[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Media Flips Over Tulsi & Matt Gaetz, Biden & Trump Take A Pic, & Famous People Leave Twitter! 4 arrested in California car insurance scam: 'Clearly a human in a bear suit' Silk Road Founder Trusts Trump To 'Honor His Pledge' For Commutation "You DESERVED to LOSE the Senate, the House, and the Presidency!" - Jordan Peterson "Grand Political Theatre"; FBI Raids Home Of Polymarket CEO; Seize Phone, Electronics Schoolhouse Limbo: How Low Will Educators Go To Better Grades? BREAKING: U.S. Army Officers Made a Desperate Attempt To Break Out of The Encirclement in KURSK Trumps team drawing up list of Pentagon officers to fire, sources say Israeli Military Planning To Stay in Gaza Through 2025 Hezbollah attacks Israeli army's Tel Aviv HQ twice in one day People Can't Stop Talking About Elon's Secret Plan For MSNBC And CNN Is Totally Panicking Tucker Carlson UNLOADS on Diddy, Kamala, Walz, Kimmel, Rich Girls, Conspiracy Theories, and the CIA! "We have UFO technology that enables FREE ENERGY" Govt. Whistleblowers They arrested this woman because her son did WHAT? Parody Ad Features Company That Offers to Cryogenically Freeze Liberals for Duration of TrumpÂ’s Presidency Elon and Vivek BEGIN Reforming Government, Media LOSES IT Dear Border Czar: This Nonprofit Boasts A List Of 400 Companies That Employ Migrants US Deficit Explodes: Blowout October Deficit Means 2nd Worst Start To US Fiscal Year On Record Gaetz Resigns 'Effective Immediately' After Trump AG Pick; DC In Full Blown Panic MAHA MEME noone2222 and John Bolton sitting in a tree K I S S I N G Donald Trump To Help Construct The Third Temple? "The Elites Want To ROB Us of Our SOVEREIGNTY!" | Robert F Kennedy Take Your Money OUT of THESE Banks NOW! - Jim Rickards Trump Taps Tulsi Gabbard As Director Of National Intelligence DC In Full Blown Panic After Trump Picks Matt Gaetz For Attorney General Cleveland Clinic Warns Wave of Mass Deaths Will Wipe Out Covid-Vaxxed Within ‘5 Years’ Judah-ism is as Judah-ism does Danger ahead: November 2024, Boston Dynamics introduces a fully autonomous "Atlas" robot. Robot humanoids are here. Trump names [Fox News host] Pete Hegseth as his Defense secretary

Miscellaneous
See other Miscellaneous Articles

Title: The year is 2012 - Ronald Reagan assesses our circumstances after almost four years with Barack Obama in the oval office.
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Apr 1, 2010
Author: RR
Post Date: 2010-04-01 10:32:18 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 1819
Comments: 226

The year is 2012 - Ronald Reagan assesses our circumstances after almost four years with Barack Obama in the oval office.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 29.

#2. To: Itistoolate (#0)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-04-01   11:35:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Technically speaking, yes. Congress makes the budget, not the President. Well, at least that's how it was at one time. What the new Rules of Tyranny are, I'm not entirely clear on at this point in time.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2010-04-01   11:38:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

in the best of all possible son of liberty worlds, americans will shoot enough of each other that they wont need to know why they're shooting anybody...

the reasons why will disappear in a sea of blood.

but that's okay, because the time for education is over.

all we need to do is shoot people, nevermind why.

groundresonance  posted on  2010-04-01   11:54:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

in the best of all possible son of liberty worlds, americans will shoot enough of each other that they wont need to know why they're shooting anybody...

the reasons why will disappear in a sea of blood.

but that's okay, because the time for education is over.

all we need to do is shoot people, nevermind why.

Where are you going with this, ground?

You are associating very nasty words/imagery with Son Of Liberty that he has never uttered on 4um, at least to my knowledge.

Although I'm not the moderator or owner of this free speech forum, as a poster, I would not like it at all if you did to me what you are doing to Son Of Liberty. You are pushing the envelope on abusing Son of Liberty's free speech by putting words in his mouth, and unattractive ones at that.

scrapper2  posted on  2010-04-01   12:19:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-04-01   12:23:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

He's [groundresonance] obviously unlike anyone with any cognizance or brains here.

I disagree. I think groundresonance is looking for some reasonable answer's that should be answered by SoL. I don't understand why SoL (or anyone else whom may be posed with a question) refuses to answer those hard, hitting questions.

buckeroo  posted on  2010-04-01   12:37:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

She can ask any question she wants about Israel. She cannot spam posts that accuse me of intentionally advocating shooting people and inciting violent war against the government. I answered her Israel obsession in a couple of posts before I put her on bozo. She didn't like my answer because I did not spew hatred but tried to remain even handed in questions of foreign policy (no entangling alliances with anybody, no foreign aid to anybody, which would necessarily include Israel being shut off from our money and our influence on their behalf).

The reason I don't answer her now, but would anybody else, is that she's clearly mentally unstable and a troll and I've had her on bozo since our first encounter. That she's willing to put a forum at legal risk to obsess about Israel with somebody she knows has her on bozo may caution you to perhaps not be so hasty to offer her up a defense.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2010-04-01   12:41:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I don't know if groundresonance is a man or a woman but the questions posed to you were on target over several threads. I remained a lurker waiting for your response(s) .... and you ignored the same.

So, now you have coupled further data confusing me. Above on this thread as you attempted to answer one, here is what you said:

When the government shoots me, as it most likely will, I will have died a good death if the reason for the shooting was that I was not obeying their evil laws.

Aren't you being a little dramatic and presumptuous? You opened Pandora's box with this graphic language which I don't understand as very often you appear to be mature and capable to discuss issues frankly as opposed to being some drama queen.

buckeroo  posted on  2010-04-01   12:50:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#34. To: buckeroo (#29)

I remained a lurker waiting for your response(s) .... and you ignored the same.

I did no such thing and I answered the questions she posed in a calm level headed manner. What I didn't do was launch into an anti-Semitic rant, which she clearly and amateurishly was attempting to get me to do. Sorry, but it's not going to happen, I don't make it a business to hate entire ethnic groups.

Aren't you being a little dramatic and presumptuous?

Not really, no. Since my chosen path now is non-compliance, assuming that I am unable to anticipate their moves at a given point in time, it may well come down to them shooting me. Or not, maybe they'll get the drop on me and I'll simpyl be thrown into jail (where I will immediately start attempts to escape). The "good death" quote that she provided out of context was in regards to *if* that happened. Given the mad dog nature of government on display right now and the ramping up of their hostility for all of us exponentially each day, it's not an unfair assumption to think they may try the "Fewer but better Russian" solution Stalin was so fond of.

You opened Pandora's box with this graphic language which I don't understand as very often you appear to be mature and capable to discuss issues frankly as opposed to being some drama queen.

If I normally discuss things evenhandedly and dispassionately, but occasionally display passion, that doesn't seem to me to be an indication of "drama queen". Drama queens wring their hands about everything all the time. A passionate person does only when the topic is so dear to the heart that he is moved by it. Something of a difference.

Beware the man without a passion in his soul, buck.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2010-04-01 12:59:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]