times in our nation. Furthermore, you are a long time poster at 4um. You know christine's rules about slander, encroaching on other people's free speech rights. You crossed the line in spades with me. And to add insult to injury, you have showed no regret, nor have you made any effort to make things right. Buy a clue, why don't you. It's your objectionable abusive behavior not mine that has led to this situation. Follow your own advice to me, buck, be a man, take responsibility for the cawcaw you have created for yourself. Got it now, "pal?"
Comments (141 - 226) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#101. To: groundresonance, buckeroo, SonOfLiberty, christine, all (#99)
groundresonance, buckeroo
“It has been said, 'time heals all wounds.' I do not agree. The wounds remain. In time, the mind, protecting its sanity, covers them with scar tissue and the pain lessens, but it is never gone.” ~ Rose F. Kennedy
#102. To: wudidiz (#101)
mentally challenged twerps
#103. To: buckeroo, groundresonance, SonOfLiberty (#68)
scrapper: Do what you want with your time, "pal," but just so you know I'm not interested what SOL and ground have said to one another on other threads on other occasions.
#104. To: scrapper2 (#103)
The only single issue that prompted my involvement in THIS THREAD is ground's flagrant disregard for SLO's free speech rights.
#105. To: scrapper2 (#103)
#106. To: scrapper2 (#103)
The only single issue that prompted my involvement in THIS THREAD is ground's flagrant disregard for SLO's free speech rights.
#107. To: wudidiz (#101)
#108. To: Eric Stratton, buckeroo (#97)
Which question did you want answered bucky?
Lord Acton
#109. To: groundresonance, christine, Jethro Tull, Original_Intent, All (#104)
too bad sol and the rest of you zionists have such a flagrant disregard for the truth when it comes to israel's control of american media, foreign policy, and politics.
#110. To: James Deffenbach (#108)
#111. To: buckeroo (#100)
I am confident that you think you just got an atta-boy.
Lord Acton
#112. To: scrapper2 (#109)
#113. To: Eric Stratton (#112)
ROFLMAO!!
#114. To: scrapper2 (#113)
#115. To: scrapper2, SonOfLiberty (#113)
Yes, it's turned into quite a spectacular train wreck and though I know I should avert my eyes and drive on by, I can't resist stopping for a closer view, so to speak.
#116. To: Eric Stratton (#114)
For all the annoying, aggravating, dumb efs who make a daily effort to harass and aggravate people who haven't bothered you:
Lord Acton
#117. To: James Deffenbach (#116)
#118. To: buckeroo, christine (#115)
But your support of SoL is everlasting, 'eh? Sol wants to kick ass on a government he/she can't understand. And you are right there behind him.
#119. To: scrapper2 (#118)
And here I am reporting you.....
#120. To: James Deffenbach (#116)
#121. To: buckeroo (#117)
More plagiarism ..... what else do you do when given an opportunity ... suck up bandwidth?
Lord Acton
#122. To: buckeroo (#119)
Good job. It won't be the last time I was banned *ANYWHERE* under the Sun with or without your commitment.
Lord Acton
#123. To: Eric Stratton (#120)
Lord Acton
#124. To: Eric Stratton (#46)
In hindsight, the CCCP, USSR, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics or what RR used to call "The Evil Empire" threat was also overblown.
They were no more threat to rule the world than Saddam Hussein ever was.
China hated them back then too.
During the cold war the Chinese were still using bugle calls and human wave attacks. They didn't get accurate nukes until Clinton sold them the technology.
#125. To: Flintlock (#124)
#126. To: buckeroo, christine (#119)
Good job. It won't be the last time I was banned *ANYWHERE* under the Sun with or without your commitment.
#127. To: scrapper2 (#126)
A simple apology for blatantly mis-reprepresenting my views and a voluntary deletion of your falsehoods about me might have gone a long way to convincing me of your sincere regret for your outrageous conduct and I would have considered withdrawing my complaint to christine.
#128. To: scrapper2 (#126)
But since it appears you want to own your lies and suffer the consequences, frankly I would feel relieved if christine decided to ban you, buckeroo.
Lord Acton
#129. To: James Deffenbach (#128)
#130. To: buckeroo (#127)
Naw.
#131. To: James Deffenbach, buckeroo (#128)
Buck is one of those people who has no respect for private property
#132. To: buckeroo (#129)
I make sense. I make credible opinion.
Lord Acton
#133. To: scrapper2 (#131)
Buckeroo has no respect for Truth.
Lord Acton
#134. To: scrapper2 (#130)
I wasn't expecting an apology from you at this stage.
#135. To: scrapper2 (#131)
Buckeroo has no respect for Truth.
Buckeroo has no respect for Truth based upon gullible BS in a chit-chat forum without facts or substantiation of the same or similar truth.
#136. To: scrapper2, groundresonance, SonofLiberty (#103)
So this is the last time I'm going to tell you this, buck, so pay close attention, please. I do not see any other "issues" as in plural in this thread. The only single issue that prompted my involvement in THIS THREAD is ground's flagrant disregard for SLO's free speech rights.
#137. To: wudidiz (#101)
You should knock it off.
#138. To: ALL (#137)
“It has been said, 'time heals all wounds.' I do not agree. The wounds remain. In time, the mind, protecting its sanity, covers them with scar tissue and the pain lessens, but it is never gone.” ~ Rose F. Kennedy
#139. To: buckeroo (#134)
you chose to rattle the forum mistress based upon some personal grief that is not only unreal but lack of substance.
#140. To: wudidiz (#138)
(Edited)
.
.
.